Atrial fibrillation is associated with higher first pass effect following thrombectomy for large vessel occlusion.

BACKGROUND: First pass effect (FPE), defined as single-pass complete or near complete reperfusion during endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) for large vessel occlusion (LVO) strokes, is a critical performance metric. Atrial fibrillation (AF)-related strokes have different clot composition compared with non-AF strokes, which may impact thrombectomy reperfusion results. We compared FPE rates in AF and non-AF stroke patients to evaluate if AF-related strokes had higher FPE rates. METHODS: We conducted a post-hoc analysis of the DIRECT-SAFE trial data, including patients with retrievable clots on the initial angiographic run. Patients were categorized into AF and non-AF groups. The primary outcome was the presence or absence of FPE (single-pass, single-device resulting in complete/near complete reperfusion) in AF and non-AF groups. We used multivariable logistic regression to examine the association between FPE and AF, adjusting for thrombolysis pre-thrombectomy and clot location. RESULTS: We included 253 patients (67 with AF, 186 without AF). AF patients were older (mean age: 74 years vs 67.5 years, p=0.001), had a higher proportion of females (55% vs 40%, p=0.044), and experienced more severe strokes (median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score: 17 vs 14, p=0.009) than non-AF patients. No differences were observed in thrombolytic agent usage, time metrics, or clot location. AF patients achieved a higher proportion of FPE compared with non-AF patients (55.22% vs 37.3%, adjusted odds ratio 2.00 (95% CI 1.13 to 3.55), p=0.017). CONCLUSIONS: AF-related strokes in LVO patients treated with EVT were associated with FPE. This highlights the need for preparedness for multiple passes and potential adjuvant/rescue therapy in non-AF-related strokes.

Association of follow-up infarct volume with functional outcome in acute ischemic stroke: a pooled analysis of seven randomized trials.

BACKGROUND: Follow-up infarct volume (FIV) has been recommended as an early indicator of treatment efficacy in patients with acute ischemic stroke. Questions remain about the optimal imaging approach for FIV measurement. OBJECTIVE: To examine the association of FIV with 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score and investigate its dependency on acquisition time and modality. METHODS: Data of seven trials were pooled. FIV was assessed on follow-up (12 hours to 2 weeks) CT or MRI. Infarct location was defined as laterality and involvement of the Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score regions. Relative quality and strength of multivariable regression models of the association between FIV and functional outcome were assessed. Dependency of imaging modality and acquisition time (≤48 hours vs >48 hours) was evaluated. RESULTS: Of 1665 included patients, 83% were imaged with CT. Median FIV was 41 mL (IQR 14-120). A large FIV was associated with worse functional outcome (OR=0.88(95% CI 0.87 to 0.89) per 10 mL) in adjusted analysis. A model including FIV, location, and hemorrhage type best predicted mRS score. FIV of ≥133 mL was highly specific for unfavorable outcome. FIV was equally strongly associated with mRS score for assessment on CT and MRI, even though large differences in volume were present (48 mL (IQR 15-131) vs 22 mL (IQR 8-71), respectively). Associations of both early and late FIV assessments with outcome were similar in strength (ρ=0.60(95% CI 0.56 to 0.64) and ρ=0.55(95% CI 0.50 to 0.60), respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with an acute ischemic stroke due to a proximal intracranial occlusion of the anterior circulation, FIV is a strong independent predictor of functional outcome and can be assessed before 48 hours, oneither CT or MRI.

Current status of pipeline embolization device in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: a review.

OBJECTIVE: Pipeline embolization device (PED) implantation is a novel endovascular treatment option for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms. It is emerging as a useful alternative to coiling and to open surgery, and its use is increasing worldwide. We performed a literature review to examine its efficacy, technical challenges, and safety. METHODS: PubMed database was used to identify all articles relating to PED. RESULTS: The review outlines the indications for PED, its technical aspects, complications, and clinical outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: PED offers an alternative to endovascular coiling for aneurysms with complex morphology. The indication for its use has evolved from the limited scope of treatment of giant aneurysms with wide necks to the inclusion of smaller aneurysms. The procedural safety profile of PED is comparable with or possibly superior to balloon-remodeling or stent-assisted coil embolization in specific circumstances. However, questions remain regarding the incidence of post-procedural subarachnoid hemorrhage. Ongoing monitoring and meticulous documentation of PED postimplantation safety is strongly recommended.

Does treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms within 24 hours improve clinical outcome?

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to analyze whether treating ruptured intracranial aneurysms within 24 hours of subarachnoid hemorrhage improves clinical outcome. METHODS: An 11-year database of consecutive ruptured intracranial aneurysms treated with endovascular coiling or craniotomy and clipping was analyzed. Outcome was measured by the modified Rankin Scale at 6 months. Our policy is to treat all cases within 24 hours of subarachnoid hemorrhage. Treatment delays are due to nonclinical logistical factors. RESULTS: Two hundred thirty cases were coiled or clipped within 24 hours of subarachnoid hemorrhage and 229 at >24 hours. No difference in age, gender, smoking, family history of subarachnoid hemorrhage, aneurysm size, or aneurysm location was found between the groups. Poor World Federation of Neurological Surgeons clinical grade patients were overrepresented in the ultra-early group. Increasing age and higher World Federation of Neurological Surgeons clinical grade were predictors of poor outcome. Eight point zero percent (16 of 199) of cases treated within 24 hours of SAH (ultra-early) were dependent or dead at 6 months compared with 14.4% (30 of 209) of those treated at >24 hours post-SAH (delayed; (χ2, P0.044) [corrected]. A total of 3.5% of cases coiled within 24 hours were dependent or dead at 6 months compared with 12.5% of cases coiled at 1 to 3 days, an 82% relative risk reduction and a 10.2% absolute risk reduction (χ2, P=0.040). These groups did not differ in age, World Federation of Neurological Surgeons clinical grade, aneurysm size, or aneurysm location. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of ruptured aneurysms within 24 hours is associated with improved clinical outcomes compared with treatment at >24 hours. The benefit is more pronounced for coiling than clipping.