Current and anticipated future state of cachexia care in patients with cancer.

Aims: We assessed care in cancer patients with cachexia across leading health systems (LHSs). Patients & methods: Qualitative interviews and quantitative surveys were conducted with LHSs executives and frontline health care personnel, representing 46 total respondents and 42 unique LHSs and including oncology service line leaders, supportive care services, dietitians and surgical oncologists. Results: Cachexia was not considered a top priority, and formal diagnoses were rare. Participants highlighted the importance of addressing barriers to increase clinical trial enrollment and support frontline health care personnel and patients in early detection of cachexia. Conclusion: Cachexia prioritization needs to be elevated across LHSs executives to obtain capital and strategic imperatives to advance related care.

[Box: see text].

Self-Efficacy and Multisite Pain Predictors among Economically Disadvantaged Women with Back Pain.

BACKGROUND: Chronic low back pain (CLBP) prevalence is higher among women and those with low socioeconomic status. Without adequate self-efficacy and subsequent self-management, patients gradually develop chronic multisite pain after one year of having CLBP alone. AIM: This study investigated the predictors of self-efficacy and multisite pain among adult, economically disadvantaged women, where pain prevalence is higher. DESIGN: Cross-sectional, descriptive study. SETTING: Pain management center. SUBJECTS: Participants (n = 50) with primary diagnosis of chronic low back pain. METHODS: After Institutional Review Board approval, data collection was conducted using valid and reliable instruments measuring several variables. Controlling for age and race, multiple linear regression was used for analyses. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: For all predictors of self-efficacy, a significant regression equation was identified (p < .01) with R2 of .413 and variance of .643. Pain catastrophizing was a significant individual predictor (p < .05). A significant regression equation was also found for all predictors of multisite pain (p < .001) with R2 of .528 and variance of .726. Individual predictors (p < .05) were age, physical function, and numbers of pain treatments and chronic medical conditions. Study findings suggest that significant predictors can be key to advancing pain research, education, practice, and healthcare policy toward improving pain management. Particularly among this population, pain catastrophizing needs to be targeted in pain management. To minimize development of multisite pain, further investigation of identified predictors including number of chronic medical conditions and pain treatments received are necessary. Multimodal, but targeted approaches addressing these predictors are recommended, instead of costly, indiscriminate multimodal therapy. Targeted interventions can help reduce pain care disparities among socioeconomically disadvantaged women, identify high risk groups for prompt intervention, facilitate better pain response to treatments, and minimize further disability.

A novel 3-year longitudinal pilot study of medical students' acquisition and retention of screening eye examination skills.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the acquisition and retention of screening ophthalmic clinical skills over 3 years of medical school. DESIGN: Observational, longitudinal, multiple skills measures. PARTICIPANTS: All 96 students enrolled in a single graduating class at a public medical school in California. METHODS: Immediately after the second-year ophthalmic clinical skills course, all students were evaluated by their preceptors and self-rated for competence in defined skills. Follow-up assessments were done during 2 required third-year clerkships without additional formal ophthalmic clinical exposure. Three complete history and physical examination chart notes routinely submitted for course grading in third-year clerkships were selected randomly for each student by clerkship directors in family medicine and internal medicine, masked for identity, and then scored for appropriateness. Funduscopic skills were assessed objectively with a simulator in the third-year Clinical Performance Examination. During a fourth-year 4-day ophthalmology clerkship, students were trained and reassessed with the same simulator. Just before graduation, a self-assessment questionnaire was administered to the entire class. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: Twelve skills were assessed: ability to evaluate visual acuity (VA); pupils; extraocular muscles; confrontation fields; lids; cornea; conjunctiva/sclera; anterior chamber depth; and, funduscopically, the disc, macula, vessels, and retina. RESULTS: Faculty rated 88% to 90% of students as able to assess acuity, pupils, ductions, and fields, and 72% to 82% as able to visualize various parts of the fundus. Seventy-six percent of students felt comfortable after funduscopic training. In 364 analyzed chart notes, one VA was measured, and pupils were examined in 66% of notes, ductions in 54%, and fields in 3%. Only 11% of notes documented attempted funduscopy; <2% suggested actual visualization. In the Clinical Performance Examination, 32% of students accurately described some aspect of the disc, with an improvement to 84% of 38 students retested after brief ophthalmology training in year 4. Of 54 (56%) respondents to the exit questionnaire, 59% felt comfortable visualizing some aspect of the fundus. CONCLUSIONS: There is worrisome erosion of students' acquired screening skills across the third-year clerkships. Skill reinforcement in the fourth year yielded improved performance. Attention must be directed to reinforcing basic ophthalmology skills training within medical school curricula to assure competence of graduates.