Standardized multi-planar reformation improves the reliability of the assessment of the anterolateral ligament in ACL-deficient knees.

PURPOSE: The anterolateral ligament (ALL) is an important structure for controlling anterolateral rotatory stability of the knee. Its assessment, however, is difficult using standardized MRI images. The goal of this study was to assess the reliability of judging the integrity of the ALL on multi-planar reformatted (MPR) MRI images and on standard coronal reformatted (SCR) MRI images in knees with an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture. METHODS: Forty-eight patients (14 females, 34 males, 30 ± 6 years (mean age ± standard deviation)) with acute ACL ruptures (< 2 weeks) and no additional knee injuries (except segond fractures) were included. Images were assessed by two independent raters twice with at least a 2-week interval in between. The assessment was first performed on SCR images and thereafter on MPR images. Images were judged for assessability of the ALL and then the integrity of the ALL was rated. RESULTS: Depending on rater and read, the ALL was judged as "torn" in between 5 (10.4%) and 11 (22.9%) patients out of 48 patients on SCR images. On MRP images, the ALL was judged as "torn" in between 5 (10.4%) and 6 (12.5%) patients out of 48 patients, depending on rater and read. Inter- and intra-rater reliability for the assessment of the ALL using MPR images was "substantial" to "almost perfect". Inter- and intra-rater reliability for the assessment using SCR was "fair" to "substantial". CONCLUSION: MPR images should be used when assessing the integrity of the ALL. Assessment quality is independent of patient positioning during MRI acquisition and the ALL can be displayed in full length on one image. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Indications, clinical outcome and survival of rotating hinge total knee arthroplasty in a retrospective study of 63 primary and revision cases.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to report and compare outcome data of both primary and revision cases using a rotating hinge knee (RHK) implant. METHODS: This study retrospectively analyzed 63 cases (19 primary, 44 revisions) at a mean follow-up of 34 ± 8 months after RHK implantation. Outcome parameters were stability, range of motion (ROM), loosening, Hospital of Special Surgery Score (HSS), Knee Society Score (KSS), Oxford Knee Score (OKS), EQ-5D-3L, and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for overall function. Revision rates and implant survival are reported. RESULTS: Eleven percent showed medio-lateral instability < 5 mm, a mean ROM of 115° ± 17° and radiologic loosening occurred in 8% (2% symptomatic). PROMS showed the following results: HSS 79 ± 18, KSS 78 ± 27, OKS 26 ± 10, EQ-5D index 0.741 ± 0.233 and VAS 70 ± 20. Primary cases revealed better outcomes in HHS (p = .035) and OKS (p = 0.047). KSS, EQ-5D index and VAS did not differ between primary and revision cases (p = 0.070; p = 0.377; p = 0.117). Revision rate was 6.3% with an implant survival of 96.8%. CONCLUSIONS: RHK arthroplasty can be performed with good clinical outcome and low revision rate in revision and complex primary cases. RHK is an option in cases where standard arthroplasty and even implants with a higher degree of constraint have reached their limits. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Staged treatment of a comminuted femoral fracture with Masquelet technique and 3D printed reposition guides.

Background: Comminuted femoral fractures pose a challenge to the trauma surgeon due to the absence of bony references during surgery. Therefore, malalignment of length and axis can occur and necessitate revision surgery. During the last decade, 3D-planning has evolved as a surgical aid in difficult cases. Case report: An 18-year-old male patient suffered a polytrauma following a motorcycle accident. This report is about the treatment of a 3rd degree open and comminuted fracture of the left distal femur. The fracture was treated with Masquelet's two-staged technique. With the intent of avoiding malalignment, the second stage surgery was performed with the aid of 3D-planned reduction guides. Despite complex fracture pattern, complete fracture union was achieved with acceptable final alignment (side-to-side comparison of length, axis and femoral torsion). Conclusion: In this case, performing Masquelet's two-staged surgery with the aid of 3D-printed reposition guides yielded favorable results in regards to rotational malalignment. The malrotation of the femur was reduced after the second operation to a clinically acceptable side-to-side difference (10°). This technique remains technically challenging due to soft tissue tension and limited possibility of soft tissue release.

3D printed fracture reduction guides planned and printed at the point of care show high accuracy - a porcine feasibility study.

PURPOSE: After surgical treatment of comminuted diaphyseal femoral and tibial fractures, relevant malalignment, especially rotational errors occur in up to 40-50%. This either results in a poor clinical outcome or requires revision surgery. This study aims to evaluate the accuracy of reduction if surgery is supported by 3D guides planned and printed at the point of care. METHODS: Ten porcine legs underwent computed tomography (CT) and 3D models of femur and tibia were built. Reduction guides were virtually constructed and fitted to the proximal and distal metaphysis. The guides were 3D printed using medically approved resin. Femoral and tibial comminuted diaphyseal fractures were simulated and subsequently reduced using the 3D guides. Postoperative 3D bone models were reconstructed to compare the accuracy to the preoperative planning. RESULTS: Femoral reduction showed a mean deviation ± SD from the plan of 1.0 mm ± 0.9 mm for length, 0.9° ± 0.7° for varus/valgus, 1.2° ± 0.9° for procurvatum/recurvatum and 2.0° ± 1.7° for rotation. Analysis of the tibial reduction revealed a mean deviation ± SD of 2.4 mm ± 1.6 mm for length, 1.0° ± 0.6° for varus/valgus, 1.3° ± 1.4° for procurvatum/recurvatum and 2.9° ± 2.2° for rotation. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows high accuracy of reduction with 3D guides planned and printed at the point of care. Applied to a clinical setting, this technique has the potential to avoid malreduction and consecutive revision surgery in comminuted diaphyseal fractures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Basic Science.