Influence of pelvic tilt correction on PJK occurrence after adult spinal deformity surgery.

INTRODUCTION: Many risk factors for proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) have been reported in the literature, especially sagittal alignment modifications, but studies on pelvic tilt (PT) variations and its influence on PJK are missing. Aim of this study was to analyze the influence of pelvic tilt correction, after long fusion surgery for ASD patients, on PJK occurrence. METHODS: A monocentric retrospective study was conducted on prospectively collected data, including 76 patients, operated with fusion extending from the thoraco-lumbar junction to the ilium. Radiologic parameters were measured on fullspine standing radiographs preoperatively, postoperatively (<6 months) and at latest follow-up (before revision surgery or >2 years). All parameters were analyzed comparing patients with PJK (group "PJK") and without PJK (group "no PJK"). A further analysis compared patients with low (PT/PI<25th percentile, LowPT group) and high (PT/PI>75th percentile, HighPT group) preoperative pelvic tilt. RESULTS: « PJK ¼ patients had a greater lumbar lordosis and thoracic kyphosis correction (p=0,03 et <0,001 respectively) compared to the "no PJK" patients. Pelvic tilt was significantly lower postoperatively in the "PJK" group (p=0,03). Patients from the HighPT PJK group were significantly more corrected than patients from the HighPT noPJK group (p=0,003). CONCLUSION: Through the analysis of 76 patients, we showed that pelvic tilt did not seem to play a role in the setting of PJK after ASD surgery. Decreasing PT after surgery could be an element to watch out for in patients with PJK risk factors.

Validation of the Total Disability Index (TDI) in French Version.

INTRODUCTION: The Total Disability Index (TDI) questionnaire has been developed to provide a more complete assessment of low back and neck pain, as they frequently co-occur. This study aimed at validating the TDI questionnaire in French, to determine if it could be used in France. HYPOTHESIS: The TDI French version is valid, reproducible and comparable to the English version. METHODS: This multicentric study prospectively included French-speaking volunteers, both patients admitted for spine surgery in two specialized spine centers and healthy individuals. Healthy subjects were recruited among students of an engineering school and medical staff. A booklet was given to the participants containing a Lumbar and Cervical Visual Analog Scale (respectively LVAS and CVAS), and the French versions of Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Neck Disability Index (NDI) and TDI questionnaires. Statistical analysis included Cronbach's α calculation for internal consistency assessment, correlation analysis with ODI and NDI items for convergent validity, principal component analyses and factor analysis. Discriminant validity was assessed by comparing healthy subjects and patients using Student's t tests, and floor and ceiling effects search. RESULTS: 71 participants were included, with 34 (48%) healthy volunteers and 37 (52%) patients. Mean age was 45.2±19.6 years and 57% of the cohort were males. Internal consistency was good: Cronbach's α was calculated at 0.96 (95%CI: [0.95-0.98]). For each TDI item, a high correlation was found with ODI corresponding items, between 0.81 and 0.97 (p<0.001), and good correlation with NDI items, ranging from 0.65 to 0.96 (p<0.001). TDI correlated also with LVAS and CVAS (respectively 0.70 and 0.65, p<0.001). Principal component analyses indicated good correlation between the TDI items and between each item and TDI total score. Factor analysis indicated two main factors explaining 77% of TDI variance, constituted by all TDI items. Regarding discriminative validity, healthy subjects and patients presented significantly different TDI scores (p-values ≤0.01 for each item). Barplot representations of each TDI item revealed no major floor nor ceiling effects. CONCLUSION: This study confirms the reliability, feasibility and validity of the Total Disability Index questionnaire in its French version. Its validation allows its use in France. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

Benefit-risks analysis of thoracoplasty in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis treated by sublaminar bands.

INTRODUCTION: Cosmetic concerns are one of the main complaints of patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). Several studies have shown a significant improvement in self-image scores after thoracoplasty. However, the effects of thoracoplasty on pulmonary function and clinical outcomes remain debated. The objective was to analyze the benefits and risks of thoracoplasty during AIS surgery using a hybrid construct with sublaminar bands. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this monocentric prospective cohort study, 68 patients with thoracic AIS were consecutively included between 2016 and 2017. All patients had low-dose 3D radiographs. Surgical correction was performed via the posterior approach, using the posteromedial translation technique with a hybrid construct (thoracic sublaminar band and lumbar pedicle screws). A thoracoplasty was proposed in cases of severe rib hump (more than 3cm). Pulmonary function was assessed by pulmonary function tests (PFT) with forced vital capacity, forced expiratory volume in 1 second and total lung capacity). Radiographic parameters and PFT were compared between patients who had or had not had a thoracoplasty preoperatively and 2 years postoperatively. The SRS-22 score was collected at follow-up. RESULTS: The average age was 15±3 years. Nineteen patients (27%) had a thoracoplasty. The demographic, radiographic and respiratory data of the 2 groups were comparable preoperatively. The correction was similar between the groups on sagittal and coronal views. At 2 years, the PFTs were comparable to those performed preoperatively and no difference was found between the groups. None of the 12 patients who had a pleural effusion had it drained. The total SRS-22 score and the cosmetic subscore were higher in the thoracoplasty group (p<0.03). DISCUSSION: The association of a thoracoplasty with AIS surgery improves the self-image of patients without altering the PFTs at 2 years postoperatively. Given the low morbidity of thoracoplasty, it seems reasonable to offer it to patients with severe rib hump and high cosmetic demands. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.