Physiology of chemokines in the cancer microenvironment.

Chemokines are chemotactic cytokines whose canonical functions govern movement of receptor-expressing cells along chemical gradients. Chemokines are a physiological system that is finely tuned by ligand and receptor expression, ligand or receptor oligomerization, redundancy, expression of atypical receptors, and non-GPCR binding partners that cumulatively influence discrete pharmacological signaling responses and cellular functions. In cancer, chemokines play paradoxical roles in both the directed emigration of metastatic, receptor-expressing cancer cells out of the tumor as well as immigration of tumor-infiltrating immune cells that culminate in a tumor-unique immune microenvironment. In the age of precision oncology, strategies to effectively harness the power of immunotherapy requires consideration of chemokine gradients within the unique spatial topography and temporal influences with heterogeneous tumors. In this article, we review current literature on the diversity of chemokine ligands and their cellular receptors that detect and process chemotactic gradients and illustrate how differences between ligand recognition and receptor activation influence the signaling machinery that drives cellular movement into and out of the tumor microenvironment. Facets of chemokine physiology across discrete cancer immune phenotypes are contrasted to existing chemokine-centered therapies in cancer.

Synchronous effects of targeted mitochondrial complex I inhibitors on tumor and immune cells abrogate melanoma progression.

Metabolic heterogeneity within the tumor microenvironment promotes cancer cell growth and immune suppression. We determined the impact of mitochondria-targeted complex I inhibitors (Mito-CI) in melanoma. Mito-CI decreased mitochondria complex I oxygen consumption, Akt-FOXO signaling, blocked cell cycle progression, melanoma cell proliferation and tumor progression in an immune competent model system. Immune depletion revealed roles for T cells in the antitumor effects of Mito-CI. While Mito-CI preferentially accumulated within and halted tumor cell proliferation, it also elevated infiltration of activated effector T cells and decreased myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC) as well as tumor-associated macrophages (TAM) in melanoma tumors in vivo. Anti-proliferative doses of Mito-CI inhibited differentiation, viability, and the suppressive function of bone marrow-derived MDSC and increased proliferation-independent activation of T cells. These data indicate that targeted inhibition of complex I has synchronous effects that cumulatively inhibits melanoma growth and promotes immune remodeling.

Inhibition of Hedgehog Signaling Alters Fibroblast Composition in Pancreatic Cancer.

PURPOSE: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a deadly disease characterized by an extensive fibroinflammatory stroma, which includes abundant cancer-associated fibroblast (CAF) populations. PDAC CAFs are heterogeneous, but the nature of this heterogeneity is incompletely understood. The Hedgehog pathway functions in PDAC in a paracrine manner, with ligands secreted by cancer cells signaling to stromal cells in the microenvironment. Previous reports investigating the role of Hedgehog signaling in PDAC have been contradictory, with Hedgehog signaling alternately proposed to promote or restrict tumor growth. In light of the newly discovered CAF heterogeneity, we investigated how Hedgehog pathway inhibition reprograms the PDAC microenvironment. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We used a combination of pharmacologic inhibition, gain- and loss-of-function genetic experiments, cytometry by time-of-flight, and single-cell RNA sequencing to study the roles of Hedgehog signaling in PDAC. RESULTS: We found that Hedgehog signaling is uniquely activated in fibroblasts and differentially elevated in myofibroblastic CAFs (myCAF) compared with inflammatory CAFs (iCAF). Sonic Hedgehog overexpression promotes tumor growth, while Hedgehog pathway inhibition with the smoothened antagonist, LDE225, impairs tumor growth. Furthermore, Hedgehog pathway inhibition reduces myCAF numbers and increases iCAF numbers, which correlates with a decrease in cytotoxic T cells and an expansion in regulatory T cells, consistent with increased immunosuppression. CONCLUSIONS: Hedgehog pathway inhibition alters fibroblast composition and immune infiltration in the pancreatic cancer microenvironment.

Beta 1 integrin signaling mediates pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma resistance to MEK inhibition.

Pancreatic cancer, one of the deadliest human malignancies, has a dismal 5-year survival rate of 9%. KRAS is the most commonly mutated gene in pancreatic cancer, but clinical agents that directly target mutant KRAS are not available. Several effector pathways are activated downstream of oncogenic Kras, including MAPK signaling. MAPK signaling can be inhibited by targeting MEK1/2; unfortunately, this approach has been largely ineffective in pancreatic cancer. Here, we set out to identify mechanisms of MEK inhibitor resistance in pancreatic cancer. We optimized the culture of pancreatic tumor 3D clusters that utilized Matrigel as a basement membrane mimetic. Pancreatic tumor 3D clusters recapitulated mutant KRAS dependency and recalcitrance to MEK inhibition. Treatment of the clusters with trametinib, a MEK inhibitor, had only a modest effect on these cultures. We observed that cells adjacent to the basement membrane mimetic Matrigel survived MEK inhibition, while the cells in the interior layers underwent apoptosis. Our findings suggested that basement membrane attachment provided survival signals. We thus targeted integrin ß1, a mediator of extracellular matrix contact, and found that combined MEK and integrin ß1 inhibition bypassed trametinib resistance. Our data support exploring integrin signaling inhibition as a component of combination therapy in pancreatic cancer.