Predictive Dosimetry and Outcomes of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated by Yttrium-90 Resin Microsphere Radioembolization: A Retrospective Analysis Using Technetium-99m Macroaggregated Albumin SPECT/CT and Planning Software.

PURPOSE: To characterize estimated mean absorbed tumor dose (ADT), objective response (OR), and estimated target dose of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after resin microsphere yttrium-90 (90Y) radioembolization using partition dosimetry. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective, single-center study, multicompartment dosimetry of index tumors receiving 90Y radioembolization between October 2015 and June 2022 was performed using a commercial software package and pretreatment technetium-99m macroaggregated albumin single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)/computed tomography (CT). In total, 101 patients with HCC underwent 102 treatments of 127 index tumors. Patients underwent imaging every 2-3 months after treatment to determine best response per modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST). Best response was defined as the greatest response category per mRECIST and categorized as OR or nonresponse (NR). A Cox proportional hazards model evaluated the probability of tumor OR and progression-free survival using ADT. RESULTS: The median follow-up period was 148 days (interquartile range [IQR], 92-273 days). The median ADT of OR was 141.9 Gy (IQR, 89.4-215.8 Gy) compared with the median ADT of NR treatments of 70.8 Gy (IQR, 42.0-135.3 Gy; P < .001). Only ADT was predictive of response (hazard ratio = 2.79 [95% confidence interval {CI}: 1.44-5.40]; P = .003). At 6 months, an ADT of 157 Gy predicted 90.0% (95% CI: 41.3%-98.3%) probability of OR. At 1 year, an ADT of 157 Gy predicted 91.6% (95% CI: 78.3%-100%) probability of progression-free survival. Partition modeling and delivered activity were predictive of progression (P = .021 and P = .003, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: For HCC treated with resin microspheres, tumors receiving higher ADT exhibited higher rates of OR. An ADT of 157 Gy predicted 90.0% OR at 6 months.

Partition Dosimetry and Outcomes of Metastatic Neuroendocrine Tumors after Yttrium-90 Resin Microsphere Radioembolization.

PURPOSE: To characterize estimated mean tumor-absorbed dose (ADT) and objective response of metastatic neuroendocrine tumor (NET) after resin microsphere yttrium-90 (90Y) hepatic radioembolization using partition dosimetry. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective, single-center study, multicompartment dosimetry of index tumors receiving 90Y radioembolization between 2013 and 2022 involved the use of Sureplan (MIM Software, Cleveland, Ohio) and technetium-99m macroaggregated albumin single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) combined with computed tomography. Thirty-six patients with NET underwent treatment of 56 index tumors. Patients underwent imaging every 3-6 months after treatment to determine best response per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 and modified RECIST (mRECIST) criteria. Responses were categorized as objective response (OR) or nonresponse (NR). Wilcoxon rank sum test evaluated differences in continuous variables, and Pearson χ2 test evaluated differences in categorical variables. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 582 days (IQR, 187-1,227 days). Per RECIST 1.1, 27 patients (75%) experienced OR and 9 patients experienced (25%) NR. Of the 36 patients, 33 (92%) showed hypervascular, mRECIST-evaluable tumors. Among them, 28 patients (85%) showed mRECIST OR and 5 patients (15%) showed NR. The mRECIST OR group received a higher ADT than the NR group (median, 107 Gy; IQR, 95.1-154 Gy vs median, 70.4 Gy; IQR, 62.9-87.6 Gy; P = .048). All tumors receiving at least 120 Gy showed mRECIST OR. CONCLUSIONS: In hypervascular metastatic NET treated by 90Y resin microsphere radioembolization, higher tumor dose was associated with better tumor response per mRECIST. Doses of ≥120 Gy led to OR.

Predictive Partition Dosimetry and Outcomes after Yttrium-90 Resin Microsphere Radioembolization of Colorectal Cancer Metastatic to the Liver: A Retrospective Analysis.

PURPOSE: To characterize estimated absorbed tumor dose (ADT), objective response (OR), and estimated target dose of liver metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) after resin microsphere yttrium-90 (90Y) radioembolization using partition dosimetry. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective, single-center study, multicompartment dosimetry of index tumors undergoing 90Y radioembolization from October 2013 to July 2022 was performed using MIM SurePlan and pretreatment technetium-99m macroaggregated albumin infusion data. Thirty-eight patients with mCRC underwent treatments for 59 index tumors. Patients were imaged every 2-3 months after treatment and then every 3-6 months after disease control to determine the best response per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.1. Responses were categorized as OR or nonresponse (NR). A Cox proportional hazards model evaluated the probability of tumor OR and local progression-free survival (LPFS) based on ADT. RESULTS: Patients had a median follow-up of 116 days (interquartile range [IQR], 69-231 days). The ADT was higher for OR patients than for NR patients (median, 130.8 [IQR, 85.6-239.0] vs 40.6 [IQR, 26.0-66.3] Gy; P < .001). A greater percentage of OR than NR patients were treated with activities calculated by partition modeling (54% vs 12%; P = .005). Only ADT predicted response (P = .032). At 6 months, an ADT of 120 Gy predicted a 55% (95% CI, 0.0%-89%) probability of OR. Only ADT (P = .010) and female sex (P = .014) predicted LPFS. At 1 year, an ADT of 120 Gy predicted a 70% (95% CI, 35%-100%) probability of LPFS. CONCLUSIONS: Tumor dose was the strongest predictor of OR for mCRC. Administration of an estimated 120 Gy to mCRC predicted 55% OR with 90Y resin microspheres at 6 months.

Machine learning applications to enhance patient specific care for urologic surgery.

PURPOSE: As computational power has improved over the past 20 years, the daily application of machine learning methods has become more prevalent in daily life. Additionally, there is increasing interest in the clinical application of machine learning techniques. We sought to review the current literature regarding machine learning applications for patient-specific urologic surgical care. METHODS: We performed a broad search of the current literature via the PubMed-Medline and Google Scholar databases up to Dec 2020. The search terms "urologic surgery" as well as "artificial intelligence", "machine learning", "neural network", and "automation" were used. RESULTS: The focus of machine learning applications for patient counseling is disease-specific. For stone disease, multiple studies focused on the prediction of stone-free rate based on preoperative characteristics of clinical and imaging data. For kidney cancer, many studies focused on advanced imaging analysis to predict renal mass pathology preoperatively. Machine learning applications in prostate cancer could provide for treatment counseling as well as prediction of disease-specific outcomes. Furthermore, for bladder cancer, the reviewed studies focus on staging via imaging, to better counsel patients towards neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Additionally, there have been many efforts on automatically segmenting and matching preoperative imaging with intraoperative anatomy. CONCLUSION: Machine learning techniques can be implemented to assist patient-centered surgical care and increase patient engagement within their decision-making processes. As data sets improve and expand, especially with the transition to large-scale EHR usage, these tools will improve in efficacy and be utilized more frequently.

Canadian clinical practice guidelines for acute and chronic rhinosinusitis.

This document provides health care practitioners with information regarding the management of acute rhinosinusitis (ARS) and chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) to enable them to better meet the needs of this patient population. These guidelines describe controversies in the management of acute bacterial rhinosinusitis (ABRS) and include recommendations that take into account changes in the bacteriologic landscape. Recent guidelines in ABRS have been released by American and European groups as recently as 2007, but these are either limited in their coverage of the subject of CRS, do not follow an evidence-based strategy, or omit relevant stakeholders in the development of guidelines and do not address the particulars of the Canadian health care environment.Advances in understanding the pathophysiology of CRS, along with the development of appropriate therapeutic strategies, have improved outcomes for patients with CRS. CRS now affects large numbers of patients globally, and primary care practitioners are confronted by this disease on a daily basis. Although initially considered a chronic bacterial infection, CRS is now recognized as having multiple distinct components (eg, infection, inflammation), which have led to changes in therapeutic approaches (eg, increased use of corticosteroids). The role of bacteria in the persistence of chronic infections and the roles of surgical and medical management are evolving. Although evidence is limited, guidance for managing patients with CRS would help practitioners less experienced in this area offer rational care. It is no longer reasonable to manage CRS as a prolonged version of ARS, but, rather, specific therapeutic strategies adapted to pathogenesis must be developed and diffused.Guidelines must take into account all available evidence and incorporate these in an unbiased fashion into management recommendations based on the quality of evidence, therapeutic benefit, and risks incurred. This document is focused on readability rather than completeness yet covers relevant information, offers summaries of areas where considerable evidence exists, and provides recommendations with an assessment of the strength of the evidence base and the degree of endorsement by the multidisciplinary expert group preparing the document.These guidelines have been copublished in both Allergy, Asthma, and Clinical Immunology and the Journal of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

Canadian clinical practice guidelines for acute and chronic rhinosinusitis.

This document provides healthcare practitioners with information regarding the management of acute rhinosinusitis (ARS) and chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) to enable them to better meet the needs of this patient population. These guidelines describe controversies in the management of acute bacterial rhinosinusitis (ABRS) and include recommendations that take into account changes in the bacteriologic landscape. Recent guidelines in ABRS have been released by American and European groups as recently as 2007, but these are either limited in their coverage of the subject of CRS, do not follow an evidence-based strategy, or omit relevant stakeholders in guidelines development, and do not address the particulars of the Canadian healthcare environment.Advances in understanding the pathophysiology of CRS, along with the development of appropriate therapeutic strategies, have improved outcomes for patients with CRS. CRS now affects large numbers of patients globally and primary care practitioners are confronted by this disease on a daily basis. Although initially considered a chronic bacterial infection, CRS is now recognized as having multiple distinct components (eg, infection, inflammation), which have led to changes in therapeutic approaches (eg, increased use of corticosteroids). The role of bacteria in the persistence of chronic infections, and the roles of surgical and medical management are evolving. Although evidence is limited, guidance for managing patients with CRS would help practitioners less experienced in this area offer rational care. It is no longer reasonable to manage CRS as a prolonged version of ARS, but rather, specific therapeutic strategies adapted to pathogenesis must be developed and diffused.Guidelines must take into account all available evidence and incorporate these in an unbiased fashion into management recommendations based on the quality of evidence, therapeutic benefit, and risks incurred. This document is focused on readability rather than completeness, yet covers relevant information, offers summaries of areas where considerable evidence exists, and provides recommendations with an assessment of strength of the evidence base and degree of endorsement by the multidisciplinary expert group preparing the document.These guidelines have been copublished in both Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology and the Journal of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.