Incisional hernia repair with a slowly absorbable P4HB mesh: what happens after the mesh disappears? A retrospective longitudinal clinical study.

PURPOSE: To analyze the incisional hernia recurrence rate at a long-term follow-up using a biosynthetic long-term absorbable mesh in patients with a higher risk of surgical infection in a contaminated surgical field. METHODS: This was a retrospective multicentric study. All patients undergoing incisional hernia repair between 2016 and 2018 at 6 participating university centers were included. Patients were classified according to the Ventral Hernia Working Group (VHWG). All consecutive patients who underwent abdominal wall repair using biosynthetic long-term absorbable mesh (Phasix®) in contaminated fields (grade 3 and 4 of the VHWG classification) were included. Patients were followed-up until September 2021. Preoperative, operative, and postoperative data were collected. All patients' surgical site infections (SSIs) and surgical site occurrences (SSOs) were recorded. The primary outcome of interest was the clinical incisional hernia recurrence rate. RESULTS: One hundred and eight patients were included: 77 with VHWG grade 3 (71.3%) and 31 with VHWG grade 4 (28.7%). Median time follow-up was 41 months [24; 63]. Twenty-four patients had clinical recurrence during the follow-up (22.2%). The SSI and SSO rates were 24.1% and 36.1%, respectively. On multivariate analysis, risk factors for incisional hernia recurrence were previous recurrence, mesh location, and postoperative enterocutaneous fistula. CONCLUSIONS: At the 3 year follow-up, the recurrence rate with a biosynthetic absorbable mesh (Phasix®) for incisional hernia repair in high-risk patients (VHWG grade 3 and 4) seemed to be suitable (22.2%). Most complications occurred in the first year, and SSI and SSO rates were low despite high-risk VHWG grading.

Slowly absorbable mesh in contaminated incisional hernia repair: results of a French multicenter study.

PURPOSE: To analyze the postoperative morbidity and 1-year recurrence rate of incisional hernia repair using a biosynthetic long-term absorbable mesh in patients at higher risk of surgical infection in a contaminated surgical field. METHODS: All patients undergoing incisional hernia repair in a contaminated surgical field with the use of a biosynthetic long-term absorbable mesh (Phasix®) between May 2016 and September 2018 at six participating university centers were included in this retrospective cohort and were followed-up until September 2019. Regarding the risk of surgical infection, patients were classified according to the modified Ventral Hernia Working Group classification. Preoperative, operative and postoperative data were collected. All patients' surgical site infections (SSIs) and occurrences (SSOs) and recurrence rates were the endpoints of the study. RESULTS: Two hundred and fifteen patients were included: 170 with mVHWG grade 3 (79%) and 45 with mVHWG grade 2 (21%). The SSI and SSO rates at 12 months were 22.3% and 39.5%, respectively. According to the Dindo-Clavien classification, 43 patients (20.0%) had at least one minor complication, and 57 patients (26.5%) had at least one major complication. Among the 121 patients (56.3%) having at least 1 year of follow-up, the clinical recurrence rate was 12.4%. Multivariate analysis showed that a concomitant gastrointestinal procedure was an independent risk factor for surgical infection (OR = 2.61), and an emergency setting was an independent risk factor for major complications (OR = 11.9). CONCLUSION: The use of a biosynthetic absorbable mesh (Phasix®) is safe in a contaminated surgical field, with satisfying immediate postoperative and 1-year results. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study is registered on Clinical Trial ID: NCT04132986.

Abbreviated laparotomy or damage control laparotomy: Why, when and how to do it?

The goal of abbreviated laparotomy is to treat severely injured patients whose condition requires an immediate surgical operation but for whom a prolonged procedure would worsen physiological impairment and metabolic failure. Indeed, in severely injured patients, blood loss and tissue injuries enhance the onset of the "bloody vicious circle", triggered by the triad of acidosis-hypothermia-coagulopathy. Abbreviated laparotomy is a surgical strategy that forgoes the completeness of operation in favor of a physiological approach, the overriding preference going to rapidity and limiting the procedure to control the injuries. Management is based on sequential association of the shortest possible preoperative resuscitation with surgery limited to essential steps to control injury (stop the bleeding and contamination), without definitive repair. The latter will be ensured during a scheduled re-operation after a period of resuscitation aiming to correct physiological abnormalities induced by the trauma and its treatment. This strategy necessitates a pre-defined plan and involvement of the entire medical and nursing staff to reduce time loss to a strict minimum.

Emergency gastrointestinal surgery in the elderly.

The main problem in management of elderly patients who present to the emergency department with abdominal pain is related to difficulties in establishing a diagnosis, because of frequently impaired communication as well as to unusual clinical and laboratory presentations, resulting in delayed management. Early use of pertinent imaging may reduce this delay. Surgical procedures in the elderly do not differ from those in younger patients, but their associated morbidity is different. Assessing co-morbidities and patient frailty, as well as taking into consideration the diagnosis, patients' wishes and status should help in decision-making. Therapeutic decisions should involve surgeons, anesthesiologists and geriatricians alike, both pre- and postoperatively, with the goal of optimizing patients' rehabilitation and offering good and appropriate care while ensuring the humane, social and financial aspects.

Imaging of non-traumatic abdominal emergencies in adults.

Non-traumatic abdominal pathology is one of the most common reasons for consultation in emergency care services. Abdominal pain is the presenting symptom for many diseases, which often requires urgent care. Clinical history and physical examination are rarely sufficient to establish a definite diagnosis and imaging is usually necessary. The choice of imaging modality is oriented by the clinical context and guided by the institutional capabilities, safety and cost-effectiveness of the available tests. Plain radiographs have little or no place in the evaluation of the acute abdomen. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) still has limited availability in many hospitals, thus narrowing the imaging choice to ultrasound (US) and computerized tomography (CT). No scientific evidence exists to allow the imposition of one single strategy. At the present time, the clinician may choose either routine US evaluation complemented by CT in case the US is inconclusive or first-line CT (except for the evaluation of right lower quadrant [RLQ] pain, right upper quadrant [RUQ] pain and in pregnant women where ultrasound is the first-line study).

Practice patterns in complex ventral hernia repair and place of biological grafts: a national survey among French digestive academic surgeons.

BACKGROUND: Despite the prevalence of complex ventral hernias, there is little agreement on the most appropriate technique or prosthetic to repair these defects, especially in contaminated fields. Our objective was to determine French surgical practice patterns among academic surgeons in complex ventral hernia repair (CVHR) with regard to indications, most appropriate techniques, choice of prosthesis, and experience with complications. METHODS: A survey consisting of 21 questions and 6 case-scenarios was e-mailed to French practicing academic surgeons performing CVHR, representing all French University Hospitals. RESULTS: Forty over 54 surgeons (74%) responded to the survey, representing 29 French University Hospitals. Regarding the techniques used for CVHR, primary closure without reinforcement was provided in 31.6% of cases, primary closure using the component separation technique without mesh use in 43.7% of cases, mesh positioned as a bridge in 16.5% of cases, size reduction of the defect by using aponeurotomy incisions without mesh use in 8.2% of cases. Among the 40 respondents, 36 had experience with biologic mesh. There was a strong consensus among surveyed surgeons for not using synthetic mesh in contaminated or dirty fields (100%), but for using it in clean settings (100%). There was also a strong consensus between respondents for using biologic mesh in contaminated (82.5%) or infected (77.5%) fields and for not using it in clean setting (95%). In clean-contaminated surgery, there was no consensus for defining the optimal therapeutic strategy in CVHR. Infection was the most common complication reported after biologic mesh used (58%). The most commonly reported influences for the use of biologic grafts included literature, conferences and discussion with colleagues (85.0%), personal experience (45.0%) and cost (40.0%). CONCLUSIONS: Despite a lack of level I evidence, biologic meshes are being used by 90% of surveyed surgeons for CVHR. Importantly, there was a strong consensus for using them in contaminated or infected fields and for not using them in clean setting. To better guide surgeons, prospective, randomized trials should be undertaken to evaluate the short- and long-term outcomes associated with these materials in various surgical wound classifications.

In-situ revascularisation for secondary aorto-enteric fistulae: the success of silver-coated Dacron is closely linked to a suitable bowel repair.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to assess short- and mid-term results of in-situ revascularisation (ISR) using silver-coated Dacron prostheses and bowel repair for management of secondary aorto-enteric fistulae (SAEF). DESIGN: Single-centre retrospective chart review. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This study includes all the patients treated by ISR using silver-coated Dacron for SAEF between 2006 and 2010. Primary end points were mortality and survival rates. Secondary end points were reinfection-free survival and secondary patency rates. RESULTS: Eighteen male patients with SAEF with a median age of 64 years were operated by ISR using silver-coated Dacron during the study period without operative death. The 30-day mortality was 22% and the in-hospital mortality rate was 39%. Indeed, during hospitalisation, a duodenal leak was observed in four patients including three who died. Four others patients died due to multi-system organ failure. Median follow-up was 16 months (range 1-66). The survival rate at 12 months was 55%. One duodenal leak was observed leading to death. The reinfection-free survival and the secondary patency rates at 12 months were 60% and 89%, respectively. CONCLUSION: In-situ revascularisation with silver-coated Dacron provides acceptable results in terms of mortality. This treatment may be useful for simple vascular reconstruction and allow greater attention to bowel repair that is a determinant in short- and mid-term survival.