Aortic root translocation and en bloc rotation of the outflow tracts surgery for complex forms of transposition of the great arteries and double outlet right ventricle: A multicenter study.

OBJECTIVE: There are several choices for the correction of complex transposition of the great arteries and double outlet right ventricle not amenable to the Rastelli-type surgery, but outcome data are limited to small series. This study aims to report results after the aortic root translocation and en bloc rotation of the outflow tract procedures. METHODS: This is a retrospective, multicentric, observational study. Clinical, anatomy, procedural, and detailed follow-up data (median, 4.43 years) were collected. RESULTS: A total of 70 patients (62.9% male; median age, 1 year; range 4 days to 12.4 years) were included: n = 43 in the aortic root translocation group and n = 27 in the en bloc rotation group. Those in the aortic root translocation group were older (P = .01) and more likely to have had previous procedures (P < .0001), but cardiac anatomy was similar in both groups. Aortic root translocation and en bloc rotation early mortality (30 days) was similar (4.7% vs 3.7%, P = .8). Late survival and freedom from any cardiac reintervention were 92.7% and 16.9% at 15 years overall, respectively. Freedom from right ventricular outflow tract/conduit reintervention was better in the en bloc rotation group than in the aortic root translocation group (100% vs 24.5%, P = .0003), but more patients in the en bloc rotation group had moderate (or worse) aortic valve regurgitation during follow-up (16% vs 2.6%, P = .07). CONCLUSIONS: Both aortic root translocation and en bloc rotation are valuable surgical options for the treatment of complex transposition of the great arteries and double outlet right ventricle. In the en bloc rotation group, there was better freedom from right ventricular outflow tract reinterventions, but a higher probability of aortic valve regurgitation. Identifying the main driving forces for these observed differences requires further study of these procedures.

Four-year outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention of unprotected left main coronary artery disease in patients with stable angina and acute coronary syndrome.

Background. Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of unprotected left main coronary artery disease (ULMCAD) have become a feasible and efficient alternative to coronary artery bypass surgery, especially in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). There are limited data regarding early and late outcomes after ULMCAD PCI in patients with ACS and stable angina.The aim of this study was to compare early and four-year clinical outcomes in patients with ULMCAD PCI presenting as ACS or stable angina in a high-volume PCI center.Methods. We conducted a single center retrospective observational study, which included 146 patients with ULMCAD undergoing PCI between 2014 and 2018. Patients were divided in two groups: Group A included patients with stable angina (n = 70, 47.9%) and Group B patients with ACS (n = 76, 52.1%).Results. 30-day mortality was 8.22% overall, lower in Group A (1.43% vs 14.47%, p = 0.02). Mortality and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) rates at 4 years were significantly lower in Group A (9.64% vs 33.25%, p = 0.001, and 24.06% vs 40.11%, p = 0.012, respectively). Target lesion revascularization (TLR) at 4 year did not differ between groups (15% in Group A vs 12.76% in Group B, p = 0.5).Conclusions. In our study patients with ULMCAD and ACS undergoing PCI had higher early and long-term mortality and MACE rates compared to patients with stable angina, with similar TLR rate at 4-year follow-up.

The Ross procedure versus prosthetic and homograft aortic valve replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: Young adults undergoing aortic valve replacement (AVR) have decreased life expectancy compared to matched controls. The Ross procedure aims to improve valve lifespan while avoiding anticoagulation. We prepared a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the Ross procedure compared to conventional AVR. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane CENTRAL for studies evaluating the Ross procedure versus any conventional AVR in adult patients. We performed screening, full-text assessment, risk of bias evaluation and data collection independently and in duplicate. We evaluated the risk of bias with the ROBINS-I and Cochrane tools and quality of evidence with the GRADE framework. We pooled data using the random- and fixed-effects models. RESULTS: Thirteen observational studies and 2 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were identified (n = 5346). No observational study was rated as having low risk of bias. The Ross procedure was associated with decreased late mortality in observational and RCT data [mean length of follow-up 2.6 years, relative risk (RR) 0.56, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.38-0.84, I2 = 58%, very low quality]. The RCT estimate of effect was similar (mean length of follow-up 8.8 years, RR 0.33, 95% CI 0.11-0.96, I2 = 66%, very low quality). No difference was observed in mortality <30 days after surgery. All-site reintervention was similar between groups in cohorts and significantly reduced by the Ross procedure in RCTs (RR 1.41, 95% CI 0.89-2.24, I2 = 55%, very low quality and RR 0.41, 95% CI 0.22-0.78, I2 = 68%, high quality, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Observational data, with residual confounding, and RCT data suggest a late survival benefit with the Ross procedure with no increased risk of reintervention when compared to conventional AVR. Considering the quality of available evidence and limited follow-up, additional high-quality randomized studies are required to strengthen these findings. Systematic review PROSPERO registration: CRD42016052512.

Indications and results of systemic to pulmonary shunts: results from a national database.

OBJECTIVES: The systemic-to-pulmonary shunt (SPS) remains an important palliative therapy in many congenital heart defects. Unlike other surgical treatments, the mortality after shunt operations has risen. We used an audit dataset to investigate potential reasons for this change and to report national results. METHODS: A total of 1993 patients classified in 13 diagnoses underwent an SPS procedure between 2000 and 2013. Indication trends by era and also results before repair or next stage are reported. A dynamic hazard model with competing risks and modulated renewal was used to determine predictors of outcomes. RESULTS: The usage of SPS in Tetralogy of Fallot (ToF) has significantly decreased in the last decade, with cases of single ventricle (SV) and pulmonary atresia (PA) with septal communication increasing (P < 0.001 for trends). This is correlated with an increase of early mortality from 5.1% in the first half of the decade to 9.8% in the latter (P = 0.007 for trend). At 1.5 years, 13.9% of patients have died, 17.8% had a shunt reintervention and 68.3% of patients are alive and reintervention-free. Low weight, PA-intact septum, SV and central shunt type are among the factors associated with increased mortality, whereas PA-ventricular septal defect, corrected transposition, isomerism, central shunt and low weight are among those associated with increased reintervention, also having a dynamic effect on the relative risk when compared with ToF patients. Shunt reinterventions are not associated with worse outcomes when adjusted by other covariates, but they do have higher 30-day mortality if occurring earlier than 30 days from the index (P < 0.001). Patients operated in later years were found to have significantly lower survival at a distance from index. CONCLUSIONS: The observed historical rise in mortality for shunt operations relates to complex factors including changing practice for repair of ToF and for univentricular palliation. PA and SV patients are the groups of patients at the highest risk of death. Small size, shunt type and underlying anatomical defect are the main determinants of outcomes. Trends in indication and mortality seem to indicate that more severely ill patients benefit from shunting, but with an increase in mortality.