Systematic review: new serological markers (anti-glycan, anti-GP2, anti-GM-CSF Ab) in the prediction of IBD patient outcomes.

Traditionally, IBD diagnosis is based on clinical, radiological, endoscopic, and histological criteria. Biomarkers are needed in cases of uncertain diagnosis, or to predict disease course and therapeutic response. No guideline recommends the detection of antibodies (including ASCA and ANCA) for diagnosis or prognosis of IBD to date. However, many recent data suggest the potential role of new serological markers (anti-glycan (ACCA, ALCA, AMCA, anti-L and anti-C), anti-GP2 and anti-GM-CSF Ab). This review focuses on clinical utility of these new serological markers in diagnosis, prognosis and therapeutic monitoring of IBD. Literature review of anti-glycan, anti-GP2 and anti-GM-CSF Ab and their impact on diagnosis, prognosis and prediction of therapeutic response was performed in PubMed/MEDLINE up to June 2014. Anti-glycan, anti-GP2 and anti-GM-CSF Ab are especially associated with CD and seem to be correlated with complicated disease phenotypes even if results differ between studies. Although anti-glycan Ab and anti-GP2 Ab have low sensitivity in diagnosis of IBD, they could identify a small number of CD patients not detected by other tests such as ASCA. Anti-glycan Abs are associated with a progression to a more severe disease course and a higher risk for IBD-related surgery. Anti-GP2 Ab could particularly contribute to better stratify cases of pouchitis. Anti-GM-CSF Ab seems to be correlated with disease activity and could help predict relapses. These new promising biomarkers could particularly be useful in stratification of patients according to disease phenotype and risk of complications. They could be a valuable aid in prediction of disease course and therapeutic response but more prospective studies are needed.

Type III hereditary angio-oedema: clinical and biological features in a French cohort.

BACKGROUND: Hereditary angio-oedema (HAE) has been associated with C1inhibitor deficiency. The first cases of type III HAE were described in patients with normal C1Inh antigenic protein level and function and normal C4 levels in 2000. This finding has been reported mostly in women with a family history and may be influenced by exogenous oestrogen exposure. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this article is to describe the clinical, biological and genetic characteristics of a French population suffering from type III HAE. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of angio-oedema (AE) cases seen in the National Reference Centre of AE between 2000 and 2009. RESULTS: We found 26 patients (from 15 unrelated families) with type III HAE. All but four were women and presented with typical AE attacks, exacerbated by pregnancy or oral contraceptives containing oestrogens (OC). We also found that 54.5% of women were worsened with oestrogen and 23% were oestrogen dependent. All patients improved on long-term prophylactic tranexamic acid treatment; some acute attacks improved with C1Inh concentrate infusion. All of the patients had normal C1Inh and C4 levels. C1Inh function was also normal, except in women receiving OC or during a pregnancy: transient, moderately low levels (32-74% of the normal range) were found in 18 patients tested (67%). No SERPING1 gene mutation was found. Six patients from three unrelated families were heterozygous for an F12 gene variant. CONCLUSION: Diagnosis of type III HAE should be based on clinical (typical attacks, often hormonally influenced), laboratory (normal C1Inh antigenic protein) and genetic (F12 gene mutation) evidence.

Acquired angioedema with C1 inhibitor deficiency: is the distinction between type I and type II still relevant?

BACKGROUND: Acquired angioedemas are divided into type I associated with lymphoproliferation and type II caused by anti-C1-inhibitor antibodies. Recent reports have suggested that this distinction is not so clear-cut, mainly because of the presence of antibodies against the C1 inhibitor in some cases belonging to the type I group. We report herein 2 additional cases of acquired angioedema with anti-C1-inhibitor antibody. MATERIAL AND METHODS: One man and 1 woman had had acquired angioedema for several years. In the man, a monoclonal component had been detected several years before the present study. In the second patient, a monoclonal component was detected during the study. The following data were studied on successive blood samples collected during angioedema manifestations: complement component levels, functional activity of the classical pathway, functional and antigenic C1 inhibitor doses, ELISA test to detect autoantibodies to C1 inhibitor and Western blot analysis of the C1 inhibitor. RESULTS: In both patients, CH50 and C4 activities were decreased, and an autoantibody to C1 inhibitor was detected. In 1 case, the antibody appeared after the monoclonal component; in the second case, it appeared before and belonged to a different immunoglobulin class. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that the distinction between type I and type II acquired angioedema is no longer valid because of overlapping in some cases.