Comparison of "complications" and functional outcome of anterolateral thigh flap and sural neurofasciocutaneus flap for foot and ankle reconstruction: A single center cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Skin and soft-tissue defects around the foot and ankle remain a challenge for orthopedic and plastic surgeons. Anterolateral thigh (ALT) flap and sural neurofasciocutaneous (NFC) flap are both used to reconstruct lower-extremity soft-tissue defects. The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes of the two flaps and attempt to provide an optimal strategy. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted, reviewing data from 93 patients who underwent reconstruction of wounds around the foot and ankle with ALT flap (42 cases) or NFC flap (51 cases) from January 2014 to January 2020. Patients' demographics, characteristics of the defect, complications, cosmetic appearance, and functional outcome were analyzed, and statistical analysis was performed. RESULT: There was no difference in gender and etiology; however, NFC flaps were more frequently used in elderly patients. Mean size of the flap in the ALT group was significantly larger in comparison with the NFC group. The ALT group had longer operation and hospitalization time than the NFC group (P < 0.05). The incidence of partial necrosis in ALT group was significantly lower than that in NFC group, while its general complications rate was higher. In long-term follow-up, esthetic appearance of the reconstructed site was comparable in both groups, the ALT group had a higher ratio of revision surgery. Moreover, the ALT group showed better overall esthetic outcomes in the donor site. CONCLUSIONS: The study showed that anterolateral thigh flaps in wound coverage of foot and ankle achieved better outcomes than neurofasciocutaneous flaps in terms of recipient benefits and donor-site compromise with a special indication for larger and more distally located defects.

Foot and ankle reconstruction using the lateral supramalleolar flap versus the anterolateral thigh flap in the elderly: A comparative study.

The purpose of this study was to compare the reconstructive outcomes of soft-tissue defects around the foot and ankle with anterolateral thigh (ALT) flap or lateral supramalleolar (LSM) flap and attempt to provide an optimal strategy for elderly patients. A retrospective review of all continuous patients with foot and ankle reconstruction using different flaps from October of 2010 and October of 2020 was performed. Based on the flap types, the patients were divided into two groups: ALT flap group (n = 50) and LSM flap group (n = 46). Outcomes were assessed according to the flap survival rate, early complications, general complications, late complications, cosmetic appearance, functional outcomes and Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS). We found that there was no difference in average age, gender, aetiology, size of the defect, debridement times between the two groups; however, a significant difference in operation time, hospitalisation time and cost were noted between them. What's more, the early flap complications between them were not significantly different. The LSM flap group showed less general complications, less flap bulky and lower cosmetic appearance. Moreover, the functional evaluation and VSS seem similar (P > .05). Thus, The ALT flap and LSM flap are both flaps available for foot and ankle reconstruction in elderly patients. However, the LSM flap offers short operation time, short hospitalisation time, and less cost with a lower frequency of postoperative complications. Thus, we advocate the LSM flap for the reconstruction of moderate-size defects of the foot and ankle region in elderly patients.

Comparison of Hybrid Fixation to Dual Plating for Both-Bone Forearm Fractures in Older Children.

When operative stabilization of forearm fractures in older children is necessary, the optimal method of fixation is controversial. This study compared the radiographic and functional outcomes of dual plating to a hybrid fixation construct with elastic intramedullary nailing of the radius and plate fixation of the ulna of forearm fractures in children aged between 10 and 16 years. Nineteen patients were treated using a hybrid fixation construct and 13 patients were treated with dual plating fixation. The 2 groups were compared retrospectively according to perioperative data and patient outcome measures. The hybrid fixation construct group had 19, with a mean age of 13.3 years (range, 10-16 years) and the dual plate group had 13 patients, with a mean age of 12.9 years (range, 10-16 years). Groups were similar for sex, arm injured, and fracture location. Duration of surgery and tourniquet use was significantly shorter in the hybrid fixation construct group. There was no significant difference in either time to union or Price scores for function evaluation between the 2 groups. Complication rates were also similar between groups, with 1 ulna delayed unions, 1 superficial infection at entry of nail in hybrid fixation construct group, and 1 ulna delayed unions in the dual plating group. Hybrid fixation, using open reduction and internal fixation with a plate-and-screw construct on the ulna and closed reduction and elastic intramedullary fixation of the ulna, is an acceptable method for treating both-bone diaphyseal forearm fractures in skeletally immature patients aged 10-16 years.

Comparison of Pediatric Forearm Fracture Fixation Between Single- and Double-Elastic Stable Intramedullary Nailing.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the outcome of single- and double-elastic stable intramedullary nailing (ESIN) for the treatment of pediatric both-bone forearm fractures. We retrospectively analyzed 49 children with both-bone forearm fractures treated with ESIN. Twenty-four patients were treated with single-ESIN (S-ESIN) to fixate the radius only, and the other 25 patients were treated with double-ESIN (D-ESIN) to fixate the radius and ulna. The duration of surgery, times of fluoroscopy, cost of hospitalization, period of castoff, union time, radiographic outcomes, clinical results, and postoperative complications were compared. The duration of surgery, times of fluoroscopy, and cost of hospitalization were significantly lower in the S-ESIN group; however, the average period of castoff was longer in the S-ESIN group. The incidence of delayed union of the ulna was significantly higher in the D-ESIN than in the S-ESIN group. Although the mean angulation deformity of the ulna in the S-ESIN group was significantly larger than in the D-ESIN group, both of them were acceptable (<10 degrees). Despite this, there was no difference in the loss of forearm motion and complication rates between the 2 groups. In conclusion, our data suggest that S-ESIN to fixate the radius alone remains an equally effective fixation method in the pediatric population compared with both-bone fixation and is our treatment of choice.