Safety and tolerability of tirbanibulin ointment 1% treatment on 100 cm2 of the face or scalp in patients with actinic keratosis: A phase 3 study.

Background: Tirbanibulin is approved for actinic keratosis (AK) field treatment up to 25 cm2. However, AK often affects larger areas; thus, AK treatments for larger fields are needed. Objective: Evaluate the safety and tolerability of tirbanibulin when applied to a field of approximately 100 cm2. Methods: Phase 3, multicenter, open-label, single-arm study among adult patients having a treatment field on the face or balding scalp of approximately 100 cm2 with 4-12 AKs. Patients received tirbanibulin to cover the treatment field once daily (5 consecutive days). Safety was assessed by evaluating treatment emergent adverse events and tolerability by composite score of 6 local tolerability signs (LTS). Results: A total of 105 patients were included. The most common LTS were erythema (96.1%) and flaking/scaling (84.4%), being mostly mild-to-moderate severity, and resolved/returned to or close to baseline by Day 29. The only severe LTS were erythema (5.8%) and flaking/scaling (8.7%). Most frequent treatment emergent adverse events were application site pruritus (10.5%) and application site pain (8.6%). Mean total number of AKs decreased from 7.7 AKs at baseline to 1.8 AKs at Day 57. Mean percent of change (reduction) from baseline in lesion count was 77.8% at Day 57. Limitations: No control group. No long-term follow-up. Conclusion: Safety and tolerability profiles in patients treated with tirbanibulin up to 100 cm2 were consistent with those previously reported over smaller field. Tirbanibulin could be used on a larger field (>25 cm2).

Effect of NFX-179 MEK inhibitor on cutaneous neurofibromas in persons with neurofibromatosis type 1.

This phase 2a trial investigated the efficacy of NFX-179 Topical Gel, a metabolically labile MEK inhibitor, in the treatment of cutaneous neurofibromas (cNFs) in neurofibromatosis type 1. Forty-eight participants were randomized to four treatment arms: NFX-179 Topical Gel 0.05%, 0.15%, and 0.5% or vehicle applied once daily to five target cNFs for 28 days. Treatment with NFX-179 Topical Gel resulted in a dose-dependent reduction in p-ERK levels in cNFs at day 28, with a 47% decrease in the 0.5% NFX-179 group compared to the vehicle (P = 0.0001). No local or systemic toxicities were observed during the treatment period, and systemic concentrations of NFX-179 remained below 1 ng/ml. In addition, 20% of cNFs treated with 0.5% NFX-179 Topical Gel showed a ≥50% reduction in volume compared to 6% in the vehicle group by ruler measurement with calculated volume (P = 0.021). Thus, NFX-179 Topical Gel demonstrated significant inhibition of MEK in cNF with excellent safety and potential therapeutic benefit.

Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Tolerability of a Single 5-Day Treatment of Tirbanibulin Ointment 1% in 100 cm2 : A Phase 1 Maximal-Use Trial in Patients with Actinic Keratosis.

Tirbanibulin ointment 1% is approved in the United States and Europe for the treatment of actinic keratosis with demonstrated efficacy, safety, and tolerability when applied over a field up to 25 cm2 . This Phase 1 maximal-use trial determines the plasma pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of tirbanibulin ointment 1% applied to 100 cm2 of the face or balding scalp in adults with actinic keratosis. Twenty-eight patients self-applied tirbanibulin once daily for a single 5-day treatment course. On Day 5, the mean maximum plasma concentration was 1.06 ng/mL and area under the plasma concentration-time curve during a dosing interval was 16.2 ng â€¢ h/mL. Systemic exposure was approximately 4-fold higher than in a previous pharmacokinetic study with a 25 cm2 field, consistent with the increase in the treated area. Tirbanibulin applied to a 100-cm2 treatment field showed favorable safety and tolerability. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events were application site reactions (in 35.7% of patients). All treatment-emergent adverse events and most of the tolerability signs were mild/moderate and resolved or returned to baseline by Day 29. In summary, under maximal-use conditions, tirbanibulin ointment 1% was safe and well tolerated supporting its potential use over a field up to 100 cm2 .

Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Safety of a 10% Aminolevulinic Acid Hydrochloride Nanoemulsion Gel (BF-200 ALA) in Photodynamic Therapy of Patients Extensively Affected With Actinic Keratosis: Results of 2 Maximal Usage Pharmacokinetic Trials.

The nanoemulsion-based 10% aminolevulinic acid (ALA) hydrochloride gel BF-200 ALA optimizes epidermal penetration of its active ingredient and is approved for topical photodynamic therapy (PDT) for the treatment of actinic keratosis in the United States and Europe. To characterize systemic absorption from dermal application during PDT, ALA and its key active metabolite protoporphyrin IX (PpIX) were analyzed in 2 maximal usage pharmacokinetic trials (MUsT) in patients severely affected with actinic keratosis. The primary objective of both MUsTs was to assess baseline-adjusted plasma concentration-time curves for ALA and PpIX after a single PDT treatment applying either 2 g (1 tube) of BF-200 ALA on the face (MUsT-1) or applying 6 g (3 tubes) of BF-200 ALA on the face/scalp or body periphery (MUsT-2), to 20 or 60 cm2 , respectively. All PDTs were performed using red light at around 635 nm wavelength. Safety and tolerability were documented along with pharmacokinetics. In both MUsTs, ALA plasma concentrations were transiently increased to a maximum concentration at about 2.5 to 3.3 times above endogenous baseline with time to maximum concentration at ≈3 hours after dosing. Plasma levels subsequently returned to baseline within 10 hours after dosing. Overall baseline-adjusted mean area under the baseline-adjusted plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to the last sampling time point at which the concentration was at or above the lower limit of quantification ranged from 142.8 to 146.2, indicating that a similar, minor fraction of topical ALA is systemically absorbed under both dosing regimens. Systemic PpIX exposure after administration of either dose of BF-200 ALA was equally minimal. Application site skin reactions were treatment area size-related, albeit transient and consistent with the known safety profile of BF-200 ALA.

Assessing Patients' Satisfaction With Hydrogen Peroxide Topical Solution, 40% for Treatment of Raised Seborrheic Keratoses.

OBJECTIVES: Assess participants’ satisfaction following treatment with a proprietary hydrogen peroxide topical solution 40%, w/w (HP40) for raised seborrheic keratoses (SKs). METHODS: In this Phase 4, open-label study, eligible participants aged 30–75 years had clinically typical raised SKs including 2 target SKs (Physician’s Lesion Assessment™ [PLA] grade of ≥2 [0 = clear; 1 = near clear; 2 = thin (≤1 mm); 3 = thick (>1 mm)]; 5–15 mm diameter) on the face and 1 target SK on the neck or décolletage. SKs received HP40 treatment on day 1. All SKs with PLA grade ≥1 were retreated on days 15 and 29. Endpoints included patients’ satisfaction with their skin’s appearance at day 113, relationships between patients’ satisfaction and lesion PLA grade (evaluated by chi-square test), and patients’ satisfaction with their treatment experience. RESULTS: Forty-one patients (mean [range] age, 62.4 [46–73] years) completed the study. 95% of patients were at least moderately satisfied with their skin’s appearance and 90.2% of target lesions were clear. A statistically significant association was observed between the number of target lesions achieving clearance and patients’ satisfaction with skin appearance level (χ2=22.03; P=0.001). 93% of patients were at least moderately satisfied with their HP40 treatment experience. Eight patients experienced treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), most of which were mild or moderate; 4 experienced TEAEs considered treatment-related. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients with SKs on the face, neck, and décolletage were satisfied or very satisfied with both their skin’s appearance and their treatment experience following HP40 treatment. These results support the use of HP40 for raised SKs. J Drugs Dermatol. 2020;19(12): doi:10.36849/JDD.2020.4974.

Tirbanibulin Ointment 1% as a Novel Treatment for Actinic Keratosis: Phase 1 and 2 Results.

BACKGROUND: Current field-directed treatments of actinic keratosis (AK), a pre-malignant condition, are often limited by severe local reactions and/or complex treatment. Tirbanibulin, a novel potent anti-proliferative synthetic agent that inhibits tubulin polymerization and Src kinase signalling, is being developed as a convenient, safe, and effective field treatment of actinic keratosis. HYPOTHESIS: A short course of tirbanibulin ointment 1% safely reduces AK lesions. METHODS: In the Phase 1 study, 4 treatment cohorts with forearm lesions received tirbanibulin ointment 1% over 25 or 100 cm2 once daily for 3 or 5 days and were evaluated through day 45. In the Phase 2 study, 2 treatment cohorts with face or scalp lesions received tirbanibulin ointment 1% once daily for 3 or 5 days over 25 cm2 and were evaluated through day 57. Lesion reductions, clearance rates, safety, and pharmacokinetics were assessed. RESULTS: Forearm AK lesions were reduced by day 45 in all Phase 1 cohorts (N=30). Complete AK clearance at day 57 for face/scalp AK lesions in Phase 2 cohorts (N=168) was demonstrated in 43% and 32% of participants of the 5-day and 3-day cohorts, respectively. Adverse reactions were mainly transient mild local erythema and flaking/scaling, pruritus, and pain. Tirbanibulin plasma concentrations were low or undetectable. CONCLUSION: Tirbanibulin ointment 1% was well tolerated and active in AK reduction. Based on activity, the 5-day regimen was selected for Phase 3 development. Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02337205; NCT02838628 J Drugs Dermatol. 2020;19(11):1093-1100. doi:10.36849/JDD.2020.5576THIS ARTICLE HAD BEEN MADE AVAILABLE FREE OF CHARGE. PLEASE SCROLL DOWN TO ACCESS THE FULL TEXT OF THIS ARTICLE WITHOUT LOGGING IN. NO PURCHASE NECESSARY. PLEASE CONTACT THE PUBLISHER WITH ANY QUESTIONS.

Topical Oxymetazoline Cream 1.0% for Persistent Facial Erythema Associated With Rosacea: Pooled Analysis of the Two Phase 3, 29-Day, Randomized, Controlled REVEAL Trials

Background: Rosacea is a chronic dermatologic condition with limited treatment options. Methods: Data were pooled from two identically designed phase 3 trials. Patients with moderate to severe persistent erythema of rosacea were randomized to receive oxymetazoline cream 1.0% or vehicle once daily for 29 days and were followed for 28 days posttreatment. The primary efficacy outcome was the proportion of patients with ≥2-grade improvement from baseline on both Clinician Erythema Assessment (CEA) and Subject Self-Assessment (SSA) at 3, 6, 9, and 12 hours postdose, day 29. Results: The pooled population included 885 patients (78.8% female); 85.8% and 91.2% had moderate erythema based on CEA and SSA, respectively. The primary outcome was achieved by significantly more patients in the oxymetazoline than vehicle group (P<0.001). Individual CEA and SSA scores and reduction in facial erythema (digital image analysis) favored oxymetazoline over vehicle (P<0.001). The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events was low (oxymetazoline, 16.4%; vehicle, 11.8%). No clinically relevant erythema worsening (based on CEA and SSA) was observed during the 28-day posttreatment follow-up period (oxymetazoline, 1.7%; vehicle, 0.6%). Conclusion: Oxymetazoline effectively reduced moderate to severe persistent facial erythema of rosacea and was well tolerated. J Drugs Dermatol. 2018;17(11):1201-1208.

Phase 2 Randomized, Dose-Ranging Study of Oxymetazoline Cream for Treatment of Persistent Facial Erythema Associated With Rosacea.

BACKGROUND: Rosacea is a chronic dermatologic condition with limited treatment options. OBJECTIVE: This phase 2 study evaluated the optimal oxymetazoline dosing regimen in patients with moderate to severe persistent facial erythema of rosacea. METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned to oxymetazoline cream, 0.5%, 1.0%, or 1.5%, or vehicle, administered once daily (QD) or twice daily (BID) for 28 consecutive days. The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of patients with ≥2-grade improvement from baseline on the Clinician Erythema Assessment (CEA) and the Subject Self-Assessment of erythema (SSA-1) on day 28. Safety assessments included treatment-emergent adverse events and dermal tolerability. RESULTS: A total of 356 patients were treated (mean age, 50.0 years; 80.1% female). The proportions of patients achieving the primary endpoint were significantly higher with oxymetazoline 0.5% QD (P=0.049), 1.0% QD (P=0.006), 1.5% QD (P=0.012), 1.0% BID (P=0.021), and 1.5% BID (P=0.006) versus their respective vehicles. For both QD and BID dosing, the efficacy of oxymetazoline 1.0% was greater than the 0.5% dose and comparable to the 1.5% dose. Safety and application-site tolerability were similar across groups. LIMITATIONS: Short-term treatment period. CONCLUSION: Oxymetazoline 1.0% QD provided the optimal dosing regimen and was selected for evaluation in phase 3 clinical studies. J Drugs Dermatol. 2018;17(3):308-316.

Clinical Pharmacokinetics of Oxymetazoline Cream Following Topical Facial Administration for the Treatment of Erythema Associated With Rosacea.

BACKGROUND: Oxymetazoline cream 1.0% is FDA-approved for the topical treatment of persistent facial erythema associated with rosacea in adults. This phase 2, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study assessed the pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of oxymetazoline in patients with moderate to severe erythema associated with rosacea. METHODS: Eligible patients were randomized to 1 of 8 treatment groups (oxymetazoline cream 0.5%, 1.0%, or 1.5% or vehicle applied topically either once or twice daily for 28 days). Pharmacokinetic analyses were conducted in patients receiving oxymetazoline. Plasma samples for pharmacokinetic assessments were collected prior to dosing and 6 times postdose on days 1 and 28. RESULTS: A total of 356 patients were included in the safety population (oxymetazoline, n=268; vehicle, n=88). Thirty patients (11.2%) in the oxymetazoline group reported treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events, most of which were mild to moderate application-site reactions. Oxymetazoline, at all concentrations, was generally safe and well tolerated. Mean maximum observed plasma concentrations were ≤115 pg/mL across all groups; the highest mean values for area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to 24 hours following once- and twice-daily administration of oxymetazoline 1.5% were 1680 pg•h/mL and 2660 pg•h/mL, respectively. Systemic exposure to oxymetazoline increased dose proportionally with once- and twice-daily administration. CONCLUSION: These findings support the use of oxymetazoline for the treatment of persistent facial erythema associated with rosacea. J Drugs Dermatol. 2018;17(2):213-220.

Pivotal Trial of the Efficacy and Safety of Oxymetazoline Cream 1.0% for the Treatment of Persistent Facial Erythema Associated With Rosacea: Findings from the First REVEAL Trial.

An unmet need exists for a safe, tolerable, effective treatment for moderate to severe persistent facial erythema in patients with rosacea. This pivotal phase 3, multicenter, double-blind study evaluated the efficacy and safety of topical oxymetazoline in patients with facial erythema associated with moderate to severe rosacea. Patients were randomly assigned to treatment with oxymetazoline hydrochloride cream 1.0% or vehicle applied once daily for 29 days, and were followed for 28 days posttreatment. The primary efficacy outcome was having at least a 2-grade decrease from baseline on both the Clinician Erythema Assessment (CEA) and the Subject Self-Assessment for rosacea facial redness (SSA) scales (composite success) at 3, 6, 9, and 12 hours postdose on day 29. Safety assessments included treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and posttreatment worsening of erythema (composite CEA/SSA increase of 1-grade severity from baseline; rebound effect). A total of 440 patients (mean age, 49.5 years; 78.9% females) were randomized (oxymetazoline, n=222; vehicle, n=218); most had moderate erythema. On day 29, significantly greater proportions of oxymetazoline recipients achieved the primary efficacy outcome at each time point (P less than 0.02) and overall (P less than 0.001) compared with vehicle recipients. The incidence of discontinuation due to TEAEs was low in both groups (oxymetazoline group, 1.8%; vehicle group, 0.5%). The most common TEAEs reported during the entire study period were application-site dermatitis, application-site erythema, and headache in the oxymetazoline group (1.4% each), and headache (0.9%) in the vehicle group. Following cessation of treatment, low proportions of patients experienced rebound effect (oxymetazoline group, 2.2%; vehicle group, 1.1%). Oxymetazoline applied to the face once daily for 29 days was effective, safe, and well tolerated in patients with moderate to severe persistent facial erythema of rosacea.

J Drugs Dermatol. 2018;17(1):97-105.

A-101, a Proprietary Topical Formulation of High-Concentration Hydrogen Peroxide Solution: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Vehicle-Controlled, Parallel Group Study of the Dose-Response Profile in Subjects With Seborrheic Keratosis of the Face.

BACKGROUND: Seborrheic keratosis (SK) is a common benign skin tumor, yet no topical treatments are approved in the United States. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the proprietary, stabilized, high-concentration hydrogen peroxide-based topical solution A-101 (32.5% and 40% concentrations) for treatment of facial SK lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this multicenter, double-blind, vehicle-controlled study, eligible subjects were randomly assigned to receive up to 2 treatments of A-101 40%, A-101 32.5%, or vehicle solution applied to a single facial SK lesion. The primary efficacy assessment was the Physician's Lesion Assessment (PLA), a validated 4-ordinal scale. RESULTS: The primary end point, the mean reduction in PLA grade from baseline to Day 106 was 1.7 for A-101 40%, 1.4 for A-101 32.5%, and 0.1 for vehicle (p < .001, both concentrations vs vehicle). Lesions for 68%, 62%, and 5% of subjects, respectively, were judged to be clear or near clear (p < .001, both concentrations vs vehicle). Local skin reactions were predominantly mild and transient. No subjects discontinued because of treatment-related adverse events. CONCLUSION: A-101 solution demonstrated efficacy in treating SKs on the face. Greater magnitude of effect was seen with the 40% concentration than the 32.5% concentration. A-101 solution had a favorable safety and tolerability profile at both concentrations.