The Impact of Age on the Physiological Assessment of Borderline Coronary Stenoses.

Background and Objectives: Coronary angiography is the gold standard for diagnosing coronary artery disease (CAD). In the case of borderline changes, patients require further diagnosis through ischemia assessment via one of the recommended methods of invasive evaluation. This study aimed to assess whether clinical factors influence the risk of a positive result in invasive myocardial ischemia assessment and if these potential factors change with the patient's age and the consistency of ischemia assessment. Materials and Methods: Data were collected retrospectively on all consecutive patients hospitalized in the University Hospital in Krakow between 2020 and 2021, on whom physiological assessments of coronary circulation were performed. Patients were divided into two groups: patients aged 60 or younger and patients older than 60. Results: Despite the older patients having more risk factors for CAD, their physiological assessment results of borderline lesions were similar to those of the younger patients. Positive fractional flow reserve (FFR) assessments were obtained from almost 50% of vessels. In the younger patients, cigarette use and type 2 diabetes mellitus increased the risk of a positive FFR result by 3.5 and 2.5 times, respectively. In the older patients, male gender and peripheral vascular disease significantly increased the risk of a positive FFR by 2.5 and 2 times, respectively. Conclusions: Clinical characteristics of patients undergoing physiological assessment of borderline coronary stenosis varied significantly by age. Refining the definition of borderline lesions to include age, gender, and other factors may improve the identification of patients who would benefit from physiological assessment and coronary revascularization.

Risk factors of contrast-induced nephropathy in patients with acute coronary syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) are at high risk of contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN), which is associated with prolonged hospitalization, higher morbidity and mortality after angiographic procedures. The occurrence of CIN is regarded as a transient and reversible condition. However, the persistence of CIN until hospital discharge in patients with ACS has not been thoroughly analyzed. AIMS: We aimed to analyze CIN persistent until hospital discharge in contemporary ACS population referred to invasive diagnostics and treatment. METHODS: A total of 2638 consecutive patients with ACS were included in a prospective registry. The occurrence of CIN was defined as a 25% increase in serum creatinine from baseline or a 0.5 mg/dl (44 µmol/l) increase in the absolute value. RESULTS: Criteria of CIN at hospital discharge were met in 10.7% of patients. Immediate percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) after angiography (67% of patients) was associated with higher rates of CIN compared to patients referred for other treatment strategies (P < 0.001). The logistic regression model showed that anemia at baseline (8.7% of patients) was an independent predictor of CIN, which occurred in 17.9% of anemic patients and 10% of patients without anemia (P < 0.001). Also, ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) presentation and immediate PCI were independent predictors of CIN. CONCLUSIONS: Despite intravenous fluid administration during the hospital stay, CIN persisted until hospital discharge in more than 10% of patients with ACS. Anemia at baseline, STEMI presentation, and immediate PCI strategy were independent predictors of CIN. Thus, preventive actions should be specially aimed at those groups of patients.

Comparison of safety and effectiveness between the right and left radial artery approach in percutaneous coronary intervention.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: There is a paucity of data comparing the left radial approach (LRA) and right radial approach (RRA) for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in all-comers populations and performed by operators with different experience levels. Thus, we sought to compare the safety and clinical outcomes of the RRA and LRA during PCI in "real-world" patients with either stable angina or acute coronary syndrome (ACS). METHODS: To overcome the possible impact of the nonrandomized design, a propensity score was calculated to compare the 2 radial approaches. The study group comprised 18 716 matched pairs with stable angina and 46 241 with ACS treated with PCI and stent implantation between 2014 and 2017 in 151 tertiary invasive cardiology centers in Poland (the ORPKI Polish National Registry). RESULTS: The rates of death and periprocedural complications were similar for the RRA and LRA in stable angina patients. A higher radiation dose was observed with PCI via the LRA in both clinical presentations (stable angina: 1067.0±947.1 mGy vs 1007.4±983.5 mGy, P=.001; ACS: 1212.7±1005.5 mGy vs 1053.5±1029.7 mGy, P=.001). More contrast was used in LRA procedures but only in ACS patients (174.2±75.4mL vs 167.2±72.1mL, P=.001). Furthermore, periprocedural complications such as coronary artery dissection (0.16% vs 0.09%, P=.008), no-reflow phenomenon (0.65% vs 0.49%, P=.005), and puncture site bleeding (0.09% vs 0.05%, P=.04) were more frequently observed with the LRA in ACS patients. There was no difference in mortality between the 2 groups (P=.90). CONCLUSIONS: Our finding of poorer outcomes with the LRA may be related to lower operator experience with this approach. While both the LRA and RRA are safe in the setting of stable angina, the LRA was associated with a higher rate of periprocedural complications during PCI in ACS patients.

Balloon Aortic Valvuloplasty for Severe Aortic Stenosis as Rescue or Bridge Therapy.

The study aimed to assess procedural complications, patient flow and clinical outcomes after balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) as rescue or bridge therapy, based on data from our registry. A total of 382 BAVs in 374 patients was performed. The main primary indication for BAV was a bridge for TAVI (n = 185, 49.4%). Other indications included a bridge for AVR (n = 26, 6.9%) and rescue procedure in hemodynamically unstable patients (n = 139, 37.2%). The mortality rate at 30 days, 6 and 12 months was 10.4%, 21.6%, 28.3%, respectively. In rescue patients, the death rate raised to 66.9% at 12 months. A significant improvement in symptoms was confirmed after BAV, after 30 days, 6 months, and in survivors after 1 year (p < 0.05 for all). Independent predictors of 12-month mortality were baseline STS score [HR (95% CI) 1.42 (1.34 to 2.88), p < 0.0001], baseline LVEF <20% [HR (95% CI) 1.89 (1.55-2.83), p < 0.0001] and LVEF <30% at 1 month [HR (95% CI) 1.97 (1.62-3.67), p < 0.0001] adjusted for age/gender. In everyday clinical practice in the TAVI era, there are still clinical indications to BAV a standalone procedure as a bridge to surgery, TAVI or for urgent high risk non-cardiac surgical procedures. Patients may improve clinically after BAV with LV function recovery, allowing to perform final therapy, within limited time window, for severe AS which ameliorates long-term outcomes. On the other hand, in patients for whom an isolated BAV becomes a destination therapy, prognosis is extremely poor.

Acute myocardial infarction in young patients.

BACKGROUND: Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is an incredibly destructive disease when it occurs in a young patient. Thus, the investigation of the disease presentation and treatment options seem to be particularly important in young patients with AMI. AIMS: The study objective was to investigate the differences between young and older patients diag-nosed with AMI in terms of clinical characteristics and treatment strategies. METHODS: The patient data comes from the National Registry of Procedures of Invasive Cardiology (ORPKI). Between 2014 and 2017, data of more than 230 000 patients with a diagnosis of AMI were collected in that registry. Young patients were defined as under 40 years old. RESULTS: Young patients with AMI (n = 3208, 1.3%) compared with older patients with AMI were more often men (86.3% vs. 65.8%; P <0.001) with higher body weight (mean 85.9 vs. 79.7 kg; P <0.001). Typical risk factors of coronary heart disease were less frequent in younger patients than in older patients. However, in the under-40 group, there was a significantly higher number of current smokers (37.5% vs. 23.0%; P <0.001). Young patients with AMI were more often diagnosed with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI; 62.0% vs. 50.0%; P <0.001). Moreover, they had more frequently non-significant ste-nosis in coronary arteries diagnosed (14.4% vs. 6.8%; P <0.001). The left anterior descending artery was more frequently an infarct-related artery in young patients (51.3% vs. 36.3%; P <0.001). Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds were more commonly implanted in young patients with AMI than in the older ones (5.6% vs. 0.9%; P <0.001). The relative number of AMI in the young patients increased from 1.20% in 2014 to 1.43% in 2017. CONCLUSIONS: Smoking is the most common risk factor in young adults. The relative number of AMI in young patients is growing.

Radial approach reduces mortality in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock.

INTRODUCTION: The beneficial outcome of the radial (RA) over femoral approach (FA) in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) has been widely demonstrated. However, most of the studies excluded patients with STEMI and cardiogenic shock (CS). OBJECTIVES: We sought to evaluate periprocedural outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with RA and FA in patients with STEMI complicated by CS using data from the Polish National PCI Registry (ORPKI). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 3,565 consecutive patients with STEMI and CS treated with emergent PCI and stent implantation were included. Data was collected prospectively between 2014 and 2018 from 151 tertiary primary-PCI centers in Poland. To avoid possible selection bias, a propensity score matching (PSM) was used to create 945 matched pairs treated via RA or FA. RESULTS: No differences were reported in baseline characteristics, clinical presentation and delays in treatment between RA and FA after the PSM. Similar radiation doses and the total amount of contrast were used in both groups. A similar rate of periprocedural complications was observed in both RA and FA. However, RA was associated with reduced periprocedural mortality (9.4% (89) vs. 18.6% (176); P=0.001) and lower incidence of cardiac arrest (9.7% (92) vs. 16.1% (152); P=0.001). In multivariable analysis, FA was the strongest independent predictor for increased periprocedural mortality (OR 2.087, 95% CI 1.629-2.674; P=0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The radial approach was associated with lower periprocedural mortality compared with FA in patients with STEMI complicated by CS. RA seems to be a valuable option in technically feasible situations.

Paravalvular leak prediction after transcatheter aortic valve replacement with self-expandable prosthesis based on quantitative aortic calcification analysis.

BACKGROUND: Paravalvular leak (PVL) is one of the most common complications of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) and affects short- and long-term outcomes. The aim of this study was to identify the computed tomography (CT) imaging biomarkers that allow PVL after TAVR to be predicted. METHODS: Patients were included who had severe aortic valve stenosis, had undergone TAVR with a self-expanding valve, and had undergone a pre-procedural CT scan. Data on baseline characteristics, procedural and long-term outcomes were collected retrospectively. We used MATLAB software with a self-developed algorithm for CT scan analysis and found parameters that quantified aortic valve calcifications (AVC) in detail. RESULTS: Fifty patients were included. The identified CT-derived parameters included AVC size, volume, thickness and density, as well as calcium radial distribution. The volume of the largest calcium block, calcium perimeter and calcium size (assessed by Feret's diameter) showed a strong association with PVL occurrence after TAVR (P=0.012, P=0.001 and P=0.045, respectively). The prognostic model showed that a 10 mm2 increase in the local AVC amount in each valve section was associated with a 9.8% (95% CI: 2-18%; P=0.019) increase in the risk of PVL occurrence in the corresponding area after TAVR. ROC analysis revealed that the cut-off point of the AVC area was 96.5 mm2 in the polar coordinate system presentation. Kaplan-Meier curves showed worse PVL-free survival in patients with more than 96.5 mm2 of calcium area (P=0.013; log-rank). CONCLUSIONS: Quantitative AVC assessment for PVL prediction may play an important role in screening before TAVR. In future, the use of quantitative AVC assessment as an imaging biomarker in TAVR candidates and the creation and extension of an online database containing quantitative AVC parameters may help to identify high PVL risk patients.

Percutaneous coronary intervention during on- and off-hours in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

OBJECTIVE: There are conflicting data on the clinical outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) based on the time of admission to the catheterization laboratory. Thus, we aimed to assess clinical outcomes in an unselected cohort of consecutive patients with STEMI treated with PCI during on-and-off hours of work. METHODS: A total of 99,783 patients were included in the analysis. Patients were divided using the most frequently used definition: On-hours (Monday-Friday 07:00 AM-04:59 PM); off-hours (Monday-Friday 05:00 PM-06:59 AM, Saturday, Sunday, and nonworking holidays) (37,469 matched pairs). To avoid potential preselection bias, a propensity score was calculated to compare on-and-off hour groups. RESULTS: Higher radiation doses were observed for PCIs performed during off-hours (1055.2(±1006.5) vs. 1081.6(±1003.25)[mGy] and p = 0.001). A similar prevalence of periprocedural complications was observed during on- and off-hours. However, there was a higher mortality rate during off-hours than during regular working hours (1.17% (439) vs. 1.49% (559) and p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Primary PCIs in STEMI performed during off-hours might be associated with a higher rate of periprocedural mortality and higher radiation doses than procedures conducted during regular working hours.

Borderline coronary lesion assessment with quantitative flow ratio and its relation to the instantaneous wave-free ratio.

PURPOSE: Quantitative flow ratio (QFR) is a recently developed image-based index for the assessment of borderline coronary artery disease. We sought to investigate a correlation between QFR and instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) for the assessment of intermediate coronary stenoses. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with borderline coronary lesions (40-90% by visual assessment) undergoing iFR assessment were enrolled. QFR was derived from a modeled hyperemic flow velocity derived from angiography without adenosine-induced hyperemia. Pressure wire-derived iFR served as the reference. RESULTS: Values of QFR and iFR from 110 vessels with a mean percent diameter stenosis of 44.6 â€‹± â€‹12.0% were compared. Mean iFR was 0.90 â€‹± â€‹0.07 and 38 (34.5%) had iFR ≤0.89. Mean QFR was 0.81 â€‹± â€‹0.10 and 44 (40%) had QFR ≤0.80. A good agreement between QFR and iFR measurements was confirmed with a mean difference of 0.09 (95%CI -0.027 to 0.207) and intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.87 (95%CI 0.81-0.91). The overall diagnostic accuracy (AUC in ROC analysis) of QFR in detecting iFR ≤0.89 was 0.87 (95%CI 0.79-0.93; p â€‹< â€‹0.001). Regarding iFR ≤0.89, the optimal cutoff value of QFR was 0.79 with sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 76.3%, 83.3%, and 80.0%, respectively. A 100% sensitivity was observed for a QFR cutoff value of 0.88 and a 100% specificity for a QFR cutoff value of 0.69. CONCLUSIONS: Our study confirmed good QFR diagnostic performance and correlation with iFR for detecting the functional ischemia caused by intermediate lesions in coronary arteries. However, the pressure wire assessment with iFR might be warranted in 2/3 of patients after QFR assessment.

Contrast medium Pd/Pa ratio in comparison to fractional flow reserve, quantitative flow ratio and instantaneous wave-free ratio for evaluation of intermediate coronary lesions.

INTRODUCTION: Contrast medium Pd/Pa ratio (cFFR) was introduced as an alternative to fractional flow reserve (FFR). AIM: To assess the accuracy of cFFR in predicting of FFR, quantitative flow ratio (QFR) and instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Resting Pd/Pa, cFFR, FFR, QFR, and iFR were measured in 110 intermediate coronary lesions. cFFR was obtained after intracoronary injection of contrast medium. FFR was measured after the intravenous administration of adenosine. QFR was derived from fixed empiric hyperemic flow velocity based on coronary angiography. iFR was calculated by measuring the resting pressure gradient across a coronary lesion during diastole. RESULTS: Forty-four patients with 110 intermediate coronary lesions were enrolled. Mean baseline Pd/Pa was 0.93 ±0.05. Mean cFFR value was similar to FFR value (0.83 ±0.09 vs. 0.81 ±0.09; p = 0.13) and QFR (0.81 ±0.1; p = 0.69) and iFR (0.90 ±0.07; p = 0.1). A total of 46 vessels (41.8%) had FFR ≤ 0.80, 50 (45.5%) vessels had cFFR ≤ 0.83, 44 (40.0%) vessels had QFR ≤ 0.80, and 38 (34.5%) vessels had iFR ≤ 0.89. An excellent agreement between cFFR and resting Pd/Pa, FFR, QFR, and iFR was confirmed (intraclass correlation coefficients of 0.83, 0.99, 0.98, and 0.88, respectively). The optimal cutoff value of cFFR was 0.83 for prediction of FFR ≤ 0.80 with sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 96.9%, 97.8%, and 97.3%, respectively. 100% sensitivity was observed for a cutoff value of 0.82 and 100% specificity for a cutoff value of 0.84; AUC = 0.998 (0.995-1.00); p < 0.001. CONCLUSIONS: Contrast medium Pd/Pa ratio seems to be accurate in predicting the functional significance of borderline coronary lesions assessed with FFR, iFR, and QFR.

Calcium Pattern Assessment in Patients with Severe Aortic Stenosis Via the Chou's 5-Steps Rule.

BACKGROUND: Progression of aortic valve calcifications (AVC) leads to aortic valve stenosis (AS). Importantly, the AVC degree has a great impact on AS progression, treatment selection and outcomes. Methods of AVC assessment do not provide accurate quantitative evaluation and analysis of calcium distribution and deposition in a repetitive manner. OBJECTIVE: We aim to prepare a reliable tool for detailed AVC pattern analysis with quantitative parameters. METHODS: We analyzed computed tomography (CT) scans of fifty patients with severe AS using a dedicated software based on MATLAB version R2017a (MathWorks, Natick, MA, USA) and ImageJ version 1.51 (NIH, USA) with the BoneJ plugin version 1.4.2 with a self-developed algorithm. RESULTS: We listed unique parameters describing AVC and prepared 3D AVC models with color pointed calcium layer thickness in the stenotic aortic valve. These parameters were derived from CT-images in a semi-automated and repeatable manner. They were divided into morphometric, topological and textural parameters and may yield crucial information about the anatomy of the stenotic aortic valve. CONCLUSION: In our study, we were able to obtain and define quantitative parameters for calcium assessment of the degenerated aortic valves. Whether the defined parameters are able to predict potential long-term outcomes after treatment, requires further investigation.

Adenosine intracoronary bolus dose escalation versus intravenous infusion to induce maximum coronary hyperemia for fractional flow reserve assessment.

BACKGROUND: Achievement of maximal hyperemia is mandatory for an accurate calculation of fractional flow reserve (FFR) and it is obtained with adenosine given either as an intravenous infusion or as an intracoronary bolus. AIMS: The purpose of this study was to compare the infusion of adenosine with intracoronary adenosine bolus dose escalation in the optimal assessment of peak FFR. METHODS: We enrolled consecutive patients with borderline coronary lesions that were assessed by FFR with the use of adenosine intracoronary boluses (100, 200, 400 and 600 µg) and intravenous infusion of 140 µg/kg/min and 280 µg/kg/min. FFR values were assessed and compared. RESULTS: Fifty patients with 125 borderline coronary artery stenoses were enrolled. Physiological severity assessed with: intravenous adenosine infusion at 140 µg/kg/min was mean 0.82 ± 0.09; infusion at 280 µg/kg/min - 0.81 ± 0.09; intracoronary bolus of 100 µg, 200 µg, 400 µg and 600 µg - 0.83 ± 0.09; 0.83 ± 0.09, 0.83 ± 0.09; and 0.83 ± 0.09, respectively. There was a strong linear correlation between FFR values obtained from 140 µg/kg/min infusion and adenosine intracoronary 100, 200, 400 and 600 µg bolus injection (r = 0.989, r = 0.99, r = 0.993, r = 0.994, respectively, p < 0.001 for all). CONCLUSIONS: FFR values achieved with intracoronary boluses of adenosine are very similar, but not identical to those obtained using intravenous adenosine administration. The values of FFR may vary between escalating doses of intracoronary boluses and intravenous infusion.

Comparison of hyperemic efficacy between femoral and antecubital fossa vein adenosine infusion for fractional flow reserve assessment.

INTRODUCTION: Intravenous infusion of adenosine via the femoral vein is commonly used to achieve maximum hyperemia for fractional flow reserve (FFR) assessment in the catheterization laboratory. In the era of transradial access for coronary interventions, obtaining additional venous access with sheath insertion in the groin is unpractical and may be associated with a higher risk of bleeding complications. In a vast majority of cases, patients scheduled for the catheterization laboratory are already equipped with peripheral vein access in antecubital fossa vein. However, only limited data exist to support non-central vein infusion of adenosine instead of the femoral vein for FFR assessment. AIM: To compare infusion of adenosine via a central versus a peripheral vein for the assessment of peak FFR. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We enrolled 50 consecutive patients with 125 borderline coronary lesions that were assessed by FFR using adenosine femoral and antecubital vein infusion of 140 µg/kg/min. RESULTS: Physiological severity assessed with femoral vein adenosine infusion at 140 µg/kg/min was mean 0.82 ±0.09, and with antecubital vein adenosine infusion at 140 µg/kg/min was 0.82 ±0.09. The mean time from initiation of adenosine infusion to maximal stable hyperemia was significantly shorter for 140 µg/kg/min femoral vein infusion as compared to antecubital vein infusion (49 ±19 s vs. 68 ±23 s; p < 0.001). There was a strong correlation between FFR values obtained from 140 µg/kg/min femoral and antecubital vein infusion (r = 0.99; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Antecubital vein adenosine infusion achieved FFR values are very similar to those obtained using femoral vein adenosine administration. However, time to maximal hyperemia is longer with infusion via the antecubital vein.

Predictors of periprocedural complications in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions within coronary artery bypass grafts.

BACKGROUND: During the first decade following the coronary bypass grafting, at least ten percent of the patients require percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) due to graft failure. Saphenous vein grafts (SVG) are innately at a higher risk of periprocedural complications. The present study aimed to investigate predictors of periprocedural complications of PCI within coronary artery bypass grafts. METHODS: This study analyzed data gathered in the Polish National Registry (ORPKI) between January 2015 and December 2016. Of the 221,195 patients undergoing PCI, data on 2,616 patients after PCI of SVG and 442 patients after internal mammary artery (IMA) were extracted. The dissimilarities in periprocedural complications between the SVG, IMA and non-IMA/SVG groups and their predictors were investigated. RESULTS: Patients in the SVG group were older (p < 0.001), with a higher burden of concomitant disease and differing clinical presentation. The rate of de-novo lesions was lower, while restenosis was higher at baseline in the SVG (p < 0.001). The rate of no-reflows (p < 0.001), perforations (p = 0.01) and all periprocedural complications (p < 0.01) was higher in the SVG group, while deaths were lower (p < 0.001). Among the predictors of no-reflows, it was found that acute coronary syndromes (ACS), thrombectomy and past cerebral stroke, while the complications included arterial hypertension, Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flow before PCI and thrombectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous coronary interventions of SVG is associated with increased risk of specific periprocedural complications. The ACS, slower TIMI flow before PCI and thrombectomy significantly increase the periprocedural complication rate in patients undergoing PCI of SVG.

A novel approach to quantification of aortic valve calcifications in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

BACKGROUND: Precise calcium evaluation in the aortic complex may be complicated. We aimed to assess the usefulness of a novel semi-automatic algorithm for multi slice computed tomography-derived (MSCT) quantitative estimation of aortic valve calcifications (AVC) in patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). METHODS: Ten patients with severe AS who underwent TAVI with Edwards Sapien S3 26 mm prosthesis and had a pre-procedural MSCT scan were included. Data on baseline characteristics, procedural and long-term outcomes were collected prospectively. Pre-procedural MSCT data were used for AVC evaluation with 3D modeling (calcium volume, thickness, area, density, and distribution) in a dedicated program. RESULTS: Mean calcium thickness was 4.6 (3.6-5.8) mm. Median calcium are 333.6 (274.7-386.7) mm2. We found a significant correlation between larger maximal calcium layer thickness and PVL occurrence after TAVI (P=0.039). The radial representation of the calcium distribution allowed to divide aortic valve into 3 zones and to compare each zone to parallel zone on TTE images. In zones with PVL ≥2 mean AVC was higher than in zones with PVL <2 (7354.6±4020.4 pixels vs. 4325.1±1790.6 pixels; P=0.018). Based on ROC analysis, the optimal cut-off value of AVC to predict PVL ≥2 was >6506 pixels with 57.1% sensitivity and 90.5% specificity (AUC 0.762 [95% CI: 0.564 to 0.901], P=0.029). CONCLUSIONS: Multiplane AVC quantitative evaluation provided details on total calcium amount, pattern and distribution in aortic valve. Established AVC parameters allowed better visualization of an operating area and prediction of PVL after TAVI.

Characteristics of patients presenting with myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) in Poland: data from the ORPKI national registry.

Myocardial infarction (MI) with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) is an important clinical problem especially in the era of extensive utilization of coronary angiography in MI patients. Its pathophysiology is poorly understood which makes diagnostics and treatment of MINOCA challenging in everyday clinical practice. The aim of the study was to assess characteristics of MINOCA patients in Poland based on data from the Polish National ORPKI Registry. In 2016, 49,893 patients with non-ST-segment elevation (NSTEMI) or ST-segment elevation (STEMI) myocardial infarction entered the ORPKI registry. MINOCA was defined as a non-obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) and a lack of previous coronary revascularization. MINOCA was identified in 3924 (7.8%) patients and clinical presentation was more often NSTEMI than STEMI (MINOCA: 78 vs. 22%; obstructive CAD 51.1 vs. 48.9%; p < 0.0001). MINOCA patients were younger and more often females with significantly lower rates of diabetes, smoking, arterial hypertension, kidney disease, previous MI and previous stroke comparing to patients with obstructive CAD. Myocardial bridge was visualized in angiography more often in the MINOCA group (2.2 vs. 0.4%; p < 0.0001). Additional coronary assessment inducing fractional flow reserve, intravascular ultrasound, optical coherence tomography was marginally (< 1%) used in both groups. Periprocedural mortality was lower in MINOCA group (0.13% vs. 0.95%; p < 0.0001). MINOCA patients represent a significant proportion of MI patients in Poland. Due to multiple potential causes, MINOCA should be considered rather as a working diagnosis after coronary angiography and further efforts should be taken to define the cause of MI in each individual patient.