Evaluation of Intracochlear Position of a Slim Modiolar Electrode Array, by Using Different Radiological Analyses.

INTRODUCTION: The radiological analysis following a cochlear implantation offers insight into the audiological outcomes of cochlear implant recipients. The wrapping factor (WF) is the most common radiological analysis measuring the modiolar position and depth of insertion of an electrode array. New measurements like the intracochlear position index (ICPI) or the homogeneity factor (HF) can offer more accurate information regarding the electrode's intracochlear position. We have also studied a new method to calculate the WF, by normalizing it with a new methodology (WFn). OBJECTIVES: To analyze and compare the results of the WF, ICPI, HF, and WFn obtained using a cone beam computer tomography (CBCT) with the histological analysis on temporal bone. MATERIAL: A perimodiolar electrode array (Nucleus Slim CI532) was inserted in three temporal bones. A perfect insertion was performed in the first temporal bone, according to the correct specifications. In the second specimen, a slightly over-inserted electrode was analyzed and in the third specimen a completely over-inserted electrode array was studied. METHOD: A CBCT was performed following the implantations and then, a histological analysis with slices perpendicular to the cochlea axis (modiolus). Each measurement was made 10 times by 10 experts (radiologist and otologist) with a total amount of 600 measurements (100 for each data, 3 CBCT and 3 histology). A t test statistical analysis was performed to compare the measurements between CBCT and histology. RESULTS: It was observed that the ICPI and the HF correctly identify the three different insertions. Regarding the WF no significant difference in the two over-inserted specimens was found. The ICPI was the only measurement that shows no statistical difference between the CBCT and the histology, so it was considered the most accurate method. Finally, the WF shows a statistical difference between the CBCT and the histology in all cases, indicating the poor value of the radiological method. The WFn analysis includes the modiolar wall length in the measurement. This improves the final result as it reduces the error induced by the size of the cochlea. CONCLUSION: The ICPI and the HF provide better radiological information than the WF, regarding the intracochlear position of the electrode array. The most relevant difference is that the ICPI, HF, and WFn include modiolar and lateral wall dimensions, thereby using the diameter of the cochlear duct for the analysis.

Reliability of cone beam computed tomography in scalar localization of the electrode array: a radio histological study.

Postoperative imaging plays a growing role in clinical studies concerning prognostic factors in cochlear implantation. Indeed, intracochlear position of the cochlear implant has recently been identified as a contributor in functional outcomes and radiological tools must be accurate enough to determine the final placement of the electrode array. The aim of our study was to validate cone beam computed tomography as a reliable technique for scalar localization of the electrode array. We performed therefore a temporal bone study on ten specimens that were implanted with a perimodiolar implant prototype. Cone beam reconstructions were performed and images were analyzed by two physicians both experienced in cochlear implant imaging, who determined the scalar localization of the implant. Temporal bones then underwent histological control to document this scalar localization and hypothetical intracochlear lesions. In four cases, a dislocation from scala tympani to scala vestibuli was suspected on cone beam reconstructions of the ascending part of the basal turn. In three of these four specimens, dislocation in pars ascendens was confirmed histologically. In the remaining temporal bone, histological analysis revealed an elevation with rupture of the basilar membrane. Histological assessment revealed spiral ligament tearing in another bone. We conclude that cone beam is a reliable tool to assess scalar localization of the selectrode array and may be used in future clinical studies.