Dynamic monitoring of serum tumor markers as prognostic factors in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer treated with first-line immunotherapy: a multicenter retrospective study.

Background: To date, no specific studies have reported the use of dynamic serum tumor markers (STMs) as prognostic factors in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who receive first-line immunotherapy. Therefore, it is unclear whether STMs can be used as a prognostic factor for first-line immunotherapy in advanced NSCLC. Objectives: To elucidate the role of STMs in monitoring immunotherapy response in advanced NSCLC. Patients were treated with first-line programmed cell death-1/programmed cell death ligand-1 inhibitors at four Chinese centers. Design: This was a multicenter retrospective study. Methods: Blood samples were collected at baseline and after 6-8 weeks of treatment. Computed tomography scans were used to evaluate treatment efficacy according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1. Post-treatment drops in STMs [Serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), neuron-specific enolase (NSE), cytokeratin fragment 19 (CYFRA21-1), carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9), and carbohydrate antigen 125 (CA125)] were decreased ⩾20% (Group C) over baseline was used as cutoff level for defining a marker response. If STMs were increased by ⩾20% after treatment, the therapeutic effect was limited (Group A). Patients with STM changes between a 20% increase or decrease were enrolled in Group B. In univariate and multivariate stepwise Cox regression analyses, STMs and RECIST responses were analyzed for their impact on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: The analysis included 716 patients. By multivariate analysis, CEA, NSE, CYFRA21-1, CA19-9, and CA125 (Group A versus Group B and Group A versus Group C) were associated with significant differences in PFS. Similar results were observed in the OS analysis. Similar results were observed in the adenocarcinoma subgroup analyses. In squamous cell carcinoma subgroup analyses, there was no statistical difference in PFS (p = 0.147) or OS (p = 0.068) between Group A and Group B for CA125. Conclusion: The increase and decrease in serum levels of STMs might be reliable prognostic factors for immunotherapy efficacy in NSCLC patients.

Comparison of first-line immunotherapy efficacy between advanced lung squamous cell carcinoma and pulmonary lymphoepithelioma-like carcinoma: A propensity score matching multicenter study.

Background: Compared with other lung squamous cell carcinomas (LUSC), pulmonary lymphoepithelioma-like carcinoma (pLELC) is closely associated with Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infections with a unique molecular profile and immune microenvironment. This study was thus established to compare the treatment response and effectiveness of immunotherapy between pLELC and LUSC. Material and Methods: We enrolled 31 patients with pLELC and 116 with LUSC receiving first-line immunotherapy at three centers in China and compared the treatment response and effectiveness of immunotherapy. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance the differences in baseline data between the two groups. Results: Before PSM, progression-free survival and overall survival were longer in the pLELC group than in the LUSC group (progression-free survival: hazard ratio (HR), 1.67, 95% CI: 1.05-2.63, P = 0.028; overall survival: HR, 1.90, 95% CI: 1.06-3.40, P = 0.028). This remained unchanged after PSM (progression-free survival: HR, 1.79, 95% CI: 1.02-3.15, P = 0.044; overall survival: HR, 2.20; 95% CI: 1.10-4.37, P = 0.022). Conclusion: pLELC showed a clinically meaningful survival benefit compared with traditional LUSC following immunotherapy. Subsequent studies should consider the role of the EBV in the tumor immune microenvironment of pLELC.

Baseline serum tumor markers predict the survival of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer receiving first-line immunotherapy: a multicenter retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to investigate the association between baseline serum tumor markers (STMs) (carcinoembryonic antigen [CEA], neuron-specific enolase [NSE], cytokeratin-19 fragment [CYFRA21-1], carbohydrate antigen 19-9 [CA19-9], and carbohydrate antigen 125 [CA125]) and the efficacy of first-line immunotherapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. METHODS: This multicenter retrospective study evaluated patients who received first-line immunotherapy between July 2017 and July 2022. The endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), as defined by the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1. We divided the patients into three groups based on STM levels: Group A ≥ threefold upper limit of normal, threefold upper limit of normal > Group B > upper limit of normal, and Group C ≤ upper limit of normal. RESULTS: In total, 716 patients were included in this study. In Cox proportional hazards analyses, the STM levels in Group C were independently associated with superior PFS and OS in patients with lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). Except for CA19-9 level, the STM levels in Group C were independently associated with superior PFS and OS in patients with lung squamous carcinoma (LUSC). Except for CEA and CA19-9 levels, the levels in Group A were independently associated with inferior PFS and OS in patients with LUAD and LUSC. CONCLUSIONS: Serum CEA, NSE, CYFRA21-1, and CA125 levels can predict PFS and OS in patients with LUAD and LUSC, and serum CA19-9 levels can predict PFS and OS in patients with LUAD. The higher the serum NSE, CYFRA21-1, and CA125 levels, the worse the PFS and OS in patients with LUAD and LUSC. In addition, the higher the serum CA19-9 level, the worse the OS in patients with LUAD.