Drug-induced cardiac toxicity and adverse drug reactions, a narrative review.

Drug-induced cardiotoxicity is a primary concern in both drug development and clinical practice. Although the heart is not a common target for adverse drug reactions, some drugs still cause various adverse cardiac events, with sometimes severe consequences. Direct cardiac toxicity encompasses functional and structural changes of the cardiovascular system due to possible exposure to medicines. This phenomenon extends beyond cardiovascular drugs to include non-cardiovascular drugs including anticancer drugs such as tyrosine kinase inhibitors, anthracyclines and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), as well as various antipsychotics, venlafaxine, and even some antibiotics (such as macrolides). Cardiac ADRs comprise an array of effects, ranging from heart failure and myocardial ischemia to valvular disease, thrombosis, myocarditis, pericarditis, arrhythmias, and conduction abnormalities. The underlying mechanisms may include disturbances of ionic processes, induction of cellular damage via impaired mitochondrial function, and even hypercoagulability. To mitigate the impact of drug-induced cardiotoxicity, multi-stage evaluation guidelines have been established, following the International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH) guidelines for in vitro and in vivo testing. Despite preclinical safeguards, post-marketing surveillance remains critical, as certain cardiotoxic drugs may escape initial scrutiny. Indeed, historical data show that cardiovascular ADRs contribute to almost 10% of market withdrawals. The impact of drug-induced cardiotoxicity on cardiac issues, particularly heart failure, is often underestimated, with incidence rates ranging from 11.0% to over 20.0%. We here comprehensively examine different patterns of drug-induced cardiotoxicity, highlighting current concerns and emerging pharmacovigilance signals. Understanding the underlying mechanisms and the associated risk factors is critical in order to promptly identify, effectively manage, and proactively prevent drug-induced cardiac adverse events. Collaborative efforts between physicians and cardiologists, coupled with thorough assessment and close monitoring, are essential to ensuring patient safety in the face of potential drug-induced cardiotoxicity.

Zoledronate and osteonecrosis of the jaw in osteoporosis: incidence and risk factors. Analysis of the French Pharmacovigilance Database.

INTRODUCTION: Bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (BRONJ) have been characterized with the use of oral bisphosphonates in osteoporosis and zoledronate in oncology. Uncertainties remain, though, with the occurrence of BRONJ related to the use of zoledronate in osteoporosis. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to estimate the incidence and characterize the risk factors of zoledronate-associated BRONJ in osteoporosis as compared with oral bisphosphonates in real life setting. METHODS: Cases of BRONJ associated with zoledronate, alendronate or risedronate were extracted from the French pharmacovigilance database up to 2020. The incidence of BRONJ was estimated as their respective numbers related to cases of BRONJ in patients treated with bisphosphonates for osteoporosis, over the same period, according to the Medic'AM database. RESULTS: Between 2011 and 2020, BRONJ incidence with zoledronate was 9.6/100,000 patient-year (PY), significantly higher than with alendronate (5.1/100,000 PY, P<0.001), and risedronate (2.0/100,000 PY, P<0.001). The number of patients treated with bisphosphonates has steadily decreased by 44.5% over 10 years. Meanwhile, the incidence of BRONJ decreased (5.8/100,000 PY in 2011; 1.5/100,000 in 2020), although a rebound was observed in 2018, including 47.6% of BRONJ following denosumab. Apart from classical risk factors, recent dental cares stood out in more than 40% of BRONJ, and zoledronate had a shorter exposure time than oral bisphosphonates. CONCLUSIONS: In a real-life setting, our data confirm that zoledronate-associated BRONJ in osteoporosis is scarce, seeming slightly more common compared with oral bisphosphonates. We also raise awareness of dental care guidelines and greater vigilance when using bisphosphonates in patients with previous exposure to denosumab.

CAR-T Cells and the Kidney: Insights from the WHO Safety Database.

BACKGROUND: Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cells have proven to be a game changer for treating several hematologic malignancies. Randomized controlled trials have highlighted potential life-threatening adverse drug reactions (ADRs), including cytokine release syndrome (CRS). Acute renal failure (ARF) has also been reported in 20% of the patients treated. However, an analysis of renal safety supported by large-scale real-life data seems warranted. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We queried VigiBase® for all reports of the Standardised MedDRA Query "acute renal failure" (ARF) involving a CAR-T cell, registered until 24 July 2022. Disproportionality for this ADR was analyzed through calculation of the Information Component [IC (95% confidence interval)]. A positive lower end of the 95% confidence interval of the IC is the threshold used in statistical signal detection in VigiBase®. The same analysis was carried out for various hydroelectrolytic disorders. RESULTS: We gathered 224 reports of ARF, and 125 reports of hydroelectrolytic disorders involving CAR-T cells. CAR-T cells were disproportionately reported with ARF [IC 1.5 (1.3-1.7)], even after excluding reports mentioning CRS. A significant disproportionate reporting was also found for hypernatremia [IC 3.1 (2.2-3.8)], hyperphosphatemia [IC 3.1 (1.8-3.9)], hypophosphatemia [IC 2.0 (0.6-2.9)], metabolic acidosis [IC 1.8 (1.2-2.2)], hyponatremia [IC 1.6 (1.1-2.0)], and hypercalcemia [IC 1.4 (0.5-2.1)]. There was no disproportionate reporting of dyskalemia. CONCLUSIONS: This study is limited by the inherent flaws of pharmacovigilance approaches. Nonetheless, our findings suggest that ARF and an array of hydroelectrolytic disorders are potential ADRs of CAR-T cell therapy, in real-life settings and in a nonselected population.

Pharmacovigilance follow-up of patients in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic.

INTRODUCTION: In the context of COVID-19 pandemic, a national pharmacovigilance survey was set up in March 2020. The purpose of this survey was to ensure continuous monitoring of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) in patients with COVID-19, not only related to the drugs used in this indication but also related to all drugs administered to these patients or suspected of having promoted the infection. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This descriptive study was based on data extracted from the French Pharmacovigilance Database from 1 January 2020 to 30 September 2021. Misuse was also analysed through the MESANGE project. The ADRs were classified according to three groups: "drugs used to treat COVID-19", "other drugs administered to COVID-19 positive patients" and "drugs suspected of having promoted COVID-19". The data were also presented according to 2 periods (period one was from January to June 2020 and period two from July 2020 onwards). RESULTS: Among 2189 included cases, 67.1% were serious. Cases were mainly related to "other drugs administrated to COVID-19 positive patients" (58.5%) followed by "drugs used to treat COVID-19" (33.7%) and "drugs suspected of having promoted COVID-19" (7.8%). Drugs used to treat COVID-19 and their main safety profile were different depending on the period: mostly hydroxychloroquine (51%) with heart injury and lopinavir/ritonavir (42%) with liver injury for the first period, and dexamethasone (46%) with hyperglycemia and tocilizumab (28%) with liver injury for the second period. The drugs suspected of worsening COVID-19 differed in both periods especially for non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs mainly reported in period 1 (41.5% versus 8.2% in period 2). Other immunosuppressive drugs were in the majority in the second period (85.7%), with mainly methotrexate (15.3%), anti-CD20 (15.3%) and anti-TNF alpha (10.5%). No confirmed safety signal was identified among other drugs administered to patients with COVID-19. The profile of ADRs and suspected drugs was similar between the 2 periods. The study of misuse in outpatient settings identified in both periods mainly hydroxychloroquine, azithromycin, ivermectin and zinc±vitamin C. DISCUSSION: This survey, based on real-time pharmacological and medical assessment of ADRs and weekly meetings in a specific national committee, made it possible to identify relevant safety signals which contribute to patient care with no delay. The main safety signal highlighted was serious cardiac damage under hydroxychloroquine, alone or combined with azithromycin and also with lopinavir/ritonavir. This signal has contributed to the evolution of the recommendations for these 2 drugs. The methodology of this survey has been taken over and is still going on for the pharmacovigilance monitoring of vaccines against COVID-19, for monoclonal antibodies used against COVID-19 and also for Paxlovid® (nirmatrelvir/ritonavir) which benefit from dedicated surveys.

Risk factors associated with immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced acute kidney injury compared with other immune-related adverse events: a case-control study.

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) foster anti-cancer immune responses. Their efficacy comes at the cost of immune-related adverse events (IRAEs). The latter affects various organs, including kidneys, mostly as acute tubulointerstitial nephritis, the pathophysiology of which remains unclear. We conducted a multicentre case-control study to compare the characteristics of patients with renal IRAEs (ICI-AKI) with those of patients diagnosed with other IRAEs. Methods: We queried the French pharmacovigilance database for all adverse events involving ICIs. Reports were classified as ICI-AKI or extrarenal IRAE. For each ICI-AKI report, four reports of extrarenal IRAEs were randomly included (control group, 4:1 ratio). Variables showing an association with a P < 0.05 were included as covariates in a multivariate analysis. Results: Therefore, 167 ICI-AKI reports were compared with 668 extrarenal IRAEs. At least one concomitant extrarenal IRAE was mentioned in 44.3% of ICI-AKI reports. Patients with ICI-AKI were significantly older than patients with extrarenal IRAEs (69.1 versus 64.6 years; P = 0.0135), and chronic kidney disease was significantly more prevalent (12.0% versus 3.3%; P = 0.0125). Patients with ICI-AKI were significantly more likely to be treated with fluindione [adjusted odds ratio (OR) 6.53, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 2.21-19.31; P = 0.0007], a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID, OR 3.18, 95% CI 1.07-9.4; P = 0.0368) or a proton-pump inhibitor (PPI, OR 2.18, 95% CI 1.42-3.34; P = 0.0004). Conclusion: This study is limited by a lack of data, preventing confirmation of numerous reports therefore not included in the analysis. We are unable to draw definite pathophysiological conclusions from our data. Nonetheless, we suggest that ICIs may be a 'second-hit' that precipitates acute kidney injury caused by another concomitant drug (fluindione, NSAID or PPI).

Drug-Associated Parosmia: New Perspectives from the WHO Safety Database.

Parosmia is a qualitative distortion of smell perception. Resulting from central causes, sinonasal diseases, and infections, parosmia has also been associated with medications. Therefore, we aimed to investigate potential signals for drugs associated with parosmia. VigiBase® (the WHO pharmacovigilance database) was queried for all reports of "Parosmia" (MedDRA Preferred Term), registered up to 23 January 2022. Disproportionality analysis relied on the reporting odds ratio and the information component. A signal is detected when the lower end of the 95% confidence interval of the information component is positive. We found 14,032 reports of parosmia, with a median patient age of 53 years. Most reported drugs were antiinfectives, among which COVID-19 vaccines accounted for 27.1% of reports. Antibiotics and corticosteroids were involved in 6.8% and 4.6% of reports. Significant disproportionate reporting was detected for corticosteroids, antibiotics, drugs used in nicotine dependence, COVID-19 and HPV vaccines, serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRI), and incretin mimetics. We suggest potential safety signals involving nicotine replacement therapies and vaccines. We also highlight the potential role of less suspected classes, such as SNRIs and incretin mimetics. An iatrogenic etiology should be evoked when parosmia occurs, especially in the elderly.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors-induced nephropathy: a French national survey.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), aiming to foster cancer-targeted immune response, proved to be effective in several advanced malignancies at the price of immune-related adverse events affecting various organs, notably the kidneys. Herein, a retrospective descriptive analysis was performed on all biopsy-confirmed cases of ICI-induced nephropathy notified to the French Pharmacovigilance database to date. Data were gathered about patients' characteristics, acute kidney injuries and histopathological features. A total of 63 biopsy-proven cases were included for analysis. Immune-related nephropathy occurred after a mean of 105.5 ± 98.6 (standard deviation) days after the introduction of the ICI. Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes acute kidney injury stage 3 occurred in 36.5% of patients, and the mean peak serum creatinine was 288 µmol/L. Histopathology suggested acute tubule-interstitial nephritis in 52 patients (83%), while signs of acute tubular necrosis were found in 18 (29%) and glomerular involvement in 5 of them (8%). Another immune-related adverse event was documented in 25 patients (39.7%). Patients were treated with corticosteroids in 88.9% of cases. All in all, 27.0% fully recovered, 54.0% partially recovered, 12.7% did not recover. Rechallenge was attempted in 19 patients and one patient relapsed. Three-quarters of patients received a medication known to cause acute tubule-interstitial nephritis. The major limits of this study are those inherent to pharmacovigilance studies, such as its retrospective nature and incomplete data. Although it cannot pretend drawing any pathophysiological conclusion, this study depicts the clinical and histopathological pictures of ICI-induced nephropathies in a large cohort of biopsied patients with all grades of severity.

Remdesivir and Acute Renal Failure: A Potential Safety Signal From Disproportionality Analysis of the WHO Safety Database.

Remdesivir is approved for emergency use by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and authorized conditionally by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) for patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Its benefit-risk ratio is still being explored because data in the field are rather scant. A decrease of the creatinine clearance associated with remdesivir has been inconstantly reported in clinical trials with unclear relevance. Despite these uncertainties, we searched for a potential signal of acute renal failure (ARF) in pharmacovigilance postmarketing data. An analysis of the international pharmacovigilance postmarketing databases (VigiBase) of the World Health Organization (WHO) was performed, using two disproportionality methods. Reporting odds ratio (ROR) compared the number of ARF cases reported with remdesivir, with those reported with other drugs prescribed in comparable situations of COVID-19 (hydroxychloroquine, tocilizumab, and lopinavir/ritonavir). The combination of the terms "acute renal failure" and "remdesivir" yielded a statistically significant disproportionality signal with 138 observed cases instead of the 9 expected. ROR of ARF with remdesivir was 20-fold (20.3; confidence interval 0.95 [15.7-26.3], P < 0.0001]) that of comparative drugs. Based on ARF cases reported in VigiBase, and despite the caveats inherent to COVID-19 circumstances, we detected a statistically significant pharmacovigilance signal of nephrotoxicity associated with remdesivir, deserving a thorough qualitative assessment of all available data. Meanwhile, as recommended in its Summary of Product Characteristics, assessment of patients with COVID-19 renal function should prevail before and during treatment with remdesivir in COVID-19.

Case Report: Successful Treatment of Steroid-Refractory Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Related Pure Red Cell Aplasia With Cyclosporin.

Anemia associated with Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) is usually hemolytic and regenerative. Cases of non-regenerative pure red cell aplasia are rare, and typically improve upon drug discontinuation and after corticotherapy. We herein report a case of nivolumab-related erythroblastopenia refractory to steroids in a melanoma patient that improved only after treatment with cyclosporin. Nivolumab had been well tolerated for 2 months after being introduced as an adjuvant treatment. Hemoglobin level then progressively decreased from 12.7 g/dl as baseline value to a nadir of 4.3 g/dL despite transfusion with a total of 29 packed red blood cells in 3 months. Extensive workup including repeated bone marrow examinations led to the diagnosis of pure red cell aplasia. Anemia persisted despite nivolumab discontinuation and over a month of corticotherapy, but improved dramatically 3 days after cyclosporin initiation and did not recur upon cyclosporin tapering. The patient remains cancer-free 9 months after nivolumab withdrawal. This case highlights the under-recognized risk of erythroblastopenia in patients treated with ICI and proves cyclosporin is a valid alternative for the treatment of steroid-refractory cases.

Association Between Early Severe Cardiovascular Events and the Initiation of Treatment With the Anti-Interleukin 12/23p40 Antibody Ustekinumab.

Importance: Ustekinumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting interleukin 12/23p40 (IL-12/23p40), is effective in the treatment of moderate to severe psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis, and Crohn disease. In 2011, a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials reported a potential risk of severe cardiovascular events (SCEs) within the first few months after the initiation of anti-IL-12/23p40 antibodies. Objective: To assess whether the initiation of ustekinumab treatment is associated with increased risk of SCEs. Design, Setting, and Participants: This case-time-control study used data from the French national health insurance database, covering 66 million individuals, on all patients exposed to ustekinumab between April 1, 2010, and December 31, 2016, classified according to their cardiovascular risk level (high- and low-risk strata). The risk period was the 6 months before the SCE, defined as acute coronary syndrome or stroke, and the reference period was the 6 months before the risk period. Statistical analysis was performed from September 20, 2017, to July 6, 2018. Exposure: The initiation of ustekinumab treatment was screened during the risk and reference periods. Main Outcomes and Measures: Odds ratios for the risk of SCE after the initiation of ustekinumab treatment were calculated. Results: Of the 9290 patients exposed to ustekinumab (4847 men [52%]; mean [SD] age, 43 [14] years), 179 experienced SCEs (65 cases of acute coronary syndrome, 68 cases of unstable angina, and 46 cases of stroke). Among patients with a high cardiovascular risk, a statisically significant association between initiaton of ustekinumab treatment and SCE occurrence was identified (odds ratio, 4.17; 95% CI, 1.19-14.59). Conversely, no statistically significant association was found among patients with a low cardiovascular risk (odds ratio, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.03-3.13). Conclusions and Relevance: This study suggests that the initiation of ustekinumab treatment may trigger SCEs among patients at high cardiovascular risk. In line with the current mechanistic models for atherosclerotic disease, the period after the initiation of anti-IL-12/23p40 may be associated with atherosclerotic plaque destabilization via the inhibition of helper T cell subtype 17. Although the study interpretation is limited by its observational design, these results suggest that caution may be needed in the prescription of ustekinumab to patients at high cardiovascular risk.

Is anti-factor Xa chromogenic assay for Rivaroxaban appropriate in clinical practice? Advantages and comparative drawbacks.

INTRODUCTION: No routine monitoring is required with factor Xa inhibitor rivaroxaban. Yet, its titration must be adapted, and its misuse may lead to increased risk of bleeding; therefore, therapeutic rivaroxaban monitoring might help in specific situations. MATERIAL AND METHODS: As asked by clinicians of our medical center, we measured rivaroxaban plasma concentrations in real conditions of use and checked their corresponding prescriptions. Measurement of 112 samples from 94 consecutive patients was performed with a Biophen LRT® anti-Xa chromogenic assay and compared blindly to the HPLC-MSMS "gold standard" method. Rivaroxaban was effectively given to 80 out of 94 patients but a mere 57% through an adequate prescription (within the scope of indications/titration). All chromogenic measurements were over the pre-specified 30ng/ml LOQ, whereas only 98 /114 samples had quantifiable rivaroxaban with HPLC-MSMS (LOQ 1ng/ml). Correlation between the two methods and linear regression were highly significant (p<0.0001). However, chromogenic values (mean 141.6ng/ml[96.6]) overestimated HPLC-MSMS values (119.7ng/ml[79.5]) by 22ng/ml according to Bland-Altman analysis (p<0.001). After re-assessing the chromogenic LOQ at 52ng/ml, 83 quantifiable samples had a mean concentration of 176.9ng/ml as compared to 158.5ng/ml with HPLC-MSMS, with no false positive anymore. CONCLUSIONS: In our medical center, rivaroxaban concentrations could be assessed by a rapid chromogenic method. Its pre-specified LOQ proved too high after being checked "on site" against HPLC-MSMS. Prescriptions for rivaroxaban were not optimal. An overestimated LOQ may impair observance monitoring or predispose patients to either risky thrombolysis or otherwise adjournable surgery in clinical practice.

Are nilotinib-associated vascular adverse events an under-estimated problem?

Vascular adverse events have been reported with nilotinib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor prescribed for chronic myeloid leukaemia. However, few data specify their incidence, or whether they occur in predisposed patients. Hence, we prospectively studied 30 consecutive patients to assess the frequency of such adverse reactions and determine whether the patients presenting with these adverse events bear predisposing factors. From 3 to 73 months after nilotinib initiation, 10 of the 30 patients experienced vascular events. Three patients of these 10 were devoid of any patent cardiovascular risk factor, except for age. This study points out an occurrence more frequent than expected of vascular adverse events associated with nilotinib (> 30% vs. < 1% in summary of product characteristics), and particularly of vascular events of late onset in patients with no pre-existing risk factors.

KCNH2 polymorphism and methadone dosage interact to enhance QT duration.

BACKGROUND: Many drugs increase the duration of the QT interval of patients, potentially leading to harmful effects such as polymorphic ventricular arrhythmias. Most of these drugs do so by inhibiting the rapid component IKr of the delayed rectifier potassium current IK. Methadone is the most prescribed heroin maintenance treatment and is known to inhibit the cardiac potassium channel hERG, which recapitulates IKr. In order to evaluate if any polymorphism of potassium channels' genes could explain some of the "idiosyncratic" QT prolongations observed in patients treated with methadone, we tested the association between KCNE1, KCNE2, and KCNH2 polymorphism and the QT interval prolongation in those patients, controlling for other variables associated with a decrease of the repolarizing reserve. METHODS: A cohort of 82 patients treated with stable dosage of methadone (mean dosage 65 mg/d) for at least three months was genotyped for five polymorphisms in KCNE1, KCNE2 and KCNH2 genes and had their corrected QT (QTc) assessed. RESULTS: The mean QTc interval was 415±34ms. In a linear regression model, longer QTc interval was associated with methadone dosage and with one genetic factor. Each copy of a Lys allele at codon 897 of KCNH2, the gene that encodes the cardiac potassium voltage-gated channel hERG, was associated with a 15.4ms longer QTc (95% CI [4.6-26.2]; p=0.001). CONCLUSION: KCNH2 genotyping may be relevant in the analysis of cumulative risk factors for QT prolongation in patients on methadone maintenance treatment.

Two-year outcome of patients after a first hospitalization for heart failure: A national observational study.

BACKGROUND: National population-based management and outcome data for patients of all ages hospitalized for heart failure have rarely been reported. AIM: National population-based management and outcome of patients of all ages hospitalized for heart failure have rarely been reported. The present study reports these results, based on 77% of the French population, for patients hospitalized for the first time for heart failure in 2009. METHODS: The study population comprised French national health insurance general scheme beneficiaries hospitalized in 2009 with a principal diagnosis of heart failure, after exclusion of those hospitalized for heart failure between 2006 and 2008 or with a chronic disease status for heart failure. Data were collected from the national health insurance information system (SNIIRAM). RESULTS: A total of 69,958 patients (mean age, 78 years; 48% men) were studied. The hospital mortality rate was 6.4%, with 1-month, 1-year and 2-year survival rates of 89%, 71% and 60%, respectively. Heart failure and all-cause readmission-free rates were 55% and 43% at 1 year and 27% and 17% at 2 years, respectively. Compared with a reference sample of 600,000 subjects, the age- and sex-standardized relative risk of death was 29 (95% confidence interval [CI] 28-29) at 2 years, 82 (95% CI 72-94) in subjects aged<50 years and 3 (95% CI 3-3) in subjects aged ≥ 90 years. For subjects aged < 70 years who survived 1 month after discharge, factors associated with a reduction in the 2-year mortality rate were: female sex; age < 55 years; absence of co-morbidities; and use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers, beta-blockers, lipid-lowering agents or oral anticoagulants during the month following discharge. Poor prognostic factors were treatment with a loop diuretic before or after hospitalization and readmission for heart failure within 1 month after discharge. CONCLUSIONS: This large population-based study confirms the severe prognosis of heart failure and the need to promote the use of effective medications and management designed to improve survival.

Aluminium and primary spontaneous pneumothorax. A suggestive but unconfirmed hypothesis.

A prospective case-control study was designed to confirm the higher plasma concentration of aluminium in primary spontaneous pneumothorax patients recently reported in literature. Ten consecutive patients with PSP entered the study. Comparison with the control group obtained from the database of the Pharmacology Department did not show any significant difference. The conclusion was that in patients with PSP from the Maritime Alps region aluminium concentration was not abnormal. Therefore, the study was stopped.