Prevalence and clinical significance of low QRS voltages in healthy individuals, athletes, and patients with cardiomyopathy: implications for sports pre-participation cardiovascular screening.

Low QRS voltages (LQRSV), defined as a QRS amplitude from peak to nadir < 0.5 mV in all limb leads, are an emerging diagnostic finding on the electrocardiogram (ECG). In healthy individuals and athletes, LQRSV are rare (2.2-4% of elite athletes, 0.5% of recreational athletes, and 0.3% of sedentary individuals). LQRSV athletes commonly show ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) on exercise, and up to 40% of those with LQRSV and VAs have late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) on cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR). The prevalence of LQRSV in arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy ranges from 17-40%, predicts left ventricular (LV) involvement, and is correlated with more extensive LGE replacement on CMR. In hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), LQRSV ranges from 0.7-11%. LQRSV-HCM patients have more segments with LGE, despite relatively smaller LV mass, suggesting a more advanced clinical stage and a worse prognosis. In dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM), LQRSV range from 6-7%, but may be higher (36%) in certain genetic forms of DCM. On a follow-up, LQRSV are independently associated with incident cardiac events, such as sudden death, sustained ventricular arrhythmia, or appropriate internal cardioverter defibrillator discharge. In cardiac amyloid, LQRSV range from 34-66% and demonstrate a negative prognostic value, with worse clinical outcomes regardless of underlying biologic, genetic, and clinical variables. In conclusion, LQRSV deserve careful consideration for exclusion of arrhythmogenic substrates in healthy individuals, athletes, and patients. While additional research is needed, it is reasonable that LQRSV should trigger clinical investigation to exclude underlying diseases at risk of life-threatening arrhythmias.

The International Criteria for Electrocardiogram Interpretation in Athletes: Common Pitfalls and Future Directions.

Preparticipation cardiovascular screening (PPCS) in young athletes is performed to detect conditions associated with sudden cardiac death. Many medical societies and sports governing bodies support the addition of a 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) to the history and physical to improve PPCS sensitivity. The current standard for ECG interpretation in athletes, the International Criteria, was developed to distinguish physiologic from pathologic ECG findings in athletes. Although application of the International Criteria has reduced the PPCS false-positive rate, interpretative challenges and potential areas of improvement remain. This review provides an overview of common pitfalls and future directions for ECG interpretation in athletes.

Non-COVID-19 cardiovascular pathology from return-to-play screening in college athletes after COVID-19.

OBJECTIVE: Concerns for cardiac involvement after SARS-CoV-2 infection led to widespread cardiac testing in athletes. We examined incidental non-COVID-19 cardiovascular pathology in college athletes undergoing postinfection return-to-play screening. METHODS: The Outcomes Registry for Cardiac Conditions in Athletes was a nationwide prospective multicentre observational cohort study that captured testing and outcomes data from 45 institutions (September 2020-June 2021). Athletes with an ECG and transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) and no pre-existing conditions were included. Findings were defined as major (associated with sudden cardiac death or requiring intervention), minor (warrants surveillance), incidental (no follow-up needed) or uncertain significance (abnormal with subsequent normal testing). RESULTS: Athletes with both ECG and TTE (n=2900, mean age 20±1, 32% female, 27% black) were included. 35 (1.2%) had ECG abnormalities. Of these, 2 (5.7%) had TTE abnormalities indicating cardiomyopathy (hypertrophic-1, dilated-1), and 1 with normal TTE had atrial fibrillation. Of 2865 (98.8%) athletes with a normal ECG, 54 (1.9%) had TTE abnormalities: 3 (5.6%) with aortic root dilatation ≥40 mm, 15 (27.8%) with minor abnormalities, 25 (46.3%) with incidental findings and 11 (20.4%) with findings of uncertain significance. Overall, 6 (0.2%) athletes had major conditions; however, coronary anatomy and aortic dimensions were inconsistently reported and pathology may have been missed. CONCLUSION: Major non-COVID-19 cardiovascular pathology was identified in 1/500 college athletes undergoing return-to-play screening. In athletes without ECG abnormalities, TTE's added value was limited to pathological aortic root dilatation in 1/1000 athletes and minor abnormalities warranting surveillance in 1/160 athletes. Two-thirds of findings were incidental or of uncertain significance.

Value of screening for the risk of sudden cardiac death in young competitive athletes.

AIMS: This study aimed to report the long-term findings of the Italian programme of cardiovascular preparticipation screening (PPS) in young, competitive athletes. METHODS AND RESULTS: The study assessed the diagnostic yield for diseases at risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD), the costs of serial evaluations, and the long-term outcomes of PPS in a large population of Italian children (age range, 7-18 years). The PPS was repeated annually and included medical history, physical examination, resting electrocardiogram, and stress testing; additional tests were reserved for athletes with abnormal findings. Over an 11-year study period, 22 324 consecutive children [62% males; mean age, 12 (interquartile range, 10-14) years at first screening] underwent a total of 65 397 annual evaluations (median 2.9/child). Cardiovascular diseases at risk of SCD were identified in 69 children (0.3%) and included congenital heart diseases (n = 17), channelopathies (n = 14), cardiomyopathies (n = 15), non-ischaemic left ventricular scar with ventricular arrhythmias (n = 18), and others (n = 5). At-risk cardiovascular diseases were identified over the entire age range and more frequently in children ≥12 years old (n = 63, 91%) and on repeat evaluation (n = 44, 64%). The estimated cost per diagnosis was 73 312€. During a follow-up of 7.5 ± 3.7 years, one child with normal PPS findings experienced an episode of resuscitated cardiac arrest during sports activity (event rate of 0.6/100.000 athletes/year). CONCLUSION: The PPS programme led to the identification of cardiovascular diseases at risk of SCD over the whole study age range of children and more often on repeat evaluations. Among screened children, the incidence of sport-related cardiac arrest during long-term follow-up was low.

Does cardiovascular preparticipation screening cause psychological distress in athletes? A systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the psychological implications of cardiovascular preparticipation screening (PPS) in athletes. DESIGN: Systematic review. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, CINAHL, SPORTDiscus, APA PsycInfo, Cochrane Library and grey literature sources. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Observational and experimental studies assessing a population of athletes who participated in a cardiovascular PPS protocol, where psychological outcomes before, during and/or after PPS were reported. METHODS: Results of included studies were synthesised by consolidating similar study-reported measures for key psychological outcomes before, during and/or after screening. Summary measures (medians, ranges) were computed across studies for each psychological outcome. RESULTS: A total of eight studies were included in this review (median sample size: 479). Study cohorts consisted of high school, collegiate, professional and recreational athletes (medians: 59% male, 20.5 years). Most athletes reported positive reactions to screening and would recommend it to others (range 88%-100%, five studies). Increased psychological distress was mainly reported among athletes detected with pathological cardiac conditions and true-positive screening results. In comparison, athletes with false-positive screening results still reported an increased feeling of safety while participating in sport and were satisfied with PPS. A universal conclusion across all studies was that most athletes did not experience psychological distress before, during or after PPS, regardless of the screening modality used or accuracy of results. CONCLUSION: Psychological distress associated with PPS in athletes is rare and limited to athletes with true-positive findings. To mitigate downstream consequences in athletes who experience psychological distress, appropriate interventions and resources should be accessible prior to the screening procedure. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42021272887.

The International Criteria for Electrocardiogram Interpretation in Athletes: Common Pitfalls and Future Directions.

Preparticipation cardiovascular screening (PPCS) in young athletes is performed to detect conditions associated with sudden cardiac death. Many medical societies and sports governing bodies support the addition of a 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) to the history and physical to improve PPCS sensitivity. The current standard for ECG interpretation in athletes, the International Criteria, was developed to distinguish physiologic from pathologic ECG findings in athletes. Although application of the International Criteria has reduced the PPCS false-positive rate, interpretative challenges and potential areas of improvement remain. This review provides an overview of common pitfalls and future directions for ECG interpretation in athletes.

ACSM-AMSSM Call to Action: Adapting Preparticipation Cardiovascular Screening to the COVID-19 Pandemic.

ABSTRACT: Preparticipation cardiovascular screening, designed to identify cardiovascular pathology responsible for sudden unexpected death, is recommended by all major professional medical organizations overseeing the clinical care of competitive athletes. Data from several large, prospective, cohort studies indicate that cardiac imaging findings consistent with inflammatory heart disease following COVID-19 infection are more common than most forms of heart disease associated with sudden death during exercise. This call-to-action document is intended to provide recommendations about how routine preparticipation cardiovascular screening for young competitive athletes - which has the capacity to detect both COVID-19 cardiovascular complications and pathology unrelated to infection - should be altered to account for recent scientific advances.

Electrocardiogram interpretation in college athletes: Local institution versus sports cardiology center interpretation.

BACKGROUND: Electrocardiogram (ECG) screening in athletes enhances the detection of conditions associated with sudden cardiac death (SCD), but concerns remain for false positive results when conducted outside of specialized centers. This study compared ECG interpretation in college athletes between local physicians and a sports cardiology center (SCC). METHODS: Screening ECGs in athletes from eight Pacific-12 Conference institutions performed between 2010 and 2016 were included. Local interpretation was compared to SCC interpretation using both the Seattle Criteria (SCC-SC) and the International Criteria (SCC-IC). RESULTS: A total of 2445 athlete ECGs (mean age 18.5 years; 57.1% male; 63.2% Caucasian and 15.3% African American) were reviewed. The proportion of ECGs classified as abnormal was similar between local and SCC-SC interpretation (3.5% vs. 3.4%, respectively; p = .94), but was lower by SCC-IC interpretation (1.5%, p < .001). ECG abnormalities interpreted as normal by local physicians but as abnormal by SCC-SC (n = 33) and SCC-IC (n = 16) standards included: pathological Q waves (n = 15 SCC-SC; n = 3 SCC-IC), T-wave inversions (n = 8 both), and ST-depressions (n = 3 both). There was a 97.5% ECG interpretation agreement and substantial interobserver reliability (k = 0.611, p < .001) between local and SCC-SC interpretation in athletes screened starting one year after publication of the Seattle Criteria (n = 1388). Both local and SCC physicians correctly identified six abnormal ECGs associated with conditions at risk of SCD. CONCLUSIONS: ECG interpretation by local physicians at college universities had similar accuracy compared to a specialized SCC with a low overall abnormal rate, similar sensitivity, and substantial interobserver reliability. Uniform application of current ECG interpretation standards is recommended to further improve accuracy.

Comparison of cardiovascular screening in college athletes by history and physical examination with and without an electrocardiogram: Efficacy and cost.

BACKGROUND: Preparticipation screening for conditions associated with sudden cardiac death (SCD) is required in college athletes. Previous cost analyses used theoretical models based on variable assumptions, but no study used real-life outcomes. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare disease prevalence, positive findings, and costs of 2 different screening strategies: history and physical examination alone (H&P) or with an electrocardiogram (H&P+ECG). METHODS: De-identified preparticipation data (2009-2017) from Pacific-12 Conference institutions were abstracted for cardiovascular history questions, cardiovascular physical examination, and ECG result. Secondary testing, cardiac diagnoses, return to play outcomes, and complications from testing were recorded. The costs of screening and secondary testing were based on the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Physician Fee Schedule. RESULTS: A total of 8602 records (4955 H&P, 3647 H&P+ECG) were included. Eleven conditions associated with SCD were detected (2 H&P only, 9 H&P+ECG). The prevalence of cardiovascular conditions associated with SCD discovered with H&P alone was 0.04% (1/2454) compared to 0.24% (1/410) when ECG was added (P = .01) (odds ratio 5.17; 95% confidence interval 1.28-20.85; P = .02). Cost of screening and secondary testing with H&P alone was $130 per athlete and in the ECG-added group was $152 per athlete. The cost per diagnosis was $312,407 in the H&P group and $61,712 in the ECG-added group. There were no adverse outcomes from secondary testing or treatment. CONCLUSION: H&P with the addition of ECG is 6 times more likely to detect a cardiovascular condition associated with SCD than without. The addition of ECG improves the cost efficiency per diagnosis by 5-fold and should be considered at college institutions with appropriate resources.

Performance of the American Heart Association ( AHA ) 14-Point Evaluation Versus Electrocardiography for the Cardiovascular Screening of High School Athletes: A Prospective Study.

Background Preparticipation cardiovascular screening in athletes is fully endorsed by major medical societies, yet the most effective screening protocol remains debated. We prospectively compared the performance of the American Heart Association ( AHA ) 14-point screening evaluation and a resting ECG for cardiovascular screening of high school athletes. Methods and Results Competitive athletes participating in organized high school or premier/select level sports underwent cardiovascular screening using the AHA 14-point history and physical examination, and an ECG interpreted with the Seattle Criteria. A limited echocardiogram was performed for all screening abnormalities. The primary outcome measure was identification of a cardiovascular disorder associated with sudden cardiac death. From October 2014 to June 2017, 3620 high school athletes (median age, 16 years; range 13-19; 46.2% female; 78.6% white, 8.0% black) were screened. One or more positive responses to the AHA 14-point questionnaire were present in 814 (22.5%) athletes. The most common history responses included chest pain (8.1%), family history of inheritable conditions (7.3%), and shortness of breath (6.4%). Abnormal physical examination was present in 356 (9.8%) athletes, and 103 (2.8%) athletes had an abnormal ECG . Sixteen (0.4%) athletes had conditions associated with sudden cardiac death. The sensitivity (18.8%), specificity (68.0%), and positive predictive value (0.3%) of the AHA 14-point evaluation was substantially lower than the sensitivity (87.5%), specificity (97.5%), and positive predictive value (13.6%) of ECG . Conclusions The AHA 14-point evaluation performs poorly compared with ECG for cardiovascular screening of high school athletes. The use of consensus-derived history questionnaires as the primary tool for cardiovascular screening in athletes should be reevaluated.

Electrocardiogram interpretation in NCAA athletes: Comparison of the 'Seattle' and 'International' criteria.

BACKGROUND: Accurate electrocardiogram (ECG) interpretation in competitive athletes requires the distinction of physiological adaptations from findings suggestive of a pathological condition. The purpose of this study was to compare the performance of the Seattle Criteria to the International Criteria in a large dataset of NCAA athletes screened with an ECG. METHODS: ECGs from 5258 NCAA athletes who underwent prior ECG screening were re-examined by two experts in the field of sports cardiology and by ECG interpretation software by Cardea (© 2018 Cardiac Insight Inc.) using the Seattle and International Criteria. Each ECG was classified as normal or abnormal and the specific ECG abnormalities noted. Chi-squared analysis was used for statistical comparisons. RESULTS: The total number of ECGs flagged as abnormal by expert over-read decreased from 158 (3.0%) using the Seattle Criteria to 83 (1.6%) using the International Criteria (p<0.0001). Likewise, the total number of abnormal ECGs using ECG interpretation software by Cardea decreased from 278 (5.3%) using Seattle Criteria programming compared to 134 (2.5%) using International Criteria programming (p<0.0001). The most common ECG abnormality by expert over-read using the International Criteria was T wave inversion 40 (48%). The newer definition of pathological Q waves reduced the number of ECGs flagged as abnormal from pathologic Q waves from 69 (Seattle) to 11 (International) (84% reduction; p<0.0001). Expert over-read using both criteria and both Cardea interpretation programs identified all 13 athletes with cardiac pathology associated with sudden cardiac death. Cardea software using the International Criteria had a higher false-positive rate (2.3%) than expert over-read (1.3%) (p=0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Use of the International Criteria for ECG interpretation significantly reduces the total abnormal and false-positive ECG rates compared to the Seattle Criteria without compromising sensitivity. Cardea interpretation software performs well and may be a useful tool to assist clinicians.

QT Corrections for Long QT Risk Assessment: Implications for the Preparticipation Examination.

BACKGROUND: Because sudden cardiac death (SCD) in the young mainly occurs in individuals with structurally normal hearts, improved screening techniques for detecting inherited arrhythmic diseases are needed. The QT interval is an important screening measurement; however, the criteria for detecting an abnormal QT interval are based on Bazett formula and older populations. OBJECTIVE: To define the normal upper limits for QT interval from the electrocardiograms (ECGs) of healthy young individuals, compare the major correction formula and propose new QT interval thresholds for detecting those at risk of SCD. METHODS: Young active individuals underwent ECGs as part of routine preparticipation physical examinations for competitive sports or community screening. This was a nonfunded study using de-identified data with no follow-up. RESULTS: There were 31 558 subjects: 2174 grade school (7%), 18 547 high school (59%), and 10 822 college (34%). Mean age was 17 (12-35 years), 45% were female, 67% white, and 11% of African descent. Bazett performed least favorably for removing the effect of heart rate (HR), whereas Fridericia performed the best. Fridericia correction also closely fit the raw data best (R of 0.65), and at percentile values applicable to screening. The recommended risk cut points using Bazetts correction identified less than half of the athletes in the 99th or 99.5th percentiles of the uncorrected QT by HR range. Use of Fridericia correction increased capture rates by over 50%. CONCLUSION: Our results support the application of the Fridericia-corrected threshold of 460 for men and 470 milliseconds for women (and 485 milliseconds for marked prolongation) rather than Bazett correction for the preparticipation examination.

Performance of the BMJ learning training modules for ECG interpretation in athletes.

To assess the accuracy of interpreting the athlete's ECG both pre and post a series of online training modules among a range of healthcare professionals. 10 512 healthcare professionals from 138 different nations commenced the online course. These were primarily doctors (43%), nurses (18.4%) and other healthcare professionals (3.9%). The users came from 102 different specialities, with General Practice/Family Medicine (24.5%), Cardiology (10.6%), Emergency Medicine (8.7%) and Sports Medicine (6.6%) predominating. Among the 2023 users who completed both the pre-course and post-course test, there was an overall improvement of 15.3% (95% CI 13.9% to 16.6%; p<0.001). 930 completed all four other modules, and these users fared significantly better (18.7% increase; 95% CI 17.3 to 20.0) than those completing no additional modules (11.7% increase; 95% CI 3.3 to 17.7, p=0.036). Demographic analysis showed that while the starting pre-test scores varied significantly between profession/specialty groups (57.8%-82.6%), post-test scores were largely consistent (80.8%-84.6%). Although users showed the most improvement when interpreting primary electrical diseases (12.4% increase), it was also an area of notable weakness compared with the modules of normal training-related findings and cardiomyopathies. With the evolving criteria for ECG interpretation eliciting ever improving levels of specificity and sensitivity in the detection of conditions associated with sudden cardiac death among athletes, training is required to ensure the infrastructure and personnel is in place to uphold these standards. The BMJ Learning course presented is a valuable first step and demonstrates that such an online tool can be effective in aiding ECG interpretation among healthcare professionals globally.

Cardiovascular Screening Practices and Attitudes From the NCAA Autonomous "Power" 5 Conferences.

BACKGROUND:: The development of athlete-specific electrocardiogram (ECG) interpretation standards, along with recent rates of sudden cardiac death (SCD) in athletes being higher than previously estimated, has heightened the debate in the sports medicine community regarding cardiovascular screening of the college athlete, including whether certain high-risk subsets, such as male basketball athletes, should undergo more intensive screening. HYPOTHESIS:: ECG and/or echocardiography screening in National Collegiate Athletic Association Autonomous 5 Division I (A5DI) schools will be more common than previous reports, and there will be more frequent use of noninvasive cardiac screening for men's basketball players than the general athlete population. STUDY DESIGN:: Cross-sectional, quantitative study. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:: Level 4. METHODS:: The head team physician for each of the 65 schools in the A5DI conferences was contacted to complete an anonymous survey regarding cardiovascular screening practices at their institution. The survey inquired about current screening protocols, whether SCD epidemiology (SCD-E) was considered in establishing those practices, and whether awareness of present epidemiology altered physician attitudes toward screening. RESULTS:: A total of 45 of the 65 team physicians (69%) responded. All schools reported performing history and a physical evaluation. While 17 (38%) perform only history and physical, 26 (58%) also include an ECG, and 12 (27%) include echocardiography for all student-athletes. Specifically for male basketball athletes, 10 (22%) schools perform only history and physical, 32 (71%) include ECG, and 20 (45%) include echocardiography. Additionally, 64% reported using SCD-E in developing their screening protocol. Those that had not considered SCD-E indicated they were unlikely to change their screening protocol when presented with current SCD-E. CONCLUSION:: The majority (62%) of A5DI institutions include ECG and/or echocardiography as part of their cardiovascular screening of all athletes, increasing to 78% when specifically analyzing male basketball athletes. CLINICAL RELEVANCE:: A5DI institutions, presumably with greater resources, have largely implemented more intensive cardiovascular screening than just history and physical for all student-athletes and specifically for men's basketball-the athlete group at greatest risk.