Analysis of Research Activity Among Ophthalmology Fellows.

PURPOSE: The academic success of ophthalmology fellows may be significantly impacted by their research engagement. Evaluating the research activity of fellows by subspecialty may provide insight into trends useful for prospective applicants. The objective of this study was to assess the research activity of ophthalmology fellows in the year 2023. METHODS: Ophthalmology fellowship programs were compiled using the Association of University Professors of Ophthalmology and the American Society of Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery websites. Program subspecialties were categorized as: Cornea and External Disease [CED]; Cornea, External Disease, and Refractive Surgery [CEDRS]; Glaucoma; Medical Retina [MR]; Neuro-Ophthalmology [NO]; Oculoplastics; Pediatric Ophthalmology [PO]; Surgical Retina [SR]; Uveitis; and Other. "Other" consisted of Oncology, Pathology, combined Oncology and Pathology fellowships. We identified current fellows using publicly available online information. Programs and fellows that did not have information available were excluded. Total publications, Hirsch index (h-index), and weighted-relative citation ration (w-RCR) were utilized as measures of research output, while total citations and mean-RCR (m-RCR) served as proxies for research impact. Duration of publishing was calculated using the years of the oldest and most recent publications. Statistical analysis was performed using Kruskal-Wallis H tests with an alpha value of .05. RESULTS: A total of 373 fellows from 229 programs met our inclusion criteria. More than half of fellows were men (54.4%), and the most common degree type was MD (93.0%). Across all subspecialties, the median h-index was 3.0 (IQR = 4), m-RCR was .9 (IQR = 1.2) and w-RCR was 3.2 (IQR = 9.8). The median number of publications was six (IQR = 10, with 34 citations (IQR = 110) and 4 years of publishing (IQR = 6). We observed significant differences in h-index (p = .038), total publications (p < .001), and w-RCR (p = .028) by subspecialty. CONCLUSION: We observed significant differences in research output, but no differences in research impact by subspecialty. Overall, Uveitis and Oculoplastics fellows had higher research activity, while Medical Retina and Other fellows had the lowest. This data is pertinent to better understand the landscape of ophthalmology fellowship applications.

Pharmacogenomic Analysis of Response to Topical Tumor Necrosis Factor α Antagonist Licaminlimab (OCS-02) in Dry Eye Disease.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the pharmacogenomics of response to topical ocular tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα) inhibitor licaminlimab in patients with DED. METHODS: Three single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with Sjögren syndrome, 3 in the TNFα gene and 1 in the TNF receptor 1 (TNFR1) gene, were assessed for association with response to licaminlimab in participants from a randomized, vehicle-controlled, Phase 2 study in which adults with DED and severe ocular discomfort persisting despite treatment with artificial tears received licaminlimab or vehicle for 6 weeks. Response was assessed for change from baseline in Global Ocular Discomfort score at Day 29 of treatment. The pharmacogenomic analysis was a prospectively specified exploratory objective of the study. mRNA expression for TNFα, interleukin (IL) 1ß, and IL8 in conjunctival epithelium cells was determined. The relationship between SNPs and response to licaminlimab was assessed using a mixed model repeated measures analysis. RESULTS: SNP rs1800693 in the TNFR1 gene showed a significant effect on response to licaminlimab (P < 0.0001, initial association test); no effect was seen for any of the other SNPs tested. The CC genotype of rs1800693 was associated with much greater response to licaminlimab than the CT or TT genotypes: LS mean changes from baseline to Day 29 in Global Ocular Discomfort score were -29.5, -0.09, and -3.90, in patients with the CC, CT, and TT genotypes, respectively (P < 0.0001). No significant effect was observed in vehicle-treated patients. Improvements from baseline were seen in 3/4 licaminlimab-treated participants with the CC genotype. Conjunctival epithelium cell levels of mRNA for TNFα, IL1ß, and IL8 decreased from baseline in participants with the CC genotype, but not with the CT or TT genotypes. Between-genotype differences in mRNA levels were not observed in participants receiving vehicle. CONCLUSIONS: The CC genotype of rs1800693, relatively common in patients with DED, was strongly associated with response to licaminlimab and decreased inflammatory cytokine gene expression in ocular surface cells during treatment. This study is one of the first to our knowledge to investigate pharmacogenomics in the treatment of DED.

A Randomized, Prospective, Observer-Masked Study Comparing Dropless Treatment Regimen Using Intracanalicular Dexamethasone Insert, Intracameral Ketorolac, and Intracameral Moxifloxacin versus Conventional Topical Therapy to Control Postoperative Pain and Inflammation in Cataract Surgery.

Purpose: To evaluate clinical efficacy and patient preference for a dropless treatment regimen compared to conventional topical therapy in patients undergoing cataract surgery. Patients and Methods: In this prospective, contralateral eye study, patients with bilateral cataract were randomized to receive either intracanalicular dexamethasone insert, intracameral phenylephrine 1%/ketorolac 0.3%, and intracameral moxifloxacin (50 µg) (study group) or topical moxifloxacin 0.5%, ketorolac 0.5%, and prednisolone acetate 1.0% QID (control group). The second eye underwent cataract surgery 2 weeks later and was treated with the opposite treatment. All patients were evaluated at Days 1, 7, 14, 28, and 3 months. The primary outcome measure was postoperative ocular pain. Secondary outcomes included summed ocular inflammation score (SOIS; the sum of the mean anterior chamber cells and anterior flare score), the patient preference for medication protocol between the two eyes, and patient out-of-pocket cost of medications. Safety outcome measures included CDVA, intraocular pressure, central retinal thickness (CRT), and the incidence of reported AEs. Results: The proportion of patients with no pain was similar in both groups at all postoperative visits (p>0.05). No statistically significant difference in SOIS score was observed between the two groups at any visit. A strong majority of the patients (94.7%) preferred the study eye's dropless regimen over the control eye's conventional topical therapy regimen. No statistically significant difference in mean intraocular pressure (IOP) was observed at any postoperative visit, except at Week 1. The mean CDVA was also similar in both groups at all postoperative visits (p>0.05). The postoperative mean CRT was comparable between the two groups. Conclusion: A dropless treatment regimen is as effective as topical eyedrop administration. A higher proportion of patients who underwent bilateral cataract surgery preferred the dropless treatment regimen over the patient-administered eye drop regimen.

Clear corneal incision, an important step in modern cataract surgery: a review.

A clear corneal incision (CCI) is the most commonly used entrance site in modern phacoemulsification cataract surgery. Despite some initial concerns about increased endophthalmitis rates through a self-sealing CCI, recent literature suggests that the risk of infection with proper wound construction and all other necessary precautions is minimal. The technique of creating a clear corneal incision has, with recent developments in corneal imaging, undergone critical appraisal leading to a better understanding of incision architecture. Many surgeons operate through smaller incisions, and they have a wide choice of surgical instruments to create their corneal incisions. The aim of this review is to discuss the history and the current status of clear corneal incision creation, the design and materials of surgical blades, and the current trends in manufacturing and sustainability. Although disposable instruments have some advantages and are very popular, recycling, if possible, and avoiding unnecessary plastic waste are important considerations. In any case, the step of CCI is a small one for the surgeon, but a big one for the eye. That is why it has to be done with the utmost precision and in-depth knowledge is important.

OCS-01 (Novel Topical Dexamethasone Formulation) in Inflammation and Pain Post Cataract Surgery: A Randomized, Double-Masked, Vehicle-Controlled Study.

PURPOSE: The goal of this study was to compare topical dexamethasone 1.5% in a novel formulation (OCS-01) once daily and BID versus vehicle for the treatment of inflammation and pain after cataract surgery. METHODS: This was a Phase II, double-masked, vehicle-controlled, randomized multicenter study. Adult patients with planned unilateral uncomplicated cataract surgery were randomized to receive OCS-01 once daily (n = 51), OCS-01 BID (n = 51), or matching vehicle (n = 51) for 15 days postsurgery. Primary end points were absence of anterior chamber cells (ACC; cells = 0) at Day 15 and absence of pain (score of "0") at postoperative Day 4. The Pearson χ2 test with a two-sided alpha = 0.1 was used to compare treatments. Safety was assessed in terms of adverse events and changes in intraocular pressure. FINDINGS: Treatment arms were generally similar in their baseline characteristics, with mean age ranging from 66 to 68 years, the proportion of male patients ranging from 29% to 37%, and 82% to 92% of each arm being White. On Day 15, a greater reduction in the percentage of eyes with ACC grade 0 was observed in the OCS-01 once daily (51%) and BID (66.7%) arms than in the vehicle arm (19.6%) (P = 0.0009 and P < 0.0001, respectively, using a Pearson χ2 test). On Day 4, the percentage of eyes with no pain was 72.5% (OCS-01 once daily), 62.7% (OCS-01 BID), and 45.1% (vehicle); statistical significance was reached for OCS-01 once daily (P = 0.005) and OCS-01 BID (P = 0.074) compared with vehicle. OCS-01 was well tolerated. A higher proportion of treatment-emergent adverse events, including ocular adverse events, were reported for the placebo group than for either OCS-01 group. IMPLICATIONS: OCS-01 once daily and BID were more effective than vehicle and well tolerated in the treatment of inflammation and pain after cataract surgery. CLINICALTRIALS: gov identifier: NCT04130802.

Transitioning from a standalone practice to a private equity-partnered practice and impact on clinical operations.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Private equity has made significant inroads into the specialty of ophthalmology. The purpose of this review is to evaluate the effect of private equity on clinical operations in an ophthalmic practice. RECENT FINDINGS: Private equity had become an important source of capital and management expertise that has resulted in the consolidation of many ophthalmic practices as an alternative to working for a hospital system, insurance carrier, or independent private practice. SUMMARY: The recent growth of private equity presence in ophthalmology has resulted in significant changes in clinical operations. These changes in clinical operations include the increased importance of data management and data analytics, economies of scale, synergies, and introduction of patient-shared billing opportunities. Although physician input into clinical operations is decreased, provisional care decision-making can be maintained.

Intracameral dexamethasone 9% vs prednisolone acetate 1% in controlling postoperative pain and inflammation in patients undergoing cataract surgery.

PURPOSE: To compare patient preferences of postoperative cataract surgery topical medication use between a 1-drop and a 3-drop regimen. SETTING: Two private cataract surgery centers. DESIGN: Open-label randomized self-controlled prospective study. METHODS: This study included 30 patients (60 eyes) undergoing routine cataract surgery in both eyes. In this contralateral eye study, 1 eye of each patient was randomized to the 1-drop regimen of intracameral delivery of moxifloxacin and dexamethasone suspension and topical bromfenac for 30 days. The other eye, randomized to the 3-drop regimen, received topical moxifloxacin 0.5% 4 times a day for 7 days and bromfenac 0.07% daily for 30 days postoperatively, along with prednisolone acetate 1% 4 times a day for 30 days. Patients reported their preferred regimen 2 weeks after the second surgery with a validated questionnaire. Secondary outcomes included subjective ocular pain, inflammation score, and out-of-pocket cost. Intraocular pressure (IOP) and macular thickness were also measured. RESULTS: Of the 29 patients, 28 (96.6%) significantly more preferred the eye treated with a 1-drop regimen. Self-reported pain, activity interference, and out-of-pocket cost were significantly less in the 1-drop group. Inflammation and 1-day uncorrected distance visual acuity were also significantly better in the 1-drop group. Macular thickness and mean IOP were similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Intracameral delivery of steroid and antibiotics was preferred by most of the patients undergoing cataract surgery. These eyes had significantly less pain, inflammation, activity interference, and out-of-pocket cost and significantly better uncorrected distance visual acuity at 1 day postoperatively. IOP and macular thickness were similar between groups.

Diagnosis and management of postrefractive surgery ectasia.

Postrefractive surgery ectasia is a serious, sight-threatening complication seen after the following procedures: laser in situ keratomileusis, photorefractive keratectomy, small-incision lenticule extraction, radial keratotomy, and/or arcuate keratotomy. Specific risk factors may include age, corneal thickness, degree of refractive error, corneal topographic changes including irregular astigmatism, percent tissue ablation, and residual stromal bed. Biomarkers may be a new option to help indicate who is at greatest risk for ectasia. Visual aids including spectacles or contacts lenses are often required to achieve optimal vision. Collagen crosslinking is the only treatment believed to stop progression of ectasia and prevent keratoplasty. Other surgical options may include topography-guided phototherapeutic keratectomy and intrastromal corneal ring segments. Ultimately, an "ounce of prevention is a pound of cure," so careful preoperative screening and ultimately offering the safest and most effective treatments for patients is arguably the most important job of the refractive surgeon.

Pain control and reduction of opioid use associated with intracameral phenylephrine1.0%-ketorolac 0.3% administered during cataract surgery.

PURPOSE: To compare pain and the need for the opioid fentanyl use associated with the administration of phenylephrine 1.0%-ketorolac 0.3% (P/K) with those of epinephrine administration during cataract surgery. SETTING: Ambulatory surgery center. DESIGN: Single-center, prospective, randomized, double-masked, self-controlled trial. METHODS: Patients undergoing bilateral, topical anesthetic cataract surgery were randomized to receive either intracameral P/K or epinephrine in their balanced salt solution for the first eye and the other for the second eye, 2 weeks later. Fentanyl was used to manage intraoperative pain. The primary end point was the need for fentanyl administration intraoperatively. Secondary outcomes included pain measurements; surgery duration; effective phacoemulsification time; pupil size; and complications. RESULTS: 112 eyes of 56 patients were enrolled. Significantly fewer eyes in the P/K group (7 [12.5%]) than in the epinephrine group (19 [33.9%]; P = .013) required intraoperative fentanyl administration. Mean pain scores were lower in the P/K group than those in the control group at all timepoints. For patients with no pain to mild pain (pain scores ≤ 3), 85.7% (n = 48) of the P/K group and 58.9% (n = 33) of the epinephrine group met this benchmark ( P = .003) intraoperatively. The combined outcome, the number of patients not receiving intravenous fentanyl and experiencing no pain to mild pain, was significantly higher in the study (82.1%, n = 46) than in the control group (58.9%, n = 33; P = .013). CONCLUSIONS: P/K administration significantly reduced pain and the need for fentanyl use. Using P/K is a practical way for cataract surgeons to provide better patient care and reduce the need for intraoperative opioids.

Presbyopia - A Review of Current Treatment Options and Emerging Therapies.

Presbyopia is a common age-related vision disorder characterized by a progressive inability to focus on near objects. If uncorrected or under-corrected, presbyopia can significantly impact patients' quality of life. Presbyopia represents an area of considerable unmet need due to its rising prevalence worldwide as the population ages, the high proportion of under-treated individuals in some parts of the world, and the limitations of currently available corrective methods. Progressive or bifocal spectacles are associated with peripheral blur, a restricted visual field and impaired depth perception, which have been linked to an increased risk of falls in the elderly. Contact lens options can be difficult to maintain due to the development of age-related dry eye symptoms and reduced manual dexterity. Other corrective methods involve surgical interventions that modify the optics of the cornea, replace the crystalline lens, or attempt to restore active accommodation. While patients undergoing surgery report satisfactory outcomes post-operatively, many of them eventually require reading glasses. Non-invasive therapies with novel mechanisms of action are currently being investigated; these include miotic agents and UNR844, a lipoic acid choline ester. In this narrative review, available evidence on presbyopia prevalence, quality of life impact and risk factors are described, with a focus on observational studies in non-clinical settings. The diagnosis pathway and patient journey in presbyopia are outlined, and various treatment options are analyzed. The data reviewed herein reveals significant gaps in the provision of vision correction for this common condition, with a paucity of effective, non-invasive treatment options broadly accessible to presbyopic individuals.

Five-Year Outcomes Prospective Study of Two First-Generation Trabecular Micro-Bypass Stents (iStent®) in Open-Angle Glaucoma.

PURPOSE: To assess 5-year effectiveness and safety of 2 iStent® trabecular micro-bypass stents in eyes with open-angle glaucoma (OAG) not controlled on 1 medication. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective, interventional, single-arm, multi-surgeon study (NCT #1252862, clinicaltrials.gov) enrolled eyes with OAG, preoperative intraocular pressure (IOP) of 18-30 mmHg on 1 ocular hypotensive medication, and 22-38 mmHg after medication washout. Eyes underwent standalone implantation of 2 iStent devices and were followed through 60 months postoperatively. Efficacy was quantified by mean diurnal IOP and medication usage. Efficacy endpoints included the proportion of eyes with ≥20% IOP reduction versus baseline unmedicated IOP (primary efficacy), and the proportion of eyes with IOP ≤18 mmHg (secondary efficacy) without medication or secondary glaucoma surgery. Safety parameters included visual acuity, cup-to-disc ratio, visual field, and complications and adverse events. RESULTS: Preoperative mean IOP on 1 medication was 20.6 ± 2.0 mmHg and post-washout unmedicated IOP was 24.1 ± 1.4 mmHg (n = 39). At 5 years postoperative, medication-free mean diurnal IOP reduced to 14.5 ± 2.2 mmHg, constituting a 40% decrease versus preoperative washed-out IOP (p < .0001). In addition, this 5-year medication-free IOP constituted a 30% decrease versus preoperative IOP on 1 medication (p < .0001). At Month 60, 89.7% (26/29) of eyes achieved the primary efficacy endpoint of ≥20% IOP reduction versus baseline unmedicated IOP, and 86.2% (25/29) of eyes achieved the secondary efficacy endpoint of IOP ≤18 mmHg, without medication or secondary glaucoma surgery. Throughout follow-up, 89.7-91.3% of eyes were on no medications. Favorable safety included no secondary glaucoma surgeries, minimal adverse events, and stable visual acuity, cup-to-disc ratio, and visual fields through 5 years postoperative. CONCLUSIONS: This prospective interventional study demonstrates persistent 5-year reductions in IOP and freedom from medications, together with favorable safety, following implantation of 2 first-generation trabecular micro-bypass stents in eyes with OAG on 1 preoperative medication.

Safety and efficacy of nepafenac punctal plug delivery system in controlling postoperative ocular pain and inflammation after cataract surgery.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of a nepafenac punctal plug delivery system (N-PPDS) after cataract surgery. SETTING: Three U.S. clinical sites. DESIGN: Prospective, multicenter, randomized (2:1), parallel-arm, double-masked, placebo-controlled, phase II pilot study. METHODS: Fifty-six subjects (aged older than 22 years) with expected postcataract correctable distance vision of 20/30 or better and lower puncta allowing dilation up to 1.0 mm received either the nepafenac (N-PPDS group; n = 38 eyes) or a placebo punctal plug delivery system (p-PPDS group; n = 18 eyes). All eyes underwent routine unilateral cataract surgery with intraocular lens implantation. The primary and secondary efficacy measures were postoperative ocular pain and inflammation, respectively. RESULTS: There were 38 patients in the experimental N-PPDS group and 18 patients in the control group. The N-PPDS group had a significantly higher percentage of pain-free patients than that in the p-PPDS group (22/32 [69%] vs 6/16 [38%] at 3 days, P = .038; and 24/36 [67%] vs 5/16 [31%] at 7 days, P = .018). A higher percentage of patients in the N-PPDS group (15/29 [52%] vs 0/14 [0%] in p-PPDS) was pain free at all visits (P = .001). Anterior chamber cell scores were better in the N-PPDS group (patients with no anterior chamber cells: 18/36 [50%] vs 3/16 [19%] in p-PPDS; P = .034) at 7 days. The plug retention rate was 98% (55/56) at 14 days. Adverse events having a suspected relationship with the punctal plug treatment occurred in 1 case of the N-PPDS group having to do with placement and zero in the p-PPDS group. CONCLUSIONS: The N-PPDS was safe and effective for the management of ocular pain and inflammation after cataract surgery.

Corneal cross-linking versus conventional management for keratoconus: a lifetime economic model.

AIMS: To assess the cost-effectiveness of corneal collagen cross-linking (CXL) versus no CXL for keratoconus in the United States (US). METHODS: A discrete-event microsimulation was developed to assess the cost-effectiveness of corneal cross-linking (CXL, Photrexa + KXL combination product) versus no CXL for patients with keratoconus. The lifetime model was conducted from a US payor perspective. The source for CXL efficacy and safety data was a 12-month randomized, open-label, sham-controlled, multi-center, pivotal trial comparing CXL versus no CXL. Other inputs were sourced from the literature. The primary outcome was the incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year gained. Costs (2019 USD) and effects were discounted 3% annually. The impacts of underlying uncertainty were evaluated by scenario, univariate, and probabilistic analyses. RESULTS: Starting at a mean baseline age of 31 years and considering a mixed population consisting of 80% slow-progressors and 20% fast-progressors, the CXL group was 25.9% less likely to undergo penetrating keratoplasty (PK) and spent 27.9 fewer years in advanced disease stages. CXL was dominant with lower total direct medical costs (-$8,677; $30,994 versus $39,671) and more QALYs (1.88; 21.80 versus 19.93) compared to no CXL. Considering the impact of reduced productivity loss in an exploratory scenario, CXL was associated with a lifetime cost-savings of $43,759 per patient. CXL was cost-effective within 2 years and cost-saving within 4.5 years. LIMITATIONS: Limitations include those that are common to similar pharmacoeconomic models that rely on disparate sources for inputs and extrapolation on short-term outcomes to a long-term analytical horizon. CONCLUSIONS: Keratoconus is a progressive and life-altering disease with substantial clinical, economic, and humanistic consequences. The economic value of cross-linking is maximized when applied earlier in the disease process and/or younger age, and extends to improved work productivity, out-of-pocket costs, and quality of life.

The Effect of Lifitegrast on Refractive Accuracy and Symptoms in Dry Eye Patients Undergoing Cataract Surgery.

PURPOSE: To determine the effect of lifitegrast ophthalmic solution 5% on improving the tear film, biometry/keratometry, and refractive accuracy for dry eye patients scheduled for cataract surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Multicenter, prospective, open-label study of 100 eyes of 100 patients undergoing cataract surgery who had a confirmed diagnosis of dry eye. Patients underwent biometry at baseline and again after a 28-day course of lifitegrast 5% BID. Primary outcome was an improvement in the accuracy of preoperative anterior corneal power measurements at predicting postoperative spherical equivalent (SE) pre- and post-lifitegrast treatment. Secondary outcomes included changes in dry eye symptoms and corneal staining. RESULTS: The accuracy of the biometry readings for the achieved refractive SE: within 0.25 D in 47% and 50% of eyes before and after the initial lifitegrast treatment, respectively; within 0.5 D in 71% and 79% of eyes before and after the initial lifitegrast treatment; and within 0.75 D in 81% and 91% of eyes before and after the initial lifitegrast treatment (p < 0.04). CONCLUSION: Lifitegrast 5% significantly improved preoperative corneal surface measurement accuracy in patients with confirmed dry eye who were scheduled for cataract surgery.

Evaluating Rotational Stability of an Extended Depth of Focus Toric Intraocular Lens Using a Slit Lamp and Image-Based Analysis.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the rotational stability of a toric extended depth of focus (EDOF) intraocular lens (IOL), using either slit lamp evaluation or image-processing software. SETTING: Three clinical practices in the USA. DESIGN: Prospective unmasked randomized clinical trial. METHODS: Subjects presenting for routine cataract surgery that were interested in improved near vision received toric EDOF lenses (TECNIS Symfony® Toric) in both eyes. The measures of interest in the current analysis were the change in orientation of the IOL between 1 day, 1 month and 3 months postoperative. Orientation was measured at the microscope on the day of surgery, and with the slit lamp at all other visits. Day 1, 1-month and 3-month images of the lens orientation were captured with a slit lamp camera. Differences in orientation were recorded and analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 150 eyes had IOL orientation data available. Image analysis showed mean absolute lens orientation changes from 1 day to 1 month and 3 months of less than 2 degrees. The percentage of lenses exhibiting rotation of ≤5 degrees between any measured time points was 97% or higher. Results were similar, but significantly more variable, when IOL orientation was measured at the slit lamp. CONCLUSION: The toric EDOF lens evaluated here demonstrated rotational stability that exceeded the prior ANSI standard. The best method to determine IOL orientation changes was through image analysis. .

Defocus Curve and Patient Satisfaction with a New Extended Depth of Focus Toric Intraocular Lens Targeted for Binocular Emmetropia or Slight Myopia in the Non-Dominant Eye.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the defocus curve and patient satisfaction after implantation of an extended depth of focus (EDOF) toric IOL when both eyes were targeted for emmetropia and when the non-dominant eye was targeted for mini monovision (-0.50D). METHODS: A prospective unmasked randomized clinical trial in three clinical practices in the USA. Subjects presenting for routine cataract surgery were assigned to one of two groups, both receiving bilateral toric EDOF lenses. One group had the non-dominant eye targeted for slight myopia (-0.50D). Measures of interest were the postoperative defocus curve and reported patient satisfaction and visual disturbances. RESULTS: Questionnaire and defocus curve data were available from 37 subjects in the Emmetropia group, while the mini monovision group included questionnaire data from 39 subjects and valid defocus curve data from 14 subjects. Mini monovision subjects had significantly better VA (a half line to a line better, p < 0.05), from a defocus of -1.50 D to -3.00 D. Reported spectacle wear and satisfaction were not significantly different between groups at any distance, but more patients in the mini monovision group reported the ability to function comfortably without glasses at near and overall (near p = 0.02, overall p < 0.01). Halos and starbursts were the two phenomena reported most often for both groups, with reported starbursts slightly more common in the mini monovision group. CONCLUSIONS: A slightly myopic correction in the non-dominant eye improved binocular near vision by 0.5 to 1.0 lines based on defocus curve data. Patients reported better functional vision, but with a slight increase in reported starbursts in the mini monovision group.

One-year visual and astigmatic outcomes of keratoconus patients following sequential crosslinking and topography-guided surface ablation: the TOPOLINK study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate long-term visual and astigmatic outcomes of sequential corneal crosslinking (CXL) followed by topography-guided photorefractive keratectomy (PRK). SETTING: Single-practice outpatient setting. DESIGN: Retrospective case review. METHODS: This is a single-surgeon retrospective case review of eyes with keratoconus undergoing sequential CXL and then topography-guided PRK. Change in uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), topographic, refractive, and keratometric astigmatism was analyzed using power vector analyses at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months after topography-guided PRK. Changes in higher-order aberrations (HOAs), posterior astigmatism, spherical equivalent (SE), and central corneal thickness (CCT) were also analyzed. Correlations between age, time between CXL and PRK, sex, manifest SE, CCT, maximum and average keratometric values, and HOAs were evaluated for significance. RESULTS: Of the 62 eyes studied, regardless of refractive treatment, topography-guided PRK following CXL in patients with keratoconus improved CDVA (mean 20/30; 2-line improvement) and UDVA (mean 20/50; 4-line improvement). Over 12 months, visual acuity continued to improve across all eyes treated (P < .001). Overall, there were significant improvements in corneal astigmatism, maximum keratometry, mean keratometry, SE, posterior astigmatism, and total HOAs. No significant correlations were found between age, sex, time elapsed between CXL and PRK, and age at the time of either procedure on final visual acuity. CONCLUSIONS: Results of this study reinforced previous findings that topography-guided PRK in previously cross-linked keratoconus eyes proves to be an efficacious and safe method for improving visual acuity and reducing irregular corneal astigmatism, with continued improvement.

Effect Of Intracameral Phenylephrine And Ketorolac 1.0%/0.3% On Intraoperative Pain And Opioid Use During Cataract Surgery.

PURPOSE: To compare the effect of Omidria (phenylephrine and ketorolac 1.0%/0.3%) vs epinephrine on pain reduction and opioid usage during cataract surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty patients at a single center underwent femtosecond laser (FLACS) or conventional phacoemulsification under topical lidocaine gel anesthesia and intracameral preservative-free lidocaine 1%. Eligible participants were prospectively assigned to receive either intracameral phenylephrine and ketorolac 1.0%/0.3% or intracameral epinephrine. All patients received standardized pre- and post-operative topical therapy. Intravenous (IV) fentanyl was administered for ocular discomfort in patients who complained of intraoperative pain. Outcome measures included both pain (measured by mean visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores from 0 (no pain) to 10 (extreme pain)) and the use of IV fentanyl during surgery. A composite endpoint identified "responders" as being patients who: (1) did not require fentanyl and (2) experienced no to minimal pain (VAS score ≤ 3). RESULTS: Forty-one patients were in the phenylephrine and ketorolac 1.0%/0.3% (study) group and 19 were in the epinephrine (control) group. Mean VAS pain scores were significantly (48.9%) lower in the study group than the control group (2.3 vs 4.5; P < 0.0001). The proportion of patients with VAS scores ≤ 3 was significantly greater in the study group (85.0%) than the control group (31.6%) (P < 0.0001). A smaller proportion of patients required intraoperative fentanyl in the study group compared to the control group (9.8% vs 42.1%; P = 0.006). For the composite endpoint, patients receiving phenylephrine and ketorolac 1.0%/0.3% were 94% less likely to require fentanyl or to have moderate-to-severe pain (pain VAS ≥ 4; OR, 0.06; 95% CI 0.02-0.24) than patients receiving epinephrine. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that the routine use of intracameral phenylephrine and ketorolac 1.0%/0.3% during cataract surgery can significantly reduce patient pain as well as the need for opioids.

Extended depth-of-focus toric intraocular lens targeted for binocular emmetropia or slight myopia in the nondominant eye: Visual and refractive clinical outcomes.

PURPOSE: To compare the visual and refractive outcomes with a diffractive toric extended depth-of-focus (EDOF) intraocular lens (IOL) when both eyes are targeted for emmetropia and the nondominant eye is targeted for slight myopia. SETTING: Three clinical practices, United States. DESIGN: Prospective case series. METHODS: Patients having routine cataract surgery with bilateral Tecnis Symfony toric EDOF IOL implantation were assigned to 1 of 2 groups. In 1 group, the nondominant eye was targeted for -0.50 diopter (D) (mini-monovision). Assessments included uncorrected monocular and binocular visual acuities (logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution) at distance (4 m), intermediate (66 cm), and near (40 cm) and the postoperative residual refractive error. RESULTS: Forty patients were enrolled in each group, with 1 dropout. The mean postoperative residual refractive astigmatism was 0.25 D in both groups, with no statistically significant difference. The mean residual refractive astigmatism was 0.50 D or lower in 92% of eyes (72/78) in the mini-monovision group and 95% of eyes (74/78) in the emmetropia group 3 months postoperatively. The mini-monovision group had slightly worse uncorrected visual acuity at 4 m than the emmetropia group (0.16 versus 0.09; P = .002) but better uncorrected acuity at 40 cm (0.25 versus 0.34; P < .001). Binocular uncorrected acuity was not statistically significantly different between groups at 4 m (-0.03 versus -0.01; P = .33) or 66 cm (0.06 versus 0.04; P = .34) but was statistically significant at 40 cm (0.25 versus 0.19; P = .03). CONCLUSIONS: The EDOF toric IOL provided functional distance, intermediate, and near vision. A slight monovision approach appears to improve near visual acuity.