RESUMO
Plerixafor is a CXC chemokine receptor (CXCR4) antagonist that mobilizes stem cells in the peripheral blood. It is indicated (in combination with granulocyte-colony stimulating factor [G-CSF]) to enhance the harvest of adequate quantities of cluster differentiation (CD) 34+ cells for autologous transplantation in patients with lymphoma or multiple myeloma whose cells mobilize poorly. Strategies for use include delayed re-mobilization after a failed mobilization attempt with G-CSF, and rescue or pre-emptive mobilization in patients in whom mobilization with G-CSF is likely to fail. Pre-emptive use has the advantage that it avoids the need to re-schedule the transplant procedure, with its attendant inconvenience, quality-of-life issues for the patient and cost of additional admissions to the transplant unit. UK experience from 2 major centers suggests that pre-emptive plerixafor is associated with an incremental drug cost of less than £2000 when averaged over all patients undergoing peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) transplant. A CD34+ cell count of <15 µl-1 at the time of recovery after chemomobilization or after four days of G-CSF treatment, or an apheresis yield of <1 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg on the first day of apheresis, could be used to predict the need for pre-emptive plerixafor.
Assuntos
Quimiorradioterapia/métodos , Consenso , Mobilização de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/métodos , Compostos Heterocíclicos/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico , Benzilaminas , Ciclamos , Mobilização de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/economia , Compostos Heterocíclicos/economia , Humanos , Neoplasias/terapia , Transplante de Células-Tronco de Sangue Periférico/métodos , Células-Tronco de Sangue Periférico/efeitos dos fármacos , Pré-Medicação , Transplante Autólogo , Reino UnidoRESUMO
Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) has been used for over 35 years in the treatment of erythrodermic cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) and over 20 years for chronic and acute graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) and solid organ transplant rejection. ECP for CTCL and GvHD is available at specialised centres across the UK. The lack of prospective randomised trials in ECP led to the development of UK Consensus Statements for patient selection, treatment schedules, monitoring protocols and patient assessment criteria for ECP. The recent literature has been reviewed and considered when writing this update. Most notably, the national transition from the UVAR XTS® machine to the new CELLEX machine for ECP with dual access and a shorter treatment time has led to relevant changes in these schedules. This consensus statement updates the previous statement from 2007 on the treatment of CTCL and GvHD with ECP using evidence based medicine and best medical practise and includes guidelines for both children and adults.
Assuntos
Rejeição de Enxerto/terapia , Doença Enxerto-Hospedeiro/terapia , Linfoma Cutâneo de Células T/terapia , Fotoferese/métodos , Consenso , Humanos , Reino UnidoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Plerixafor with granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) has been shown to enhance stem cell mobilization in patients with multiple myeloma and lymphoma with previous mobilization failure. In this European named patient program we report the experience in insufficiently mobilizing patients diagnosed with nonhematologic diseases. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Thirty-three patients with germ cell tumor (n=11), Ewing sarcoma (n=6), Wiscott-Aldrich disease (n=5), neuroblastoma (n=4), and other nonhematologic diseases (n=7) were included in the study. Plerixafor was limited to patients with previous or current stem cell mobilization failure and given after 4 days of G-CSF (n=21) or after chemotherapy and G-CSF (n=12) in patients who mobilized poorly. RESULTS: Overall, 28 (85%) patients succeeded in collecting at least 2×10(6)/kg body weight (b.w.) CD34+ cells (median, 5.0×10(6)/kg b.w. CD34+ cells; range, 2.0×10(6)-29.5×10(6)/kg b.w. CD34+ cells), and five (15%) patients collected a median of 1.5×10(6)/kg b.w. CD34+ cells (range, 0.9×10(6)-1.8×10(6)/kg b.w. CD34+ cells). Nineteen patients proceeded to transplantation. The median dose of CD34+ cells infused was 3.3×10(6)/kg b.w. (range, 2.3×10(6)-6.7×10(6)/kg b.w. CD34+ cells). The median numbers of days to neutrophil and platelet engraftment were 11 (range, 9-12) and 15 (range, 10-25) days, respectively. CONCLUSION: These data emphasize the role of plerixafor in combination with G-CSF or chemotherapy and G-CSF as an effective mobilization regimen with the potential of successful stem cell collection. Accordingly, plerixafor seems to be safe and effective in patients with nonhematologic diseases. Larger prospective studies are warranted to further assess its use in these patients.
Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Remoção de Componentes Sanguíneos/métodos , Mobilização de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/métodos , Compostos Heterocíclicos/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico , Transplante de Células-Tronco/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Fármacos Anti-HIV/uso terapêutico , Benzilaminas , Neoplasias Ósseas/tratamento farmacológico , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Terapia Combinada , Ciclamos , Europa (Continente) , Feminino , Fator Estimulador de Colônias de Granulócitos/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias Embrionárias de Células Germinativas/tratamento farmacológico , Neuroblastoma/tratamento farmacológico , Sarcoma de Ewing/tratamento farmacológico , Síndrome de Wiskott-Aldrich/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto JovemRESUMO
Fludarabine and lenalidomide are essential drugs in the front-line treatment of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) and multiple myeloma (MM), respectively. Data suggests that fludarabine and lenalidomide therapy may have a deleterious effect on stem cell mobilization. In the European compassionate use program, 48 patients (median age 57 years) previously treated with fludarabine (median 5 cycles; range: 1-7 cycles) were given plerixafor plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) for remobilization following a primary mobilization attempt. The overall median number of CD34+ cells collected was 2.3 × 10(6)/kg (range: 0.3-13.4). The minimum required number of CD34+ cells (≥2.0 × 10(6)/kg) was collected from 58% of patients in a median of 2 days. Thirty-five patients (median age = 57 years) previously treated with lenalidomide (median 5 cycles; range: 1-10 cycles) were given plerixafor plus G-CSF for remobilization. The overall median number of CD34+ cells collected was 3.4 × 10(6)/kg (range: 1.1-14.8). The minimum required number of CD34+ cells (≥2.0 × 10(6) per kg) was collected from 69% of patients in a median of 2 days. In conclusion, salvage mobilization with plerixafor plus G-CSF is successful in the majority of patients with MM previously treated with lenalidomide. In fludarabine-exposed patients, only 58% of patients will achieve successful salvage mobilization with plerixafor plus G-CSF, suggesting the need for novel mobilization regimens algorithms in this subgroup of patients.
Assuntos
Fármacos Anti-HIV/administração & dosagem , Antineoplásicos/administração & dosagem , Mobilização de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/métodos , Compostos Heterocíclicos/administração & dosagem , Linfoma não Hodgkin/terapia , Mieloma Múltiplo/terapia , Transplante de Células-Tronco de Sangue Periférico , Talidomida/análogos & derivados , Vidarabina/análogos & derivados , Adulto , Idoso , Fármacos Anti-HIV/efeitos adversos , Antígenos CD34/sangue , Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos , Benzilaminas , Ensaios de Uso Compassivo , Ciclamos , Feminino , Fator Estimulador de Colônias de Granulócitos/administração & dosagem , Fator Estimulador de Colônias de Granulócitos/efeitos adversos , Compostos Heterocíclicos/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Lenalidomida , Linfoma não Hodgkin/sangue , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Mieloma Múltiplo/sangue , Talidomida/administração & dosagem , Talidomida/efeitos adversos , Fatores de Tempo , Transplante Autólogo , Vidarabina/administração & dosagem , Vidarabina/efeitos adversosRESUMO
A phase I-II study of high-dose (HD) alkylating agents in newly diagnosed patients with multiple myeloma after maximum response to Z-Dex (idarubicin, dexamethasone) therapy and DHAP (cisplatin, HD cytosine arabinoside, dexamethasone), stem cell mobilization is reported. Twenty-six patients, median age 56 years (range 42-66), completed Z-Dex chemotherapy and peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) were mobilized with DHAP. Patients then preceded to cyclophosphamide (HD Cy: 6 g/m(2)) with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor followed by busulphan-melphalan-conditioned PBSC autograft. Interferon alpha was introduced at 3 months post transplant as maintenance therapy. Six patients failed to complete the full protocol. Median time from diagnosis to transplantation was 8 months (range 6-12). Mean CD34+ cell dose collected was 15.8 x 10(6)/kg (CI 11.8, 19.8). Median time from DHAP to HD-Cy was 6 weeks (range 4-12) and from HD-Cy to transplant was 8 weeks (range 6-12). The median follow-up was 36 months (range 6-63). On an intent-to-treat basis, the response rates were three complete response (CR, 12%), 21 partial response (PR, 80%) and two stable disease (SD, 8%) post Z-Dex, five CR (19%) and 21 PR (81%) post HD-Cy, and 14 CR (54%) and 12 PR (46%) post transplant. The treatment-related mortality (TRM) was 4% (1 patient). Median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) have not been reached; estimated values were 60 and 48 months respectively. The 3-year OS and PFS were 72% and 62%. Actuarial 5-year OS and event-free survival were 49% and 32%. DHAP produces effective PBSC mobilization and sequential HD therapy, including autologous PBSCT, in patients who received Z-Dex; this offers significant durable disease response rates with acceptable TRM.