Automated detection of nine infantile fundus diseases and conditions in retinal images using a deep learning system.

Purpose: We developed an Infant Retinal Intelligent Diagnosis System (IRIDS), an automated system to aid early diagnosis and monitoring of infantile fundus diseases and health conditions to satisfy urgent needs of ophthalmologists. Methods: We developed IRIDS by combining convolutional neural networks and transformer structures, using a dataset of 7697 retinal images (1089 infants) from four hospitals. It identifies nine fundus diseases and conditions, namely, retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) (mild ROP, moderate ROP, and severe ROP), retinoblastoma (RB), retinitis pigmentosa (RP), Coats disease, coloboma of the choroid, congenital retinal fold (CRF), and normal. IRIDS also includes depth attention modules, ResNet-18 (Res-18), and Multi-Axis Vision Transformer (MaxViT). Performance was compared to that of ophthalmologists using 450 retinal images. The IRIDS employed a five-fold cross-validation approach to generate the classification results. Results: Several baseline models achieved the following metrics: accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score (F1), kappa, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) with best values of 94.62% (95% CI, 94.34%-94.90%), 94.07% (95% CI, 93.32%-94.82%), 90.56% (95% CI, 88.64%-92.48%), 92.34% (95% CI, 91.87%-92.81%), 91.15% (95% CI, 90.37%-91.93%), and 99.08% (95% CI, 99.07%-99.09%), respectively. In comparison, IRIDS showed promising results compared to ophthalmologists, demonstrating an average accuracy, precision, recall, F1, kappa, and AUC of 96.45% (95% CI, 96.37%-96.53%), 95.86% (95% CI, 94.56%-97.16%), 94.37% (95% CI, 93.95%-94.79%), 95.03% (95% CI, 94.45%-95.61%), 94.43% (95% CI, 93.96%-94.90%), and 99.51% (95% CI, 99.51%-99.51%), respectively, in multi-label classification on the test dataset, utilizing the Res-18 and MaxViT models. These results suggest that, particularly in terms of AUC, IRIDS achieved performance that warrants further investigation for the detection of retinal abnormalities. Conclusions: IRIDS identifies nine infantile fundus diseases and conditions accurately. It may aid non-ophthalmologist personnel in underserved areas in infantile fundus disease screening. Thus, preventing severe complications. The IRIDS serves as an example of artificial intelligence integration into ophthalmology to achieve better outcomes in predictive, preventive, and personalized medicine (PPPM / 3PM) in the treatment of infantile fundus diseases. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13167-024-00350-y.

An Artificial Intelligence System for Screening and Recommending the Treatment Modalities for Retinopathy of Prematurity.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to develop an artificial intelligence (AI) system for the identification of disease status and recommending treatment modalities for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP). METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included a total of 24,495 RetCam images from 1075 eyes of 651 preterm infants who received RetCam examination at the Shenzhen Eye Hospital in Shenzhen, China, from January 2003 to August 2021. Three tasks included ROP identification, severe ROP identification, and treatment modalities identification (retinal laser photocoagulation or intravitreal injections). The AI system was developed to identify the 3 tasks, especially the treatment modalities of ROP. The performance between the AI system and ophthalmologists was compared using extra 200 RetCam images. RESULTS: The AI system exhibited favorable performance in the 3 tasks, including ROP identification [area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), 0.9531], severe ROP identification (AUC, 0.9132), and treatment modalities identification with laser photocoagulation or intravitreal injections (AUC, 0.9360). The AI system achieved an accuracy of 0.8627, a sensitivity of 0.7059, and a specificity of 0.9412 for identifying the treatment modalities of ROP. External validation results confirmed the good performance of the AI system with an accuracy of 92.0% in all 3 tasks, which was better than 4 experienced ophthalmologists who scored 56%, 65%, 71%, and 76%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The described AI system achieved promising outcomes in the automated identification of ROP severity and treatment modalities. Using such algorithmic approaches as accessory tools in the clinic may improve ROP screening in the future.