Gluteal Compartment Syndrome After Femoral Nail Extraction: A Case Report.

Gluteal compartment syndrome is a rare disorder and no definitive treatment has yet been established. Fasciotomy is often the treatment of choice for gluteal compartment syndrome, but there have been only a few cases that have improved with conservative therapy. A 26-year-old male with a body mass index of 40.5 who underwent femoral nail extraction surgery had severe pain in the right buttock and numbness in the right lower extremity. Initially, we suspected transient pain due to prolonged exposure to the same posture, but muscle weakness in the lower extremities and worsening of renal function appeared over time. Orthopedic evaluation revealed physical examination findings and MRI imaging findings consistent with gluteal compartment syndrome. Conservative treatment with temporary dialysis was chosen instead of fasciotomy because of the time required for diagnosis. Dialysis was started on postoperative day 3, renal function and muscle weakness recovered over time, and the patient was discharged home on postoperative day 37. At six months post-op, the patient was walking without pain and he had no changes in his peripheral neurologic examination compared to his preoperative baseline. Orthopedic surgeons should always be aware of the possibility of gluteal compartment syndrome when especially obese patients with prolonged operation times appeal to acute buttock pain. Diagnosis should be made as early as possible to get a good prognosis.

Co-existence of Lumbar Disc Herniation and Posterior Ring Apophyseal Fracture: It Is Not Rare and Computed Tomography Is Useful.

Introduction Posterior ring apophyseal fracture (PRAF) is characterized by the separation of bone fragments and sometimes coexists with lumbar disc herniation (LDH). However, how often these conditions coexist and the details of the clinical course remain unclear. Methods We analyzed 200 patients who underwent surgical treatment for LDH at our hospital from January 2016 to December 2020. Among these, we reviewed 21 patients who underwent microendoscopic surgery to treat PRAF. They consisted of 11 male and 10 female patients, ranging in age from 15 to 63 years. The average age was 32.8 months, and the average follow-up period was 39.8 years. We performed simple roentgenography and magnetic resonance imaging for all patients and computed tomography for about 80% of the patients. We evaluated the type of PRAF fragment (Takata classification), disease level, Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score, Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RDQ) score, operating time, intraoperative blood loss, and perioperative complications. Results A total of 10.5% of patients with LDH also had PRAF. The mean JOA score significantly improved from 10.6 ± 5.7 points before surgery to 21.4 ± 5.1 points at the final observation (p < 0.05). The mean RDQ score significantly improved from 17.1 ± 4.5 preoperatively to 5.5 ± 0.5 at the final observation (p < 0.05). The average operation time was 88.6 minutes. There were no complications requiring early surgery that were due to postoperative infection or epidural hematoma, but one patient required reoperation. Conclusion This study showed that PRAF coexisted with LDH in about 10% of cases, and the outcomes of surgical treatment were generally good. Computed tomography is recommended to improve the diagnostic rate and assist with surgical planning and intraoperative decision-making.

Risk Factors of Periprosthetic Infection in Patients with Tumor Prostheses Following Resection for Musculoskeletal Tumor of the Lower Limb.

Tumor prostheses for the lower limb following resection of musculoskeletal tumors is useful limb salvage management; however, as compared with routine total joint replacement, an increased incidence of deep periprosthetic infection of tumor prosthesis has been observed. The risk factors for periprosthetic infection of tumor prosthesis remain unclear. This study examines the risk factors and outcomes of periprosthetic infection. This was a retrospective observational study including 121 patients (67 males and 54 females) who underwent tumor prosthesis of the lower limb after resection of musculoskeletal tumors between 1 January 2000 and 30 November 2018. Among a total of 121 tumor prostheses, 7 were total femurs, 47 were proximal femurs, 47 were distal femurs, and 20 were proximal tibias. The incidence of postoperative infection and its risk factors were analyzed. Forty-five patients (37%) had osteosarcoma, 36 patients (30%) had bone metastasis, and 10 patients (8%) had soft-tissue tumors invading the bone. The mean operating time was 229 min, and the mean follow-up duration was 5.9 years. Deep periprosthetic infection was noted in 14 patients (12%). In the multivariate analysis, the risk factors for postoperative infection were identified as being male (hazard ratio [HR], 11.2316; p = 0.0100), soft-tissue tumor (HR, 52.2443; p = 0.0003), long operation (HR, 1.0056; p = 0.0184), and radiotherapy (HR, 6.5683; p = 0.0476). The incidence of periprosthetic infection in our institution was similar to that of previous reports. Patients undergoing tumor prosthesis of the lower limb who were male, had a soft-tissue tumor, were predicted to have a long operation, and who underwent radiation, had an increased possibility of postoperative infection.