Advances in immune regulation of the G protein-coupled estrogen receptor.

Estrogen and related receptors have been shown to have a significant impact on human development, reproduction, metabolism and immune regulation and to play a critical role in tumor development and treatment. Traditionally, the nuclear estrogen receptors (nERs) ERα and ERß have been thought to be involved in mediating the estrogenic effects. However, our group and others have previously demonstrated that the G protein-coupled estrogen receptor (GPER) is the third independent ER, and estrogen signaling mediated by GPER is known to play an important role in normal physiology and a variety of abnormal diseases. Interestingly, recent studies have progressively revealed GPER involvement in the maintenance of the normal immune system, abnormal immune diseases, and inflammatory lesions, which may be of significant clinical value primarily in the immunotherapy of tumors. In this article, we review current advances in GPER-related immunomodulators and provide a theoretical basis and potential clinical targets to ameliorate immune-related diseases and immunotherapy for tumors.

YB-1 Targeted by miR-509-3-5p Affects Migration and Invasion of Triple­Negative Breast Cancer by Regulating Cellular Epithelial­Mesenchymal Transition.

The epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) process is closely linked to metastasis of breast cancer. This article elucidates the role of Y-box binding protein-1 (YB-1) on the migration and invasion of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) cells by regulating EMT, and the related mechanism. The expression data of YB-1 and miR-509-3-5p in TNBC samples and normal samples were downloaded from the GEO database. The proliferation, migration, invasion, and EMT of TNBC cells were detected by CCK-8 assay, colony formation assay, wound-healing assay, transwell assay, and immunoblotting analyses. The targeted binding of YB-1 and miR-509-3-5p was validated by luciferase reporter experiment. A xenograft mouse model was constructed to investigate the influence of the miR-509-3-5p/YB-1 axis on TNBC tumor growth in vivo. YB-1 was overexpressed, while miR-509-3-5p was underexpressed in TNBC tumor tissues and various cell lines. Silencing YB-1 depressed cell viability, proliferation, motility, and EMT in vitro, and miR-509-3-5p upregulation exerted the same effects. YB-1 was targeted by miR-509-3-5p. The suppressive effects on the phenotypes of TNBC cells caused by overexpressed miR-509-3-5p were attenuated by YB-1 upregulation. In addition, miR-509-3-5p overexpression restrained TNBC tumor growth and downregulated the YB-1-mediated EMT process in vivo. YB-1 targeted by miR-509-3-5p affects motility of TNBC cells by regulating cellular EMT.

Patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma who receive immune-targeted therapy may derive survival benefit from nephrectomy.

BACKGROUND: Nephrectomy, whether in the era of cytokine therapy or targeted therapy, has an important role in the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma. With the advent of immunotherapy, immunotherapy combined with targeted therapy has become the mainstream of systemic therapy, but the role of nephrectomy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma is unclear. In this study, we retrospectively analyzed the impact of nephrectomy on survival in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma who received immune-targeted therapy. METHODS: Patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma who received immune-targeted therapy at three centers between May 17, 2019 and August 1, 2022 were collected, who were divided into two groups based on whether nephrectomy was performed or not. Survival, response rate and adverse event were compared between the two groups. The primary end point was progression free survival, Subgroup analysis and univariate and multivariable prognostic analyses were also assessed. RESULTS: With a median follow-up time of 29.3 months (95% CI 28.5-30.2), 165 patients were recruited and divided into two groups based on whether they underwent nephrectomy or not. There were 68 patients in the non-nephrectomy group, 97 in the nephrectomy group. Compared to patients treated with immune-targeted therapy, patients treated with immune-targeted therapy plus nephrectomy were able to achieve survival benefits, with a median PFS of 10.8 months (95% CI 8.3-13.3) and 14.4 months (95% CI 12.6-16.2), respectively, as well as an HR of 0.476 (95% CI 0.323-0.701, p = 0.0002). The 12-month and 18-month PFS rates were 30.9% versus 60.8% and 7.4% versus 25.8%, respectively. The objective response rate (ORR) was 52.9% and 60.8%, respectively, in the non-nephrectomy and nephrectomy groups (p = 0.313), and the disease control rate (DCR) was 75% and 83.5%, respectively (p = 0.179). The most common adverse events related to treatment were hypothyroidism, immune-related pneumonitis and rash. Multivariate analysis showed that primary tumor nephrectomy prior to immune-targeted therapy, clear cell renal carcinoma and oligo metastasis were independent prognostic factors. CONCLUSIONS: Nephrectomy may provide PFS benefit with tolerable safety for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma who receive immune-targeted therapy. In multivariate analysis, nephrectomy, clear cell carcinoma, and oligo-organ metastasis were found to be favorable independent prognostic factors.

Efficacy and safety of different PD-1 inhibitors in combination with lenvatinib in the treatment of unresectable primary liver cancer: a multicentre retrospective study.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are safe and efficacious treatments for advanced primary liver cancer (PLC). The efficacy of different ICIs in the treatment of liver cancer remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to explore whether there is a difference in the efficacy and safety of various programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitors in combination with lenvatinib in the treatment of unresectable PLC. Patients with PLC treated with lenvatinib in combination with PD-1 inhibitors (camrelizumab, tislelizumab, sintilimab, or pembrolizumab) between January 2018 and December 2021 were retrospectively enrolled. Tumor response, adverse events, and grades were evaluated. Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank test were used to compare the overall survival and progression-free survival of patients treated with different PD-1 inhibitors. Cox regression analysis was used for univariate and multivariate analyses to identify clinical variables related to treatment efficacy. This study included a total of 176 patients who received a combination of lenvatinib and PD-1 inhibitors. Of these, 103 patients received camrelizumab, 44 received tislelizumab, 20 received sintilimab, and 9 received pembrolizumab. There was no significant difference in the pairwise comparison of camrelizumab, tislelizumab, sintilimab, and pembrolizumab using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Adverse events occurred in 40 (22.7%) patients (grade ≥ 3, 2.3%). The incidence of grade 3 adverse events among the four PD-1 inhibitor groups was below 5%. Camrelizumab, tislelizumab, sintilimab, and pembrolizumab are viable options for patients with unresectable PLC. These PD-1 inhibitors in combination with lenvatinib showed good safety profiles. The results guide selecting treatment for patients with unresectable PLC.

Efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors in elderly patients with primary liver cancer: a retrospective, multicenter, real-world cohort study.

BACKGROUND: There is still no specific real-world data regarding the clinical activity of immune checkpoint inhibitors in the elderly with liver cancer. Our study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors between patients aged ≥ 65 years and the younger group, while exploring their differences in genomic background and tumor microenvironment. METHODS: This retrospective study was conducted at two hospitals in China and included 540 patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors for primary liver cancer between January 2018 and December 2021. Patients' medical records were reviewed for clinical and radiological data and oncologic outcomes. The genomic and clinical data of patients with primary liver cancer were extracted and analyzed from TCGA-LIHC, GSE14520, and GSE140901 datasets. RESULTS: Ninety-two patients were classified as elderly and showed better progression-free survival (P = 0.027) and disease control rate (P = 0.014). No difference was observed in overall survival (P = 0.69) or objective response rate (P = 0.423) between the two age groups. No significant difference was reported concerning the number (P = 0.824) and severity (P = 0.421) of adverse events. The enrichment analyses indicated that the elderly group was linked to lower expression of oncogenic pathways, such as PI3K-Akt, Wnt, and IL-17. The elderly had a higher tumor mutation burden than younger patients. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicated that immune checkpoint inhibitors might exhibit better efficacy in the elderly with primary liver cancer, with no increased adverse events. Differences in genomic characteristics and tumor mutation burden may partially explain these results.

YB-1 Expression Is Associated with Lymph Node Metastasis and Drug Resistance to Adriamycin in Breast Cancer.

Background: Breast cancer (BC) is the most common malignant tumor among females. Although there are multiple treatments for breast cancer, many patients still face the dilemma of drug resistance after multiline treatment. It would be greatly helpful for clinical work to identify additional and improved prognostic predictors. Y-box binding protein-1 (YB-1) is a member of the cold shock protein family, and patients with overexpression of YB-1 have a worse prognosis. Methods: This study collected 48 specimens from 48 patients with breast cancer and analyzed the clinicopathological characteristics of the patients. Immunohistochemistry, immunofluorescence, cell viability analysis, tumor spheroid formation and cell morphology, cell invasion, cycle analysis, qRT-PCR, Western blot, and tumorigenicity in BALB/c nude mice were performed to verify the results. Results: We found that patients with overexpression of YB-1 were related to lymph node metastasis and the patients' age tended to be young. Because of the short follow-up time, a survival analysis could not be performed. Based on the results of in vitro and in vivo experiments, this study indicated that breast cancer cells with overexpression of YB-1 had stronger proliferation, migration, and invasion abilities than cells with low expression of YB-1. Compared with cells with low expression of YB-1, the proliferation, migration, and invasion abilities of YB-1 overexpressed cells were not significantly affected by adriamycin. Conclusion: This suggested that breast cancer cells with overexpression of YB-1 were resistant to adriamycin. Therefore, YB-1 is associated with lymph node metastasis of breast cancer cell. YB-1 could be a prognostic, predictive factor and a novel therapeutic target of BC.

Hepatic artery intervention combined with immune-targeted therapy is superior to sequential therapy in BCLC-C hepatocellular carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Hepatic artery intervention combined with immunotarget therapy exerts excellent disease control and prolongs survival. However, the arrangement of hepatic artery intervention and systemic therapy confuses clinical decisions. METHODS: A two-center, retrospective clinical study was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee. From December 2018 to February 2022, patients with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage C (BCLC-C) hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who received targeted therapy plus PD-1 inhibitors with or without hepatic artery intervention were included. According to the treatment mode, the patients were assigned to three groups: initial hepatic artery intervention combined with immunotarget therapy, immunotarget therapy sequential hepatic artery interventional therapy, and immunotarget therapy only. The survival, response, and adverse events were compared among the three groups. Subgroup analysis and univariate and multivariate prognostic analyses were also evaluated. RESULTS: The median follow-up time was 18.3 months (95% CI 16.7 to 20.0 months). A total of 163 patients with BCLC-C stage HCC were assigned to three groups: initial hepatic artery intervention plus PD-1 inhibitors plus targeted therapy (HPT, n = 66), PD-1 inhibitors plus targeted therapy followed by hepatic artery intervention (PTH, n = 56) and PD-1 inhibitors plus targeted therapy (PT, n = 41). The median progression-free survival was 8.37 months (95% CI 6.35-10.39) with HPT versus 5.3 months (95% CI 3.48-7.12) with PTH versus 6.33 months (95% CI 3.75-8.92) with PT. The progression-free survival of the HPT group was better than that of the PTH group (HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.45-0.97, p = 0.027) and PT group (HR 0.60, 95% CI 0.39-0.92, p = 0.01). The median overall survival was 14.6 months (95% CI 10.6-18.7) with HPT, 10.0 months (95% CI 8.2-11.8) with PTH and 11.3 months (95% CI 8.3-14.3) with PT. The 1-year overall survival (OS) rates in the HPT, PTH and PT groups were 50%, 33.9%, and 34.1%, respectively. Overall survival was significantly longer in the HTP group than in the PT group (HR 0.60, 95% CI 0.361-0.996, p = 0.032). Compared with the PTH group, the overall survival of the HTP group had a prolonged survival trend (HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.416-1.032, p = 0.059). All treatment modalities were deemed equally safe. Multivariate analysis suggested that the mode of treatment, albumin level, Child‒Pugh grade and hepatectomy history were independent prognostic factors for BCLC-C HCC patients. CONCLUSIONS: Initial hepatic artery intervention combined with immunotarget therapy gained survival benefits with tolerable side effects compared with immunotarget sequential hepatic artery intervention and immunotarget therapy alone. Multivariate analysis suggested that liver reserve function was closely correlated with prognosis.

Predictive Value of the Hepatic Immune Predictive Index for Patients with Primary Liver Cancer Treated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors.

BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have improved survival outcomes and resulted in long-term responses in primary liver cancer in some patients. Nevertheless, not all patients with PLC could benefit from immunotherapy. Therefore, it is necessary to identify patients suitable for such therapy. METHODS: 215 patients with primary liver cancer with immunotherapy from Nanfang Hospital were screened between August 2018 and October 2020 as a training set and our validation set included 71 patients of hepatocellular carcinoma from Jiangxi Cancer Hospital from May 2019 to July 2021. The primary endpoint was the disease control rate (DCR), and the secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival. RESULTS: In the training set, neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) ≥3 and alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) level ≥20 ng/mL were independently associated with non-DCR in the training set after adjusting for distant metastasis at baseline and targeted therapy combination. Furthermore, a hepatic immune predictive index (HIPI) based on NLR and AFP level was developed and patients with poor HIPI associated with worse clinical outcomes. In validation set, high HIPI was associated with poor OS. CONCLUSION: HIPI, based on NLR and AFP level, is an effective indicator in ICI-treated patients with primary liver cancer. Our findings may help guide the selection and on-treatment strategies for immunotherapies for primary liver cancer patients.

Valproic Acid Inhibits Peripheral T Cell Lymphoma Cells Behaviors via Restraining PI3K/AKT Pathway.

Objective: Alproic acid (VPA) is a clinic antiepileptic drug. Antitumor role of VPA has been studied. The aim of this study was to clarify the treatment effect and potential mechanism of VPA on peripheral T cell lymphomas (PTCLs). Materials and Methods: Hut 78 cells were obtained from the Shanghai Cell Bank, Chinese Academy of Sciences, and randomly divided into six groups: control, VPA (8 mM), empty vector (NC), miR-3196 mimics, miR-3196 inhibitor, and VPA + miR-3196 mimics groups. CCK-8 assay was performed to clarify the regulative role of VPA on cell proliferation. Flow cytometry was applied to determine the apoptotic rate and ROS levels. miR-3196 was tested by RT-qPCR. Western blot was used to test the level of p-PI3K and p-AKT. Biochemical experiments were used to detect changes in the content of ATP, lactate level, and glucose content. Electron microscopy was used to show the structure of mitochondria in Hut 78 cells. Results: VPA greatly promoted the expression of miR-3196 and inhibited cell proliferation in a dose-dependent manner. Compared with the NC group, the cell apoptosis rate, Bax and cleaved-caspase-3 expression, lactate level, ROS expression, and glucose content in the VPA group were significantly increased (P < 0.05), and cell proliferation, ATP production, and the expression of Bcl-2, p-PI3K and p-AKT was decreased significantly (P < 0.05). The role of mir-3196 mimics is similar to VPA. While, the miR-3196 inhibitor had the opposite effect to VPA and mimics. The combination of VPA and miR-3196 mimics has the most obvious effect. Conclusion: VPA can inhibit the proliferation of Hut 78 cells and promote cell apoptosis and the structure and dysfunction of mitochondria by regulating the activity of the PI3K/AKT pathway.

Persistent Response to a Combination Treatment Featuring a Targeted Agent and an Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor in a Patient With Collecting Duct Renal Carcinoma: A Case Report and Literature Review.

Collecting duct carcinoma (CDC) is a rare and highly aggressive subtype of kidney cancer that is associated with a poor prognosis. At present, there is no effective treatment for CDC. Herein, we report a case of metastatic CDC treated with a combination of a tyrosine kinase inhibitor and an immune checkpoint inhibitor. A 67-year-old male was diagnosed with CDC with lung and bone metastasis. Pazopanib and camrelizumab were administered after cytoreductive nephrectomy. The patient achieved a partial response after one cycle of treatment; however, he then experienced serious drug-induced hepatic injury. Therefore, we discontinued camrelizumab and administered monotherapy with pazopanib. Three months later, the cancer had progressed and axitinib and sintilimab were administered. The patient achieved a partial response, accompanied by the complete disappearance of the metastatic lesion in the lung. The patient had an excellent physical status after 11 months. This is the first reported case of metastatic CDC successfully treated with a combination of a tyrosine kinase inhibitor and an immune checkpoint inhibitor. This form of combination treatment may be an effective option for treating metastatic CDC.