The optimal timing of hepatitis C therapy in liver transplant-eligible patients: Cost-effectiveness analysis of new opportunities.

Different strategies of DAAs treatment are currently possible both pre- and postliver transplantation (LT). Clinical and economic consequences of these strategies still need to be adequately investigated; this study aims at assessing their cost-effectiveness. A decision analytical model was created to simulate the progression of HCV-infected patients listed for decompensated cirrhosis (DCC) or for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Three DAAs treatment strategies were compared: (i) a 12-week course of DAAs prior to transplantation (PRE-LT), (ii) a 4-week course of DAAs starting at the time of transplantation (PERI-LT) and (iii) a 12-week course of DAAs administered at disease recurrence (POST-LT). The population was substratified according to HCC presence and, in those without HCC, according to the MELD score at listing. Data on DAAs effectiveness were estimated using a cohort of patients still followed by 11 transplant centres of the European Liver and Intestine Transplant Association and by data available in the literature. In this study, PRE-LT treatment strategy was dominant for DCC patients with MELD<16 and cost-effective for those with MELD16-20, while POST-LT strategy emerged as cost-effective for DCC patients with MELD>20 and for those with HCC. Sensitivity analyses confirmed PRE-LT as the cost-effective strategy for patients with MELD≤20. In conclusion, PRE-LT treatment is cost-effective for patients with MELD≤20 without HCC, while treatments after LT are cost-effective in cirrhotic patients with MELD>20 and in those with HCC. It is worth reminding, though, that the final choice of a specific regimen at the patient level will have to be personalized based on clinical, social and transplant-related factors.

Efficacy and Safety of Everolimus and Mycophenolic Acid With Early Tacrolimus Withdrawal After Liver Transplantation: A Multicenter Randomized Trial.

SIMCER was a 6-mo, multicenter, open-label trial. Selected de novo liver transplant recipients were randomized (week 4) to everolimus with low-exposure tacrolimus discontinued by month 4 (n = 93) or to tacrolimus-based therapy (n = 95), both with basiliximab induction and enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium with or without steroids. The primary end point, change in estimated GFR (eGFR; MDRD formula) from randomization to week 24 after transplant, was superior with everolimus (mean eGFR change +1.1 vs. -13.3 mL/min per 1.73 m2 for everolimus vs. tacrolimus, respectively; difference 14.3 [95% confidence interval 7.3-21.3]; p < 0.001). Mean eGFR at week 24 was 95.8 versus 76.0 mL/min per 1.73 m2 for everolimus versus tacrolimus (p < 0.001). Treatment failure (treated biopsy-proven acute rejection [BPAR; rejection activity index score >3], graft loss, or death) from randomization to week 24 was similar (everolimus 10.0%, tacrolimus 4.3%; p = 0.134). BPAR was more frequent between randomization and month 6 with everolimus (10.0% vs. 2.2%; p = 0.026); the rate of treated BPAR was 8.9% versus 2.2% (p = 0.055). Sixteen everolimus-treated patients (17.8%) and three tacrolimus-treated patients (3.2%) discontinued the study drug because of adverse events. In conclusion, early introduction of everolimus at an adequate exposure level with gradual calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) withdrawal after liver transplantation, supported by induction therapy and mycophenolic acid, is associated with a significant renal benefit versus CNI-based immunosuppression but more frequent BPAR.

Renal function at two years in liver transplant patients receiving everolimus: results of a randomized, multicenter study.

In a 24-month prospective, randomized, multicenter, open-label study, de novo liver transplant patients were randomized at 30 days to everolimus (EVR) + Reduced tacrolimus (TAC; n = 245), TAC Control (n = 243) or TAC Elimination (n = 231). Randomization to TAC Elimination was stopped prematurely due to a significantly higher rate of treated biopsy-proven acute rejection (tBPAR). The incidence of the primary efficacy endpoint, composite efficacy failure rate of tBPAR, graft loss or death postrandomization was similar with EVR + Reduced TAC (10.3%) or TAC Control (12.5%) at month 24 (difference -2.2%, 97.5% confidence interval [CI] -8.8%, 4.4%). BPAR was less frequent in the EVR + Reduced TAC group (6.1% vs. 13.3% in TAC Control, p = 0.010). Adjusted change in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) from randomization to month 24 was superior with EVR + Reduced TAC versus TAC Control: difference 6.7 mL/min/1.73 m(2) (97.5% CI 1.9, 11.4 mL/min/1.73 m(2), p = 0.002). Among patients who remained on treatment, mean (SD) eGFR at month 24 was 77.6 (26.5) mL/min/1.73 m(2) in the EVR + Reduced TAC group and 66.1 (19.3) mL/min/1.73 m(2) in the TAC Control group (p < 0.001). Study medication was discontinued due to adverse events in 28.6% of EVR + Reduced TAC and 18.2% of TAC Control patients. Early introduction of everolimus with reduced-exposure tacrolimus at 1 month after liver transplantation provided a significant and clinically relevant benefit for renal function at 2 years posttransplant.

Everolimus with reduced tacrolimus improves renal function in de novo liver transplant recipients: a randomized controlled trial.

In a prospective, multicenter, open-label study, de novo liver transplant patients were randomized at day 30±5 to (i) everolimus initiation with tacrolimus elimination (TAC Elimination) (ii) everolimus initiation with reduced-exposure tacrolimus (EVR+Reduced TAC) or (iii) standard-exposure tacrolimus (TAC Control). Randomization to TAC Elimination was terminated prematurely due to a higher rate of treated biopsy-proven acute rejection (tBPAR). EVR+Reduced TAC was noninferior to TAC Control for the primary efficacy endpoint (tBPAR, graft loss or death at 12 months posttransplantation): 6.7% versus 9.7% (-3.0%; 95% CI -8.7, 2.6%; p<0.001 for noninferiority [12% margin]). tBPAR occurred in 2.9% of EVR+Reduced TAC patients versus 7.0% of TAC Controls (p = 0.035). The change in adjusted estimated GFR from randomization to month 12 was superior with EVR+Reduced TAC versus TAC Control (difference 8.50 mL/min/1.73 m(2) , 97.5% CI 3.74, 13.27 mL/min/1.73 m(2) , p<0.001 for superiority). Drug discontinuation for adverse events occurred in 25.7% of EVR+Reduced TAC and 14.1% of TAC Controls (relative risk 1.82, 95% CI 1.25, 2.66). Relative risk of serious infections between the EVR+Reduced TAC group versus TAC Controls was 1.76 (95% CI 1.03, 3.00). Everolimus facilitates early tacrolimus minimization with comparable efficacy and superior renal function, compared to a standard tacrolimus exposure regimen 12 months after liver transplantation.

[Evaluation of noninvasive diagnostic criteria for hepatocellular carcinoma on pretransplant MRI (2010): correlation between MR imaging features and histological features on liver specimen]. / Évaluation des critères diagnostiques non invasifs du carcinome hépatocellulaire sur IRM pré-greffe hépatique (2010) : corrélations IRM - anatomopathologiques sur explants hépatiques.

PURPOSE: To validate the 2010 diagnostic criteria from the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) on MRI using the surgical liver specimen as a gold standard. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 21 liver transplant recipients were retrospectively included. Each underwent surgery because of HCC between January 2007 and January 2008. Pre-transplant MRI was performed on a 1.5 Tesla MR unit. The T1W and T2W signal and kinetic contrast enhancement were correlated for each lesion with the surgical specimen. Lesion diameters between MRI and specimen were compared (Spearman). A multivariate model was created (R statistics software package) to predict the presence and grade of tumor differentiation (WHO, Edmonson Steiner). RESULTS: A total of 71 nodules were detected at histology, including 54 HCC (mean size: 25.3mm) compared to 68 on MRI. There was moderate agreement (r=0.58, P<0.001) between the maximum lesion diameters measured on MRI and at histology. Wash-out on MRI provided an accuracy of 75 % for the detection of HCC (sensitivity=75 %, specificity=76 %). Adding T2W hyperintensity to the AASLD criteria increased the sensitivity of MRI from 70.3 % to 77.7 % for the diagnosis of HCC and from 67.6 % to 79 % for nodules less than 20mm in diameter, without affecting specificity. On multivariate analysis, wash out as a single variable was significantly associated with a diagnosis of HCC (P<0.01, odds ratio 12.0, CI 95 % [2.6-55.5]). T1W hyperintensity (P=0.04, odds ratio 5.4) and loss of signal on opposed-phase images (P=0.02, odds ratio 9.2) were predictive of good differentiation. CONCLUSION: On MRI, the AASLD criteria or presence of wash out within a liver nodule in patients with underlying chronic hepatocellular disease are suggestive of tumoral transformation. The addition of T2W hyperintensity to the AASLD criteria increases the detection of HCC, especially nodules smaller than 20mm.

Regression of new-onset diabetes mellitus after conversion from tacrolimus to cyclosporine in liver transplant patients: results of a pilot study.

INTRODUCTION: New-onset diabetes mellitus (NODM) has important implications for long-term outcome following liver transplantation. AIM: To evaluate the impact of conversion from tacrolimus to cyclosporine in liver transplant patients presenting NODM. METHOD: In a 12-month pilot study, 39 liver transplant patients with NODM were converted from tacrolimus to cyclosporine. Most patients (59%) were receiving antidiabetic therapy (18% insulin, 41% oral) and all patients had received dietary advice prior to the study. RESULTS: At month 12, NODM had significantly resolved (FBG<7 mmol/L without treatment) in 36% of patients (95% CI 20.8-51.0%). In the 16 patients not receiving antidiabetic drugs at baseline, mean FBG decreased from 8.1 mmol/L to 6.6 mmol/L (P=0.008) and mean HbA(1c) decreased from 6.4 to 6.0% (P=0.05). Steroids were stopped rapidly in the nine patients receiving steroids at inclusion but NODM resolution was observed in only one of these nine patients. No significant factors were identified that could have affected NODM resolution. There were three episodes of biopsy-proven acute rejection (7.7%), no graft losses and one death. Overall, cyclosporine tolerance was good with no significant change in creatinine clearance at month 12. Total cholesterol increased from 4.6 mmol/L to 5.1 mmol/L (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that liver transplant patients with NODM may benefit from conversion to cyclosporine from tacrolimus through improved glucose metabolism. Confirmation in a prospective, randomized comparative study is required.

[Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma and potential application of PSI]. / Carcinome hépatocellulaire et transplantation hépatique : rôle futur des inhibiteurs de la mTOR.

Liver transplantation is considered the best treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma but its efficacy depends on the risk of tumour recurrence. The risk of recurrence depends on tumour characteristics but is also influenced by immunosuppressive regimens. Immunosuppressants of the mTOR inhibitors family share anti-tumour properties which are already taken into account in the treatment of renal carcinoma and advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. These features make interesting their use in liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma, with the following goals: to reduce the risk of post-transplant tumour recurrence, to expand the indications of liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma and eventually to slow down tumour growth during the waiting period. However, to date, the potential role of mTOR inhibitors after liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma is only based on small encouraging proof of concept studies. Large randomized studies are therefore required to further define the specific indications of these compounds. The demonstration of a beneficial impact of mTOR inhibitors in the setting of liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma would be a major therapeutical advance.

[Hepatic transplantation]. / La transplantation hépatique.

The first liver transplantation (LT) was conducted in 1963. After a two-decade development phase with the improvement of surgical and anesthesia-resuscitation techniques, and a better control of allograft rejection, LT has become the benchmark treatment for the majority of end-stage liver diseases. Since the 1980s, indications of LT have gradually expanded and the current main indications in adults are hepatocellular carcinoma at an early stage (15 to 30% of indications), C cirrhosis (15 to 40% of indications) and alcoholic cirrhosis (20 to 25% of indications). Five thousand LTs are performed yearly in Europe, including 1000 LTs in France, with, over the 2000-2006 period, survival rates of 86, 75 and 68% at one, five and 10 years, respectively. Several advances have accompanied the increasing number of indications and these excellent results: (a) the development of more specific immunosuppressive drugs to prevent rejection, the incidence of which is currently less than 20%: tacrolimus, mycophenolic acid, anti-IL2 receptor antibodies, mTOR inhibitors, (b) a policy of active recruitment of organs together with surgical innovations (split liver, domino LT, living donor transplantation) contributing to the expansion of the pool of organs, (c) standardization of organ allocation policies, based on the sickest first policy. The applicability of LT, however, remains limited by the shortage of organs and the occurrence of long-term complications of immunosuppression. Due to the lack of effective alternative perspectives to LT for the treatment of end-stage liver diseases, the two major challenges for the liver transplant community should be the optimization of organ recruitment and the development of innovative immunosuppressive regimens able to overcome the side effects of current immunosuppressive drugs. The development of non heart beating donation and appropriate use of intrafamilial donation could partly compensate for the organ shortage in the midterm. The identification of molecular signatures in tolerant patients in whom immunosuppression could be stopped, and induction of tolerance, trough lymphocyte depletion or T lymphocyte costimulation blockade, are the most advanced research ways to reduce complications of immunosuppression.

Natural history and therapeutic management of recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma after liver transplantation.

While the natural history and appropriate diagnostic and management practices are relatively well defined for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), data are scarce concerning the characteristic features and treatment modalities for recurrent HCC after liver transplantation. The time of recurrence appears to impact survival more significantly than localization, but to date, guidelines for therapeutic management of recurrent HCC have not been established. Data in the literature shows that late and unifocal recurrence has a better prognosis when treated by surgery or radiofrequency. In the event of early recurrence, surgery cannot be recommended due to the lack of evidence and the high risk of advanced disease. Systemic therapy can be discussed in a situation of multifocal recurrence. Proliferative signal inhibitors exhibit both immunosuppressive and antiproliferative properties and liver transplantation teams tend to introduce such treatment despite the lack of extensive data.

Improved clinical outcomes for liver transplant recipients using cyclosporine monitoring based on 2-hr post-dose levels (C2).

BACKGROUND: A prospective, open-label, study was conducted at 29 centers in 9 countries, involving 307 de novo liver transplant patients to compare the clinical usefulness of monitoring 2-hr post-dose cyclosporine (CsA) levels (C2) with conventional trough cyclosporine blood levels (pre-dose) (C0). METHODS: Neoral oral therapy was initiated at 15 mg/kg/day and dose adjusted according to predetermined C2 or C0 target level ranges. The primary efficacy variable was treatment failure at 3 months, where evaluation was based on a composite endpoint of biopsy-proven rejection, treatment for rejection, graft loss, death, or premature withdrawal/discontinuation from the study. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. Graft loss at 12 weeks (retransplantation or death) occurred in 6.8% C2 and in 7.0% C0 patients. Overall incidence of treated acute rejection was lower for C2 (23.6%) than C0 patients (31.6%) (P=0.144, Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel [CMH] test). In hepatitis C virus (HCV)-negative patients, the incidence of rejection in the C2 group was significantly less than in the C0 group (21.2% vs. 33.0%; P<0.05), whereas in HCV-positive patients, the rejection rate was similar in both groups (26.7% for C2 group vs. 27.3% for C0 group: P=0.81). C2 patients (n=16) who reached minimum target CsA levels by day 3 had a notably low incidence of rejection (12.5%), whereas there was no difference in the incidence of rejection in C0 patients, irrespective of time to reach target level. For biopsy-proven acute rejections (21.6% for C2 vs. 30.4% for C0), the incidence of moderate and severe histological diagnosis was significantly lower in the C2 group than in the C0 group (47% vs. 73%; P=0.01). Safety profiles were similar between the two groups, with few patient withdrawals due to adverse events (9.5% for C2; 7.0% for C0). CONCLUSIONS: Using C2 monitoring, the overall incidence of acute cellular rejection was lower compared with the C0 group, and the histological severity of acute rejections was shown to be significantly milder for the C2 group, indicative of good long-term prognosis. These data demonstrate that the use of C2 monitoring is superior to C0 and results in a reduction in the incidence and severity of acute cellular rejection without detrimental effect on the drug safety profile.

[Liver transplantation: which indications? which results?]. / Transplantation hépatique: quelles indications? Quels résultats?

UNLABELLED: THE ONLY TREATMENT: Liver transplantation (LT) is currently the final treatment for most types of end-stage liver diseases including alcoholic cirrhosis, so far alcoholic cirrhosis has become the first indication for LT in France and other western countries, accounting for 25% of all procedures. However due to ethical issues and also the discrepancy between the theoretical number of candidates and available organs, indications for LT in alcoholic cirrhosis must be rigorously defined. INDICATIONS: On the average, candidates are 50 years old, males in two-thirds of the cases, with pre-terminal liver disease combining advanced-stage liver dysfunction (PT < 40%, bilirubin > 50 mumol/l, albumin < 30 g/l) and intractable ascitis. The gain in survival being best in patients with severe cirrhosis (Child-Pugh grade C), these patients should be given priority when liver function fails to improve despite prolonged abstention. For less advanced diseases (Child-Pugh B or A), LT can be considered after failure of symptomatic medical treatments or in case a small hepatocellular carcinoma develops. CONTRAINDICATIONS: The list includes presence of extrahepatic organ failure, generally related to alcohol-tobacco abuse (cardiomyopathy, pancreatitis, neuropathy, squamous cell carcinoma ...) and precarious psychosocial situations exposing the patient to the risk of recurrent alcoholism and non-compliance after transplantation. Predictive factors of after recidivism after transplantation are preoperative abstinence of less than 6 months duration, denial of alcoholism, lack of familial and occupational support, antisocial behavior and a history of psychiatric disorders or drug abuse. Patients with several of these risk factors cannot reasonably be considered as candidates for LT. Inversely, transplantation should be proposed for patients with no or few risk factors due to the excellent physical and social outcome observed. Generally, a full 6 months of preoperative abstinence is required by most transplantation centers. The aim is to avoid underestimation for liver function recovery and to limit the risk of recurrent alcoholism. RESULTS: Using the above criteria, LT for alcoholic cirrhosis can restore a satisfactory quality of life and provides a 5-year survival to the order of 65%, similar to results obtained in other indications for LT. Recurrent pathological consumption of alcohol occurs in 10 to 15% of the cases, generally with moderate effects on the liver graft. PRACTICAL ATTITUDE: Using the currently accepted selection criteria, less than 5% of the patient with alcoholic cirrhosis actually undergo transplantation. For these patients, LT enables to treat both cirrhosis and alcoholic disease in 80% of the cases. Based on these results, segregating among patients with severe alcoholic cirrhosis considered as reasonable candidates for LT after a complete pluridisciplinary preoperative work-up must be avoided.

Treatment of B-lymphoproliferative disorder with a monoclonal anti-interleukin-6 antibody in 12 patients: a multicenter phase 1-2 clinical trial.

Severe T-cell immunodeficiency after solid organ or bone marrow transplantation may result in the uncontrolled outgrowth of latently Epstein-Barr virus-infected B cells, leading to B-lymphoproliferative disorder (BLPD). Given the potentially important pathogenic role of IL-6 in BLPD, it was tested whether the in vivo neutralization of IL-6 by a monoclonal anti-IL-6 antibody could contribute to the control of BLPD. Safety and efficacy were assessed in 12 recipients of transplanted organs who had BLPD refractory to the reduction of immunosuppression over 8 days. Five patients received 0.4 mg/kg per day. The next 7 patients received 0.8 mg/kg per day. Treatment was scheduled to last 15 days. It was completed in 10 patients, and in the other 2 patients was discontinued early (days 10 and 13, respectively) because of disease progression. Treatment tolerance was good, and no major side effects were observed. High C-reactive protein levels were found in 9 patients before treatment but were normalized under treatment in all patients, demonstrating efficient IL-6 neutralization. Complete remission (CR) was observed in 5 patients and partial remission (PR) in 3 patients. Relapse was observed in 1 of these 8 patients in whom remission was observed. This relapse was unresponsive to treatment. Disease was stable in 1 patient, but it progressed in 3 patients. Seven patients are alive and well. Two patients died because of disease progression, and 3 patients died while in CR (chronic rejection in 2 patients and BLPD sequelae in 1 patient). These data suggest that the anti-IL-6 antibody is safe and should be further explored in the treatment of BLPD.

Liver iron accumulation in patients with chronic active hepatitis C: prevalence and role of hemochromatosis gene mutations and relationship with hepatic histological lesions.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Liver iron accumulation has been described in patients with chronic active hepatitis (CAH) C, and could play a role in the course of liver disease and negatively influence the response to interferon. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence and severity of liver iron accumulation in CAH C, to assess its relationship with the HFE C282Y and H63D mutations, and to study its interactions with hepatic histological lesions. METHODS: Two hundred and nine patients (131 men, 78 women, mean age 44.3+/-12.0 years) with CAH C, including 19 patients with cirrhosis (9.1%) were studied. A semiquantitative grading system from 0 to 3 was used for histological assessment of liver iron accumulation on Perls' staining. The HFE C282Y and H63D mutations were screened for by restriction enzyme analysis performed on PCR-amplified products. Histological scores of activity and fibrosis were determined according to a previously validated METAVIR score system. RESULTS: Liver iron accumulation was found in 88/209 patients (42.1%), and was generally mild. The C282Y and H63D allele frequencies were in 23 (11.0%), and 50 (23.9%), respectively. No association was found between the presence of liver iron accumulation and the detection of the C282Y and H63D mutations. A significant relationship was found between the severity of histological activity and liver iron accumulation of macrophagic or mixed (i.e. both macrophagic and hepatocytic) type (p = 0.04). Although the number of cirrhotic patients was small, cirrhosis was more frequently observed in patients with than without liver iron accumulation (17.2% vs. 3.3%, p = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: Overall, these data suggest that the liver iron accumulation in patients with CAH C is significantly associated with histological activity and cirrhosis, whereas the two missense hemochromatosis gene mutations are not major determinants.

Inhibitor against coagulation factor V after liver transplantation.

A new case of anti-factor V inhibitor is described in a 46-year-old man, who received a liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma, without exposure to bovine thrombin or fibrin glue during the operative course. The inhibition occurred on the 14th postoperative day, while the patient was being treated with oxacillin, azathioprine, and a new immunosuppressive drug, FK506. The inhibition was of short duration (3 days), and no bleeding complication occurred despite a very low plasmatic level of factor V activity and antigen (<5%). Plasma samples drawn after cessation of FK506 disclosed a dose-dependent inhibitory activity when alcoholic solutions of FK506 were exogeneously added; this suggests a possible role of the FK506 drug in the occurrence of this anti-factor V inhibitor.

Role of hepatitis C virus in lymphoproliferative disorders after liver transplantation.

It has been suggested that hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection could be associated with B-cell clonal expansion. The aim of this study was to analyze the relationship between lymphoproliferative disorders and HCV infection in liver transplant recipients. We studied 157 patients receiving a liver transplant between January 1989 and May 1997 with a follow-up longer than 3 months. The incidence of posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLDs) was analyzed with reference to the indication for liver transplantation, the induction and maintenance immunosuppression, the incidence of acute rejection episodes, and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection. Six PTLDs occurred after a median posttransplant follow-up of 7 months (3.8%). Four of the 6 PTLDs occurred among the 38 patients transplanted for HCV-related cirrhosis, and 2 PTLDs occurred in the 119 patients receiving a liver transplant for non-HCV liver diseases (10.5% vs. 1.7%, respectively; P =.03). The 4-year probability of PTLD was significantly higher in patients receiving a liver transplant for HCV-related cirrhosis than non-HCV liver diseases (12.3% vs. 2.2%, respectively; P =.015). Patients receiving a liver transplant for HCV-related cirrhosis were more likely to receive antithymocyte globulins (ATG). However, in patients treated with ATG, the 4-year probability of PTLD was higher among those patients receiving a liver transplant for HCV-related cirrhosis than for non-HCV liver diseases (27.1% vs. 6.4%, respectively; P =.08). EBV gene products were detected in tumor tissues in 3 of 4 patients with HCV-associated PTLD. Our data suggest that, in addition to EBV infection, 2 mutually nonexclusive factors, i.e., the use of ATG and HCV infection, could play a role in the occurrence of PTLD after a liver transplant for HCV-related cirrhosis.

Increased incidence of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas after liver transplantation for alcoholic cirrhosis.

BACKGROUND: THE aim of this study was to describe the features of posttransplantation tumors observed in a series of liver transplant recipients with special reference to patients receiving a transplant for alcoholic cirrhosis. METHODS: Among 171 consecutive liver transplant recipients, 90 patients who had received a first liver allograft for cirrhosis were studied. After liver transplantation, detection of de novo malignancies was prospectively undertaken and the characteristics of the patients in whom tumors occurred were compared with those in whom tumors did not develop. RESULTS: With a follow-up of 45.2+/-21.2 months, 11 tumors were observed in 90 patients (overall incidence of 12.2%). The incidence of tumors was higher in patients receiving a transplant for alcoholic cirrhosis than in patients receiving a transplant for nonalcoholic cirrhosis (26.7% vs. 5.0%, P<0.01). Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the oropharynx or esophagus and posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorders were mainly observed. SCC (uvula in two cases, tongue in one case, esophagus in one case, pharynx in one case) occurred exclusively in patients transplanted for alcoholic cirrhosis (16.7% vs. 0%, P=0.001). The incidence of posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorders was similar in alcoholics and nonalcoholics (6.7% vs. 5%, NS). Survival was not influenced by the occurrence of SCC. CONCLUSION: The incidence of oropharyngeal SCC could be high in patients receiving a transplant for alcoholic cirrhosis. This could be due to an additional effect of posttransplantation immunosuppression in patients exposed to alcohol and tobacco before transplant. Careful posttransplantation screening of oropharyngeal SCC is warranted after liver transplantation for alcoholic cirrhosis.