Efficacy of dupilumab on chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps and concomitant asthma in biologic-naive and biologic-pretreated patients.

OBJECTIVES: Dupilumab, an anti-IL-4 receptor monoclonal antibody (mAb), was recently approved for the treatment of severe chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP). The main objective of this study was to assess whether previous exposure to biological treatment affected the clinical outcomes in CRSwNP and asthma patients, treated with dupilumab over time. A collateral secondary objective was to analyse the effects over time of dupilumab in patients with and without aeroallergen sensitization. METHODS: Single-centre retrospective observational study on severe CRSwNP patients treated with dupilumab. Nasal polyp score (NPS), visual analogue scale (VAS) symptom score, sinonasal outcome test (SNOT-22), aeroallergen sensitization, total serum IgE levels, and blood eosinophil counts were assessed at baseline and after 4, 6 and 12 months. RESULTS: 42 patients were included, 40 (95.2%) had asthma. Twenty-one (50%) patients received dupilumab without prior biological treatment (Group A: naive) and 50% switched to dupilumab from previous biological treatment (Group B: pre-treated). NPS, VAS symptoms, SNOT-22 improved significantly after 12 months treatment in both groups of patients (p < 0.001). After 12 months, VAS overall symptom score showed a significant reduction from 6 (IQR, 4.6-8.6) and 6 (IQR, 3.8-7.1) for Group A and Group B patients respectively, to 1.2 (IQR, 0.8-2.7) and 1.2 (IQR, 0.2-2.5); NPS from 6 (IQR, 4.0-7.0) and 5 (IQR, 3.5-6.0), respectively, to 1 (IQR, 0.0-2.0) and 0 (IQR, 0.0-3.0) and SNOT-22 from 64 (IQR, 56-78) and 71 (IQR, 47.5-76.0) respectively, to 5.5 (IQR, 4-21) and 6 (IQR, 4-15). IgE reduced from 57 to 22.1 and from 46.9 to 30.2 in Group A and Group B respectively (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Dupilumab improves symptom severity, polyp size, and health-related quality of life, regardless of the presence or absence of comorbid aeroallergen sensitization and previous administration of biologic therapy.

Dupilumab proved to be effective in patients with severe chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP).We observed that dupilumab for CRSwNP leads to a very rapid improvement in polyps, symptoms, and quality of life, regardless of previous biologic treatment status and presence or absence of allergic rhinitis.VAS, SNOT-22 and NPS may be established as outcome markers in everyday clinical practice during dupilumab treatment.

Real-Life Effectiveness of Mepolizumab in Refractory Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of mepolizumab in patients affected by chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) in real-life. A single-center retrospective observational study was conducted on severe CRSwNP patients treated with mepolizumab. Nasal endoscopic polyp score (NPS), visual analogue scale (VAS) symptom score, sinonasal outcome test (SNOT-22), asthma control test (ACT) score, fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO), eosinophils blood cells and prednisone intake were assessed at baseline and after 6 months. A total of 55 patients were included; 49 patients (89%) presented with asthma; aspirin exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD) in 28 patients (51%). A statistically significant decrease in the SNOT-22 score was observed (median difference -63; 95% CI: -68; -58; p < 0.001) with median t0 76 and IQR (61;90) to t6 10 (5;15). A reduction in NPS, median t0 NPS 4; (IQR:4;6), median t6 NPS 1; (IQR:0;1) p < 0.001, was greater in patients with AERD. The median baseline VAS score was 6 (IQR:6;7) and the differences between t0 and t6 were statistically significant p < 0.001. Significant changes in blood eosinophils cells, median t0 500 cell/mcl (IQR:340;830), median t6 97 cell/mcl (IQR:60;160) p < 0.001, were greater in patients with AERD. Mepolizumab treatment effects have been demonstrated with significantly reduced symptoms, polyp scores, blood eosinophils and systemic corticosteroid use, resulting in an increased health-related quality of life in patients with severe CRSwNP, regardless of the presence or absence of asthma or AERD.

Expert consensus on the use of systemic glucocorticoids for managing eosinophil-related diseases.

Eosinophil-related diseases represent a group of pathologic conditions with highly heterogeneous clinical presentation and symptoms ranging from mild to critical. Both systemic and localized forms of disease are typically treated with glucocorticoids. The approval of novel biologic therapies targeting the interleukin-5 pathway can help reduce the use of systemic glucocorticoids (SGC) in eosinophilic diseases and reduce the risk of SGC-related adverse effects (AEs). In this article, a panel of experts from different medical specialties reviewed current evidence on the use of SGC in two systemic eosinophilic diseases: Eosinophilic Granulomatosis with PolyAngiitis (EGPA) and HyperEosinophilic Syndrome (HES); and in two single-organ (respiratory) eosinophilic diseases: Chronic RhinoSinusitis with Nasal Polyps (CRSwNP) and Severe Asthma with Eosinophil Phenotype (SA-EP), and contrasted it with their experience in clinical practice. Using nominal group technique, they reached consensus on key aspects related to the dose and tapering of SGC as well as on the initiation of biologics as SGC-sparing agents. Early treatment with biologics could help prevent AEs associated with medium and long-term use of SGC.