Auditing plasma transfusion in intensive care: Use of decision time interval analysis.

OBJECTIVES: To present a new method for displaying blood utilization data based on analysis of decision time intervals (DTIs). METHODS: Retrospective study of patients treated in a medical intensive care unit (ICU), surgical ICU, or postcardiac surgery ICU at an academic hospital between January 2018 and June 2023. Each patient's episode of care was divided into a series of DTIs. Transfusions during each time interval were recorded. RESULTS: In total, 16,562 patients received 6980 units of plasma and 21,034 units of red blood cells during 111,557 time intervals of care. Patients had international normalized ratio (INR) values ranging from less than 1.0 to more than 4.0. Data on plasma transfusion at different INR values were displayed as the number of transfusion episodes, number of units given, or the proportion of DTIs with transfusion. Clinicians transfused plasma on 1.5% of occasions when the INR was 1.5 or less and on 2.2% of occasions when the INR was less than 2.0. Plasma was transfused without red blood cells in only 0.75% of DTIs. Transfusion practice was statistically different among the 3 ICUs. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with traditional methods of displaying the results of blood audits, DTI analysis displays information regarding the decision both to transfuse and to not transfuse. Utilization reviews that display data based on decision time analysis reveal clinical practice patterns very different from those suggested by traditional displays of plasma audit data.

Improving Transfusion Safety in the Operating Room With a Barcode Scanning System Designed Specifically for the Surgical Environment and Existing Electronic Medical Record Systems: An Interrupted Time Series Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Manual processes for verifying patient identification before blood transfusion and documenting this pretransfusion safety check are prone to errors, and compliance with manual systems is especially poor in urgent operating room settings. An automated, electronic barcode scanner system would be expected to improve pretransfusion verification and documentation. METHODS: Audits were conducted of blood transfusion documentation under a manual paper system from January to October 2014. An electronic barcode scanning system was developed to streamline transfusion safety checking and automate documentation. This system was implemented in 58 operating rooms between October and December 2014, with follow-up compliance audits through December 2015. The association of barcode scanner implementation with transfusion documentation compliance was assessed using an interrupted time series analysis. Anesthesia providers were surveyed regarding their opinions on the electronic system. In mid-2016, the scanning system was modified to transfer from the Metavision medical record system to Epic OpTime. Follow-up analysis assessed performance of this system within Epic during 2017. RESULTS: In an interrupted time series analysis, the proportion of units with compliant documentation was estimated to be 19.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 10.7-25.6) the week before scanner implementation, and 74.4% (95% CI, 59.4-87.4) the week after implementation. There was a significant postintervention level change (odds ratio 10.80, 95% CI, 6.31-18.70; P < .001) and increase in slope (odds ratio 1.14 per 1-week increase, 95% CI, 1.11-1.17; P < .001). After implementation, providers chose to use the new electronic system for 98% of transfusions. Across the 2 years analyzed (15,997 transfusions), the electronic system detected 45 potential transfusion errors in 27 unique patients, and averted transfusion of 36 mismatched blood products into 20 unique patients. A total of 69%, 86%, and 88% of providers reported the electronic system improved patient safety, blood transfusion workflow, and transfusion documentation, respectively. When providers used the barcode scanner, no transfusion errors or reactions were reported. The scanner system was successfully transferred from Metavision to Epic without retraining staff or changing workflows. CONCLUSIONS: A barcode-based system designed for easy integration to different commonly used anesthesia information management systems was implemented in a large urban academic hospital. The system allows a single user with the assistance of a software system to perform and document pretransfusion safety verification. The system improved transfusion documentation compliance, averted potential transfusion errors, and became the preferred method of blood transfusion safety checking.

Chemotherapy-sparing treatment of haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis with intravenous immunoglobulins and corticosteroids.

Haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) can be a rapidly fatal disease. Current treatment in adults is extrapolated from the HLH-2004 protocol that specifies a regimen of etoposide, dexamethasone and cyclosporine. However, HLH presents as a spectrum of disease severity. A therapeutic challenge arises for milder cases where the harms of potent chemotherapy such as etoposide may outweigh its benefit. We present a case of an adult with HLH who developed significant pancytopenia but was otherwise not critically ill and who responded to treatment with a chemotherapy-sparing approach consisting of intravenous immunoglobulins and corticosteroids alone. The case illustrates that tailored therapy may allow effective treatment of the disorder while minimising therapy-related toxicities.

Risk factors for recurrent severe anemia among previously transfused children in Uganda: an age-matched case-control study.

BACKGROUND: In resource-poor settings, transfused children often experience recurrence of severe anemia (SA) following discharge from hospital. This study determined the factors associated with recurrent severe anemia (RSA) among previously transfused Ugandan children aged less than 5 years. METHODS: A case-control study was conducted in five hospitals in Uganda from March 2017 to September 2018. We prospectively enrolled 196 hospitalised children who had been transfused for severe anemia 2 weeks to 6 months prior to enrollment. Of these, 101 children (cases) were re-admitted with a hemoglobin [Hb] level of ≤6 g/dL and required transfusion; and 95 children (age-matched controls) were admitted for other clinical illness with a Hb > 6 g/dL. Children known to have sickle cell anemia, cancer, or bleeding disorders were excluded. Clinical and laboratory evaluation were done. Conditional logistic regression adjusted for age, was used to determine factors associated with RSA. RESULTS: The median time (IQR) between the earlier transfusion and enrollment was 3.5 (1.9-5.7) months for cases, and was 5.0 (2.9-6.0) months for controls (p-value = 0.015). Risk factors (adjusted odds ratio, 95% confidence interval, and significance) for development of RSA were: hemoglobinuria (36.33, 2.19-600.66, p = 0.012); sickle cell anemia - newly diagnosed (20.26, 2.33-176.37, p = 0.006); history of earlier previous transfusions (6.95, 1.36-35.61, p = 0.020) and malaria infection (6.47, 1.17-35.70, p = 0.032). CONCLUSION: Malaria chemoprevention, follow up visit for Hb check after discharge from hospital and sickle cell screening among previously transfused children represent practical strategies to prevent and identify children at risk for recurrent severe anemia. The cause of hemoglobinuria in children merits further investigations.

Electronic patient identification for sample labeling reduces wrong blood in tube errors.

BACKGROUND: Wrong blood in tube (WBIT) errors are a preventable cause of ABO-mismatched RBC transfusions. Electronic patient identification systems (e.g., scanning a patient's wristband barcode before pretransfusion sample collection) are thought to reduce WBIT errors, but the effectiveness of these systems is unclear. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Part 1: Using retrospective data, we compared pretransfusion sample WBIT rates at hospitals using manual patient identification (n = 16 sites; >1.6 million samples) with WBIT rates at hospitals using electronic patient identification for some or all sample collections (n = 4 sites; >0.5 million samples). Also, we compared WBIT rates after implementation of electronic patient identification with preimplementation WBIT rates. Causes and frequencies of WBIT errors were evaluated at each site. Part 2: Transfusion service laboratories (n = 18) prospectively typed mislabeled (rejected) samples (n = 2844) to determine WBIT rates among samples with minor labeling errors. RESULTS: Part 1: The overall unadjusted WBIT rate at sites using manual patient identification was 1:10,110 versus 1:35,806 for sites using electronic identification (p < 0.0001). Correcting for repeat samples and silent WBIT errors yielded overall adjusted WBIT rates of 1:3046 for sites using manual identification and 1:14,606 for sites using electronic identification (p < 0.0001), with wide variation among individual sites. Part 2: The unadjusted WBIT rate among mislabeled (rejected) samples was 1:71 (adjusted WBIT rate, 1:28). CONCLUSION: In this study, using electronic patient identification at the time of pretransfusion sample collection was associated with approximately fivefold fewer WBIT errors compared with using manual patient identification. WBIT rates were high among mislabeled (rejected) samples, confirming that rejecting samples with even minor labeling errors helps mitigate the risk of ABO-incompatible transfusions.

Fresh-Frozen Plasma: Ordering Patterns and Utilization in the Operating Rooms of a Tertiary Referral Hospital.

BACKGROUND: Blood product transfusion is the most commonly performed hospital procedure. Intraoperative blood product utilization varies between institutions and anesthesiologists. In the United States in 2011, nearly 4 million plasma units were transfused. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of intraoperative plasma ordering patterns and utilization (thawing and transfusing) was performed at a tertiary, academic hospital between January 2015 and March 2016. RESULTS: Over 15 months, 46,002 operative procedures were performed. In 1540 of them, plasma was thawed or transfused: 8297 plasma units were thawed and 3306 of those units were transfused. These 3306 plasma units were transfused in 749 cases with a median of 2 plasma units (interquartile range, 2-4) transfused. The percentage of average monthly procedures with plasma thawed and none transfused was 51.3% (confidence interval, 49.0%-53.6%). The cardiac surgery service requested the greatest number of plasma units to be thawed (2143) but only transfused 712 (33.2%) of them. Of all plasma units not transfused, 45% were generated by procedures with 1 to 4 units of plasma thawed; 95.7% of these units were thawed as even integers (ie, 2, 4). CONCLUSIONS: For operative procedures, far more plasma was thawed than was transfused and this practice occurred across surgical specialties and anesthesiologists. Considering the plasma that was not transfused, 45% occurred in procedures with 4 or fewer units of plasma requested suggesting these low-volume requests were a primary source of potential waste. Further studies are needed to examine associations between plasma utilization and clinical outcomes.

A Man with Paraneoplastic Retinopathy plus Small Fiber Polyneuropathy Associated with Waldenström Macroglobulinemia (Lymphoplasmacytic Lymphoma): Insights into Mechanisms.

PURPOSE: To report a well-characterized Waldenström's macroglobulinemia (WM) case that provides insight into the mechanisms of two paraneoplastic complications -- cancer-associated retinopathy (CAR) and small fiber polyneuropathy (SFPN). METHODS: Retrospective medical chart review. RESULTS: A 58-year old man with WM developed vision loss and bilateral lower extremity pain. CAR was diagnosed by history, a depressed electroretinogram (ERG) and positive anti-retinal antibodies. SFPN diagnosis was based on abnormal autonomic nerve function testing and a distal-leg skin biopsy that demonstrated absent epidermal small-fiber innervation, IgM and complement deposition and microvasculopathy. Plasma exchange (PLEX) led to dramatic pain relief and subjective improvement in eye symptoms along with improvement of some ERG parameters. Repeat skin biopsy after treatment showed less microvascular abnormalities and decreased complement deposition. CONCLUSIONS: The concurrence of CAR and SFPN in this patient suggest that both were complications of WM and their common response to PLEX suggests co-mediation by humoral factors that accessed target antigens through IgM-triggered, complement-mediated vascular damage.

Prevention of bedside errors in transfusion medicine (PROBE-TM) study: a cluster-randomized, matched-paired clinical areas trial of a simple intervention to reduce errors in the pretransfusion bedside check.

BACKGROUND: Transfusion of the incorrect blood component is a frequent serious incident associated with transfusion and often involves misidentification of the patient and/or the unit of blood. The objective of this study was to assess the effect of a simple intervention designed to improve performance of the bedside check and to observe the durability of any effect. The intervention was a tag on blood bags reminding staff to check the patient's wristband. The tag was positioned in such a way that the transfusionist was required to remove the tag to spike the unit. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The intervention was tested in a multicenter cluster-randomized controlled trial incorporating short-term and long-term follow-up periods. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients transfused with red cell units for whom the key elements of the bedside check were all correctly completed. RESULTS: Fifteen matched-paired clinical areas at 12 participating hospitals in six countries were included in the trial. Combining data from all participating hospitals, the bedside check was correctly performed in 37 percent of transfusions during the baseline audit period. There was no evidence of a favorable effect of the intervention immediately after its introduction (pooled odds ratio, 1.09; 95% confidence interval, 0.54-2.17). There was similarly no evidence of a favorable effect after continued use of the intervention for an additional 8 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: A simple intervention in the form of a barrier warning label on blood bags reminding staff to check the patient's wristband failed to improve bedside transfusion practice. The robust study design developed for this study could be applied to investigate other interventions to improve the safety of bedside transfusion practice.

New technology for transfusion safety.

Hemovigilance programs from around the world document that the greatest risk to recipients of blood transfusion is human error, resulting in transfusion of the incorrect blood component. Errors in transfusion care have strong parallels with errors in medication administration. Errors often result from 'lapse' or 'slip' mistakes in which details of patient identification are overlooked. Three areas of transfusion are focal points for improved care: the labelling of the patient's pre-transfusion sample, the decision to transfuse and the final bedside check designed to prevent mis-transfusion. Both barcodes and radio-frequency identification technology, each ideally suited to matching alpha-numeric identifiers, are being implemented in order to improve performance sample labelling and the bedside check. The decision to transfuse should ultimately be enhanced through the use of nanotechnology sensors, computerised order entry and decision support systems. Obstacles to the deployment of new technology include resistance to change, confusion regarding the best technology, and uncertainty regarding the return-on-investment. By focusing on overall transfusion safety, deploying validated systems appropriate for both medication and blood administration, thoughtful integration of technology into bedside practice and demonstration of improved performance, the application of new technologies will improve care for patients in need of transfusion therapy.

Fresh frozen plasma and platelet transfusion for nonbleeding patients in the intensive care unit: benefit or harm?

OBJECTIVE: Whereas restrictive red cell transfusion has become a standard of care for the critically ill, evidenced-based indications for use of other blood components such as fresh frozen plasma (FFP) and platelet transfusions are limited. We searched the National Library of Medicine PubMed database as well as references of retrieved articles and summarized the current evidence for the use of FFP and platelet transfusions in critically ill patients. RESULTS: Routine coagulation tests are poor determinants of bleeding risk in critically ill patients with coagulopathy. FFP transfusion has limited efficacy and is associated with significant morbidity in critically ill patients, in particular, pulmonary edema and acute lung injury. Routine minimally invasive critical care procedures can be safely performed by experienced clinicians in the setting of mildly abnormal coagulation test results, and there is no evidence that FFP transfusion alters the risk of bleeding. For platelet transfusion, the American Society of Clinical Oncology has developed practice guidelines designed for oncology patients. However, because the pathophysiology of thrombocytopenia in critically ill patients often differs from that of thrombocytopenia in oncology patients, published guidelines for oncology patients may not be applicable. CONCLUSION: Because the risk-benefit ratio of a liberal FFP or platelet transfusion strategy for critically ill patients may not be favorable, randomized controlled trials are warranted for evaluating a restrictive vs. liberal FFP or platelet transfusion strategy for nonbleeding patients in the intensive care unit.

Paucity of studies to support that abnormal coagulation test results predict bleeding in the setting of invasive procedures: an evidence-based review.

BACKGROUND: The literature was systematically reviewed to determine whether a prolonged prothrombin time or elevated international normalized ratio predicts bleeding during invasive diagnostic procedures. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: MEDLINE and CENTRAL were searched through August 2004, with no language restriction, and reference lists were reviewed. For inclusion, articles must have reported on bleeding in more than five patients with abnormal test results undergoing diagnostic procedures. RESULTS: One trial and 24 observational studies were included. In 2 studies of bronchoscopy, the bleeding rates were similar among those with normal and abnormal tests, with wide confidence intervals (CIs) around the risk differences. During central vein cannulation (3 studies), bleeding rates among those with abnormal tests was unlikely to exceed 2.3 percent. The largest of 3 studies of arteriography found equivalent bleeding rates in patients with and without abnormal tests (risk difference, 0%; 95% CI, -3% to 2%). In the 3 studies of liver biopsy with plugging, bleeding rates were 0, 4, and 5 percent with the upper bounds of the CI as high as 17 percent. In the largest study of transjugular biopsy, the bleeding rate was 1.5 percent (95% CI, 0.3%-4%) in patients with abnormal tests. The highest bleeding rate in the 3 studies of percutaneous liver biopsy was 5.3 percent (95% CI, 1%-13%), similar to the rate in patients with normal test results. CONCLUSION: There is insufficient evidence to conclude that abnormal test results predict bleeding. Randomized controlled trials should be performed to provide stronger evidence for clinical decision making regarding preprocedure transfusion.

Predicting hemorrhage using preoperative coagulation screening assays.

Each year in the United States, millions of units of fresh frozen plasma and platelets are transfused. A substantial proportion of these units are given to nonbleeding patients to "decrease the risk" of bleeding at the time of invasive procedures. The decision to transfuse is frequently triggered by an elevated prothrombin time (PT; international normalized ratio ) or activated partial thromboplastin time test result or by a depressed platelet count. This review summarizes published studies on the extent to which mild to moderate abnormalities of common laboratory tests of hemostasis reflect an increased risk of bleeding at the time of invasive bedside procedures, including central line placement, liver biopsy, paracentesis, thoracentesis, gastrointestinal endoscopy and biopsy, renal biopsy, bronchoscopy and transbronchial lung biopsy, and lumbar punctures. The poor predictive value of the PT (INR) is understandable in the context of the design and performance of this assay. Whether mild to moderate abnormalities of commonly used laboratory tests have any clinically relevant predictive value as appropriate triggers for prophylactic transfusions before invasive procedures should be investigated in formal randomized clinical trials.

Transfusion-related acute lung injury or acute chest syndrome of sickle cell disease? - A case report.

PURPOSE: To describe how to differentiate transfusion-related acute lung injury from acute chest syndrome of sickle cell disease. CLINICAL FEATURES: A neurosurgical patient with sickle cell disease received two units of packed red blood cells postoperatively. Four hours later she developed progressive respiratory distress, diffuse geographical airspace disease and bilateral pulmonary edema. The patient recovered sufficiently to be transferred from the intensive care unit within four days. The temporal relationship to transfusion, features on computerized tomographic scan, and the rapid resolution of severe edema point to a diagnosis of transfusion related acute lung injury. Granulocyte or human leukocyte antigen antibodies in donor plasma may confirm a diagnosis of transfusion injury. CONCLUSION: The clinician should appreciate that erythrocyte transfusion to prevent or treat acute chest syndrome may cause transfusion related acute lung injury, a condition that mimics, exacerbates or possibly triggers the syndrome it was intended to treat.

Patient safety and blood transfusion: new solutions.

Current risk from transfusion is largely because of noninfectious hazards and defects in the overall process of delivering safe transfusion therapy. Safe transfusion therapy depends on a complex process that requires integration and coordination among multiple hospital services including laboratory medicine, nursing, anesthesia, surgery, clerical support, and transportation. The multidisciplinary hospital transfusion committee has been traditionally charged with oversight of transfusion safety. However, in recent years, this committee may have been neglected in many institutions. Resurgence in hospital oversight of patient safety and transfusion efficacy is an important strategy for change. A new position, the transfusion safety officer (TSO), has been developed in some nations to specifically identify, resolve, and monitor organizational weakness leading to unsafe transfusion practice. New technology is becoming increasingly available to improve the performance of sample labeling and the bedside clerical check. Several technology solutions are in various stages of development and include wireless handheld portable digital assistants, advanced bar coding, radiofrequency identification, and imbedded chip technology. Technology-based solutions for transfusion safety will depend on the larger issue of the technology for patient identification. Devices for transfusion safety hold exciting promise but need to undergo clinical trials to show effectiveness and ease of use. Technology solutions will likely require integration with delivery of pharmaceuticals to be financially acceptable to hospitals.

Leukoreduction of blood components.

During the past year, blood component therapy witnessed two quite contradictory trends in the area of leukoreduction. On the one hand, the year saw widespread forced implementation of leukoreduction by several national blood suppliers, including the American Red Cross, who refused to sell hospitals nonleukoreduced blood. The forced implementation came at high cost to hospitals and with the strong endorsement of the US Food and Drug Administration, which stopped short of mandating universal leukoreduction in the United States. On the other hand, the year saw the publication of several pivotal clinical trials that failed to demonstrate significant patient benefit from the use of leukoreduced blood components. The emerging scientific and clinical evidence reviewed in this article demonstrates that leukoreduction technology is an effective means to reduce the risk of three complications of transfusion: HLA alloimmunization, cytomegalovirus transmission, and recurrent febrile nonhemolytic transfusion reactions. The application of the technology to all blood components does not appear to be warranted.

Treatment of recurrent allograft dysfunction with intravenous hematin after liver transplantation for erythropoietic protoporphyria.

Erythropoietic protoporphyria (EPP) is a rare inherited disorder of the heme biosynthetic pathway in which toxic levels of protoporphyrins often precipitate in the liver, leading to cirrhosis, liver failure, and the need for liver transplantation (OLT). Because the underlying enzyme defect in EPP is bone marrow derived, the risk for recurrent EPP allograft dysfunction is high. Although plasmapheresis may ameliorate acute allograft disease, strategies to maintain disease remission are needed. A 59-year-old man who underwent OLT for hepatic EPP experienced increased bilirubin and aminotransferases on postoperative day 700. Allograft biopsy demonstrated recurrent EPP. He was managed initially with plasmapheresis, hypertransfusion, and infusions of i.v. hematin. After normalization of liver tests, the hematin infusions have been given intermittently, are well tolerated, and associated with normal allograft function for nearly 2 years. This is the first case of the use of hematin given post-OLT to help achieve and maintain remission of allograft EPP disease.