Longitudinal trajectories of a claims-based frailty measure during adjuvant chemotherapy in women with stage I-III breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Frailty is a dynamic syndrome characterized by reduced physiological reserve to maintain homeostasis. Prospective studies have reported frailty worsening in women with breast cancer during chemotherapy, with improvements following treatment. We evaluated whether the Faurot frailty index, a validated claims-based frailty measure, could identify changes in frailty during chemotherapy treatment and identified predictors of trajectory patterns. METHODS: We included women (65+ years) with stage I-III breast cancer undergoing adjuvant chemotherapy in the SEER-Medicare database (2003-2019). We estimated the Faurot frailty index (range: 0-1; higher scores indicate greater frailty) at chemotherapy initiation, 4 months postinitiation, and 10 months postinitiation. Changes in frailty were compared to a matched noncancer comparator cohort. We identified patterns of frailty trajectories during the year following chemotherapy initiation using K-means clustering. RESULTS: Twenty-one thousand five hundred and ninety-nine women initiated adjuvant chemotherapy. Mean claims-based frailty increased from 0.037 at initiation to 0.055 4 months postchemotherapy initiation and fell to 0.049 10 months postinitiation. Noncancer comparators experienced a small increase in claims-based frailty over time (0.055-0.062). We identified 6 trajectory patterns: a robust group (78%), 2 resilient groups (16%), and 3 nonresilient groups (6%). Black women and women with claims for home hospital beds, wheelchairs, and Parkinson's disease were more likely to experience nonresilient trajectories. CONCLUSIONS: We observed changes in a claims-based frailty index during chemotherapy that are consistent with prior studies using clinical measures of frailty and identified predictors of nonresilient frailty trajectories. Our study demonstrates the feasibility of using claims-based frailty indices to assess changes in frailty during cancer treatment.

A Retrospective Review on the Effects of Nasoalveolar Molding on Infant Weight Gain and Time to Primary Lip Repair in Unilateral and Bilateral Cleft Lip and Palate.

BACKGROUND: In patients with severe cleft deformities, nasoalveolar molding (NAM) can improve long-term lip and nasal symmetry by reducing the size of the cleft, better aligning the alveolus, lip, and nose, and making the primary lip repair more predictable. Despite the increasing number of published studies on modified NAM techniques, the effects of NAM on weight gain and time to primary lip repair remain less studied. PURPOSE: This study aims to evaluate the effect of NAM on feeding, weight gain, growth velocity, and time to primary lip repair in patients with complete unilateral and bilateral cleft lip and palate (BCLP). METHODS: A retrospective, single-institution review was conducted to identify patients with complete unilateral and BCLP treated between January 2005 and June 2020. The following outcomes were measured: age at the time of lip and palate repairs; weight, height, and BMI on the date of lip repair; and growth velocity. Crude and standardized morbidity ratio-weighted differences in outcome means and 95% confidence intervals were estimated using t tests. RESULTS: Seventy-one patients were included in the study, 30 of whom underwent NAM. On average, patients treated with preoperative NAM underwent lip repair later than patients who were not treated with NAM. They also had a greater growth velocity and BMI when compared to their non-NAM counterparts. These differences, however, were not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: This study explores the relationships between the use of NAM and preoperative weight gain, as well as time to lip repair in patients with complete unilateral and BCLP. Additional studies may be needed to better elucidate the effect of NAM on weight gain and the time required for surgical repair of the cleft lip and palate.

Functional Status Associations With Treatment Receipt and Outcomes Among Older Adults Newly Diagnosed With Multiple Myeloma.

PURPOSE: Multiple myeloma (MM) is a prevalent hematologic malignancy in older adults, who often experience physical disability, increased health care usage, and reduced treatment tolerance. Home health (HH) services are frequently used by this group, but the relationship between disability, HH use, and MM treatment receipt is unclear. This study examines the connections between disability, treatment receipt, and survival outcomes in older adults with newly diagnosed MM using a nationwide data set. METHODS: The SEER-Medicare data set was used to identify adults aged 66 years and older diagnosed with MM from 2010 to 2017, who used HH services the year before diagnosis. Disability was assessed with the Outcome and Assessment Information Set, using a composite score derived from items related to ability to complete activities of daily living. Mortality, therapy receipt, and health care utilization patterns were evaluated. RESULTS: Of 37,280 older adults with MM, 6,850 (18.2%) used HH services before diagnosis. Moderate disability at HH assessment resulted in similar MM-directed therapy receipt as mild disability, with comparable health care usage after diagnosis to severe disability. HH users had a higher comorbidity burden and higher mortality (adjusted risk ratio for 3-year mortality: 1.59 [95% CI, 1.55 to 1.64]). Severe functional disability before diagnosis was strongly related to postdiagnosis mortality. CONCLUSION: Among older adults with MM receiving HH services, disability is a predictor of early mortality. Moderately disabled individuals undergo similar therapy intensity as the mildly disabled but experience increased acute care utilization. Previous HH use could identify patients with MM requiring intensive support during therapy initiation.

Prognosis of older adults with chronic lymphocytic leukemia: A Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: While prognosis for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) has improved over time in younger adults, only modest improvements have occurred in older adults. We conducted a descriptive study of prognosis in older adults with CLL. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We used data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare database from 2003 to 2016. We identified older adults (≥66 years) diagnosed with primary CLL between 2004 and 2015 (Overall Cohort). A subset who initiated CLL-directed therapy during the year following diagnosis was also identified (Treated Cohort). Both cohorts were matched to Medicare beneficiaries without cancer based on age, sex, and region. For each year from 2004 to 2013, three-year survival for patients with CLL and non-cancer comparators was described using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Inverse probability weighted Cox regression models were used to compare survival in the CLL and non-cancer comparator cohorts, accounting for demographic information and comorbidity and frailty indices. Among older adults with CLL, ten-year cause-specific cumulative mortality was estimated using Aalen-Johansen estimators that accounted for competing risks. Predictors of cause-specific mortality, including comorbidity and frailty burden, were assessed using sub-distribution hazards models. RESULTS: In the Overall Cohort, three-year survival increased non-monotonically from 71.4% in 2004 to 73.4% in 2013, with a peak of 74.4% in 2011, and was lower than survival in non-cancer comparators (78.3% in 2004 to 83.2% in 2013). In the Treated Cohort, three-year survival was 56.3% in 2004 and 56.5% in 2013, with a peak of 64.2% in 2011. Cox models suggested that survival in the Treated Cohort was approaching survival in non-cancer comparators after 2011 (hazard ratio = 1.04, 95% confidence interval, 0.93-1.17). Ten-year cumulative mortality was 68.6% in the Overall Cohort and 81.7% in the Treated Cohort, with most deaths attributed to non-CLL causes. In the sub-distribution hazards models, age, year of diagnosis, frailty, and comorbidities were all associated with prognosis. DISCUSSION: Prognosis in older adults has been stable over time and most patients with CLL die from non-CLL causes. CLL-directed treatment decision-making in older adults should consider age-related factors, such as comorbidity and frailty.

Preferred Feedback Styles Among Different Groups in an Academic Medical Center.

INTRODUCTION: Feedback is an essential component in complex work environments. Different generations have been shown to have different sets of values, derived from societal and cultural changes. We hypothesize that generational differences may be associated with preferred feedback patterns among medical trainees and faculty in a large academic institution. METHODS: A survey was distributed to all students, residents/fellows, and faculty at a large academic medical institution from April 2020 through June 2020. Survey questions evaluated feedback methods for six domains: preparedness, performance, attitude, technical procedures, inpatient, and outpatient care. Participants selected a preferred feedback method for each category. Patient demographics and survey responses were described using frequency statistics. We compared differences in feedback preferences based on generation and field of practice. RESULTS: A total of 871 participants completed the survey. Preferred feedback patterns in the medical field do not seem to align with sociologic theories of generational gaps. Most participants preferred to receive direct feedback after an activity away from their team, irrespective of their age or medical specialty. Individuals preferred direct feedback during an activity in front of their team only for technical procedures. Compared to nonsurgeons, surgeons were more likely to prefer direct feedback in front of team members for preparedness, performance, and attitude. CONCLUSIONS: Generational membership is not significantly associated with preferred feedback patterns in this complex medical academic environment. Variations in feedback preferences are associated with field of practice that may be due to specialty-specific differences in culture and personality traits present within certain medical specialties, particularly surgery.

Costs and recurrence of inguinal hernia repair in premature infants during neonatal admission.

BACKGROUND: Timing of inguinal hernia repair (IHR) in premature infants remains variable, yet the impact of IHR timing on procedure costs and recurrence is unclear. We sought to compare cost and recurrence rates of IHR in premature infants based on timing of repair. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study using MarketScan insurance claims data from 2007 to 2018 to evaluate IHR occurring within 365 days of birth in preterm infants (gestational age [GA]<37 weeks at birth). Patients were stratified based on timing of IHR: those occurring during and after neonatal discharge. Hernia recurrences within one year following IHR were identified. Patient demographic characteristics and costs were compared between groups. Time to recurrence and cumulative recurrence hazards were estimated using Kaplan Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards regression. RESULTS: We identified 3,662 preterm infants with IHR within 365 days of birth; 1,054(28.8%) occurred early. Infants with IHR during NICU stay were more likely to have GA at birth≤32 weeks (74.7% vs. 37.2%; p<0.01) and birthweight<1500 g (83.0% vs. 40.3%; p<0.01) compared to post-NICU IHR. The hernia recurrence rate was higher and total procedure costs lower in early IHR. Early IHR (HR:1.86, 95% CI: 1.56-2.22), incarcerated/strangulated hernia (HR:1.86, 95% CI:1.49-2.32), GA≤32 weeks (HR: 1.40, 95% CI: 1.19-1.65), and congenital anomalies (HR: 1.32, 95% CI: 1.12-1.57) were predictors of hernia recurrence. CONCLUSION: Using insurance claims data, IHR performed during initial neonatal admission was associated with lower cost, but higher recurrence rate, when compared to delayed repairs in preterm infants. TYPE OF STUDY: Retrospective study LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Incidence of venous thromboembolism in patients with peripheral arterial disease after endovascular intervention.

OBJECTIVE: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a well-known postoperative complication; however, the incidence of VTE after peripheral vascular intervention (PVI) has not been well described. Despite the minimally invasive nature of these procedures, the patients undergoing PVI have significant risk factors for the development of VTE. In the present study, our objective was to describe the short-term incidence of VTE after PVI, identify differences between sexes, and examine the periprocedural antiplatelet and anticoagulation regimens. METHODS: We identified adults (age >66 years) who had undergone PVI from January 1, 2008 to September 30, 2015 from the inpatient Medicare claims data. The patients were followed for 365 days after the procedure. VTE events during follow-up were identified using the International Classification of Diseases, 9th revision, diagnosis codes. The covariate-standardized 30- and 90-day cumulative incidence of VTE events, overall and stratified by sex, were estimated using Aalen-Johansen estimators, accounting for death as a competing risk. Differences in sex between females and males were identified using Gray's test. Any antiplatelet or anticoagulant prescription fill was defined as any fill from 14 days before the endovascular intervention through the date of the VTE event. Persistence with antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapy was assessed by creating daily logs of antiplatelet and anticoagulant coverage using the dispensing dates and days of supply. Over-the-counter medications (ie, aspirin) were not evaluated. RESULTS: We identified 31,593 qualifying patients with a mean age of 76.8 ± 7.4 years. Of the 31,593 patients, 46% were male, and 12% had a history of VTE. After the procedure, deep vein thrombosis (DVT) was a commonly diagnosed complication (3.8% and 4.8% at 30 and 90 days, respectively). The cumulative incidence of pulmonary embolism was 0.9% and 1.2% at 30 and 90 days after the procedure, respectively. Throughout the 90-day postoperative period, females had had a slightly increased risk of DVT compared with males (30-day risk difference, 0.007; P < .01; 90-day risk difference, 0.008; P = .02). We found no sex-based differences in the risk of pulmonary embolism. Of the patients who had developed VTE at 90 days, 970 (55%) had had no prescription fill for an antiplatelet or anticoagulant. Assuming all the patients had been taking aspirin, only 15% of the patients who had developed VTE had been taking prescribed dual antiplatelet medication persistently after PVI. In addition, among the patients who had developed VTE at 90 days, females were less likely to have had a prescription fill for an anticoagulant. CONCLUSIONS: The findings from our study have demonstrated that the incidence of VTE after PVI is high, with an increased risk of deep vein thrombosis for females. We also found that females were less likely to have been prescribed an anticoagulant after PVI. Future studies are needed to characterize the variables associated with an increased risk of VTE after PVI and to identify strategies to increase dual antiplatelet therapy or anticoagulant prescription adherence to reduce the risk of VTE.

The Timing, the Treatment, the Question: Comparison of Epidemiologic Approaches to Minimize Immortal Time Bias in Real-World Data Using a Surgical Oncology Example.

BACKGROUND: Studies evaluating the effects of cancer treatments are prone to immortal time bias that, if unaddressed, can lead to treatments appearing more beneficial than they are. METHODS: To demonstrate the impact of immortal time bias, we compared results across several analytic approaches (dichotomous exposure, dichotomous exposure excluding immortal time, time-varying exposure, landmark analysis, clone-censor-weight method), using surgical resection among women with metastatic breast cancer as an example. All adult women diagnosed with incident metastatic breast cancer from 2013-2016 in the National Cancer Database were included. To quantify immortal time bias, we also conducted a simulation study where the "true" relationship between surgical resection and mortality was known. RESULTS: 24,329 women (median age 61, IQR 51-71) were included, and 24% underwent surgical resection. The largest association between resection and mortality was observed when using a dichotomized exposure [HR, 0.54; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.51-0.57], followed by dichotomous with exclusion of immortal time (HR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.59-0.65). Results from the time-varying exposure, landmark, and clone-censor-weight method analyses were closer to the null (HR, 0.67-0.84). Results from the plasmode simulation found that the time-varying exposure, landmark, and clone-censor-weight method models all produced unbiased HRs (bias -0.003 to 0.016). Both standard dichotomous exposure (HR, 0.84; bias, -0.177) and dichotomous with exclusion of immortal time (HR, 0.93; bias, -0.074) produced meaningfully biased estimates. CONCLUSIONS: Researchers should use time-varying exposures with a treatment assessment window or the clone-censor-weight method when immortal time is present. IMPACT: Using methods that appropriately account for immortal time will improve evidence and decision-making from research using real-world data.

Increased long-term bleeding complications in females undergoing endovascular revascularization for peripheral arterial disease.

OBJECTIVE: Females with peripheral arterial disease (PAD) treated with endovascular interventions have increased limb-based procedural complications compared with males. Little is known regarding long-term bleeding risk in these patients who often require long-term antiplatelet or anticoagulation therapy. We hypothesize that females have a higher incidence of bleeding events compared with males in the year after endovascular intervention for PAD. METHODS: Adults (aged ≥65 years) who underwent endovascular revascularization for PAD between 2008 and 2015 in Medicare claims data were identified. Patients were allocated by prescribed postprocedural antithrombotic therapy, including (1) antiplatelet therapy, (2) anticoagulation therapy, (3) dual antiplatelet and anticoagulation therapy, and (4) no prescription antithrombotic therapy. Bleeding events were classified as gastrointestinal, intracranial, hematoma, airway, or other. Crude and covariate-standardized 30-, 90-, and 365-day cumulative incidence of bleeding events, overall and by sex, were estimated using Aalen-Johansen estimators accounting for death as a competing risk. Sex differences were identified using Gray's test. RESULTS: Of 31,593 eligible patients, 54% were females. Females were older (77.9 years vs 75.5 years) and tended to use antiplatelet therapy more often at 30, 90, and 365 days after the intervention. Clopidogrel was the most prescribed antiplatelet, and 32% of patients continued its use at 365 days. Anticoagulants were prescribed to 26.0% of patients at the time of the procedure, and only 8.8% continued anticoagulation at 365 days. Thirty-one percent of patients were diagnosed with a bleeding event within 1 year after the intervention. The cumulative incidence of any bleeding event during the postintervention period was higher in females compared with males with a risk difference of 3% between the sex cohorts (P < .01). Specifically, females had a higher incidence of gastrointestinal bleeding and hematoma (P < .01), but a lower incidence of airway-related bleeding at each time point as compared with males (P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: Sex disparities in bleeding complications after endovascular intervention for PAD persist in the long term. Females are more likely to be readmitted with a bleeding complication up to 1 year after the procedure. Antithrombotic therapy disproportionately increases the risk of bleeding in females. Further research is necessary to understand the mechanisms responsible for abnormal coagulopathy in females after endovascular therapy.

Pathologic complete response and survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in cT1-T2/N0 HER2+ breast cancer.

Women with small HER2+ breast cancers may have excellent prognosis with adjuvant single-agent chemotherapy and HER2-targeted therapy. The role of de-escalated therapy in the neoadjuvant setting, however, remains uncertain. We conducted a cohort study of adult women with T1-2/cN0 HER2+ breast cancer diagnosed 2013-2016 in the National Cancer Database treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and HER2-targeted therapy. Factors associated with pathologic complete response (pCR) and overall survival were examined. In total, 6994 patients were included, 32% cT1 and 68% cT2. Multi-agent NAC was given to 90% of women while single-agent NAC was given to 10% of women. pCR was achieved in 46% of cT2 patients and 43% of cT1, and in 46% of patients treated with multi-agent versus 38% single agent. Patients receiving multi-agent chemotherapy were younger, had fewer comorbidities, and had higher cT stage and grade. In all patients, pCR was associated with improved survival (p < 0.01). Multi-agent chemotherapy (OR 1.3, p = 0.003), hormone receptor negative (OR 2.6, p < 0.001), higher grade (OR 2.2, p < 0.001), younger age (OR 1.4, p = 0.011), and later year of diagnosis (OR 1.3, p = 0.005) were associated with achieving pCR. Multi-agent chemotherapy was associated with higher likelihood of pCR, but this effect was modest compared to other factors. Single-agent NAC with HER2-directed therapy in selected patients may provide excellent outcome with reduced toxicity, while allowing escalated therapy in the adjuvant setting for patients with residual disease. Prospective studies are needed to determine effects of de-escalation in the neoadjuvant setting on survival and optimal selection strategies.

Gender Disparities in Aortoiliac Revascularization in Patients with Aortoiliac Occlusive Disease.

BACKGROUND: Gender disparities have been previously reported in aortic aneurysm and critical limb ischemia outcomes; however, limited info is known about disparities in aortoiliac occlusive disease. We sought to characterize potential disparities in this specific population. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients who underwent aortobifemoral bypass and aortic thromboendarterectomy (Current Procedural Terminology codes 35646 and 35331) between 2012 and 2019 were identified in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. A binomial regression model was used to estimate gender differences in 30-day morbidity and mortality. Inverse probability weighting was used to standardize demographic and surgical characteristics. RESULTS: We identified 1,869 patients, of which 39.8% were female and the median age was 61 years. Age, body composition, and other baseline characteristics were overall similar between genders; however, racial data were missing for 26.1% of patients. Females had a higher prevalence of preexisting chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (20.9% vs. 14.7%, prevalence difference 6.1%, P < 0.01), diabetes mellitus (25.4% vs. 19.4%, prevalence difference 6.0%, P < 0.01), and high-risk anatomical features (39.4% vs. 33.7%, prevalence difference 5.8%, P = 0.01). Preprocedural medications included a statin in only 68.2% of patients and antiplatelet agent in 76.7% of patients. Females also had a higher incidence of bleeding events when compared to males (25.2% vs. 17.5%, standardized risk difference 7.2%, P < 0.01), but were less likely to have a prolonged hospitalization greater than 10 days (18.2% vs. 20.9%, standardized risk difference -5.0%, P = 0.01). The 30-day mortality rate was not significantly different between genders (4.7% vs. 3.6%, standardized risk difference 1.2%, P = 0.25). CONCLUSIONS: Female patients treated with aortobifemoral bypass or aortic thromboendarterectomy are more likely to have preexisting chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes mellitus, and high-risk anatomical features. Regardless of a patient's gender, there is poor adherence to preoperative medical optimization with both statins and antiplatelet agents. Female patients are more likely to have postoperative bleeding complications while males are more likely to have a prolonged hospital stay greater than 10 days. Future work could attempt to further delineate disparities using databases with longer follow-up data and seek to create protocols for reducing these observed disparities.

Minimally invasive, benign foregut surgery is not associated with long-term, persistent opioid use postoperatively: an analysis of the IBM® MarketScan® database.

BACKGROUND: It is unknown if opioid naïve patients who undergo minimally invasive, benign foregut operations are at risk for progressing to persistent postoperative opioid use. The purpose of our study was to determine if opioid naïve patients who undergo minimally invasive, benign foregut operations progress to persistent postoperative opioid use and to identify any patient- and surgery-specific factors associated with persistent postoperative opioid use. METHODS: Opioid-naïve, adult patients who underwent laparoscopic fundoplication, hiatal hernia repair, or Heller myotomy from 2010 to 2018 were identified within the IBM® MarketScan® Commercial Claims and Encounters Database. Daily drug logs of the preoperative and postoperative period were evaluated to assess for changes in drug use patters. The primary outcome of interest was persistent postoperative opioid use, defined as at least 33% of the proportion of days covered by opioid prescriptions at 365-day follow-up. Patient demographic information and clinical risk factors for persistent postoperative opioid use at 365 days postoperatively were estimated using log-binomial regression. RESULTS: A total of 17,530 patients met inclusion criteria; 6895 underwent fundoplication, 9235 underwent hiatal hernia repair, and 1400 underwent Heller myotomy. 9652 patients had at least one opioid prescription filled in the perioperative period. Sixty-five patients (0.4%) were found to have persistent postoperative opioid use at 365 days postoperatively. Lower Charlson comorbidity index scores and a history of mental illness or substance use disorder had a statistically but not clinically significant protective effect on the risk of persistent postoperative opioid use at 365 days postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: Only half of opioid naïve patients undergoing minimally invasive, benign foregut operations filled an opioid prescription postoperatively. The risk of progression to persistent postoperative opioid use was less than 1%. These findings support the current guidelines that limit the number of opioid pills prescribed following general surgery operations.

Sociodemographic and Clinical Predictors of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in cT1-T2/N0 HER2-Amplified Breast Cancer.

BACKGROUND: The optimal treatment strategy for small node-negative human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive (HER2+) breast cancer remains controversial. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy may risk overtreatment, whereas surgery first fails to identify patients with residual disease in need of escalated adjuvant systemic therapy. We investigated patient characteristics associated with receipt of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. METHODS: Adult women with cT1-T2/N0, HER2+ breast cancer between 2013 and 2017 in the National Cancer Database who underwent surgery within 8 months of diagnosis were included. Patients were classified as receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy versus a surgery-first approach. We assessed the sociodemographic and clinical predictors of neoadjuvant chemotherapy versus surgery first and associations between neoadjuvant chemotherapy and breast cancer treatments using multivariable regression models. RESULTS: We identified 56,784 women, of whom 12,758 (22%) received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, 29,139 (53%) received adjuvant chemotherapy, 12,907 (24%) received no chemotherapy, and 1980 were missing chemotherapy information. After adjustment, cT2 stage was the strongest predictor of neoadjuvant chemotherapy compared with surgery first. Younger age and later diagnosis year were positively associated with receipt of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. In contrast, hormone receptor positivity, Black race, rural county, and government-funded or no health insurance were inversely associated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. In multivariable analyses, patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy were more likely to have a mastectomy (vs. lumpectomy) and sentinel lymph node biopsy or no nodal surgery (vs. axillary lymph node dissection). Patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy were more likely to receive multi-agent (vs. single-agent) chemotherapy than those who received adjuvant chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Substantial differences in the utilization of neoadjuvant chemotherapy exist in women with HER2+ breast cancer, which reflect both clinical parameters and disparities. Optimal treatment strategies should be implemented equitably across sociodemographic groups.

A Budget Impact Analysis of the Introduction of Copanlisib for Treatment of Relapsed Follicular Lymphoma in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Copanlisib was recently granted accelerated approval by the FDA for the treatment of adult patients with relapsed follicular lymphoma (FL) after 2 previous systemic therapies. It is important to assess the effect that this and other changes in the treatment landscape of relapsed FL have on a payer's budget to inform formulary decisions. OBJECTIVE: To assess the budget impact associated with the addition of copanlisib to a formulary as third- or higher-line treatment for adult patients with relapsed FL who have received at least 2 previous systemic therapies, from the perspective of a U.S. third-party payer. METHODS: A budget impact model was developed over a 1-year horizon. The model considered a hypothetical population of 1 million people enrolled in a commercial health plan; patients with relapsed FL were identified based on epidemiology data. Treatments included copanlisib and approved and off-label therapies used for management of relapsed FL. Treatment distributions within the target population were based on a market research survey. Drug acquisition, administration, prophylaxis, and monitoring costs were based on prescribing information, clinical trials, literature, and expert opinion. All costs were inflated to 2017 U.S. dollars. Total costs were compared between 2 scenarios, 1 without and 1 with copanlisib on a formulary. A deterministic sensitivity analysis (DSA) was conducted to evaluate the robustness of the model. RESULTS: Within the 1 million-member health care plan, 18 patients had relapsed FL and had received at least 2 previous systemic therapies. Over 1 year, the addition of copanlisib and an increase in the use of obinutuzumab + bendamustine (from 9.0% without copanlisib to 13.1% with copanlisib) and lenalidomide + rituximab (from 0.3% to 12.0%) were estimated to increase drug acquisition costs by $238,536, drug administration and prophylaxis costs by $3,565, and monitoring costs by $539. The increase in total budget was $242,641, corresponding to $0.02 per member per month; 21.8% of this increase was attributable to copanlisib, 12.9% to obinutuzumab + bendamustine, and 65.3% to lenalidomide + rituximab. Results were generally robust in the DSA. CONCLUSIONS: Over a 1-year period, the model found that the addition of copanlisib to a formulary resulted in a small increase in total budget of $242,641, corresponding to $0.02 per patient per month and taking into account a concurrent increase in the use of obinutuzumab + bendamustine and lenalidomide + rituximab. Therefore, adding copanlisib to a formulary appears to be an affordable option for payers. Further studies should be conducted to more comprehensively assess the clinical and economic implications of adding copanlisib to the treatment armamentarium of relapsed FL. DISCLOSURES: This study was funded by Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals. The study sponsor was involved in study design, data interpretation. and data review. All authors contributed to the development of the manuscript and maintained control over the final content. Appukkuttan, Yaldo, Gharibo, and Babajanyan report employment with Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals at the time of this study. Duchesneau, Zichlin, Bhak, and Duh report employment with Analysis Group, which received research funds from Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals for work on this study. A synopsis of the current research was presented in poster format at the AMCP Managed Care & Specialty Pharmacy Annual Meeting; April 23-26, 2018; Boston, MA.

Cost Effectiveness of Midostaurin in the Treatment of Newly Diagnosed FLT3-Mutated Acute Myeloid Leukemia in the United States.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the cost effectiveness of midostaurin + cytarabine + daunorubicin (midostaurin arm) versus placebo + cytarabine + daunorubicin (placebo arm) in the treatment of adult patients with newly diagnosed FLT3-mutated acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who are eligible for standard cytarabine + daunorubicin chemotherapy, from a US third-party payer perspective. METHODS: A lifetime partitioned survival model with four health states (active disease, complete remission [CR], relapse, and death) was constructed. Efficacy inputs (time to CR or death, time to relapse or death, and overall survival) were estimated using data from the RATIFY trial (NCT00651261). Costs (inflated to 2016 US dollars) included treatment, drug monitoring, stem cell transplantation (SCT), adverse events costs, and medical costs associated with health states. Incremental costs per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) and life-year (LY) gained were estimated. Deterministic (DSA) and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (and PSA) were performed to assess model robustness. RESULTS: In the base case, patients in the midostaurin arm incurred higher total direct costs over a lifetime compared with the placebo arm ($4,043,470 vs. $3,959,741), resulting in an incremental cost of $83,729; however, the midostaurin arm had better effectiveness, with 1.59 more LYs and 1.37 more QALYs. These led to a base-case incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $52,596 per LY, or $61,167 per QALY. Results were robust in the DSA. In the PSA, the probability of the midostaurin arm being cost-effective compared with the placebo arm was 65.9%, at a willingness to pay of $150,000/QALY. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis suggests that midostaurin is a cost-effective treatment for adult patients with newly diagnosed FLT3-mutated AML, from a US third-party payer perspective.

The Additional Costs per Month of Progression-Free Survival and Overall Survival: An Economic Model Comparing Everolimus with Cabozantinib, Nivolumab, and Axitinib for Second-Line Treatment of Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: When considering optimal second-line treatments for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), clinicians and payers seek to understand the relative clinical benefits and costs of treatment. OBJECTIVE: To use an economic model to compare the additional cost per month of overall survival (OS) and of progression-free survival (PFS) for cabozantinib, nivolumab, and axitinib with everolimus for the second-line treatment of mRCC from a third-party U.S. payer perspective. METHODS: The model evaluated mean OS and PFS and costs associated with drug acquisition/administration; adverse event (AE) treatment; monitoring; and postprogression (third-line treatment, monitoring, and end-of-life costs) over 1- and 2-year horizons. Efficacy, safety, and treatment duration inputs were estimated from regimens' pivotal clinical trials; for everolimus, results were weighted across trials. Mean 1- and 2-year OS and mean 1-year PFS were estimated using regimens' reported OS and PFS Kaplan-Meier curves. Dosing and administration inputs were consistent with approved prescribing information and the clinical trials used to estimate efficacy and safety inputs. Cost inputs came from published literature and public data. Additional cost per additional month of OS or PFS was calculated using the ratio of the cost difference per treated patient and the corresponding difference in mean OS or PFS between everolimus and each comparator. One-way sensitivity analyses were conducted by varying efficacy and cost inputs. RESULTS: Compared with everolimus, cabozantinib, nivolumab, and axitinib were associated with 1.6, 0.3, and 0.5 additional months of PFS, respectively, over 1 year. Cabozantinib and nivolumab were associated with additional months of OS compared with everolimus (1 year: 0.7 and 0.8 months; 2 years: 1.6 and 2.3 months; respectively); axitinib was associated with fewer months (1 year: -0.2 months; 2 years: -0.7 months). The additional costs of treatment with cabozantinib, nivolumab, or axitinib versus everolimus over 1 year were $34,141, $19,371, and $17,506 higher, respectively. Everolimus had similar OS and lower costs compared with axitinib. The additional cost per month of OS was $48,773 for cabozantinib and $24,214 for nivolumab versus everolimus. The additional treatment cost with cabozantinib, nivolumab, or axitinib versus everolimus for each additional month of PFS was estimated at $21,338, $64,570, and $35,012, respectively. Over 2 years, the additional costs per additional month of OS for nivolumab and axitinib versus everolimus were similar to the 1-year analysis; for cabozantinib, the cost was lower. Results were sensitive to changes in mean OS, mean PFS, therapy duration, and drug costs estimates. CONCLUSIONS: Everolimus for second-line mRCC was associated with similar OS and lower costs compared with axitinib over 1- and 2-year horizons. The additional cost per additional month of OS and PFS associated with cabozantinib or nivolumab versus everolimus creates a metric for evaluating the cost of second-line therapies in relation to their respective treatment effects. DISCLOSURES: Funding for this research was provided by Novartis, which was involved in all stages of study research and manuscript preparation. Ghate and Perez are employees of Novartis and own stock/stock options. Swallow, Messali, McDonald, and Duchesneau are employees of Analysis Group, which has received consultancy fees from Novartis. Study concept and design were contributed by Swallow, Messali, Ghate, and Perez, along with McDonald and Duchesneau. Swallow, Messali, McDonald, and Duchesneau collected the data, and all authors participated in data interpretation. The manuscript was written by Swallow, Messali, and Ghate, along with the other authors, and revised by Swallow, Messali, Ghate, and Perez. A synopsis of the current research was presented in poster format at the 15th International Kidney Cancer Symposium on November 4-5, 2016, in Miami, Florida.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of ocrelizumab versus subcutaneous interferon beta-1a for the treatment of relapsing multiple sclerosis.

AIM: To conduct a cost-effectiveness analysis to compare ocrelizumab vs subcutaneous (SC) interferon beta-1a for the treatment of relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS). METHODS: A Markov cohort model with a 20-year horizon was developed to compare ocrelizumab with SC interferon beta-1a from a US payer perspective. A cohort of patients with relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) and Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) scores of 0-6, who initiated treatment with ocrelizumab or SC interferon beta-1a, were entered into the model. The model considered 21 health states: EDSS 0-9 in RRMS, EDSS 0-9 in secondary-progressive multiple sclerosis (SPMS), and death. Patients with RRMS could transition across EDSS scores, progress to SPMS, experience relapses, or die. Transition probabilities within RRMS while patients received ocrelizumab or SC interferon beta-1a were based on data from the two SC interferon beta-1a-controlled Phase III OPERA I and OPERA II trials of ocrelizumab in RMS. Transitions within RRMS when off-treatment, RRMS-to-SPMS transitions, transitions within SPMS, and transitions to death were based on the literature. Utilities of health states, disutilities of relapses, costs of therapies, and medical costs associated with health states, relapse, and adverse events were from the literature and publicly available data sources. The model estimated per-patient total costs, incremental cost per life year (LY) gained, and incremental cost per quality-adjusted LY (QALY) gained. Deterministic sensitivity analyses (DSA) and probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA) were conducted to evaluate the robustness of the model results. RESULTS: Ocrelizumab was associated with a cost savings of $63,822 and longer LYs (Δ = 0.046) and QALYs (Δ = 0.556) over a 20-year time horizon. The results of the model were robust in the DSA and PSA. LIMITATIONS: The model did not consider subsequent treatments and their impact on disease progression. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that ocrelizumab is more cost-effective than SC interferon beta-1a for the treatment of RMS.