A risk-based monitoring approach to source data monitoring and documenting monitoring findings.

BACKGROUND: Clinical trial monitoring is evolving from labor-intensive to targeted approaches. The traditional 100% Source Data Monitoring (SDM) approach fails to prioritize data by significance, diverting attention from critical elements. Despite regulatory guidance on Risk-Based Monitoring (RBM), its widespread implementation has been slow. METHODS: Our study teams assess the study's overall risk, document heightened and critical risks, and create a study-specific risk-based monitoring plan, integrating SDM and Central Data Monitoring (CDM). SDM combines a fixed list of pre-identified variables and a list of randomly identified variables to monitor. Identifying variables follows a two-step approach: first, a random sample of participants is selected, second, a random set of variables for each participant selected is identified. Sampling weights prioritize critical variables. Regular team meetings are held to discuss and compile significant findings into a Study Monitoring Report. RESULTS: We present a random SDM sample and a Study Monitoring Report. The random SDM output includes a look-up table for selected database elements. The report provides a holistic view of the study issues and overall health. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed random sampling method is used to monitor a representative set of critical variables, while the Study Monitoring Report is written to summarize significant monitoring findings and data trends. The report allows the sponsor to assess the current status of the study and data effectively. Communicating and sharing emerging insights facilitates timely adjustments of future monitoring activities, optimizing efficiencies, and study outcomes.

Efficacy and safety of zibotentan and dapagliflozin in patients with chronic kidney disease: study design and baseline characteristics of the ZENITH-CKD trial.

BACKGROUND: Sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) are part of the standard of care for patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), both with and without type 2 diabetes. Endothelin A (ETA) receptor antagonists have also been shown to slow progression of CKD. Differing mechanisms of action of SGLT2 and ETA receptor antagonists may enhance efficacy. We outline a study to evaluate the effect of combination zibotentan/dapagliflozin versus dapagliflozin alone on albuminuria and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). METHODS: We are conducting a double-blind, active-controlled, Phase 2b study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ETA receptor antagonist zibotentan and SGLT2i dapagliflozin in a planned 415 adults with CKD (Zibotentan and Dapagliflozin for the Treatment of CKD; ZENITH-CKD). Participants are being randomized (1:2:2) to zibotentan 0.25 mg/dapagliflozin 10 mg once daily (QD), zibotentan 1.5 mg/dapagliflozin 10 mg QD and dapagliflozin 10 mg QD alone, for 12 weeks followed by a 2-week off-treatment wash-out period. The primary endpoint is the change in log-transformed urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR) from baseline to Week 12. Other outcomes include change in blood pressure from baseline to Week 12 and change in eGFR the study. The incidence of adverse events will be monitored. Study protocol-defined events of special interest include changes in fluid-related measures (weight gain or B-type natriuretic peptide). RESULTS: A total of 447 patients were randomized and received treatment in placebo/dapagliflozin (n = 177), zibotentan 0.25 mg/dapagliflozin (n = 91) and zibotentan 1.5 mg/dapagliflozin (n =  179). The mean age was 62.8 years, 30.9% were female and 68.2% were white. At baseline, the mean eGFR of the enrolled population was 46.7 mL/min/1.73 m2 and the geometric mean UACR was 538.3 mg/g. CONCLUSION: This study evaluates the UACR-lowering efficacy and safety of zibotentan with dapagliflozin as a potential new treatment for CKD. The study will provide information about an effective and safe zibotentan dose to be further investigated in a Phase 3 clinical outcome trial. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04724837.

Anti-Phospholipase A2 Receptor in Nonlupus Patients with Membranous Nephropathy and Crescents.

Introduction: Anti-phospholipase A2 receptor (PLA2R) is detected in approximately 70% of biopsies of "primary" membranous nephropathy (MN). Crescents in MN in nonlupus patients suggest additional injury, such as antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA) or anti-glomerular basement membrane (anti-GBM)-associated glomerulonephritis and are postulated to reflect injury by a mechanism that unmasks cryptic epitopes leading to the second autoantibody. Methods: We studied PLA2R staining in nonlupus patients with MN and crescents. Native renal biopsies in 16 nonlupus patients with MN and crescents were stained for PLA2R. Results: The patients included 5 women and 11 men, with mean age 61 years and elevated serum creatinine (mean 4.68 mg/dL). Hematuria and proteinuria (mean 4.97 g/day) were documented in 13 patients. Two patients had positive serum anti-GBM antibody. Nine of 11 patients tested for ANCA were positive, with p-ANCA (n = 4), c-ANCA (n = 2), or both (n = 1), with 2 not specified. On average, 27% of glomeruli had crescents. One patient had an initial biopsy with MN, 4 years later had MN with crescent, and 7 years later had rebiopsy with persistent MN with crescents. One patient had ANCA-associated vasculitis, and 5 years later had MN and crescent. The remaining 14 patients had concurrent diagnoses of MN and crescents. PLA2R was positive in 5 cases, 3 with ANCA positivity, 2 with unknown ANCA status, and none with anti-GBM disease. The patient with initial MN preceding crescent was PLA2R positive; the patient with initial ANCA-associated vasculitis preceding MN was PLA2R negative. Conclusions: Most patients (64%) presented with concomitant MN and crescents, with rare occurrence of an initial disease process followed later by the second injury. PLA2R was positive in 31% of patients, suggesting most are secondary MN. Further study to determine the cryptic epitopes may shed light on the triggering mechanisms for these rare but unlikely coincidental glomerular injuries.

Efficacy and safety of lipid lowering by alirocumab in chronic kidney disease.

Individuals with chronic kidney disease are at increased risk of premature cardiovascular disease. Among them, many with elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) are unable to achieve optimal LDL-C on statins and require additional lipid-lowering therapy. To study this, we compared the LDL-C-lowering efficacy and safety of alirocumab in individuals with hypercholesterolemia with impaired renal function, defined as eGFR 30-59 ml/min/1.73 m2, to those without impaired renal function eGFR ≥60 ml/min/1.73 m2. A total of 4629 hypercholesterolemic individuals without or with impaired renal function, pooled from eight phase 3 ODYSSEY trials (double-blind treatments of 24-104 weeks), were on alirocumab 150 mg or 75/150 mg every two weeks vs. placebo or ezetimibe. Overall, 10.1% had impaired renal function and over 99% were receiving statin treatment. Baseline LDL-C in alirocumab and control groups was comparable in subgroups analyzed. LDL-C reductions at week 24 ranged from 46.1 to 62.2% or 48.3 to 60.1% with alirocumab among individuals with or without impaired renal function, respectively. Similar reductions were observed for lipoprotein (a), non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, apolipoprotein B, and triglycerides. Safety data were similar in both treatment subgroups, regardless of the degree of CKD. Renal function did not change over time in response to alirocumab. This post hoc efficacy analysis is limited by evaluation of alirocumab treatment effects on renal and lipid parameters by serum biochemistry. Thus, alirocumab consistently lowered LDL-C regardless of impaired renal function, with safety comparable to control, among individuals with hypercholesterolemia who nearly all were on statin treatment.

The safety of achieved iron stores and their effect on IV iron and ESA use: post-hoc results from a randomized trial of ferric citrate as a phosphate binder in dialysis
.

Iron stores assuring optimal efficacy/safety for erythropoiesis are unknown in the dialysis population. Using multicenter trial data, we related safety profiles, erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA), and intravenous iron dosing to achieved iron stores in 441 subjects randomized 2 : 1 to ferric citrate or active control as their phosphate binder over 52 weeks. Intravenous iron was given at each site's discretion if ferritin ≤ 1,000 ng/mL and transferrin saturation ≤ 30%. Multivariable time-dependent Cox regression jointly related the primary safety outcome (composite of cardiac, infection, gastrointestinal, and hepatobiliary serious adverse events) to moving averages of ferritin and transferrin saturation over the preceding 90 days with covariate adjustment. Multivariable generalized estimating equations related elevated ESA and intravenous iron doses to trailing 90-day averages of ferritin and transferrin saturation with covariate adjustment. The adjusted hazard ratio for the safety composite per 10% increase in transferrin saturation was 0.84 (95% confidence interval 0.68 - 1.02, p = 0.08) and 1.09 (0.86 - 1.35, p = 0.48) per 400 ng/mL increase in ferritin. The adjusted hazard ratio for the safety composite was 0.50 (0.29 - 0.88, p = 0.016) for the highest transferrin saturation tertile vs. the lowest. Adjusted odds ratios for higher intravenous iron dose were lower in the highest (0.23 [0.16 - 0.35], p < 0.001) and middle transferrin saturation tertile (0.42 [0.31 - 0.57], p < 0.001) vs. lowest. Incidence of elevated ESA dose was lower in the highest transferrin saturation tertile (p = 0.01). Ferritin did not predict clinical events or ESA dose. Transferrin saturation may be a better marker than serum ferritin to judge optimal iron stores in dialysis patients. Transferrin saturations > 34% are safe and provide maximal efficacy.
.

We Give Too Much Intravenous Iron.

Dialysis patients have absolute and functional iron deficiencies. Traditionally, oral iron preparations have been insufficient to maintain iron stores to support erythropoiesis, especially in the setting of the ubiquitous use of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents. This has led to the widespread adoption of intravenous iron protocols designed to maintain iron stores at levels that are much higher than for patients not on dialysis. These protocols are often developed by dialysis providers and may be largely independent of the treating nephrologist. Concerns about multiple risks associated with the use of intravenous iron persist. Despite this, mean ferritin levels in the United States have risen, partly due to more intravenous iron use and partly due to reduced erythropoiesis-stimulating agent use. Questions about the relationship of intravenous iron to infection, cardiac, and hepatobiliary risks remain. The failure of oral iron preparations to maintain iron stores continues to prompt the use of intravenous iron. Recently, studies with oral ferric citrate as a phosphate binder have shown improved iron stores and maintenance of hemoglobin, and studies with soluble ferric pyrophosphate added to dialysate have shown both maintenance of iron stores and hemoglobin. With new iron options that affect iron stores in dialysis patients, the use of intravenous iron and its potential risks may wane.

Ferric Citrate, an Iron-Based Phosphate Binder, Reduces Health Care Costs in Patients on Dialysis Based on Randomized Clinical Trial Data.

BACKGROUND: Patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) require phosphate binders for hyperphosphatemia and erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) and intravenous (i.v.) iron for anemia. Ferric citrate (FC) is a novel, iron-based phosphate binder that increases iron stores and decreases i.v. iron and ESA usage while maintaining hemoglobin levels, and may decrease the cost of ESRD care. The study objectives were to (1) quantify differences in ESA and i.v. iron usage among ESRD patients receiving FC compared with active control (AC) (sevelamer carbonate and/or calcium acetate) on the basis of data from a 52-week phase III clinical trial and (2) standardize trial data to the general United States (US) ESRD population and calculate the potential impact of FC on ESRD cost/patient/year in the USA. STUDY DESIGN: The study was a randomized, controlled clinical trial. SETTING AND POPULATION: A total of 441 adult subjects with ESRD who received FC or AC for 52 weeks were included. MODEL, PERSPECTIVE, AND TIMELINE: Differences in ESA and i.v. iron usage between the treatment groups were modeled over time using generalized linear mixed models and zero-inflated Poisson models. Trends were modeled via logarithmic curves, and utilization patterns were applied to the general dialysis population to estimate expected resource savings. OUTCOMES: Study outcomes were costs saved/patient/year using FC versus AC (US dollars). RESULTS: Our model suggests an annual decrease of 129,106 U of ESAs and 1960 mg of i.v. iron per patient in the second year after a switch from AC to FC. Applying 2013 Medicare pricing, this would save $1585 in ESAs and $516 in i.v. iron: a total of $2101/patient/year; these savings would be expected to double for managed care plans. LIMITATIONS: The projections were made on 1 year of trial data. CONCLUSIONS: Phosphate binding with FC reduces i.v. iron and ESA usage. Given the high cost burden of ESRD, our model demonstrates significant potential cost savings. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01191255) http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01191255 .

Ferric Citrate Reduces Intravenous Iron and Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agent Use in ESRD.

Ferric citrate (FC) is a phosphate binder with shown efficacy and additional effects on iron stores and use of intravenous (iv) iron and erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs). We provide detailed analyses of changes in iron/hematologic parameters and iv iron/ESA use at time points throughout the active control period of a phase 3 international randomized clinical trial. In all, 441 subjects were randomized (292 to FC and 149 to sevelamer carbonate and/or calcium acetate [active control (AC)]) and followed for 52 weeks. Subjects on FC had increased ferritin and transferrin saturation (TSAT) levels compared with subjects on AC by week 12 (change in ferritin, 114.1±29.35 ng/ml; P<0.001; change in TSAT, 8.62%±1.57%; P<0.001). Change in TSAT plateaued at this point, whereas change in ferritin increased through week 24, remaining relatively stable thereafter. Subjects on FC needed less iv iron compared with subjects on AC over 52 weeks (median [interquartile range] dose=12.9 [1.0-28.9] versus 26.8 [13.4-47.6] mg/wk; P<0.001), and the percentage of subjects not requiring iv iron was higher with FC (P<0.001). Cumulative ESA over 52 weeks was lower with FC than AC (median [interquartile range] dose=5303 [2023-9695] versus 6954 [2664-12,375] units/wk; P=0.04). Overall, 90.3% of subjects on FC and 89.3% of subjects on AC experienced adverse events. In conclusion, treatment with FC as a phosphate binder results in increased iron parameters apparent after 12 weeks and reduces iv iron and ESA use while maintaining hemoglobin over 52 weeks, with a safety profile similar to that of available binders.

Ferric citrate controls phosphorus and delivers iron in patients on dialysis.

Patients on dialysis require phosphorus binders to prevent hyperphosphatemia and are iron deficient. We studied ferric citrate as a phosphorus binder and iron source. In this sequential, randomized trial, 441 subjects on dialysis were randomized to ferric citrate or active control in a 52-week active control period followed by a 4-week placebo control period, in which subjects on ferric citrate who completed the active control period were rerandomized to ferric citrate or placebo. The primary analysis compared the mean change in phosphorus between ferric citrate and placebo during the placebo control period. A sequential gatekeeping strategy controlled study-wise type 1 error for serum ferritin, transferrin saturation, and intravenous iron and erythropoietin-stimulating agent usage as prespecified secondary outcomes in the active control period. Ferric citrate controlled phosphorus compared with placebo, with a mean treatment difference of -2.2±0.2 mg/dl (mean±SEM) (P<0.001). Active control period phosphorus was similar between ferric citrate and active control, with comparable safety profiles. Subjects on ferric citrate achieved higher mean iron parameters (ferritin=899±488 ng/ml [mean±SD]; transferrin saturation=39%±17%) versus subjects on active control (ferritin=628±367 ng/ml [mean±SD]; transferrin saturation=30%±12%; P<0.001 for both). Subjects on ferric citrate received less intravenous elemental iron (median=12.95 mg/wk ferric citrate; 26.88 mg/wk active control; P<0.001) and less erythropoietin-stimulating agent (median epoetin-equivalent units per week: 5306 units/wk ferric citrate; 6951 units/wk active control; P=0.04). Hemoglobin levels were statistically higher on ferric citrate. Thus, ferric citrate is an efficacious and safe phosphate binder that increases iron stores and reduces intravenous iron and erythropoietin-stimulating agent use while maintaining hemoglobin.

Does renal dysfunction and method of bridging support influence heart transplant graft survival?

BACKGROUND: Renal insufficiency is common in status 1B patients supported with inotropes or a continuous flow left ventricular device (CF-LVAD) as a bridge to heart transplantation. We evaluated the association of renal function and inotrope versus CF-LVAD support on posttransplant graft survival in status 1B patients. METHODS: The Scientific Registry for Transplant Recipients database was analyzed for posttransplant survival in status 1B patients bridged with inotropes or CF-LVAD who underwent transplantation between 2003 and 2012. Pretransplant renal function was measured by estimating glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and was stratified as less than 45 mL · min(-1) · 1.73 m(-2), 45 to 59, and 60 or greater. Univariate Kaplan-Meier and multivariate Cox regression models were used to evaluate the main effects of GFR strata and inotropes versus CF-LVAD, and the interaction effect of GFR strata by CF-LVAD, on graft survival. RESULTS: This study included 4,158 status 1B patients (74% male, aged 53 ± 12 years). Of those, 659 patients had a CF-LVAD (HeartMate-II [Thoratec, Pleasanton, CA], n = 638; HVAD [HeartWare, Framingham, MA], n = 21), and 3,530 were receiving inotropes (31 CF-LVAD patients were also receiving inotropes). Kaplan-Meier analyses demonstrated reduced graft survival (p = 0.022) in patients with pretransplant GFR less than 45 versus GFR 45 to 59 (p = 0.062) and versus GFR 60 or greater (p = 0.007), and no effect of inotrope versus CF-LVAD support on graft survival (p = 0.402). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that, after adjusting for the main effects of GFR stratum, CF-LVAD, and inotropes, status 1B patients bridged with a CF-LVAD and GFR in the lowest stratum had reduced graft survival (interaction effect p = 0.040). CONCLUSIONS: Pretransplant renal insufficiency was associated with reduced posttransplant graft survival in status 1B patients. This risk is increased for patients bridged with a CF-LVAD (versus inotropes) who have GFR in the lowest stratum.

Optimizing blood pressure control in patients with nondiabetic glomerular disease.

Hypertension is a common problem among patients with glomerular disease and CKD. Optimal blood pressure targets for these patients have been the source of much debate. Careful review of the available data supports a blood pressure target of less than 140/90 mmHg. Consideration for a lower goal of less than 130/80 mmHg should be given for patients with heavy proteinuria. Renin-angiotensin system inhibitors should be used as the cornerstone of therapy for all patients with glomerular disease and CKD.

AKI in an HIV patient.

The renal manifestations of patients infected with HIV are diverse. Patients may have podocytopathies ranging from a minimal-change-type lesions to FSGS or collapsing glomerulopathy. Furthermore, such patients produce a variety of autoantibodies without clinical signs of the disease. Antiretroviral drugs also cause renal injury, including crystals and tubular injury, acute interstitial nephritis, or mitochondrial toxicity. In these circumstances, it is essential to perform a renal biopsy for diagnosis and to guide treatment. Here we describe a patient with HIV who presented with AKI and hematuria without concomitant systemic manifestations. Renal biopsy elucidated the cause of acute deterioration of kidney function.

Dose-response and efficacy of ferric citrate to treat hyperphosphatemia in hemodialysis patients: a short-term randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: Most dialysis patients require phosphate binders to control hyperphosphatemia. Ferric citrate has been tested in phase 2 trials as a phosphate binder. This trial was designed as a dose-response and efficacy trial. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, phase 3, multicenter, open-label, randomized clinical trial. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: 151 participants with hyperphosphatemia on maintenance hemodialysis therapy. INTERVENTION: Fixed dose of ferric citrate taken orally as a phosphate binder for up to 28 days (1, 6, or 8 g/d in 51, 52, and 48 participants, respectively). OUTCOMES: Primary outcome is dose-response of ferric citrate on serum phosphorus level; secondary outcomes are safety and tolerability. MEASUREMENTS: Serum chemistry tests including phosphorus, safety data. RESULTS: 151 participants received at least one dose of ferric citrate. Mean baseline phosphorus levels were 7.3 ± 1.7 (SD) mg/dL in the 1-g/d group, 7.6 ± 1.7 mg/dL in the 6-g/d group, and 7.5 ± 1.6 mg/dL in the 8-g/d group. Phosphorus levels decreased in a dose-dependent manner (mean change at end of treatment, -0.1 ± 1.3 mg/dL in the 1-g/d group, -1.9 ± 1.7 mg/dL in the 6-g/d group, and -2.1 ± 2.0 mg/dL in the 8-g/d group). The mean difference in reduction in phosphorus levels between the 6- and 1-g/d groups was 1.3 mg/dL (95% CI, 0.69 to 1.9; P < 0.001), between the 8- and 1-g/d groups was 1.5 mg/dL (95% CI, 0.86 to 2.1; P < 0.001), and between the 8- and 6-g/d groups was 0.21 mg/dL (95% CI, -0.39 to 0.81; P = 0.5). The most common adverse event was stool discoloration. LIMITATIONS: Sample size and duration confirm efficacy, but limit our ability to confirm safety. CONCLUSIONS: Ferric citrate is efficacious as a phosphate binder in a dose-dependent manner. A phase 3 trial is ongoing to confirm safety and efficacy.

Nonproteinuric diabetic nephropathy: when diabetics don't read the textbook.

Diabetic nephropathy (DN) refers to the structural and functional changes in the kidneys of patients with diabetes mellitus (type 1 or 2). A subset of patients with presumed DN may not have overt proteinuria as a prerequisite to renal failure, contrary to the classical paradigm. No animal model fully recapitulates the human subset. All studies on this subject are observational and most lack biopsy data. Many mechanisms have been postulated, including use of renin-angiotensin system agents, recurrent bouts of acute kidney injury, genetic predisposition, and renal lesions other than DN. A well-designed biopsy study and a series of intervention trials are needed to fully understand this entity.

Membranous glomerulopathy with superimposed pauci-immune necrotizing crescentic glomerulonephritis.

We describe a 61-year-old woman with acute kidney injury, nephrotic range proteinuria and hematuria. Kidney biopsy showed membranous glomerulopathy (MG) with superimposed pauci-immune necrotizing crescentic glomerulonephritis (PNCGN). Coexistent MG and PNCGN is a rare occurrence. The diagnosis of such an exceptionally rare combination relies on the combination of renal biopsy findings and serologic testing. We also review previous reported cases and discuss possible pathogenesis of this rare dual glomerulopathy.

Membranous nephropathy with crescents.

Membranous nephropathy is a common cause of nephrotic syndrome in adults and can be primary or secondary to systemic lupus erythematosus, chronic infection, or drugs. Rapid decline in renal function in patients with membranous nephropathy may be due to renal vein thrombosis, malignant hypertension, or an additional superimposed destructive process involving the renal parenchyma. Crescents are rare in primary membranous nephropathy and thus suggest another underlying disease process, such as combined membranous and focal or diffuse lupus nephritis. However, in some patients with membranous nephropathy and crescents, the crescentic lesion may be due to a distinct, separate disease process, such as anti-glomerular basement membrane antibodies or anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies-related pauci-immune glomerulonephritis. Here we describe a case with such renal biopsy findings, review previous reported cases, and discuss possible implications for pathogenesis of the coexistence of these lesions.

Proximal tubular dysfunction associated with tenofovir and didanosine causing Fanconi syndrome and diabetes insipidus: a report of 3 cases.

We report 3 cases of patients with HIV/AIDS in whom Fanconi syndrome and nephrogenic diabetes insipidus developed secondary to use of an antiretroviral regimen containing tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and didanosine. These patients presented with a history of polydipsia, polyuria, weight loss, anorexia, and wasting. Interestingly, 1 patient was not taking protease inhibitors. This response is a well-documented yet uncommon complication of tenofovir use in the HIV population. We recommend continued monitoring for renal toxicity when using NRTI combination of tenofovir and didanosine.