Proteomic and lipidomic analysis of the mechanism underlying astragaloside IV in mitigating ferroptosis through hypoxia-inducible factor 1α/heme oxygenase 1 pathway in renal tubular epithelial cells in diabetic kidney disease.

ETHNOPHARMACOLOGICAL RELEVANCE: The limitations of modern medicine in mitigating the pathological process of diabetic kidney disease (DKD) necessitate novel, precise, and effective prevention and treatment methods. Huangqi, the root of Astragalus membranaceus Fisch. ex Bunge has been used in traditional Chinese medicine for various kidney ailments. Astragaloside IV (AS-IV), the primary pharmacologically active compound in A. membranaceus, is involved in lipid metabolism regulation; however, its potential in ameliorating renal damage in DKD remains unexplored. AIM OF THE STUDY: To elucidate the specific mechanism by which AS-IV moderates DKD progression. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A murine model of DKD and high glucose-induced HK-2 cells were treated with AS-IV. Furthermore, multiomics analysis, molecular docking, and molecular dynamics simulations were performed to elucidate the mechanism of action of AS-IV in DKD, which was validated using molecular biological methods. RESULTS: AS-IV regulated glucose and lipid metabolism in DKD, thereby mitigating lipid deposition in the kidneys. Proteomic analysis identified 12 proteins associated with lipid metabolism regulated by AS-IV in the DKD renal tissue. Additionally, lipid metabolomic analysis revealed that AS-IV upregulated and downregulated 4 beneficial and 79 harmful lipid metabolites, respectively. Multiomics analysis further indicated a positive correlation between the top-ranked differential protein heme oxygenase (HMOX)1 and the levels of various harmful lipid metabolites and a negative correlation with the levels of beneficial lipid metabolites. Furthermore, enrichment of both ferroptosis and hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF)-1 signaling pathways during the AS-IV treatment of DKD was observed using proteomic analysis. Validation results showed that AS-IV effectively reduced ferroptosis in DKD-affected renal tubular epithelial cells by inhibiting HIF-1α/HMOX1 pathway activity, upregulating glutathione peroxidase-4 and ferritin heavy chain-1 expression, and downregulating acyl-CoA synthetase long-chain family member-4 and transferrin receptor-1 expression. Our findings demonstrate the potential of AS-IV in mitigating DKD pathology by downregulating the HIF-1α/HMOX1 signaling pathway, thereby averting ferroptosis in renal tubular epithelial cells. CONCLUSIONS: AS-IV is a promising treatment strategy for DKD via the inhibition of ferroptosis in renal tubular epithelial cells. The findings of this study may help facilitate the development of novel therapeutic strategies.

Meta-analysis: loop ileostomy versus colostomy to prevent complications of anterior resection for rectal cancer.

PURPOSE: Anastomotic leakage is a serious complication of colorectal cancer surgery, prolonging hospital stays and impacting patient prognosis. Preventive colostomy is required in patients at risk of anastomotic fistulas. However, it remains unclear whether the commonly used loop colostomy(LC) or loop ileostomy(LI) can reduce the complications of colorectal surgery. This study aims to compare perioperative morbidities associated with LC and LI following anterior rectal cancer resection, including LC and LI reversal. METHODS: In this meta-analysis, the Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for prospective cohort studies, retrospective cohort studies, and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on perioperative morbidity during stoma development and reversal up to July 2023, The meta-analysis included 10 trials with 2036 individuals (2 RCTs and 8 cohorts). RESULTS: No significant differences in morbidity, mortality, or stoma-related issues were found between the LI and LC groups after anterior resection surgery. However, patients in the LC group exhibited higher rates of stoma prolapse (RR: 0.39; 95%CI: 0.19-0.82; P = 0.01), retraction (RR: 0.45; 95%CI: 0.29-0.71; P < 0.01), surgical site infection (RR: 0.52; 95%CI: 0.27-1.00; P = 0.05) and incisional hernias (RR: 0.53; 95%CI: 0.32-0.89; P = 0.02) after stoma closure compared to those in the LI group. Conversely, the LI group showed higher rates of dehydration or electrolyte imbalances(RR: 2.98; 95%CI: 1.51-5.89; P < 0.01), high-output(RR: 6.17; 95%CI: 1.24-30.64; P = 0.03), and renal insufficiency post-surgery(RR: 2.51; 95%CI: 1.01-6.27; P = 0.05). CONCLUSION: Our study strongly recommends a preventive LI for anterior resection due to rectal cancer. However, ileostomy is more likely to result in dehydration, renal insufficiency, and intestinal obstruction. More multicenter RCTs are needed to corroborate this.

Effect of Indocyanine Green Fluorescence Angiography on Anastomotic Leakage in Patients Undergoing Colorectal Surgery: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials and Propensity-Score-Matched Studies.

Background: Meta-analyses have demonstrated that indocyanine green (ICG) can effectively prevent anastomotic leakage (AL) after colorectal surgery. However, recent evidence from large randomized controlled trial (RCT) has suggested that ICG fluorescence angiography does not reduce the incidence of AL in colorectal surgery. This study was conducted to evaluate the value of ICG for the prevention of AL following colorectal surgery. Methods: Up to September 16, 2021, PubMed, Embase, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and VIP databases were searched for RCTs and propensity-score matched (PSM) studies evaluating the use of ICG for prevention of AL after colorectal surgery. Mean differences (MDs) or odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. Results: Twenty studies (5 RCTs and 15 PSM studies) with a total of 5,125 patients were included. ICG did not reduce the reoperation rate (OR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.38, 1.30), conversion rates (OR, 1.34; 95% CI, 0.65, 2.78), or mortality (OR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.13, 1.85), but ICG did reduce the incidence of AL (OR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.36, 0.59) and symptomatic AL (OR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.33, 0.71), and reduced the length of hospital stay (MD,-1.21; 95% CI,-2.06,-0.35) and intraoperative blood loss (MD,-9.13; 95% CI,-17.52,-0.74). In addition, ICG use did not increase the incidence of total postoperative complications (OR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.64, 1.35), postoperative ileus (OR, 1.26; 95% CI, 0.53, 2.97), wound infection (OR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.44, 1.32), urinary tract infection (OR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.30, 2.59), pulmonary infection (OR, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.04, 1.45), urinary retention (OR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.23, 5.04), anastomotic bleeding (OR, 1.53; 95% CI, 0.27, 8.60), anastomotic stricture (OR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.24, 2.29), or operative time (MD,-9.64; 95% CI,-20.28, 1.01). Conclusions: ICG can effectively reduce the incidence of AL, without prolonging the operation time or increasing postoperative complications in colorectal surgery. Systematic Review Registration: www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/#recordDetails, identifier: CRD42021279064.

Optimal Interval to Surgery After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

This study aimed to evaluate the influence of a waiting interval of ≥ 8 weeks between the end of preoperative neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) and surgery on the outcomes of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. We conducted a comprehensive literature review of retrospective and prospective studies from PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases to investigate the length of the preoperative nCRT-surgery waiting interval and outcomes in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. The primary outcome measure was pathologic complete response (pCR) rate. Secondary outcome measures included overall survival, disease-free survival, operative time, and the incidence of local recurrence, postoperative complications, anastomotic leakage, and sphincter-preserving surgery. Standardized mean differences and risk ratios were calculated. Thirteen studies involving 19,652 patients were included. The meta-analysis demonstrated that pCR was significantly increased in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer and a waiting interval of ≥ 8 weeks between preoperative nCRT and surgery compared to a waiting interval of < 8 weeks, or a waiting interval of > 8 weeks compared to ≤ 8 weeks (risk ratio = 1.25; 95% confidence interval, 1.16-1.35; P < .0001). There were no significant differences in overall survival, disease-free survival, operative time, or incidence of local recurrence, postoperative complications, or sphincter-preserving surgery. This study revealed that performing surgery after a waiting interval of ≥ 8 weeks after the end of preoperative nCRT is safe and efficacious for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer, significantly improving pCR without increasing operative time or incidence of postoperative complications, compared to a waiting interval of ≤ 8 weeks.