Factors associated with acute esophagitis during radiation therapy for lung cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Limiting acute esophagitis remains a clinical challenge during the treatment of locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: Demographic, dosimetric, and acute toxicity data were prospectively collected for patients undergoing definitive radiation therapy +/- chemotherapy for stage II-III NSCLC from 2012 to 2022 across a statewide consortium. Logistic regression models were used to characterize the risk of grade 2 + and 3 + esophagitis as a function of dosimetric and clinical covariates. Multivariate regression models were fitted to predict the 50 % risk of grade 2 esophagitis and 3 % risk of grade 3 esophagitis. RESULTS: Of 1760 patients, 84.2 % had stage III disease and 85.3 % received concurrent chemotherapy. 79.2 % of patients had an ECOG performance status ≤ 1. Overall rates of acute grade 2 + and 3 + esophagitis were 48.4 % and 2.2 %, respectively. On multivariate analyses, performance status, mean esophageal dose (MED) and minimum dose to the 2 cc of esophagus receiving the highest dose (D2cc) were significantly associated with grade 2 + and 3 + esophagitis. Concurrent chemotherapy was associated with grade 2 + but not grade 3 + esophagitis. For all patients, MED of 29 Gy and D2cc of 61 Gy corresponded to a 3 % risk of acute grade 3 + esophagitis. For patients receiving chemotherapy, MED of 22 Gy and D2cc of 50 Gy corresponded to a 50 % risk of acute grade 2 + esophagitis. CONCLUSIONS: Performance status, concurrent chemotherapy, MED and D2cc are associated with acute esophagitis during definitive treatment of NSCLC. Models that quantitatively account for these factors can be useful in individualizing radiation plans.

Upfront Neck Dissection for Treatment Selection and Improvement in Quality of Life as a Novel Treatment Paradigm for Deintensification in HPV+ OPSCC.

PURPOSE: Locoregionally advanced HPV+ oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) has excellent cure rates, although current treatment regimens are accompanied by acute and long-term toxicities. We designed a phase II deescalation trial for patients with HPV+ OPSCC to evaluate the feasibility of an upfront neck dissection to individualize definitive treatment selection to improve the quality of life without compromising survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with T1-3, N0-2 HPV+ OPSCC underwent an upfront neck dissection with primary tumor biopsy. Arm A included patients with a single lymph node less than six centimeters, with no extracapsular spread (ECS) and no primary site adverse features underwent transoral surgery. Arm B included patients who had two or more positive lymph nodes with no ECS, or those with primary site adverse features were treated with radiation alone. Arm C included patients who had ECS in any lymph node and were treated with chemoradiation. The primary endpoint was quality of life at 1 year compared with a matched historical control. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients were enrolled and underwent selective neck dissection. On the basis of pathologic characteristics, 14 patients were assigned to arm A, 10 patients to arm B, and 9 to arm C. A significant improvement was observed in Head and Neck Quality of Life (HNQOL) compared with historical controls (-2.6 vs. -11.9, P = 0.034). With a median follow-up of 37 months, the 3-year overall survival was 100% and estimated 3-year estimated progression-free survival was 96% [95% confidence interval (CI), 76%-99%]. CONCLUSIONS: A neck dissection-driven treatment paradigm warrants further research as a deintensification strategy.

Prospective Evaluation of Limited-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer Radiotherapy Fractionation Regimen Usage and Acute Toxicity in a Large Statewide Quality Collaborative.

PURPOSE: National guidelines on limited-stage small cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC) treatment give preference to a hyperfractionated regimen of 45 Gy in 30 fractions delivered twice daily; however, use of this regimen is uncommon compared with once-daily regimens. The purpose of this study was to characterize the LS-SCLC fractionation regimens used throughout a statewide collaborative, analyze patient and treatment factors associated with these regimens, and describe real-world acute toxicity profiles of once- and twice-daily radiation therapy (RT) regimens. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Demographic, clinical, and treatment data along with physician-assessed toxicity and patient-reported outcomes were prospectively collected by 29 institutions within the Michigan Radiation Oncology Quality Consortium between 2012 and 2021 for patients with LS-SCLC. We modeled the influence of RT fractionation and other patient-level variables clustered by treatment site on the odds of a treatment break specifically due to toxicity with multilevel logistic regression. National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.0, incident grade 2 or worse toxicity was longitudinally compared between regimens. RESULTS: There were 78 patients (15.6% overall) treated with twice-daily RT and 421 patients treated with once-daily RT. Patients receiving twice-daily RT were more likely to be married or living with someone (65% vs 51%; P = .019) and to have no major comorbidities (24% vs 10%; P = .017). Once-daily RT fractionation toxicity peaked during RT, and twice-daily toxicity peaked within 1 month after RT. After stratifying by treatment site and adjusting for patient-level variables, once-daily treated patients had 4.11 (95% confidence interval, 1.31-12.87) higher odds of treatment break specifically due to toxicity than twice-daily treated patients. CONCLUSIONS: Hyperfractionation for LS-SCLC remains infrequently prescribed despite the lack of evidence demonstrating superior efficacy or lower toxicity of once-daily RT. With peak acute toxicity after RT and lower likelihood of a treatment break with twice-daily fractionation in real-word practice, providers may start using hyperfractionated RT more frequently.

Cardiac and Pulmonary Dosimetric Parameters in Patients With Lung Cancer Undergoing Postoperative Radiation Therapy Across a Statewide Consortium.

PURPOSE: The recently published Lung Adjuvant Radiotherapy Trial (Lung ART) reported increased rates of cardiac and pulmonary toxic effects in the postoperative radiation therapy (PORT) arm. It remains unknown whether the dosimetric parameters reported in Lung ART are representative of contemporary real-world practice, which remains relevant for patients undergoing PORT for positive surgical margins. The purpose of this study was to examine heart and lung dose exposure in patients receiving PORT for non-small cell lung cancer across a statewide consortium. METHODS AND MATERIALS: From 2012 to 2022, demographic and dosimetric data were prospectively collected for 377 patients at 27 academic and community centers within the Michigan Radiation Oncology Quality Consortium undergoing PORT for nonmetastatic non-small cell lung cancer. Dosimetric parameters for target coverage and organ-at-risk exposure were calculated using data from dose-volume histograms, and rates of 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT) and intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) utilization were assessed. RESULTS: Fifty-one percent of patients in this cohort had N2 disease at the time of surgery, and 25% had a positive margin. Sixty-six percent of patients were treated with IMRT compared with 32% with 3D-CRT. The planning target volume was significantly smaller in patients treated with 3D-CRT (149.2 vs 265.4 cm3; P < .0001). The median mean heart dose for all patients was 8.7 Gy (interquartile range [IQR], 3.5-15.3 Gy), the median heart volume receiving at least 5 Gy (V5) was 35.2% (IQR, 18.5%-60.2%), and the median heart volume receiving at least 35 Gy (V35) was 9% (IQR, 3.2%-17.7%). The median mean lung dose was 11.4 Gy (IQR, 8.1-14.3 Gy), and the median lung volume receiving at least 20 Gy (V20) was 19.6% (IQR, 12.7%-25.4%). These dosimetric parameters did not significantly differ by treatment modality (IMRT vs 3D-CRT) or in patients with positive versus negative surgical margins. CONCLUSIONS: With increased rates of IMRT use, cardiac and lung dosimetric parameters in this statewide consortium were slightly lower than those reported in Lung ART. These data provide useful benchmarks for treatment planning in patients undergoing PORT for positive surgical margins.

Cannabis Use in Patients Seen in an Academic Radiation Oncology Department.

PURPOSE: Cannabis use rates are increasing in the United States. Patients with cancer use cannabis for many reasons, even without high-quality supporting data. This study sought to characterize cannabis use among patients seen in radiation oncology in a state that has legalized adult nonmedical use cannabis and to identify key cannabis-related educational topics. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Cannabis history was documented by providers using a structured template at patient visits in an academic radiation oncology practice October 2020 to November 2021. Cannabis use data, including recency/frequency of use, reason, and mode of administration, were summarized, and logistic regression was used to explore associations between patient and disease characteristics and recent cannabis use. A multivariable model employed stepwise variable selection using the Akaike Information Criterion. RESULTS: Of 3143 patients total, 91 (2.9%) declined to answer cannabis use questions, and 343 (10.9%) endorsed recent use (≤1 month ago), 235 (7.5%) noted nonrecent use (>1 month ago), and 2474 (78.7%) denied history of cannabis use. In multivariable analyses, those ≥50 years old (odds ratio [OR], 0.409; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.294-0.568; P < .001) or with history of prior courses of radiation (OR, 0.748; 95% CI, 0.572-0.979; P = .034) were less likely, and those with a mental health diagnosis not related to substance use (OR, 1.533; 95% CI, 1.171-2.005; P = .002) or who smoked tobacco (OR, 3.003; 95% CI, 2.098-4.299; P < .001) were more likely to endorse recent cannabis use. Patients reported pain, insomnia, and anxiety as the most common reasons for use. Smoking was the most common mode of administration. CONCLUSIONS: Patients are willing to discuss cannabis use with providers and reported recent cannabis use for a variety of reasons. Younger patients new to oncologic care and those with a history of mental illness or tobacco smoking may benefit most from discussions about cannabis given higher rates of cannabis use in these groups.

Randomized trial of laryngeal organ preservation evaluating two cycles of induction chemotherapy with platinum, docetaxel, and a novel Bcl-xL inhibitor.

BACKGROUND: Single cycle induction chemotherapy (IC) with platinum and 5-flurouracil (PF) and treatment based on clinical response predicts organ preservation in laryngeal cancer. Other agents offer intriguing alternatives with potentially increased ease of administration, reduced risk for severe toxicities, and increased platinum sensitivity. METHODS: We report the results of a phase II bioselection trial in advanced resectable laryngeal cancer utilizing an IC regimen of two cycles of platinum plus docetaxel (TP) with a Bcl-2 inhibitor. The primary endpoint was organ preservation rate at 12 weeks post chemoradiation. RESULTS: Fifty-four patients were enrolled. Response to IC was 72%. The organ preservation rate was 59% with a laryngectomy free survival of 46%. Induction related grade ≥3 toxicities were observed in 56% of patients with two grade 5 events. CONCLUSIONS: Two cycles of TP IC plus a Bcl-2 inhibitor did not improve laryngeal preservation compared to a single cycle of PF.

Effect of Education and Standardization of Cardiac Dose Constraints on Heart Dose in Patients With Lung Cancer Receiving Definitive Radiation Therapy Across a Statewide Consortium.

PURPOSE: Cardiac radiation exposure is associated with an increased rate of adverse cardiac events in patients receiving radiation therapy for locally advanced non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). Previous analysis of practice patterns within the Michigan Radiation Oncology Quality Consortium (MROQC) revealed 1 in 4 patients received a mean heart dose >20 Gy and significant heterogeneity existed among treatment centers in using cardiac dose constraints. The purpose of this study is to analyze the effect of education and initiation of standardized cardiac dose constraints on heart dose across a statewide consortium. METHODS AND MATERIALS: From 2012 to 2020, 1681 patients from 27 academic and community centers who received radiation therapy for locally advanced NSCLC were included in this analysis. Dosimetric endpoints including mean heart dose (MHD), mean lung dose, and mean esophagus dose were calculated using data from dose-volume histograms. These dose metrics were grouped by year of treatment initiation for all patients. Education regarding data for cardiac dose constraints first occurred in small lung cancer working group meetings and then consortium-wide starting in 2016. In 2018, a quality metric requiring mean heart dose <20 Gy while maintaining dose coverage (D95) to the target was implemented. Dose metrics were compared before (2012-2016) versus after (2017-2020) initiation of interventions targeting cardiac constraints. Statistical analysis was performed using the Wilcoxon rank sum test. RESULTS: After education and implementation of the heart dose performance metric, mean MHD declined from an average of 12.2 Gy preintervention to 10.4 Gy postintervention (P < .0001), and the percentage of patients receiving MHD >20 Gy was reduced from 21.1% to 10.3% (P < .0001). Mean lung dose and mean esophagus dose did not increase, and target coverage remained unchanged. CONCLUSIONS: Education and implementation of a standardized cardiac dose quality measure across a statewide consortium was associated with a reduction of mean heart dose in patients receiving radiation therapy for locally advanced NSCLC. These dose reductions were achieved without sacrificing target coverage, increasing mean lung dose, or increasing mean esophagus dose. Analysis of the clinical ramifications of the reduction in cardiac doses is ongoing.

Association Between Physician- and Patient-Reported Symptoms in Patients Treated With Definitive Radiation Therapy for Locally Advanced Lung Cancer in a Statewide Consortium.

PURPOSE: Little data have been reported about the patient experience during curative radiation therapy (RT) for lung cancer in routine clinical practice or how this relates to treatment toxicity as reported by clinicians. The purpose of this study was to compare clinician-reported adverse events (AEs) with patient-reported outcomes (PROs), including both specific symptoms/side effects, as well as overall quality of life (QoL) during and after definitive RT for locally advanced lung cancer (LALC) in a large statewide cohort. METHODS AND MATERIALS: PROs were prospectively collected from patients treated with definitive RT for LALC at 24 institutions within the Michigan Radiation Oncology Quality Consortium between 2012 and 2018 using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy trial outcome index. Physicians prospectively recorded AEs using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.0. Patient-reported QoL changes from baseline were assessed during and after RT using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy trial outcome index. Spearman correlation coefficients were calculated for AEs and similar PROs, and a multivariable analysis was used to assess associations with QoL. RESULTS: A total 1361 patients were included in the study, and 53% of respondents reported clinically meaningful declines in QoL at the end of RT. The correlation between clinician-reported esophagitis and patient-reported trouble swallowing was moderate (R = .67), but correlations between clinician-reported pneumonitis and patient-reported shortness of breath (R = .13) and cough (R = .09) were weak. Clinician-reported AEs were significantly associated with clinically meaningful declines in patient-reported QoL (R = - .46 for summary AE score). QoL was more strongly associated with fatigue (R = - .41) than lung-specific AEs. CONCLUSIONS: AEs are associated with clinically meaningful declines in QoL during and after RT for LALC, but associations between AEs and QoL are only modest. This highlights the importance of PRO data, and future research should assess whether earlier detection of PRO changes could allow for interventions that reduce the frequency of treatment-related clinically meaningful declines in QoL.

Patient-reported financial toxicity and adverse medical consequences in head and neck cancer.

OBJECTIVES: Financial toxicity (FT) is a significant barrier to high-quality cancer care, and patients with head and neck cancer (HNCA) are particularly vulnerable given their need for intensive support, daily radiotherapy (RT), and management of long-term physical, functional, and psychosocial morbidities following treatment. We aim to identify predictors of FT and adverse consequences in HNCA following RT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a prospective survey study of patients with HNCA seen in follow-up at an academic comprehensive cancer center (CCC) or Veterans Affairs hospital between 05/2016 and 06/2018. Surveys included validated patient-reported functional outcomes and the COST measure, a validated instrument for measuring FT. RESULTS: The response rate was 86% (n = 63). Younger age and lower median household income by county were associated with lower COST scores (i.e., worse FT) on multivariable analysis (p = .045 and p = .016, respectively). Patients with worse FT were more likely to skip clinic visits (RR (95% CI) 2.13 (1.23-3.67), p = .007), be noncompliant with recommended supplements or medications (1.24 (1.03-1.48), p = .02), and require supportive infusions (1.10 (1.02-1.20), p = .02). At the CCC, patients with worse FT were more likely to require feeding tubes (1.62 (1.14-2.31), p = .007). Overall, 36% reported that costs were higher than expected, 48% were worried about paying for treatment, and 33% reported at least a moderate financial burden from treatment. CONCLUSION: HNCA patients experience substantial FT from their diagnosis and/or therapy, with potential implications for medical compliance, QOL, and survivorship care.

Predictive Values of MRI and PET Derived Quantitative Parameters for Patterns of Failure in Both p16+ and p16- High Risk Head and Neck Cancer.

Purpose: FDG-PET adds to clinical factors, such tumor stage and p16 status, in predicting local (LF), regional (RF), and distant failure (DF) in poor prognosis locally advanced head and neck cancer (HNC) treated with chemoradiation. We hypothesized that MRI-based quantitative imaging (QI) metrics could add to clinical predictors of treatment failure more significantly than FDG-PET metrics. Materials and methods: Fifty four patients with poor prognosis HNCs who were enrolled in an IRB approved prospective adaptive chemoradiotherapy trial were analyzed. MRI-derived gross tumor volume (GTV), blood volume (BV), and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) pre-treatment and mid-treatment (fraction 10), as well as pre-treatment FDG PET metrics, were analyzed in primary and individual nodal tumors. Cox proportional hazards models for prediction of LRF and DF free survival were used to test the additional value of QI metrics over dominant clinical predictors. Results: The mean ADC pre-RT and its change rate mid-treatment were significantly higher and lower in p16- than p16+ primary tumors, respectively. A Cox model identified that high mean ADC pre-RT had a high hazard for LF and RF in p16- but not p16+ tumors (p = 0.015). Most interesting, persisting subvolumes of low BV (TVbv) in primary and nodal tumors mid-treatment had high-risk for DF (p < 0.05). Also, total nodal GTV mid-treatment, mean/max SUV of FDG in all nodal tumors, and total nodal TLG were predictive for DF (p < 0.05). When including clinical stage (T4/N3) and total nodal GTV in the model, all nodal PET parameters had a p-value of >0.3, and only TVbv of primary tumors had a p-value of 0.06. Conclusion: MRI-defined biomarkers, especially persisting subvolumes of low BV, add predictive value to clinical variables and compare favorably with FDG-PET imaging markers. MRI could be well-integrated into the radiation therapy workflow for treatment planning, response assessment, and adaptive therapy.

Locoregional failure and the risk of distant metastasis after modern radiotherapy for head and neck cancer.

BACKGROUND: Evolving epidemiology and improvements in locoregional therapy necessitate reassessment of the relationship between locoregional failure and distant metastasis in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). METHODS: Retrospective assessments of factors associated with distant metastasis-free survival were made for 560 patients with SCCHN who received definitive radiotherapy (RT) +/- concurrent systemic therapy at our institution between 1995 and 2007. RESULTS: Fifty-six patients (10.0%) developed distant metastasis. Three-year actuarial locoregional control and distant metastasis-free survival were 72% and 87%, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed N classification and locoregional failure as significant predictors of reduced distant metastasis-free survival (p < .001). In patients with distant metastasis detected after locoregional failure, the mean interval between these events was 11.6 months. CONCLUSION: Locoregional failure may play a causative role for distant metastasis in some patients with SCCHN, suggesting a need for continued focus on improving locoregional therapies.

Impact of average weekly dose of radiation during radiotherapy alone or chemoradiotherapy in head and neck cancer.

BACKGROUND: Altered fractionated radiotherapy (RT) has been shown to improve locoregional control (LRC) and overall survival (OS) in squamous cell cancer of the head and neck (SCCHN). We investigated patient outcomes using a new parameter: the average weekly dose (AWD). METHODS: The medical records of 601 patients who received definitive RT for SCCHN were reviewed. AWD was calculated by dividing the total dose in Gray (Gy) by overall treatment time in weeks, and assessed for predictive value. RESULTS: Various standard RT fractionation schedules were used. An AWD >10.0 Gy was associated with improved LRC at 2 years for patients treated with RT alone (80.9% vs 60.9%; p = .006), but not for those treated with concurrent chemoradiation (75.3% vs 77.3%; p = .77). Nonsignificant increases in late dysphagia were seen with AWD >10.0 Gy. CONCLUSION: An AWD of >10 Gy was found to be beneficial for RT alone regimens but not chemoradiotherapy regimens.

Reporter gene imaging using radiographic contrast from nonradioactive iodide sequestered by the sodium-iodide symporter.

The hypothesis that the human sodium-iodide symporter, NIS, can be used to detect NIS expression using standard radiological techniques was tested using adenoviral transduced NIS expression in human tumor xenografts grown in mice and in a naive dog prostate. Nonradioactive iodide was administered systemically to animals that 1-3 days previously had received a local injection of a replication-competent adenovirus expressing NIS under the control of the CMV promoter. The distribution of radiopacity was assessed in mouse tumors using micro-CT and a clinical X-ray machine and in the prostate of an anesthetized dog using a clinical spiral CT. Iodide sequestration and NIS expression were measured using X-ray spectrochemical analysis and fluorescence microscopy, respectively. Radiographic contrast due to NIS gene expression that was observed indicates the technique has potential for use in preclinical rodent tumor studies but probably lacks sensitivity for human use.

Antisense oligonucleotide inhibition of tumor necrosis factor receptor 1 protects the liver from radiation-induced apoptosis.

PURPOSE: Liver damage by radiation limits its efficacy in cancer treatment. As radiation can generate apoptotic signals, we wished to examine the potential to protect the liver by inhibiting apoptosis through two key mediators, FAS and tumor necrosis factor receptor 1 (TNFR1). EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Radiation-induced liver damage was assessed by serum aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase, hepatocyte micronucleus formation, and apoptosis assays (terminal nucleotidyl transferase-mediated nick end labeling and caspase-3 cleavage) in mice. Protection was evaluated by pretreating mice with antisense oligonucleotides (ASO) for FAS or TNFR1 prior to radiation. TNF-alpha production in liver and in Kupffer cells were determined by ELISA. RESULTS: Radiation increased liver FAS and TNFR1 transcription in a dose- and time-dependent manner (maximized at 25 Gy and 8 hours postirradiation). Pretreatment with ASOs for FAS and TNFR1 resulted in the inhibition of liver FAS and TNFR1 by 78% and 59%, respectively. Inductions of serum aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase were observed at 2 hours after radiation and could be reduced by pretreating mice with ASO for TNFR1 but not FAS or control oligonucleotide. Radiation-induced liver apoptosis (terminal nucleotidyl transferase-mediated nick end labeling staining and caspase-3 activation on Western blot) and hepatocyte micronucleus formation were reduced by pretreatment with ASO for TNFR1. In addition, radiation stimulated TNF-alpha production both in irradiated liver and in cultured Kupffer cells by >50% and 100%, respectively. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that ionizing radiation activates apoptotic signaling through TNFR1 in the liver, and thus provides a rationale for anti-TNFR1 apoptotic treatment to prevent radiation-induced liver injury.

Ionizing radiation-induced adenovirus infection is mediated by Dynamin 2.

Specific viral targeting into intrahepatic tumors remains critical for adenovirus gene therapy in liver cancer. We previously showed that ionizing radiation increases adenovirus uptake and transgene expression in cells and colon cancer xenografts. Here, we tested whether radiation induces viral uptake through virus-cell membrane interaction. We found that radiation (8 Gy) induced adenoviral gene transfer in rat hepatocytes (WB) and human colon carcinoma cells (LoVo). This induction (24.4- and 6.5-fold, respectively) and viral uptake were significantly diminished by preincubation with antibody for Dynamin 2 but not for Coxsackie adenovirus receptor or for integrin alpha(v). Radiation-induced Dynamin 2 expression was detected by immunohistochemical staining and by increased mRNA levels for Dynamin 2 in WB (1.5-fold) and LoVo (2.2-fold) cells. Specific small interference RNA (siRNA) transfection significantly inhibited Dynamin 2 expression in various tumor cell lines (LoVo, D54, and MCF-7) and abolished the radiation induction of Dynamin 2. Likewise, radiation-induced viral gene transfer in these cells (6.5-, 5.5-, and 9.0-fold, respectively) was significantly reduced in siRNA-transfected cells (2.7-, 3.7-, and 5.0-fold, respectively). Moreover, viral uptake in LoVo tumor xenografts was significantly increased in s.c. tumors (10.9-fold) when adenovirus was given i.v. at 24 hours after tumor irradiation, coincident with an elevated Dynamin 2 expression in irradiated tumors. These data suggest that ionizing radiation induces adenovirus gene transfer in cells and tumor xenografts by regulating viral uptake, potentially through interaction with cellular Dynamin 2 and thus should provide insight into improving adenovirus targeting in tumors.