Clinical impact of acute kidney injury on short- and long-term outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve implantation with the CoreValve prosthesis.

BACKGROUND: Acute kidney injury (AKI) after cardiac surgery is associated with increased mortality, but few data exist on the occurrence and clinical impact of AKI associated with transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). The objective of this study was to determine the incidence and prognosis of AKI after percutaneous implantation of the CoreValve(®) (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA) prosthesis. METHODS: A total of 357 patients with severe aortic stenosis and 9 patients with pure native aortic regurgitation were treated with the CoreValve prosthesis. AKI was defined according to Valve Academic Research Consortium criteria as the absolute increase in serum creatinine ≥0.3mg/dl at 72h post percutaneous procedure. RESULTS: AKI was identified in 58 patients (15.8%), none of whom required renal replacement therapy. In patients with AKI, the mortality at 30 days was 13.5% compared with 1.6% of patients without AKI, [odds ratio (OR)=12.2 (95% CI 3.53-41.9); p<0.001] and total mortality after a mean of 26.2±17 months was 29.3% vs. 14.9% [OR=2.36 (95% CI 1.23-4.51), p=0.008]. In the multivariate analysis, AKI was an independent predictor of cumulative total mortality [hazard ratio=2.151, (95% CI from 1.169 to 3.957), p=0.014]. CONCLUSIONS: The deterioration of renal function in patients undergoing TAVI with the CoreValve prosthesis is a serious and frequent complication. The occurrence of AKI was associated with increased early mortality and was also a predictor of worse outcomes in follow-up.

[Factors influencing mobilisation of endothelial progenitor cells and angiogenic cytokines after an extensive acute myocardial infarction]. / Factores que influyen en la liberación de células endoteliales progenitoras y citocinas angiogénicas tras un infarto de miocardio extenso.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Following an acute myocardial infarction (AMI), bone-marrow derived endothelial progenitor cells (EPC) are mobilised into the peripheral blood. Our aim was to examine the factors influencing this spontaneous cell mobilisation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this study we analysed 47 patients with extensive AMI (left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] <50% by echocardiography during the first week post-AMI); we studied the peripheral blood EPC populations expressing CD133(+), CD34(+), KDR(+), CXCR4(+), as well as the cytokines VEGF (vascular endothelial growth factor), SDF-1 (stromal cell-derived factor 1) and TSP-1 (thrombospondin 1), measured on day 5±2.5 after AMI. RESULTS: The extension of AMI (CPK peak) correlated with the number of CD133(+) mobilised cells: (r=0.40; P=.011). Patients who did not receive perfusion during the acute phase (34%) had more CD34(+)CXCR4(+) cells with a median (interquartile ranges) of 2,401 (498-7,004) vs. 999 (100-1,600), P=.048, and strong correlations between VEGF and CD133(+)CD34(+)KDR(+) (r=.84; P<.01) and SDF-1 and CD34(+)CXCR4(+) (r=.67; P<.01), and between these 2 cytokines (r=.57; P=.01). In the reperfused patients, the correlation between VEGF and CD133(+)CD34(+)KDR(+) was lower (r=.38; P=.03) and the correlation between SDF-1 and CD34(+)CXCR4(+) and VEGF disappeared. Multivariate analysis showed that a VEGF >7pg/mL (P<.01) predicted the mobilisation of CD133(+)CD34(+)KDR(+), whereas hypertension showed a trend (P=.055). Diabetes (P=.045) predicted the number of CD34(+)CXCR4(+), with reperfusion treatment showing a trend in this subpopulation (P=.054). CONCLUSIONS: Mobilisation of progenitor cells after AMI is influenced by factors such as diabetes and the cytokine VEGF. Hypertension and reperfusion therapy during the acute phase also tend to influence the cell response.

Percutaneous treatment of a dysfunctional aortic bioprosthesis with the CoreValve(®) prosthesis.

Recently, percutaneous aortic valve replacement has emerged as a therapeutic option for patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis and a high surgical risk. We report our initial experience in four patients with percutaneous implantation of a CoreValve aortic prosthesis to treat aortic bioprosthesis dysfunction involving aortic stenosis or regurgitation. In-hospital and medium-term outcomes were analyzed. The procedure was performed under local anesthesia and guided by angiography. The prosthesis was implanted successfully in all patients, although a second prosthesis was required in one case because the first was positioned too high. There were no major complications. After a mean follow-up of 7 months (SD, 4.7), all patients remained asymptomatic.

Comparison of medium-term outcomes obtained with drug-eluting stents and coronary artery bypass grafts in an unselected population of diabetic patients with multivessel coronary disease. Propensity score analysis.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Since the introduction of drug-eluting stents, the optimum revascularization strategy in diabetic patients with multivessel coronary disease has remained controversial. METHODS: This study used multivariate logistic regression analysis and propensity score matching to compare results in 270 consecutive diabetic patients (2000-2004) with multivessel disease (> or =2 vessels with a >70% de novo stenosis involving the proximal left anterior descending coronary artery) who underwent either coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG; n=142) or implantation of a drug-eluting stent (DES; i.e. rapamycin or paclitaxel; n=128). The following clinical outcomes (i.e. major adverse cardiac or cerebrovascular events [MACCEs]) were assessed: death, nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI), stroke and repeat revascularization at 2 years. RESULTS: Patients who received DESs were older (67.5+/-7 years vs. 65.3+/-8 years; P=.05) and more often had a previous MI (49.2% vs. 28.2%; P< .01), but no more often had a depressed left ventricular ejection fraction < or =45% (32.4% vs. 28.1%). Coronary anatomy was more complex in surgical patients (SYNTAX score, 25.9+/-7 vs. 18.5+/-6; P< .001) and the quality of revascularization was better (i.e. anatomically complete revascularization: 52.8% vs. 28.1%; P< .01). The incidence of MACCEs was 18.7% in the CABG group and 21.8% in the DES group (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 0.93; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.47-1.86). The composite endpoint of death, MI or stroke occurred in 15.8% undergoing CABG and 12.9% receiving a DES (adjusted OR = 1.19; 95% CI, 0.72-1.88). There was less need for revascularization in CABG patients (4.3% vs. 12.1%; adjusted OR = 0.42; 95% CI, 0.16-1.14; P=.09). CONCLUSIONS: In an unselected population of diabetic patients with multivessel coronary disease, the principle advantage of CABG was the reduced need for revascularization. There was no difference in the rate of death, MI or stroke.

Closure of perivalvular leaks using an Amplatzer occluder.

Reoperation of patients with perivalvular leaks due to heart failure or hemolysis is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Percutaneous closure using an Amplatzer device offers a promising alternative. We describe our initial experience between 2004 and 2006, during which we used an Amplatzer device in eight patients for the percutaneous closure of perivalvular leaks (four aortic and four mitral). The patients were all symptomatic and had a high surgical risk. Device placement was successful in all patients with mitral leaks and in three with aortic leaks. There were no periprocedural complications. With four of the seven (57%) device placements, there was a significant reduction in the degree of regurgitation and, at 12-month follow-up, only these four patients showed clinical improvements. Of the other three, one required reoperation and two died of non-cardiovascular causes. Percutaneous closure of perivalvular leaks was feasible and safe and can be regarded as a treatment option in patients with a high surgical risk.

Experiência inicial em Málaga(Espanha) com prótese aórtica CoreValve para tratamento de estenose aórtica sintomática grave / Malaga(Spain)early experience with the CoreValve aortic prosthesis for the treatment of severe symptomatic aortic stenosis

Introdução: A prevalência de estenose aórtica grave vem crescendo em decorrência do aumento da expectativa de vida. Alguns pacientes não se beneficiam do tratamento cirúrgico por causa das comorbidades associadas. Apresentamos os resultados de nossa experiência no tratamento percutâneo da estenose aórtica. Método: Estudo prospectivo, realizado entre abril de 2008 e fevereiro de 2009, em que 31 pacientes consecutivos com estenose aórtica grave sintomática e que apresentavam alto risco cirúrgico foram tratados com a prótese aórtica CoreValve. Todos os procedimentos foram realizados com anestesia local. Em 29 casos a via de acesso foi a artéria femoral, com introdutor 18 F, a punção femoral foi fechada com Prostar 10 F, e em 2 pacientes a artéria subclávia esquerda foi a via de acesso. Resultados: A média de idade foi de 77,8 ± 8,9anos e o EuroSCORE logístico médio foi de 17,5 ± 12,6%. O sucesso do implante foi de 100%. O gradiente de pico a pico após o implante desapareceu. Nenhum paciente apresentou insuficiência aórtica residual > grau 2 de Sellers. A mortalidade aos 30 dias foi de 3,2%. Foram necessários marca-passos definitivos em 31% dos pacientes. Depois de acompanhamento médio de 154 ± 90 dias, foram registrados 4 óbitos (1 morte súbita e 3 por causas não-cardíacas). Conclusões: O implante percutâneo da prótese aórtica CoreValve como tratamento alternativo da estenose aórtica grave em pacientes com alto risco cirúrgico é factível e seguro, com elevada taxa de êxito no procedimento e porcentual de complicações abaixo do esperado em função do risco cirúrgico estimado com o EuroSCORE.

Background: The prevalence of severe aortic stenosis is increasing with the rise in life expectancy. Some patients cannot undergo surgical treatment of aortic stenosis due to associated disorders. We present the results of our experience with the percutaneous treatment of aortic stenosis as an alternative to surgery in high-risk patients. Methods: This prospective cohort study included 31 consecutive high surgical risk patients with severe and symptomatic aortic stenosis treated with a CoreValve aortic prosthesis from April 2008 to February 2009. All the procedures were undertaken with local anesthesia. In 29 patients we used a femoral artery access, with an 18 F introducer, closing the femoral puncture with a 10 F Prostar, and in two patients the access was via the left subclavian artery. Results: The mean age of the patients was 77.8 ± 8.9 years and the mean logistic EuroSCORE was 17.5 ± 12.6%. The implant was successful in 100% of cases. The peak-to-peak gradient after the implant disappeared. No patient had residual aortic insufficiency Sellers' grade > 2. One-month mortality was 3.2%. A definitive pacemaker was required in 31% of the patients. After a mean follow-up of 154 ± 90 days there were four deaths (1 sudden death and 3 for noncardiac causes). Conclusions: Percutaneous implantation of the CoreValve aortic prosthesis as an alternative treatment for severe aortic stenosis in high surgical risk patients is feasible and safe, with a high success rate for the procedure and a percentage of complications below the expected for the surgical risk, as estimated by the EuroSCORE.

[Long-term prognosis in diabetic patients in whom revascularization is deferred following fractional flow reserve assessment]. / Pronóstico a largo plazo de diferir la intervención coronaria en diabéticos sobre la base de la reserva fraccional de flujo.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: The fractional flow reserve (FFR) has been shown to be a valid and useful measure in the functional assessment of coronary stenoses of intermediate severity. Our aim was to determine the usefulness of FFR assessment in diabetic patients, in whom determination of the FFR can be influenced by microvascular dysfunction. METHODS: Between 1997-2004, FFR assessment was used to evaluate 222 consecutive coronary lesions judged by an interventional cardiologist to be of intermediate severity (ie, 40%-70%). Intravenous adenosine (140 microg/kg per min) was used to achieve maximum hyperemia. The occurrence of cardiac events (ie, death, non-fatal acute myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularization) was compared in diabetics and nondiabetics in whom FFR assessment gave a negative result and intervention was deferred. The mean follow-up period was 30+/-21 months. RESULTS: Revascularization was deferred for 144 lesions (in 136 patients) in which the FFR was >/=0.75. Of these, 42 lesions (29.2%) were in diabetics (40 patients). The proportion of patients who were female or who had hypertension, dyslipidemia or multivessel disease was greater in the diabetic group. There was no difference in indications for coronary angiography. In both groups, the most frequently investigated vessel was the left anterior descending coronary artery. The mean FFR was 0.87+/-0.06, and there was no difference between the groups. On long-term follow-up, there was no difference in the rate of death or acute myocardial infarction. Overall, 8.8% of nondiabetics and 14.3% of diabetics with a negative FFR test result required target lesion revascularization (P=.32). CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that deferring percutaneous coronary intervention in diabetics with a moderately severe coronary artery stenosis and an FFR >/=0.75 is safe.