Thymidylate synthase protein expression in colorectal cancer metastases predicts for clinical outcome to leucovorin-modulated bolus or infusional 5-fluorouracil but not methotrexate-modulated bolus 5-fluorouracil.

BACKGROUND: Different 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) schedules and/or biochemical modulators may result in different mechanisms of cytotoxicity, potentially affecting the correlation between thymidylate synthase (TS) expression and the clinical response to the fluoropyrimidine. PATIENTS AND METHODS: TS levels were measured immunohistochemically on archival specimens of colorectal cancer metastases from 124 patients homogeneously treated in a series of clinical trials at our institutions with: (A) leucovorin (LV)-modulated infusional 5-FU (n = 48); (B) LV-modulated bolus 5-FU (n = 41); (C) methotrexate (MTX)-modulated bolus 5-FU (n = 35). RESULTS: A statistically significant correlation between TS levels and the clinical response was observed with the regimens involving continuous infusion and/or LV modulation (response rate in patients with low and high TS: 66% versus 24%, P = 0.003, and 50% versus 0%, P = 0.0001, in group A and B, respectively). Conversely, TS levels failed to predict the clinical response within the group of patients treated with MTX-modulated bolus 5-FU (response rate 21% versus 13%, P = 0.50, with low and high TS, respectively). Consistently, the median time to progression/overall survival time in patients with low and high TS were 9 versus 6 months/19 versus 14 months (P = 0.009/0.035, group A), 8 versus 2 months/12 versus 6 months (P = 0.002/0.0006, group B) and 3 versus 2 months/12 versus 13 months (P = 0.14/0.74, group C). CONCLUSIONS: The correlation between intratumoral TS levels and the clinical response to 5-FU depends strongly on the schedule of administration/biochemical modulators that are used in different 5-FU regimens. These data strengthen the notion that different 5-FU schedules have different mechanisms of cytotoxicity.

Combination chemotherapy of carboplatin and gemcitabine against solid tumors: a phase I trial.

BACKGROUND: Some trials have suggested that the combination of gemcitabine and platinum compounds can have a synergistic effect on several solid tumors, but, at present, the data concerning carboplatin-gemcitabine combinations are not sufficient to allow the planning of phase II trials. The present phase I trial was planned to define the maximum tolerated dose and the dose-limiting toxicity of a carboplatin-gemcitabine combination. METHODS: Thirty-two patients with advanced, pretreated solid tumors were treated with carboplatin on day 1 and gemcitabine on days 1, 8, and 15 every 28 days. The starting doses of carboplatin and gemcitabine were 3.5 mg/ml per min (area under the curve; AUC), and 600 mg/m2, respectively. The doses of the two agents were alternately increased to 4, 4.5, and 5 mg/ml per min and to 800 and 960 mg/m2, respectively. At each dose level, three patients were initially enrolled. If one of them experienced grade IV hematological toxicity or grade III-IV nonhematological toxicity (with the exception of alopecia), an additional three patients were enrolled at the same dose level. If two or more patients experienced grade IV hematological toxicity or grade III-IV non-hematological toxicity (with the exception of alopecia), the maximum tolerated dose was considered to have been reached, and the dose below this was recommended for further studies. All patients were evaluated weekly for toxicity and after every two courses of chemotherapy for response. RESULTS: Dose-limiting toxicity was hematological, and the maximum tolerated doses were 4.5 mg/ml per min for carboplatin and 800 mg/m2 for gemcitabine. The activity of the carboplatin/gemcitabine combination was encouraging, with a 21.9% response rate (7/32), three complete disease regressions, and a median time to progression of 30 weeks. The gemcitabine doses of day 15 or days 8 and 15 were omitted for hematological toxicity in 57 (50%) and 17 (14.9%) courses of chemotherapy, while no courses of chemotherapy were delayed for grade III-IV hematological or nonhematological toxicity. CONCLUSION: The maximum tolerated doses suggested by this trial are lower than those in other similar phase I trials, but they are consistent with those reported by most of the trials investigating gemcitabine either in combination with cisplatin or in heavily pretreated patients. Carboplatin 4.5 mg/ml per min on day 1 plus gemcitabine 800 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, and 15 every 28 days may represent a promising schedule for further phase II trials.

[Subacute cerebellar degeneration and pleural mesothelioma. Report of a case]. / Degenerazione cerebellare subacuta e mesotelioma pleurico. Descrizione di un caso.

Subacute cerebellar degeneration is an autoimmune disorder and represents the paraneoplastic neurologic syndrome most frequently occurring in the central nervous system. To our knowledge, until now, no case of such a paraneoplastic syndrome as been described in patients with mesothelioma; on the contrary, some non-neurologic paraneoplastic syndromes have been described in patients with mesothelioma, and an aberrant production of cytokines has been suggested as the main pathogenetic event. In our report it can be supposed that an aberrant production of cytokines might have triggered an autoimmune reaction, causing anti Purkinje cells antibodies production, neurological damage and clinical outcome.

Staging of breast cancer: what standards should be used in research and clinical practice?

BACKGROUND: Bone scan (BS), chest X-rays (CXR), liver ultrasonography (LUS) and laboratory parameters (LP) are frequently used as routine staging procedures for breast cancer patients. These procedures are not always appropriate in either clinical or research settings, regardless of the stage. The aim of this study was to identify groups of patients with differing risks for metastases in order to select more precise standard staging procedures. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The staging data relating to 406 breast cancer patients consecutively referred to our institution between November 1989 and October 1996 were analysed including pathological TNN grading and biological parameters. All of the cases with a positive or suspicious pre-operatory staging and who proved to have metastatic disease before surgery or during the first six months of follow-up were considered true-positive; all of the other cases with a positive or suspicious initial staging but with no evidence of distant metastasis before surgery and with a disease-free survival longer then six months were considered false-positive. In the same way all cases with negative initial staging who relapsed during the first six months of follow-up were considered false-negative and those with negative initial staging and with a disease-free survival longer then six months were considered true-negative. Statistical analysis was performed using Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: BS, CXR and LUS, 388, 399 and 398 examinations respectively, were considered available, and 17 (4.38%), six (1.5%) and four (1%), respectively, proved to be true-positive. A statistically significant difference was observed when our cases were grouped according to T status (T4 vs. T1-T2-T3, P < 0.01) and nodal status (N0-N1 cases with less than three involved nodes and N1 with more than three positive lymph nodes N2 patients, P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The present study suggests that breast cancer patients can be divided into three subgroups with different detection rates for distant metastases at staging (0.59%, 2.94% and 15.53%), and that the standard practice should be changed. In the first (T1N0 and T1N1 patients with < or = 3 positive lymph nodes--41.13% of the patients) and the second group (T2N0, T2N1 with < or = 3 positive lymph nodes, T3N0 and T3N1 patients with < or = 3 positive lymph nodes--33.49% of the patients) there is no need for a complete set of staging procedures, whereas full procedural staging is needed in the third group of patients (T4, N1 with > 3 lymph nodes and N2, 25.37% of the patients).

Assessment of the RSCL quality of life instrument during chemotherapy in an Italian setting.

Evaluation of the quality of life of oncological patients is now perceived as a major element of cancer treatment, and various instruments for measuring it have been proposed. However, whatever instrument is used must be capable of reflecting the different ways in which different contexts and cultures respond to cancer. We administered the Italian version of the Rotterdam Symptom Checklist (RSCL) to 60 patients with advanced disease attending five oncological centres in Romagna (central Italy). The RSCL was found to be able to measure both psychological and physical well-being and to detect a difference between patients on low/medium and those on high-burden chemotherapy. The Italian version of the RSCL is an adequate scale that is capable of capturing patient perceptions and could be used for monitoring the quality of life of Italian patients participating in clinical trials.

Burn and stricture of the ostomy due to colostomy irrigation. Report of a case.

A case of burn and stricture of the ostomy subsequent to colostomy irrigation is reported. Heretofore, perforation has been the only serious complication noted. In this case, it was necessary to reconstruct the ostomy because of the development of postburn stricture.