RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To determine the measures to prevent spontaneous preterm birth (excluding preterm premature rupture of membranes)and its consequences. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The PubMed database, the Cochrane Library and the recommendations from the French and foreign obstetrical societies or colleges have been consulted. RESULTS: In France, premature birth concerns 60,000 neonates every year (7.4 %), half of them are delivered after spontaneous onset of labor. Among preventable risk factors of spontaneous prematurity, only cessation of smoking is associated to a decrease of prematurity (level of evidence [LE] 1). This is therefore recommended (grade A). Routine screening and treatment of vaginal bacteriosis in general population is not recommended (grade A). Asymptomatic women with single pregnancy without history of preterm delivery and a short cervix between 16 and 24 weeks is the only population in which vaginal progesterone is recommended (grade B). A history-indicated cerclage is not recommended in case of only past history of conisation (grade C), uterine malformation (Professional consensus), isolated history of pretem delivery (grade B) or twin pregnancies in primary (grade B) or secondary (grade C) prevention of preterm birth. A history-indicated cerclage is recommended for single pregnancy with a history of at least 3 late miscarriages or preterm deliveries (grade A).). In case of past history of a single pregnancy delivery before 34 weeks gestation (WG), ultrasound cervical length screening is recommended between 16 and 22 WG in order to propose a cerclage in case of length<25mm before 24 WG (grade C). Cervical pessary is not recommended for the prevention of preterm birth in a general population of asymptomatic women with a twin pregnancy (grade A) and in populations of asymptomatic women with a short cervix (Professional consensus). Although the implementation of a universal transvaginal cervical length screening at 18-24 weeks of gestation in women with a singleton gestation and no history of preterm birth can be considered by individual practitioners, this screening cannot be universally recommended. In case of preterm labor, (i) it is not possible to recommend one of the methods over another (ultrasound of the cervical length, vaginal examination, fetal fibronectin) to predict preterm birth (grade B); (ii) routine antibiotic therapy is not recommended (grade A); (iii) prolonged hospitalization (grade B) and bed rest (grade C) is not recommended. Compared with placebo, tocolytics are not associated with a reduction in neonatal mortality or morbidity (LE2) and maternal severe adverse effects may occur with all tocolytics (LE4). Atosiban and nifedipine (grade B), contrary to betamimetics (grade C), can be used for tocolysis in spontaneous preterm labour without preterm premature rupture of membranes. Maintenance tocolysis is not recomended (grade B). Antenatal corticosteroid administration is recommended to every woman at risk of preterm delivery before 34 weeks of gestation (grade A). After 34 weeks, evidences are not consistent enough to recommend systematic antenatal corticosteroid treatment (grade B), however, a course might be indicated in the clinical situations associated with the higher risk of severe respiratory distress syndrome, mainly in case of planned cesarean delivery (grade C). Repeated courses of antenatal corticosteroids are not recommended (grade A). Rescue courses are not recommended (Professional consensus). Magnesium sulfate administration is recommended to women at high risk of imminent preterm birth before 32WG (grade A). Cesarean is not recommended in case of vertex presentation (Professional consensus). Both planned vaginal or elective cesarean delivery is possible in case of breech presentation (Professional consensus). A delayed cord clamping may be considered if the neonatal or maternal state so permits (Professional consensus). CONCLUSION: Except for antenatal corticosteroid and magnesium sulfate administration, diagnostic tools or prenatal pharmacological treatments implemented since 30 years to prevent preterm birth and its consequences have not matched expectations of caregivers and families.
Assuntos
Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Nascimento Prematuro/prevenção & controle , Feminino , Humanos , Gravidez , Nascimento Prematuro/epidemiologia , Nascimento Prematuro/etiologiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To determine the post-partum management of women and their newborn whatever the mode of delivery. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The PubMed database, the Cochrane Library and the recommendations from the French and foreign obstetrical societies or colleges have been consulted. RESULTS: Because breastfeeding is associated with a decrease in neonatal morbidity (lower frequency of cardiovascular diseases, infectious, atopic or infantile obesity) (EL2) and an improvement in the cognitive development of children (EL2), exclusive and extended breastfeeding is recommended (grade B) between 4 to 6 months (Professional consensus). In order to increase the rate of breastfeeding initiation and its duration, it is recommended that health professionals work closely with mothers in their project (grade A) and to promote breastfeeding on demand (grade B). There is no scientific evidence to recommend non-pharmacological measures of inhibition of lactation (Professional consensus). Pharmacological treatments for inhibition of lactation should not be given routinely to women who do not wish to breastfeed (Professional consensus). Because of potentially serious adverse effects, bromocriptin is contraindicated in inhibiting lactation (Professional consensus). For women aware of the risks of pharmacological treatment of inhibition of lactation, lisuride and cabergolin are the preferred drugs (Professional consensus). Whatever the mode of delivery, numeration blood count is not systematically recommended in a general population (Professional consensus). Anemia must be sought only in women with bleeding or symptoms of anemia (Professional consensus). The only treatment of post-dural puncture headache is the blood patch (EL2), it must not be carried out before 48 h (Professional consensus). Women vaccination status and their family is to be assessed in the early post-partum (Professional consensus). Immediate postoperative monitoring after caesarean delivery should be performed in the recovery room, but in exceptional circumstances, it may be performed in the delivery unit provided safety rules are maintained and regulatory authorities are informed (Professional consensus). An analgesic multimodal protocol developed by the medical team should be available and oral way should be favored (Professional consensus) (grade B). For every cesarean delivery, thromboprophylaxis with elastic stockings applied on the morning of the surgery and kept for at least 7 postoperative days is recommended (Professional consensus) with or without the addition of LMWH according to the presence or not of additional risk factors, and depending on the risk factor (major, minor). Early postoperative rehabilitation is encouraged (Professional consensus). Postpartum visit should be planned 6 to 8 weeks after delivery and can be performed by an obstetrician, a gynecologist, a general practitioner or a midwife, after normal pregnancy and delivery (Professional consensus). Starting effective contraception later 21 days after delivery in women who do not want closely spaced pregnancy is recommended (grade B), and to prescribe it at the maternity (Professional consensus). According to the postpartum risk of venous thromboembolism, the combined hormonal contraceptive use before six postpartum weeks is not recommended (grade B). Rehabilitation in asymptomatic women in order to prevent urinary or anal incontinence in medium or long-term is not recommended (Expert consensus). Pelvic-floor rehabilitation using pelvic-floor muscle contraction exercises is recommended to treat persistent urinary incontinence at 3 months postpartum (grade A), regardless of the type of incontinence. Postpartum pelvic-floor rehabilitation is recommended to treat anal incontinence (grade C). Postpartum pelvic-floor rehabilitation is not recommended to treat or prevent prolapse (grade C) or dyspareunia (grade C). The optimal time for maternity discharge for low risk newborn depends more on the organisation of the post-discharge follow up (Professional consensus). The months following the birth are a transitional period, and psychological alterations concern all parents (EL2). It is more difficult in case of psychosocial risk factors (EL2). In situations of proven psychological difficulties, the impact on the psycho-emotional development of children can be important (EL3). Among these difficulties, postpartum depression is the most common situation. However, the risk is generally higher in the perinatal period for all mental disorders (EL3). CONCLUSION: Postpartum is, for clinicians, a unique and privileged opportunity to address the physical, psychological, social and somatic health of their patients.
Assuntos
Parto Obstétrico/reabilitação , Cuidado Pós-Natal/normas , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Aleitamento Materno/psicologia , Aleitamento Materno/estatística & dados numéricos , Consenso , Anticoncepção/métodos , Anticoncepção/normas , Anticoncepção/estatística & dados numéricos , Contraindicações , Parto Obstétrico/métodos , Parto Obstétrico/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Cuidado Pós-Natal/métodos , Cuidado Pós-Natal/estatística & dados numéricos , Período Pós-Parto/fisiologia , Período Pós-Parto/psicologia , Padrões de Prática Médica/normas , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , GravidezRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To propose guidelines for clinical practice for routine postnatal visit and after pathological pregnancies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Bibliographic searches were performed with PubMed and Cochrane databases, and within international guidelines references. RESULTS: Postpartum visit should be planned 6 to 8 weeks after delivery and can be performed by an obstetrician, a gynecologist, a general practitioner or a midwife, when after normal pregnancy and delivery (Professional consensus). If any complication occurred, this visit should be handled by an obstetrician (Professional consensus). Physical examination should focus on patient symptoms and pregnancy complications (Professional consensus). Gynecological examination is not systematic (Professional consensus). Pap smear should be performed if previous exam was done more than 2years ago or when the previous exam was abnormal (Professional consensus). Weight should be measured to encourage weight loss (Professional consensus), with the aim to catch up preconceptional weight within 6 months after delivery (gradeC). Professional intervention may reduce weight retention (professional consensus). Tobacco, alcohol and illicit drugs cessation should be promoted (grade B) and supported by a professional (grade A). Obstetrical risks consecutive to short interval between pregnancies should be explained (evidence level [EL]: 3) and contraception discussed regarding family project (Professional consensus). Mother mood, mother to child relationship and breastfeeding troubles should be systematically evaluated (professional consensus). Pelvic-floor rehabilitation should be performed only when urinary of fecal incontinence persist 3 months after delivery (Professional consensus). Serological screening for toxoplamosis (grade B) and blood hemoglobin concentration should not be systematically performed (gradeC). After spontaneous preterm birth, women should be screened for uterine anomalies and treatment should be discussed (Professional consensus). Evidence is lacking to recommend any exploration to diagnose cervical incompetence (Professional consensus). When investigations are performed, there is no argument to recommend a specific exam (Professional consensus). Women should be screened for antiphospholipid antibodies after severe or early pre-eclampsia, IUGR or intra-uterine fetal death (Professional consensus) but screening for inherited thrombophilia is not recommended (grade B). Women with persistent proteinuria and/or hypertension 3 months after pre-eclampsia should be referred to a nephrologist (Professional consensus). Normalization of liver enzymes should be checked 8 to 12 weeks after intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (Professional consensus). A synthetic document should be send to the women corresponding physicians (Professional consensus). Preconceptional counseling is recommended (Professional consensus). CONCLUSION: A postpartum visit is recommended 6 to 8 weeks after delivery, including mother physical and psychological evaluation and information about contraception, short interval between pregnancy, weight loss, smoking cessation (Professional consensus). To ensure continuity in the management of women health, relevant medical elements will be pass on to the corresponding physicians (Professional consensus).
Assuntos
Visita a Consultório Médico , Cuidado Pós-Natal , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Padrões de Prática Médica/normas , Complicações na Gravidez/reabilitação , Consenso , Anticoncepção/métodos , Anticoncepção/estatística & dados numéricos , Parto Obstétrico/reabilitação , Parto Obstétrico/normas , Parto Obstétrico/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Visita a Consultório Médico/estatística & dados numéricos , Cuidado Pós-Natal/métodos , Cuidado Pós-Natal/normas , Cuidado Pós-Natal/estatística & dados numéricos , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Gravidez , Complicações na Gravidez/epidemiologiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The risk of gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN) after a hydatidiform mole (HM) is well known. However, the risk of GTN after normalisation of hCG in HM is poorly reported. The aim of this study was to evaluate the risk of GTN after normalisation of hCG according to HM types. METHODS: This prospective cohort study carried out between 2000 and 2010 used the database of the French Trophoblastic Disease Centre (FTDC). A total of 2008 registered patients with ascertained types of HM were analysed. Cases of GTN occurring after normalisation of hCG were analysed. RESULTS: A GTN developed in 239 out of 1980 HMs (12.1%) and 6 out of these 239 post-molar GTN (2.5%) were diagnosed after normalisation of hCG. The risk of GTN after normalisation of hCG was 0.34% (6/1747) following a HM, 0% (0/593) after a partial HM (PHM), 0.36% (4/1122) after a complete HM (CHM), and 9.5% (2/21) after a multiple pregnancy with HM. CONCLUSIONS: The risk of post-molar GTN justifies hCG monitoring in all women with HM. However, after normalisation of hCG, monitoring of PHM can be stopped safely while it should be maintained for CHM and more importantly for multiple pregnancies with HM.
Assuntos
Gonadotropina Coriônica/sangue , Doença Trofoblástica Gestacional/sangue , Mola Hidatiforme/sangue , Adulto , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , França/epidemiologia , Doença Trofoblástica Gestacional/epidemiologia , Doença Trofoblástica Gestacional/patologia , Humanos , Mola Hidatiforme/epidemiologia , Mola Hidatiforme/patologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Gravidez , Estudos Prospectivos , RiscoRESUMO
Preterm premature rupture of the membranes (PPROM) begins a high-risk period for both mother and fetus. This literature review updates the knowledge on latency-period complications and proposed monitoring strategies. Four latency-period complications are described: spontaneous onset of labor, infection (chorioamnionitis), abruptio placentae, and fetal, distress which can be linked to umbilical cord prolapse. Admittedly, the infection/inflammation process plays a key role during the latency period. Conservative management of PPROM is recommended and is associated with significant pregnancy prolongation. This strategy allows a gain in fetal maturity, but increases the risk of complications. The prediction of infection seems to be essential; classical markers, such as blood count and reactive C protein are not very effective. New markers have been tested, with IL-6 appearing to be one of the best infection markers. Fetal pulmonary maturity can be evaluated with a rapid screening test and can yield arguments for the management strategy.
Assuntos
Descolamento Prematuro da Placenta/etiologia , Corioamnionite/etiologia , Sofrimento Fetal/etiologia , Ruptura Prematura de Membranas Fetais/diagnóstico , Monitorização Fetal , Trabalho de Parto Prematuro/etiologia , Líquido Amniótico/química , Biomarcadores/sangue , Feminino , Ruptura Prematura de Membranas Fetais/imunologia , Humanos , Interleucina-6/sangue , Gravidez , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
Non closure of the peritoneum at cesarean is still debatable, despite the national and international guidelines. This review aims at exposing risks and benefits of non closure of the peritoneum, focusing on the peritoneum adhesions. Many studies demonstrated no benefits at peritoneum closure in the duration of surgery, the immediate postoperative period and the short-term complications. Data about pelvic adhesion risk are more inconsistent. Different criteria were considered in the studies: adhesions incidence and density during subsequent cesareans or pelvic surgeries, duration of surgery and the delay between incision and birth during the subsequent cesarean and fertility known to be impaired by thick-pelvic adhesions. Most of the studies are exhibiting serious bias, leading to weak conclusions. However, two randomised controlled trials compared pelvic adhesion in the subsequent c-section, in step with closure or non closure of the parietal and visceral peritoneum at first caesarean. The results showed that non closure of the peritoneum does not increase or even reduce the adhesions risk. These results are consistent with results from three studies reporting no modification of patient fertility. As a conclusion, current data are supporting the national and international medical society recommendations about the benefits of the non closure of the peritoneum at caesarean section.
Assuntos
Cesárea/métodos , Doenças Peritoneais/etiologia , Doenças Peritoneais/prevenção & controle , Cesárea/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Humanos , Gravidez , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Aderências Teciduais/etiologia , Aderências Teciduais/prevenção & controle , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To review the need for the removal of functional ovarian cysts. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Over a 5-year period, between July 1994 and June 1999, all functional ovarian cysts files were reviewed in order to determine the main surgical indication. RESULTS: Thirty-four functional ovarian cysts (11.45%) were removed during that period. In 14 cases, the surgical operation was considered justified. In 32 cases, the cysts were not organic as supposed to be and had no reason to be removed. DISCUSSION: Reported functional ovarian cyst removal rates range from 15 to 30%. Present exploration means (particularly ultrasound-guided needle aspiration) does not permit to discriminate functional from organic cysts in more than 70% of the cases. CONCLUSION: It is impossible to reduce functional cyst removal rate to 0% but we should all evaluate our activity yearly and be able to limit this rate to less than 30%.
Assuntos
Cistos Ovarianos/cirurgia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Biópsia por Agulha , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Cistos Ovarianos/diagnóstico , Cistos Ovarianos/patologia , Neoplasias Ovarianas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Ovarianas/patologia , Pós-Menopausa , UltrassonografiaRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Laparoscopy allows to perform Burch colposuspension in case of genuine urinary stress incontinence but this approach must not lead to reduced success rates. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to describe laparoscopic Burch techniques and evaluate urinary continence and satisfaction rates. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Clinical and urodynamic data were reviewed for 48 consecutive patients operated on from May 1993 to June 1999. The methods for entering the space of Retzius and performing the colposuspension were analyzed. The continence and satisfaction rates were evaluated with a questionnaire. RESULTS: The operative technique we are now using is the extraperitoneal approach with an umbilical trocar site. A non-absorbable mesh is fixed to the Cooper's ligament and to the vaginal fascia. With a mean follow-up of 41 months, the satisfaction rate is 76.8% with a cure rate of 37.3% and an improvement rate of 41.8%. CONCLUSION: Long term results with laparoscopic Burch colposuspension are relatively good but a bit lower than those published with traditional open technique. The effects of the learning curve with an evolving technique are to be considered when analyzing the results.
Assuntos
Colposcopia , Incontinência Urinária por Estresse/cirurgia , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Satisfação do Paciente , Micção , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Urológicos/métodosRESUMO
Abdominal wall metastasis to laparoscopic trochar sites after preoperative staging procedure is rare for uterine cervix cancer. Prognosis is unfavorable. We report a case of metastasis to a laparoscopic trochar site in a patient with a stage IIB cervical cancer with no nodal involvement who is alive four and a half years after radical surgery and radiotherapy.