Impact of KRAS, BRAF and microsatellite instability status after cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC in a national cohort of colorectal peritoneal metastasis patients.

BACKGROUND: Patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) carrying BRAF (mutBRAF) or KRAS mutation (mutKRAS) have an inferior prognosis after liver or lung surgery, whereas the prognostic role in the context of peritoneal metastasis (PM) after cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) has been less investigated. METHODS: In total, 257 patients with non-appendiceal PM-CRC were included from the Norwegian National Unit for CRS-HIPEC. RESULTS: In total, 180 patients received CRS-HIPEC with Mitomycin C, 77 patients received palliative surgery only. In the CRS-HIPEC group, mutBRAF was found in 24.7%, mutKRAS 33.9% and double wild-type 41.4% without differences in survival. MSI was found in 29.3% of mutBRAF cases. Patients with mutBRAF/MSI had superior 5-year survival compared to mutBRAF with MSS (58.3% vs 25.2%, P = 0.022), and better 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) compared to mutKRAS (48.6% vs 17.2%, P = 0.049). Peritoneal Cancer Index and the number of lymph node metastasis were prognostic for OS, and the same two, location and gender prognostic for DFS in multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: PM-CRC with CRS-HIPEC patients has a surprisingly high proportion of mutBRAF (24.7%). Survival was similar comparing mutBRAF, mutKRAS and double wild-type cases, whereas a small subgroup with mutBRAF and MSI had better survival. Patients with mutBRAF tumours and limited PM should be considered for CRS-HIPEC.

Liver transplantation for unresectable colorectal liver metastases in patients and donors with extended criteria (SECA-II arm D study).

BACKGROUND: Patients with metastatic colorectal cancer receiving palliative chemotherapy have a 5-year survival rate of approximately 10 per cent. Liver transplantation using strict selection criteria in patients with colorectal cancer and unresectable liver-only disease will result in a 5-year survival rate of 56-83 per cent. The aim of this study was to evaluate survival of patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) after liver transplantation using extended criteria for both patients and donors. METHODS: This was a prospective single-arm study. Patients with synchronous unresectable CRLM who were not suitable for arms A, B or C of the SEcondary CAncer (SECA) II study who had undergone radical resection of the primary tumour and received chemotherapy were included; they underwent liver transplantation with extended criteria donor grafts. Patients who had resectable pulmonary metastases were eligible for inclusion. The main exclusion criteria were BMI above 30 kg/m2 and liver metastases larger than 10 cm. Survival was estimated using Kaplan-Meier analysis. RESULTS: Ten patients (median age 54 years; 3 women) were included. They had an extensive liver tumour load with a median of 20 (range 1-45) lesions; the median size of the largest lesion was 59 (range 15-94) mm. Eight patients had (y)pN2 disease, six had poorly differentiated or signet ring cell-differentiated primary tumours, and five had primary tumour in the ascending colon. The median Fong clinical risk score was 3 (range 2-5) and the median Oslo score was 1 (range 1-4). The median plasma carcinoembryonic antigen level was 4·3 (range 2-4346) µg/l. Median disease-free and overall survival was 4 and 18 months respectively. CONCLUSION: Patients with unresectable liver-only CRLM undergoing liver transplantation with extended patient and donor criteria have relatively short overall survival.

ANTECEDENTES: Los pacientes con cáncer colorrectal metastásico (metastatic colorectal c¡ncer, CRC) que reciben quimioterapia paliativa presentan aproximadamente una supervivencia a los 5 años del 10%. El trasplante de hígado utilizando criterios de selección estrictos en pacientes con CRC y enfermedad localizada hepática no resecable presenta una supervivencia a los 5 años del 56-83%. El objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar la supervivencia de pacientes con metástasis hepáticas CRC no resecables (non-resectable CRC liver metastases, CRLM) después del trasplante hepático utilizando criterios extendidos para pacientes y donantes. MÉTODOS: Se ha realizado un estudio prospectivo de un solo brazo. A los pacientes con CRLM sincrónicas no resecables que no eran adecuados para ser incluidos en los brazos A, B o C del estudio SECA-II, con resección quirúrgica radical previa del tumor primario y que recibieron quimioterapia, se les realizó un trasplante de hígado con injerto de donante con criterios extendidos. Los pacientes con metástasis pulmonares resecables también podían ser incluidos. Los principales criterios de exclusión principales fueron el índice de masa corporal > 30 y metástasis hepáticas > 10 cm. La supervivencia se estimó utilizando el método de Kaplan-Meier. RESULTADOS: Diez pacientes (mediana de edad de 54 años, 3 varones) incluidos en el estudio tenían una carga tumoral hepática extensa con una mediana de 20 lesiones (rango 1-45) y un tamaño mediano de la lesión más grande de 59 mm (rango 15-94 mm). Ocho pacientes tenían (y) pN2, seis tenían tumores primarios pobremente diferenciados/células de anillo de sello y cinco tenían tumor primario en colon ascendente. La mediana del Fong Clinical Risk Score fue 3 (rango 2-5). La mediana del Oslo Score fue 1 (rango 1-4). La mediana del nivel de CEA en plasma fue 4 µg/L (rango 2-4346). La mediana de supervivencia libre de enfermedad y supervivencia global fue de 4 y 18 meses, respectivamente. CONCLUSIÓN: Los pacientes con CRLM no resecables localizadas en el hígado que se someten a un trasplante de hígado con criterios extendidos de pacientes y donantes tienen una supervivencia global relativamente corta.

Long-term quality of life after liver transplantation for non-resectable colorectal metastases confined to the liver.

Background: Liver transplantation for patients with non-resectable colorectal liver metastases offers increased survival, with median overall survival of more than 5 years. The aim of this study was to compare quality of life before and up to 3 years after liver transplantation for colorectal liver metastases. Methods: Quality of life was assessed using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30 questionnaire version 3.0. The patients received the questionnaire before and up to 3 years after liver transplantation. Results: Some 23 patients were included in the analysis. Three months after liver transplantation they reported reduced quality of life (global health status scale), physical function and role function, and increased dyspnoea. At 6 months, global health status, physical function and role function had returned to pretransplant values. Three years after liver transplantation all symptom and function scores were comparable to baseline values. Patients with high scores for fatigue, pain and appetite loss at baseline had reduced 3-year overall survival. Conclusion: Patients with non-resectable colorectal liver-only metastases receiving liver transplantation had good long-term quality of life. Patients with high symptom scores before transplantation had reduced 3-year overall survival.

Cost-effectiveness of liver transplantation in patients with colorectal metastases confined to the liver.

BACKGROUND: Patients with non-resectable colorectal metastases are currently treated with chemotherapy. However, liver transplantation can increase the 5-year survival rate from 9 to 56 per cent if the cancer is confined to the liver. The aim of this study was to estimate the cost-effectiveness of liver transplantation for colorectal liver metastases. METHODS: A Markov model with a lifetime perspective was developed to estimate the life-years, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), direct healthcare costs and cost-effectiveness for patients with non-resectable colorectal liver metastases who received liver transplantation or chemotherapy alone. RESULTS: In non-selected cohorts, liver transplantation increased patients' life expectancy by 3·12 life-years (2·47 QALYs), at an additional cost of €209 143, giving an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of €67 140 per life-year (€84 667 per QALY) gained. In selected cohorts (selection based on tumour diameter, time since primary cancer, carcinoembryonic antigen levels and response to chemotherapy), the effect of liver transplantation increased to 4·23 life-years (3·41 QALYs), at a higher additional cost (€230 282), and the ICER decreased to €54 467 per life-year (€67 509 per QALY) gained. Given a willingness to pay of €70 500, the likelihood of transplantation being cost-effective was 0·66 and 0·94 (0·23 and 0·67 QALYs) for non-selected and selected cohorts respectively. CONCLUSION: Liver transplantation was cost-effective but only for highly selected patients. This might be possible in countries with good access to grafts and low waiting list mortality.

Methodological development and biological observations of cell free DNA with a simple direct fluorescent assay in colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Cell free DNA (cfDNA) has shown promising utility as prognostic biomarker for patients with colorectal cancer (CRC), with an ongoing need to optimize and validate the laboratory methodology. Here, we report our optimization and validation of a direct fluorescent assay and display the potential utility in patients with colorectal cancer. METHODS: Plasma cfDNA was analyzed by a direct fluorescent assay (DFA) and compared to quantification by droplet digital PCR (ddPCR). For clinical validation, baseline blood samples were available for a total of 273 patients from six different Nordic trials, covering patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (n = 176, cohorts A + B), liver limited metastatic CRC (n = 75C + D) and wide spread metastatic CRC (n = 22 E + F). RESULTS: Validating the DFA analysis with ddPCR revealed a strong correlation with an R2 of 0.81. For the clinical cohorts, the levels of cfDNA were: 0.8 ng/uL (95%CI 0.75-0.83) (A + B), 0.93 ng/uL (95%CI 0.86-1.02) (C + D) and 1.2 ng/uL (95%CI 0.85-1.47) (E + F), respectively (p < 0.01). All cohorts of colorectal cancer had higher levels of cell free DNA than healthy individuals (n = 94) (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Analysis of cell free DNA by a direct fluorescent assay could be an attractive laboratory option for a rapid inexpensive quantification of cell free DNA.

Beyond total mesorectal excision in locally advanced rectal cancer with organ or pelvic side-wall involvement.

BACKGROUND: In locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC), beyond total mesorectal excision (bTME) is often necessary to obtain complete resection (R0). The aim of this study was to identify prognostic determinants and compare morbidity and survival in LARC cases requiring bTME or TME surgery. METHOD: Single centre cohort study of LARC cases where all patients received neoadjuvant radiotherapy (n = 332). Data was registered prospectively in an institutional database linked to the National Registry. RESULTS: bTME surgery was performed in 224 patients, 171 with resections of adjacent organs (bTME-o group) and 53 with pelvic side-wall resections (bTME-pw group). TME surgery was performed in 108 patients. Six deaths occurred within 100 days and severe morbidity was registered in 23.8% of the whole cohort and in 25.4% of the bTME groups. The R0 rates were 93.5%, 84.2%, and 75.5% in the TME, bTME-o, and bTME-pw groups, respectively. Five-year disease free survival (DFS) was 67.3% (TME group), 54.5% (bTME-o group) and 48.7% (bTME-pw group), and five-year overall survival (OS) 78.7%, 69.0% and 60.4% respectively. Patients with involved resection margins (R1), high pT-stage, pN-positivity or poor response to neoadjuvant therapy were associated with inferior DFS and OS. CONCLUSION: In organ-threatening or infiltrating LARC, bTME surgery can be performed with low mortality and acceptable morbidity to obtain a good long-term outcome. Patients with pelvic side-wall infiltration were identified as a subgroup with increased risk of R1 resection and inferior long-term outcome.

Survival following liver transplantation for liver-only colorectal metastases compared with hepatocellular carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Liver transplantation is considered the standard of care for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) within the Milan criteria. Liver transplantation in patients with unresectable colorectal cancer with liver-only disease has been shown to be associated with a 5-year overall survival rate of 56 per cent, compared with 9 per cent in patients receiving standard palliative chemotherapy. The aim of the present study was to compare disease-free (DFS) and overall (OS) survival after liver transplantation in patients with HCC and those with colorectal metastases. METHODS: Data were collected from the SEcondary CAncer (SECA) study database and an institutional (national) database of patients undergoing liver transplantation for HCC; all liver-transplanted patients were included. Patients with colorectal metastases treated by liver transplantation were divided into high- and low-risk groups for mortality based on carcinoembryonic antigen levels, response to chemotherapy, largest lesion at time of transplantation and time from primary surgery to transplantation. RESULTS: Patients with colorectal metastases had a median of 8 lesions, compared with 1 in patients with HCC within the Milan criteria. DFS was shorter in both the high-risk and the low-risk colorectal cancer groups compared with that in patients with HCC. The 5-year OS rate in the low-risk colorectal cancer group was 75 per cent, compared with 76 per cent in patients with HCC within the Milan criteria. The 5-year OS rate in patients with HCC beyond the Milan criteria was 56 per cent. CONCLUSION: The low-risk group of patients with colorectal cancer and unresectable liver-only disease had a 5-year OS rate following liver transplantation similar to that of patients with HCC with lesions within the Milan criteria.

Growth rates of pulmonary metastases after liver transplantation for unresectable colorectal liver metastases.

BACKGROUND: The previously reported SECA study demonstrated a dramatic 5-year survival improvement in patients with unresectable colorectal liver metastases (CLM) treated with liver transplantation (LT) compared with chemotherapy. The objective of this study was to assess whether immunosuppressive therapy accelerates the growth of pulmonary metastases in patients transplanted for unresectable CLM. METHODS: Chest CT scans from 11 patients in the SECA study resected for 18 pulmonary metastases were reviewed retrospectively. Tumour diameter, volume and CT characteristics were registered and tumour volume doubling time was calculated. Findings in the SECA group were compared with those of a control group consisting of 12 patients with non-transplanted rectal cancer resected for 26 pulmonary metastases. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) after first pulmonary resection were determined. RESULTS: Median doubling time based on tumour diameter and volume in the SECA and control groups were 125 and 130 days (P = 0·658) and 110 and 129 days (P = 0·632) respectively. The metastases in both groups were distributed to all lung lobes and were mostly peripheral. Median DFS after LT in the SECA group and after primary pelvic surgery in the control group was 17 (range 6-42) and 18 (2-57) months respectively (P = 0·532). In the SECA group, estimated 5-year DFS and OS rates after first pulmonary resection were 39 and 51 per cent respectively. CONCLUSION: Patients treated by LT for unresectable CLM have a good prognosis following resection of pulmonary metastases. Doubling time did not appear to be worse with the immunosuppression used after LT.

Resection of synchronous liver metastases between radiotherapy and definitive surgery for locally advanced rectal cancer: short-term surgical outcomes, overall survival and recurrence-free survival.

AIM: There is debate as to the correct treatment algorithm sequence for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer with liver metastases. The aim of the study was to assess safety, resectability and survival after a modified 'liver-first' approach. METHOD: This was a retrospective study of patients undergoing preoperative radiotherapy for the primary rectal tumour, followed by liver resection and, finally, resection of the primary tumour. Short-term surgical outcome, overall survival and recurrence-free survival are reported. RESULTS: Between 2009 and 2013, 45 patients underwent liver resection after preoperative radiotherapy. Thirty-four patients (76%) received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, 24 (53%) concomitant chemotherapy during radiotherapy and 17 (43%) adjuvant chemotherapy. The median time interval from the last fraction of radiotherapy to liver resection and rectal surgery was 21 (range 7-116) and 60 (range 31-156) days, respectively. Rectal resection was performed in 42 patients but was not performed in one patient with complete response and two with progressive metastatic disease. After rectal surgery three patients did not proceed to a planned second stage liver (n = 2) or lung (n = 1) resection due to progressive disease. Clavien-Dindo ≥Grade III complications developed in 6.7% after liver resection and 19% after rectal resection. The median overall survival and recurrence-free survival in the patients who completed the treatment sequence (n = 40) were 49.7 and 13.0 months, respectively. Twenty of the 30 patients who developed recurrence underwent further treatment with curative intent. CONCLUSION: The modified liver-first approach is safe and efficient in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer and allows initial control of both the primary tumour and the liver metastases.

Oxaliplatin-containing Preoperative Therapy in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: Local Response, Toxicity and Long-term Outcome.

AIMS: This non-randomised study was undertaken to examine oxaliplatin as possibly an intensifying component of sequential neoadjuvant therapy in locally advanced rectal cancer for improved local and metastatic outcome. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ninety-seven patients (57 T2-3 cases, 40 T4 cases) received two cycles of the Nordic FLOX regimen (oxaliplatin 85 mg/m(2) day 1 and bolus 5-fluorouracil 500 mg/m(2) and folinic acid 100 mg days 1 and 2) before long-course chemoradiotherapy with concomitant oxaliplatin and capecitabine, followed by pelvic surgery. Treatment toxicity, local tumour response and long-term outcome were recorded. RESULTS: Good histologic tumour regression was obtained in 72% of patients. Implementing protocol-specific dose adjustments, tolerance was acceptable and 95% of patients received the total prescribed radiation dose. Estimated 5 year progression-free and overall survival were 61% and 83%, respectively. T4 stage was associated with an inferior local response rate, which again was highly associated with impaired long-term outcome. CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort of rectal cancer patients dominated by T4 and advanced T3 cases given sequential oxaliplatin-containing preoperative therapy with acceptable toxicity, high tumour response rates and overall survival were obtained, consistent with both local and systemic effects. However, tumour response and long-term outcome remained inferior for a significant number of T4 cases, suggesting that the T4 entity is biologically heterogeneous with subgroups of patients eligible for further individualisation of therapy.

Phase I trial of EpCAM-targeting immunotoxin MOC31PE, alone and in combination with cyclosporin.

BACKGROUND: A phase I trial was performed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), safety, pharmacokinetics and immunogenicity of the anti-EpCAM immunotoxin (IT) MOC31PE in cancer patients. An important part of the study was to investigate whether the addition of Sandimmune (cyclosporin, CsA) suppressed the development of anti-IT antibodies. METHODS: Patients with EpCAM-positive metastatic disease were eligible for treatment with intravenous MOC31PE using a modified Fibonacci dose escalation sequence. Maximum tolerated dose was first established without, then with intravenously administered CsA. RESULTS: Sixty-three patients were treated with MOC31PE in doses ranging from 0.5 to 8 µg kg(-1). Maximum tolerated dose was 8 µg kg(-1) for MOC31PE alone, and 6.5 µg kg(-1) when combined with CsA. The dose-limiting adverse event was reversible liver toxicity. No radiological complete or partial responses were observed, whereas stable disease was seen in 36% of the patients receiving MOC31PE only. The pharmacokinetic profile of MOC31PE was characterised by linear kinetics and with a half-life of ∼3 h. The addition of CsA delayed the generation of anti-IT antibodies. CONCLUSIONS: Intravenous infusion of MOC31PE can safely be administered to cancer patients. Immune suppression with CsA delays the development of anti-MOC31PE antibodies. The antitumour effect of MOC31PE warrants further evaluation in EpCAM-positive metastatic disease.

A first-in-human phase I and pharmacokinetic study of CP-4126 (CO-101), a nucleoside analogue, in patients with advanced solid tumours.

BACKGROUND: CP-4126 (gemcitabine elaidate, previously CO-101) is a lipid-drug conjugate of gemcitabine designed to circumvent human equilibrative nucleoside transporter1-related resistance to gemcitabine. The purpose of this study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) of CP-4126, and to describe its pharmacokinetic profile. METHODS: Eligible patients with advanced refractory solid tumours, and adequate performance status, haematological, renal and hepatic function, were treated with one of escalating doses of CP-4126 administered by a 30-min intravenous infusion on days 1, 8 and 15 of a 28-day cycle. Blood and urine samples were collected to determine the pharmacokinetics (PKs) of CP-4126. RESULTS: Forty-three patients, median age 59 years (range 18-76; male = 27, female = 16), received one of ten dose levels (30-1600 mg/m(2)). Dose-limiting toxicities included grade 3 anaemia, grade 3 fatigue and grade 3 elevation of transaminases. The MTD and RP2D were 1250 mg/m(2) on basis of the toxicity and PK data. CP-4126 followed dose-dependent kinetics and maximum plasma concentrations occurred at the end of CP-4126 infusion. Seven patients achieved stable disease sustained for ≥3 months, including two patients with pancreatic cancer who had progressed on or after gemcitabine exposure. CONCLUSIONS: CP-4126 was well tolerated with comparable toxicity profile to gemcitabine. Future studies are required to determine its anti-tumour efficacy, either alone or in combination with other cytotoxic chemotherapy regimens.

MRI volumetry for prediction of tumour response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate if MRI-assessed tumour volumetry correlates with histological tumour response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) and subsequent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). METHODS: Data from 69 prospectively enrolled patients with LARC receiving NACT followed by CRT and radical surgery were analysed. Whole-tumour volumes were contoured in T2 weighted MR images obtained pre-treatment (VPRE), after NACT (VNACT) and after the full course of NACT followed by CRT (VCRT). VPRE, VNACT and tumour volume changes relative to VPRE, ΔVNACT and ΔVCRT were calculated and correlated to histological tumour regression grade (TRG). RESULTS: 61% of good histological responders (TRG 1-2) to NACT followed by CRT were correctly predicted by combining VPRE < 10.5 cm(3), ΔVNACT > -78.2% and VNACT < 3.3 cm(3). The highest accuracy was found for VNACT, with 55.1% sensitivity given 100% specificity. The volume regression after completed NACT and CRT (VCRT) was not significantly different between good and poor responders (TRG 1-2 vs TRG 3-5). CONCLUSION: MRI-assessed small tumour volumes after NACT correlated with good histological tumour response (TRG 1-2) to the completed course of NACT and CRT. Furthermore, by combining tumour volume measurements before, during and after NACT, more good responders were identified. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: MRI volumetry may be a tool for early identification of good and poor responders to NACT followed by CRT and surgery in LARC in order to aid more individualized, multimodal treatment.

Predictive and prognostic factors for treatment and survival in 305 patients with advanced gastrointestinal neuroendocrine carcinoma (WHO G3): the NORDIC NEC study.

BACKGROUND: As studies on gastrointestinal neuroendocrine carcinoma (WHO G3) (GI-NEC) are limited, we reviewed clinical data to identify predictive and prognostic markers for advanced GI-NEC patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data from advanced GI-NEC patients diagnosed 2000-2009 were retrospectively registered at 12 Nordic hospitals. RESULTS: The median survival was 11 months in 252 patients given palliative chemotherapy and 1 month in 53 patients receiving best supportive care (BSC) only. The response rate to first-line chemotherapy was 31% and 33% had stable disease. Ki-67<55% was by receiver operating characteristic analysis the best cut-off value concerning correlation to the response rate. Patients with Ki-67<55% had a lower response rate (15% versus 42%, P<0.001), but better survival than patients with Ki-67≥55% (14 versus 10 months, P<0.001). Platinum schedule did not affect the response rate or survival. The most important negative prognostic factors for survival were poor performance status (PS), primary colorectal tumors and elevated platelets or lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels. CONCLUSIONS: Advanced GI-NEC patients should be considered for chemotherapy treatment without delay.PS, colorectal primary and elevated platelets and LDH levels were prognostic factors for survival. Patients with Ki-67<55% were less responsive to platinum-based chemotherapy, but had a longer survival. Our data indicate that it may not be correct to consider all GI-NEC as one single disease entity.

Evaluation of complete cytoreductive surgery and two intraperitoneal chemotherapy techniques in Pseudomyxoma peritonei.

BACKGROUND: Pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP) is a low-grade malignancy characterized by mucinous tumor on the peritoneal surface. Treatment involves cytoreductive surgery (CRS) to remove all macroscopic tumor and perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy (PIC) to eliminate remaining microscopic disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 1994 and 2009, 93 patients were treated at the Norwegian Radium Hospital with complete CRS and PIC. PIC was administered as early postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy (EPIC) using mitomycin C (MMC) and 5-fluoruracil (n = 48) and as hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) using MMC (n = 45). Patients were classified into three histopathological subgroups: Disseminated peritoneal adenomucinosis (n = 57), peritoneal mucinous carcinomatosis (n = 21) and an intermediate group (n = 15). Tumor distribution by peritoneal cancer index (PCI) was PCI ≤ 10 (n = 31), PCI 11-20 (n = 29), PCI ≥ 21 (n = 33). RESULTS: Recurrence was diagnosed in 38 patients and 25 patients died during follow-up. Estimated 10-year overall survival (OS) was 69% and 10-year disease-free survival (DFS) was 47%. Mean OS was 154 months (95% CI 131-171) and median OS was not reached (follow-up median 85 months (3-207)). Low-grade malignant histology (p = 0.001) and female gender (p = 0.045) were associated with improved OS. Almost equal OS and DFS were observed between patients treated with EPIC and HIPEC. CONCLUSIONS: Patients treated for PMP with complete CRS and PIC achieved satisfactory long-term outcome. The most important prognostic factor was histopathological differentiation, but acceptable survival was observed even in patients with aggressive histology and extensive intraperitoneal tumor growth. Administration of EPIC and HIPEC was equally efficacious with respect to long-term outcome.

Salvage surgery for locally recurrent rectal cancer: total mesorectal excision during the primary operation does not influence the outcome.

AIM: This study investigated whether total mesorectal excision (TME), when carried out at the original operation for rectal cancer, influenced the effectiveness of subsequent salvage treatment for pelvic recurrence. METHOD: Between September 1990 and January 2006, 124 patients underwent radiotherapy and salvage surgery at the Norwegian Radium Hospital for locally recurrent rectal cancer without known distant metastases. Most of the primary operations had been performed at other hospitals: 62 patients had undergone a non-TME procedure (most operations in this group of patients were carried out before 1994); and 62 patients had undergone a TME procedure (all operations in this group of patients were carried out after 1992). In the TME group, 17 patients also received radiosensitizing chemotherapy. RESULTS: A lower proportion of primary abdominoperineal resection and more sensitizing chemotherapy seemed to be to the advantage of the TME group, while a higher frequency of intra-operative radiotherapy might be beneficial in the non-TME group. The 5-year survival and R0 stage achievement were 30/24% and 44/40% for non-TME/TME groups. The local re-recurrence rates were nearly identical, at around 50%, for both groups. There was no change in R stage over time. CONCLUSION: A primary operation which includes TME does not reduce the effectiveness of subsequent salvage treatment for locally recurrent rectal cancer.

Extended total mesorectal excision in locally advanced rectal cancer (T4a) and the clinical role of MRI-evaluated neo-adjuvant downstaging.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical ability of MRl taken before and after neo-adjuvant treatment in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) to predict the necessary extension of TME (ETME) and the possibility to achieve a R0 resection. METHOD: Prospective registration of 92 MRI evaluated T4a cancers undergoing elective surgery between 2002 and 2007 in a tertiary referral centre for multimodal treatment of rectal cancer. RESULTS: MRI identified patients in need of neo-adjuvant treatment and predicted T-downstaging in 10% and N-downstaging in 59%. Seventy-nine percent R0 resections, 18% R1 and 3% R2 were obtained after ETME in 95% of the patients and TME in the rest. Higher tumour regression grade (TRG) was achieved in higher ypT-stage (P < 0.01). Preoperative chemo radiotherapy resulted in that more patients obtained TRG1-3 compared to those receiving radiotherapy (79% vs. 57%, P = 0.02). The pelvic wall was the area of failure in 70% of the R1 resections. Tumour cells outside the mesorectal fascia scattered within fibrosis was found in 18 TRG2-3 among 33 ypT4 tumours (55%). CONCLUSION: MRl cannot discriminate tumour within fibrosis. Therefore, if a R0 resection is the goal, we advocate optimal surgery in accordance with the pre-treatment MRI. Post treatment MRI is a poor predictor of final histology and should not be relied upon to guide the extent of surgical resection. The study has initiated a new approach to histopathological classification of the removed specimen where we introduce a MRI assisted technique for investigating the areas at risk outside the mesorectal fascia in the specimen.

Preoperative irradiation and surgery for local recurrence of rectal and rectosigmoid cancer. Prognostic factors with regard to survival and further local recurrence.

OBJECTIVE: Local recurrence after rectal cancer surgery is an important clinical problem. METHOD: 150 patients with local recurrence after rectal/rectosigmoid cancer, stage M0, underwent surgery after preoperative irradiation (46-50 Gy). RESULTS: The overall 5-year survival was 27% (44% R0, 38% R1 and 17% R2-stage). Corresponding survival/local recurrence rates were 52%/27% for R0- and 14%/63% for R1-stage. No R2-resected survived 4 years. A normal pretreatment CEA level was significantly associated with increased survival but normalization following preoperative therapy was not associated with an improvement in prognosis. Survival and local recurrence were also significantly influenced by the type of primary operation. Several factors were significant for the prediction of an R0-resection in univariate analysis, but only CEA and symptoms at the time of recurrence predicted an R0-resection in multivariate analysis. A long latency time to recurrence did not significantly influence prognosis. CONCLUSION: Preoperative irradiation and surgery can result in an R0-resection and a long survival in patients with recurrence after initial treatment for rectal or rectosigmoid cancer. Also patients with an R1-resection can benefit from surgery since a substantial number will die without further local recurrence. An R0-resection is the main prognostic factor followed by CEA level, sex and type of primary operation. Normalization of CEA after preoperative treatment is not of prognostic significance. The value of the Norwegian follow-up regimen is questioned.