Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand ; 93(4): 399-407, 2014 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24575790

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether postpartum hemorrhage can be predicted in women with gestational hypertension or mild preeclampsia at term. DESIGN: A cohort study in which we used data from our multicentre randomized controlled trial (HYPITAT trial). SETTING: The study was conducted in 38 hospitals in the Netherlands between 2005 and 2008. POPULATION: Women with gestational hypertension or mild preeclampsia at term (n = 1132). METHODS: An antepartum model (model A) and an antepartum/intrapartum model (model B) were created using logistic regression. The predictive capacity of the models was assessed with receiver operating characteristic analysis and calibration. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Postpartum hemorrhage, defined as blood loss >1000 mL within 24 h after delivery. RESULTS: Postpartum hemorrhage occurred in 118 (10.4%) women. Maternal age (odds ratio 1.03), prepregnancy body mass index (odds ratio 0.96), and women with preeclampsia (odds ratio 1.5) were independent antepartum prognostic variables of postpartum hemorrhage. Intrapartum variables incorporated in the model were gestational age at delivery (odds ratio 1.2), duration of dilatation stage (odds ratio 1.1), and episiotomy (odds ratio 1.5). Model A and model B showed moderate discrimination, with areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.59 (95% confidence interval 0.53-0.64) and 0.64 (95% confidence interval 0.59-0.70), respectively. Calibration was moderate for model A (Hosmer-Lemeshow p = 0.26) but better for model B (Hosmer-Lemeshow p = 0.36). The rates of postpartum hemorrhage ranged from 4% (lowest 10%) to 22% (highest 10%). CONCLUSION: In the assessment of performance of a prediction model, calibration is more important than discriminative capacity. Our prediction model shows that for women with gestational hypertension or mild preeclampsia at term, distinction between low and high risk of developing postpartum hemorrhage is possible when antepartum and intrapartum variables are combined.


Assuntos
Hipertensão Induzida pela Gravidez/fisiopatologia , Modelos Estatísticos , Hemorragia Pós-Parto/etiologia , Pré-Eclâmpsia/fisiopatologia , Adulto , Análise de Variância , Índice de Massa Corporal , Calibragem , Estudos de Coortes , Parto Obstétrico , Feminino , Idade Gestacional , Humanos , Idade Materna , Estudos Multicêntricos como Assunto , Países Baixos/epidemiologia , Razão de Chances , Hemorragia Pós-Parto/epidemiologia , Hemorragia Pós-Parto/fisiopatologia , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Gravidez , Prognóstico , Curva ROC , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Índice de Gravidade de Doença
2.
Implement Sci ; 8: 3, 2013 Jan 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23281646

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Caesarean section (CS) rates are rising worldwide. In the Netherlands, the most significant rise is observed in healthy women with a singleton in vertex position between 37 and 42 weeks gestation, whereas it is doubtful whether an improved outcome for the mother or her child was obtained. It can be hypothesized that evidence-based guidelines on CS are not implemented sufficiently. Therefore, the present study has the following objectives: to develop quality indicators on the decision to perform a CS based on key recommendations from national and international guidelines; to use the quality indicators in order to gain insight into actual adherence of Dutch gynaecologists to guideline recommendations on the performance of a CS; to explore barriers and facilitators that have a direct effect on guideline application regarding CS; and to develop, execute, and evaluate a strategy in order to reduce the CS incidence for a similar neonatal outcome (based on the information gathered in the second and third objectives). METHODS: An independent expert panel of Dutch gynaecologists and midwives will develop a set of quality indicators on the decision to perform a CS. These indicators will be used to measure current care in 20 hospitals with a population of 1,000 women who delivered by CS, and a random selection of 1,000 women who delivered vaginally in the same period. Furthermore, by interviewing healthcare professionals and patients, the barriers and facilitators that may influence the decision to perform a CS will be measured. Based on the results, a tailor-made implementation strategy will be developed and tested in a controlled before-and-after study in 12 hospitals (six intervention, six control hospitals) with regard to effectiveness, experiences, and costs. DISCUSSION: This study will offer insight into the current CS care and into the hindering and facilitating factors influencing obstetrical policy on CS. Furthermore, it will allow definition of patient categories or situations in which a tailor-made implementation strategy will most likely be meaningful and cost effective, without negatively affecting the outcome for mother and child. TRIAL REGISTRATION: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov: NCT01261676.


Assuntos
Cesárea/estatística & dados numéricos , Fidelidade a Diretrizes/normas , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Complicações na Gravidez/cirurgia , Cesárea/economia , Protocolos Clínicos , Custos e Análise de Custo , Tomada de Decisões , Medicina Baseada em Evidências , Feminino , Ginecologia/economia , Ginecologia/normas , Hospitalização/economia , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Países Baixos , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Padrões de Prática Médica/economia , Padrões de Prática Médica/normas , Gravidez , Complicações na Gravidez/economia , Cuidado Pré-Natal/economia , Cuidado Pré-Natal/normas , Indicadores de Qualidade em Assistência à Saúde , Procedimentos Desnecessários/estatística & dados numéricos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA