Cutaneous manifestations induced by check point inhibitors in 120 melanoma patients-The European MelSkinTox study.

BACKGROUND: Checkpoint inhibitors provide an effective approach for the melanoma treatment. They prolong lymphocyte effects, which explains the cytotoxicity underlying immune-related adverse events (IrAEs). Cutaneous IrAEs affect nearly 40% of PD-1i and 50% of CTLA4i-treated patients. Severe cutaneous irAE do not often occur but could be life-threatening and may persist despite treatment discontinuation. METHODS: We aimed to investigate cutaneous IrAEs in a cohort of patients treated with ICI across Europe in an effort to characterize the reactions in a real-world, phase IV, post-marketing study using a follow-up questionnaire. Data since November 2016 until March 2021 were obtained from the Melskintox database, a European multicentric biobank dedicated to the follow-up of melanoma and cutaneous adverse events, supported by EADO. The dermatoses reported were pooled into four categories: inflammatory dermatosis, bullous diseases, drug-related eruptions and pigmentary diseases. RESULTS: Inflammatory benign dermatoses (n = 63) represented the most common group of reactions (52.5%), followed by drug-related eruptions (n = 24, 20%), pigmentary diseases (n = 23, 19.2%) and bullous diseases (n = 10, 8.3%). Grade II (n = 41, 34.2%) are represented by bullous pemphigoid, eczema, hypodermitis, lichenoid eruption, maculopapular rash, pruritus, psoriasis-like rash, urticarial eruption and vitiligo. Grade III (n = 18, 15.0%) are represented by bullous pemphigoid, lichenoid eruption and rashes. Grade IV (n = 2, 1.7%) is only represented by bullous disease. Most cutaneous IrAEs led to immunotherapy continuation (n = 95, 88.0%). CR is associated with more severe the cutaneous irAEs. We report an average time-to-onset of 208 days and some late-onset events. CONCLUSION: Our study has characterized the clinical spectrum of cutaneous irAEs, their timing and severity and their relationship with tumour response. Grade I-II cutaneous IrAE are easily managed allowing ongoing anticancer treatment. Severe late-onset cutaneous irAE are not uncommon. A dermatological follow-up helps mitigate the risk of life-threatening adverse events. These findings highlight the importance of oncodermatological involvement in management of patients with melanoma receiving immunotherapy.

Quality of life measurement in rosacea. Position statement of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology Task Forces on Quality of Life and Patient Oriented Outcomes and Acne, Rosacea and Hidradenitis Suppurativa.

The European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (EADV) Task Forces (TFs) on Quality of Life (QoL) and Patient-Oriented Outcomes and Acne, Rosacea and Hidradenitis Suppurativa (ARHS) do not recommend the use of any generic instrument as a single method of Health Related (HR) QoL assessment in rosacea, except when comparing quimp (quality of life impairment) in rosacea patients with that in other non-dermatologic skin diseases and/or healthy controls. The EADV TFs on QoL and Patient-Oriented Outcomes and ARHS recommend the use of the dermatology-specific HRQoL instrument the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) and the rosacea-specific HRQoL instrument RosaQoL in rosacea patients. The DLQI minimal clinically important difference may be used as a marker of clinical efficacy of the treatment and DLQI score banding of 0 or 1 corresponding to no effect on patients' HRQoL could be an important treatment goal. This information may be added to consensuses and guidelines for rosacea.

Efficacy of sonic hedgehog inhibitors rechallenge, after initial complete response in recurrent advanced basal cell carcinoma: a retrospective study from the CARADERM database.

BACKGROUND: Smoothened (SMO) inhibitors, blocking the sonic hedgehog pathway, have been approved for advanced basal cell carcinoma (aBCC). Safety analyses reveal a high rate of adverse events (AEs) and, most of the time, vismodegib is most commonly stopped when the best overall response is reached. The long-term evolution of aBCC after vismodegib discontinuation is poorly described. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the SMO inhibitors (SMOis) available (vismodegib and sonidegib) following rechallenge after complete response (CR) following an initial treatment by vismodegib. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This real-life, retrospective, multicenter and descriptive study is based on an extraction from the CARADERM accredited database, including 40 French regional hospitals, of patients requiring BCC systemic treatment. RESULTS: Of 303 patients treated with vismodegib, 110 achieved an initial CR. The vast majority of these patients (98.2%) stopped vismodegib, notably due to poorly tolerated AEs. The CARADERM database provided a median follow-up of 21 months (13.5-36.0 months) after CR. Of the 110 patients, 48.1% relapsed after a median relapse-free survival of 24 months (13.0-38.0 months). Among them, 35 patients were retreated by an SMOi and the overall response rate was 65.7% (34.3% of CR and 31.4% of partial response). The median duration of retreatment was 6.0 months (4.0-9.5 months). CONCLUSION: Our real-life study, carried out on patients with complex clinical pictures, shows that after treatment discontinuation, 48.1% of patients achieved CR relapse within an average of 24 months (13.0-38.0 months). It emphasized that even though rechallenge can be considered as a therapeutic option, efficacy seems to decrease, suggesting the development of resistance mechanisms.

Photoprotection according to skin phototype and dermatoses: practical recommendations from an expert panel.

Increasing evidence on the impact of the different wavelengths of sunlight on the skin demonstrates the need for tailored recommendations of sunscreen according to skin phototype and dermatoses, which is now possible due to advances in the filters and formulations of sunscreens. A selective literature search was performed by an international expert panel, focusing on the type of sunscreen to recommend for photoaging, skin cancers, photodermatoses, pigmentary disorders and skin inflammatory disorders. Protection against ultraviolet (UV)B is especially important for light skin as there is a high risk of sunburn, DNA damage and skin cancers. Darker skin may be naturally better protected against UVB but is more prone to hyperpigmentation induced by visible light (VL) and UVA. Protection against UVA, VL and infrared A can be helpful for all skin phototypes as they penetrate deeply and cause photoaging. Long-wave UVA1 plays a critical role in pigmentation, photoaging, skin cancer, DNA damage and photodermatoses. Adapting the formulation and texture of the sunscreen to the type of skin and dermatoses is also essential. Practical recommendations on the type of sunscreen to prescribe are provided to support the clinician in daily practice.

Which adjuvant treatment for patients with BRAFV600-mutant cutaneous melanoma?

Treatment of patients with melanoma has considerably improved over the past decade and more recently with adjuvant therapies for patients with American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage III (loco-regional metastases) or IV (distant metastases) totally resected melanoma, in order to prevent recurrence. In the adjuvant setting, two options are available to patients with BRAFV600-mutant AJCC stage III totally resected melanoma: anti-PD-1 blockers (nivolumab or pembrolizumab) or BRAF plus MEK inhibitors (dabrafenib plus trametinib). In the absence of comparative studies, it is difficult to determine which of these options is best. Our aim was to review published studies focusing on the management of patients with BRAFV600-mutant melanoma in the adjuvant setting. We also reviewed the main clinical trials of BRAF plus MEK inhibitors and immunotherapy in advanced (i.e. unresectable metastatic) BRAF-mutant melanoma in an attempt to identify results potentially affecting the management of patients on adjuvants. More adverse events are observed with targeted therapy, but all resolve rapidly upon drug discontinuation, whereas with immune checkpoint blockers some adverse events may persist. New therapeutic strategies are emerging, notably neoadjuvant therapies for stage III patients and adjuvant therapies for stage II patients; the place of the adjuvant strategy amidst all these options will soon be re-evaluated. The choice of adjuvant treatment could influence the choice of subsequent treatments in neo-adjuvant or metastatic settings. This review will lead clinicians to a better understanding of the different adjuvant treatments available for patients with totally resected AJCC stage III and IV BRAFV600-mutant melanoma before considering subsequent treatment strategies.

Benefits of simulation using standardized patients for training dermatology residents in breaking bad news.

INTRODUCTION: Simulation in healthcare is a rapidly developing teaching method in the training of technical procedures. It is also used to enable caregivers to learn how to inform patients of serious illness and complex health status. However, its use is not widespread in the field of dermatology. This study investigated the utility of simulation as regards disclosing melanoma diagnosis, taking resident physician satisfaction as a primary endpoint. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifteen dermatology residents were recruited as trainees. Four scenarios were allocated based on length of residency. An introductory briefing was held prior to the training sessions. Debriefing took place on completion of the diagnosis disclosure consultation. The participants completed questionnaires after the simulation session, after debriefing, and 3 months after the simulation session. The primary endpoint was usefulness of the session felt by trainees several months after the simulation. RESULTS: The majority of participants (93.3%) thought the session helped with stress management, improved their attitude and control over their reaction (86.6%), and improved their communication skills (100%). They rated the usefulness of the simulation at 7.79/10 on average (range: 5-10). DISCUSSION: According to our findings the resident physicians involved, particularly those with the least experience, were satisfied with this type of learning technique. Any difficulties encountered by these residents were brought to light and addressed during debriefing. CONCLUSION: There would appear to be real benefits to be reaped from simulation, whatever the stage of medical training at which it takes place. Simulation should become an increasingly important part of contemporary pregraduate specialty programs.

Cobimetinib plus atezolizumab in BRAFV600 wild-type melanoma: primary results from the randomized phase III IMspire170 study.

BACKGROUND: Emerging data suggest that the combination of MEK inhibitors and immunotherapeutic agents may result in improved efficacy in melanoma. We evaluated whether combining MEK inhibition and immune checkpoint inhibition was more efficacious than immune checkpoint inhibition alone in patients with previously untreated BRAFV600 wild-type advanced melanoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: IMspire170 was an international, randomized, open-label, phase III study. Patients were randomized 1 : 1 to receive cobimetinib (60 mg, days 1-21) plus anti-programmed death-ligand 1 atezolizumab (840 mg every 2 weeks) in 28-day cycles or anti-programmed death-1 pembrolizumab (200 mg every 3 weeks) alone until loss of clinical benefit, unacceptable toxicity, or consent withdrawal. The primary outcome was progression-free survival (PFS), assessed by an independent review committee in the intention-to-treat population. RESULTS: Between 11 December 2017, and 29 January 2019, 446 patients were randomized to receive cobimetinib plus atezolizumab (n = 222) or pembrolizumab (n = 224). Median follow-up was 7.1 months [interquartile range (IQR) 4.8-9.9] for cobimetinib plus atezolizumab and 7.2 months (IQR 4.9-10.1) for pembrolizumab. Median PFS was 5.5 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 3.8-7.2] with cobimetinib plus atezolizumab versus 5.7 months (95% CI 3.7-9.6) with pembrolizumab [stratified hazard ratio 1.15 (95% CI 0.88-1.50); P = 0.30]. Hazard ratios for PFS were consistent across prespecified subgroups. In exploratory biomarker analyses, higher tumor mutational burden was associated with improved clinical outcomes in both treatment arms. The most common grade 3-5 adverse events (AEs) were increased blood creatine phosphokinase (10.0% with cobimetinib plus atezolizumab versus 0.9% with pembrolizumab), diarrhea (7.7% versus 1.9%), rash (6.8% versus 0.9%), hypertension (6.4% versus 3.7%), and dermatitis acneiform (5.0% versus 0). Serious AEs occurred in 44.1% of patients with cobimetinib plus atezolizumab and 20.8% with pembrolizumab. CONCLUSION: Cobimetinib plus atezolizumab did not improve PFS compared with pembrolizumab monotherapy in patients with BRAFV600 wild-type advanced melanoma.

[Panniculitis during BRAF inhibitor and/or MEK inhibitor therapy: A new case report and literature review]. / Hypodermite sous inhibiteur de BRAF et/ou inhibiteur de MEK : revue de la littérature à partir d'une nouvelle observation.

INTRODUCTION: BRAF inhibitors±MEK inhibitors can cause panniculitis. Since the initial case described in 2012 by Zimmer et al., some sixty further cases have been reported. Based on a clinical study and a recent and complete review of the literature, we set out in detail the characteristics of panniculitis occurring during BRAF and MEK inhibition therapy as well as the treatment thereof. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A 25-year-old-patient followed for multi-metastatic melanoma and taking dabrafenib and trametinib consulted for the appearance, twenty-two days after the start of targeted therapy (TT), of panniculitis of the legs and forearms possibly induced by the TT after other causes had been ruled out. The TT had been continued following dose reduction and corticoid therapy for ten days, and complete resolution occurred after fifteen days. RESULTS: Fifty-three cases of panniculitis during BRAF±MEK inhibition therapy were analysed. The condition occurred mainly with BRAF inhibitors alone (especially vemurafenib), but it was also described with three combinations of BRAF and MEK inhibitors, regardless of age (median: 45 years), with a M/F ratio of 0.51, and in 50 % of cases, it occurred within the first month (time to onset: between 1 and 480 days). Non-specific biopsy is useful to rule out differential diagnoses. Symptomatic anti-inflammatory treatment, whether systemic or topical, may be given. In the absence of signs of severity, the TT may be continued. CONCLUSION: When panniculitis occurs during BRAF±MEK inhibitor therapy, the causal role of the TT must be considered after full etiological investigation. It is essential to determine whether a causal relationship exists in order to avoid unwarranted cessation of treatment.

The evolving field of Dermato-oncology and the role of dermatologists: Position Paper of the EADO, EADV and Task Forces, EDF, IDS, EBDV-UEMS and EORTC Cutaneous Lymphoma Task Force.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of skin cancers has been increasing steadily over the last decades. Although there have been significant breakthroughs in the management of skin cancers with the introduction of novel diagnostic tools and innovative therapies, skin cancer mortality, morbidity and costs heavily burden the society. OBJECTIVE: Members of the European Association of Dermato-Oncology, European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology, International Dermoscopy Society, European Dermatology Forum, European Board of Dermatovenereology of the European Union of Medical Specialists and EORTC Cutaneous Lymphoma Task Force have joined this effort to emphasize the fundamental role that the specialist in Dermatology-Venereology has in the diagnosis and management of different types of skin cancer. We review the role of dermatologists in the prevention, diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of patients with melanoma, non-melanoma skin cancers and cutaneous lymphomas, and discuss approaches to optimize their involvement in effectively addressing the current needs and priorities of dermato-oncology. DISCUSSION: Dermatologists play a crucial role in virtually all aspects of skin cancer management including the implementation of primary and secondary prevention, the formation of standardized pathways of care for patients, the establishment of specialized skin cancer treatment centres, the coordination of an efficient multidisciplinary team and the setting up of specific follow-up plans for patients. CONCLUSION: Skin cancers represent an important health issue for modern societies. The role of dermatologists is central to improving patient care and outcomes. In view of the emerging diagnostic methods and treatments for early and advanced skin cancer, and considering the increasingly diverse skills, knowledge and expertise needed for managing this heterogeneous group of diseases, dermato-oncology should be considered as a specific subspecialty of Dermatology-Venereology.

[Mycosis fungoides bullosa: A rare clinical presentation]. / Mycosis fongoïde bulleux : une présentation clinique exceptionnelle.

INTRODUCTION: Mycosis fungoides (MF) is the most common form of cutaneous lymphoma and usually manifests as erythematous and scaly patches or plaques. Its phenotypic or histologic presentation can be heterogeneous. Herein we report a very rare form of MF bullosa. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A 73-year-old man presented with a 4-month history of erythematous, scaly and itchy plaques on the trunk, as well as blistering lesions present for 2 months and which appeared on the trunk and lower limbs, both on patches of MF and on apparently healthy skin. Histopathology confirmed the diagnosis of bullous mycosis fungoides. Gene rearrangement of TCR showed a monoclonal profile in the skin. The hypothesis of bullous pemphigoid was ruled out by additional exams. Our patient was successively treated with combined interferon, bexarotene and methotrexate, followed by vorinostat, resulting in partial remission. DISCUSSION: Cases of bullous MF are very rare. In the literature, the clinical presentation is heterogeneous, with tense or flaccid bullae that can occur on unaffected skin or on erythematous plaques. The bullae generally appear after the plaques. The histologic blister site may be subepidermal or, more rarely, intra-epidermal. The exact mechanism of blister formation is not clear. Its treatment is poorly codified but follows the usual treatment of MF in its classical form. CONCLUSION: Bullous MF is a very rare entity that can mimic autoimmune blistering disease, and this diagnosis must therefore be ruled out.

Acne treatments: future trajectories.

Current acne treatments present several limitations, posing the need for new effective therapies for long-term administration for recalcitrant or relapsing acne. Key players in acne that may emerge as targets for future acne treatments include the cutaneous loss of diversity of Cutibacterium (formerly Propionibacterium) acnes phylotypes and the insulin-like growth factor-1 signalling pathway. New data about the loss of diversity of microbiota in acne provides the rationale for the potential use of oral or topical probiotics. Another therapeutic approach to modulate the microbiota could be topical formulation of C. acnes bacteriophages to target specifically the pathogenic 'acnegenic' C. acnes phylotypes. Insulin-sensitizing agents such as metformin, myo-inositol and d-chiro-inositol represent promising agents, but to date there have been only limited studies and much heterogeneity in the methods of assessing acne efficacy outcomes. Moving towards a holistic approach for patients with acne is the future, by taking into account both internal and external factors, such as pollution, stress, acne family history, age, smoking habits and diet, and addressing quality of life and the psychological impact of acne.

[Tattoo and sarcoidosis reaction]. / Tatouage et réaction sarcoïdosique.

The practice of tattoo is developing more and more all over the world. Infections are known. but chronic inflammatory reactions have often resulted in a variety of clinical manifestations. In addition to allergic reactions, non-allergic reactions prevail in black tattoos and manifest themselves as "papulonodular" lesions. The importance of biopsy of papulonodular lesions to confirm the diagnosis should be emphasized. Carbon black nanoparticles agglomerate in the dermis over time to form sarcoid granulomas. Pigment-bound foreign-body granuloma and sarcoidosis are often difficult to distinguish. The black color seems to be the most common. Other aetiologias than pigment are evoked, such as the role of an infectious agent, but to date none has been identified, a particular genetic terrain remains to be defined. Systemic localizations being possible, the extension assessment is important to carry out. It is also important, as a preventive measure, that subjects and their treating physician be informed of the potential risk associated with these drugs indicated for specific serious pathologies.

Predictive value of FDG-PET imaging for relapse in metastatic melanoma patients treated with immunotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Anti-PD1 immunotherapy has shown a sustainable clinical activity in patients with metastatic melanoma. However, strong predictive factors of the long-term response or risk of relapse remain to be identified. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether FDG-PET imaging could be superior to CT scan in distinguishing residual tumours versus the absence of tumour in patients with a partial response (PR) or stable disease (SD) and whether a complete metabolic response (CMR) was associated with better outcomes. METHODS: Retrospective study conducted in all patients with metastatic melanoma treated with anti-PD1 immunotherapy between October 2014 and October 2017 considered to be in complete remission. The primary outcome was the occurrence of a relapse during the follow-up. CT scan and FDG-PET scan had to be performed within a maximum of 2 months of treatment discontinuation. For CT imaging, the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST) 1.1 were used and included progressive disease (PD), SD, PR and complete response (CR). For FDG-PET imaging, the metabolic responses were classified as progressive metabolic disease, stable metabolic disease, residual FDG avidity (RFA) and CMR. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients were in complete remission after collegial decision. Two patients had a SD on CT scan and a CMR on FDG-PET scan, and none of them relapsed. Ten patients had a PR on CT scan and a CMR on FDG-PET scan, and none of them relapsed. The mean treatment duration to achieve a complete remission was 7 months (3-23). A univariate analysis showed that a RFA assessed on the FDG-PET scan was significantly associated with a relapse (P = 0.00231). CONCLUSIONS: Most patients with a PR on the CT scan and a CMR on the FDG-PET scan should be considered with a CR. Our study showed that FDG-PET imaging could play a crucial role in predicting the long-term outcome and help to decide whether treatment should be discontinued.

Sonidegib and vismodegib in the treatment of patients with locally advanced basal cell carcinoma: a joint expert opinion.

Sonidegib and vismodegib are hedgehog pathway inhibitors (HhIs) approved for the treatment of advanced basal cell carcinoma (BCC). Until recently, vismodegib was the only targeted treatment available for patients with locally advanced BCC (laBCC) in cases where surgery and radiotherapy are inappropriate. Sonidegib has recently been approved and now presents an alternative treatment option. The clinical differences between the two HhIs in patients with laBCC are unclear, as no head-to-head randomized controlled trials are or will be initiated. Moreover, there were important differences in the designs of their pivotal studies, BOLT (sonidegib) and ERIVANCE (vismodegib), and these differences complicate evidence-based analysis of their relative efficacy and safety profiles. In this paper, a group of clinical experts in the management of laBCC summarizes the clinical and pharmacological profiles of sonidegib and vismodegib based on published data and their own clinical experience. One key difference between the two pivotal studies was the criteria used to assess BCC severity. ERIVANCE (a single-arm phase II trial) used the conventional Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), while the more recent double-blind randomized BOLT trial used the stringent modified RECIST. A preplanned analysis adjusted the outcomes from BOLT with RECIST-like criteria, and this enabled the experts to discuss relative efficacy outcomes for the two treatments. Centrally reviewed objective response rate (ORR) for vismodegib was 47.6% (95% CI: 35.5-60.6) at 21-month follow-up using RECIST. After adjusting with RECIST-like criteria, the ORR for sonidegib according to central review at 18-month follow-up was 60.6% (95% CI: 47.8-72.4). Both treatments were associated with similar patterns of adverse events. Sonidegib and vismodegib share the same efficacy and tolerability profiles, but their pharmacokinetic profiles show several differences, such as volume of distribution and half-life. Further studies are needed to understand how these differences may impact clinical practice.