Use of G-CSF to hasten neutrophil recovery after auto-SCT for AML is not associated with increased relapse incidence: a report from the Acute Leukemia Working Party of the EBMT.

Application of G-CSF in AML is controversial as leukemic blasts may express receptors interacting with the cytokine, which may stimulate leukemia growth. We retrospectively analyzed the impact of G-CSF use to accelerate neutrophil recovery after auto-SCT on outcome. Adults with AML in first CR autografted between 1994 and 2010 were included. Nine hundred and seventy two patients were treated with G-CSF after auto-SCT whereas 1121 were not. BM and PB were used as a source of stem cells in 454 (22%) and 1639 (78%) cases, respectively. The incidence of relapse at 5 years in the BM-auto-SCT group was 38% for patients receiving post-transplant G-CSF and 43% for those not treated with G-CSF, P=0.46. In the PB-auto-SCT cohort, respective probabilities were 48% and 49%, P=0.49. No impact of the use of G-CSF could be demonstrated with respect to the probability of leukemia-free survival: in the BM-auto-SCT group, 51% for G-CSF(+) and 48% for G-CSF(-), P=0.73; in PB-auto-SCT group, 42% for G-CSF(+) and 43% for G-CSF(-), P=0.83. Although G-CSF administration significantly shortened the neutropenic phase, no beneficial effect was observed with regard to non-relapse mortality. In patients with AML, the use of G-CSF after auto-SCT is not associated with increased risk of relapse irrespective of the source of stem cells used.

Incidence and risk factors of EBV reactivation after unrelated cord blood transplantation: a Eurocord and Société Française de Greffe de Moelle-Therapie Cellulaire collaborative study.

EBV viremia and post-transplantation lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLDs) have been associated with high mortality rates after allogeneic hematopoietic SCT (allo-HSCT). Few retrospective studies, without EBV load monitoring postulated that umbilical cord blood transplantation (UCBT) might be associated with high incidence of EBV events. We retrospectively studied 175 UCBT recipients for whom RQ-PCR was used to monitor EBV blood load at least once a week during the first 3 months after UCBT. Median age was 23 years, 74% had leukemia. Conditioning was myeloablative in 54% and reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) was used in 46%. A total of 24 patients presented an EBV reactivation. For 15 patients, the reactivation occurred during the first 100 days (cumulative incidence: 8%) and included 4 EBV-PTLD. Rituximab as preemptive treatment was used in 12 of these 15 patients. In univariate analysis, the increased risk of early EBV reactivation was associated with RIC in combination with antithymocyte globulin (P=0.03) and previous history of auto-HSCT (P=0.01). Multivariate analysis did not find any independent risk factor. EBV reactivation as time-dependent covariate was not statistically associated with survival. Therefore, EBV events were not major complications after UCBT when EBV load is weekly monitored and preemptive treatment started.