Strength and Functional Outcomes Following Achilles Tendon Reconstruction With Hamstring Tendon Autograft Augmentation.

BACKGROUND: The proposed advantages of hamstring autograft reconstruction when compared to alternative procedures, such as flexor hallucis longus (FHL) transfer, V-Y lengthening, and allograft reconstruction, are improved healing and reproduction of normal tendon biomechanics and reduced morbidity within the foot and ankle. In this study, we examined the effect of Achilles tendon reconstruction using hamstring autografts on strength and functional outcomes. METHODS: Patients who underwent Achilles repair with a hamstring autograft for insertional or midsubstance tendinopathy, delayed diagnosis of rupture, or infection after primary repair were evaluated for inclusion. Forty-six patients were identified; 12 further augmented with an FHL transfer are included in the analysis. Isokinetic testing was completed with a Biodex dynamometer under supervision of a physical therapist masked to surgical side. Pre- and postoperative Foot and Ankle Outcome Scores (FAOS, before March 2016) or Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS, after March 2016) surveys were collected. RESULTS: For knee flexion, peak torque was not significantly different when comparing operative and nonoperative sides at 180 degrees/second (45.38 Nm vs 45.96 Nm; P = .69) nor at 300 degrees/second (44.2 Nm vs 47.02 Nm; P = .069). Knee extension absolute peak torque was only found to be significantly weaker on the operative side at the faster testing (75.5 Nm vs 79.56 Nm; P < .05). Peak ankle plantarflexion torque was significantly weaker on the operative side at both the slower speed (60 degrees/second: 39.9 Nm vs 48.76 Nm; P < .005) and the faster speed (120 degrees/second: 31.3 Nm vs 40.7 Nm; P < .001). Average power for ankle plantarflexion did not differ significantly from the operative side to the nonoperative side in the slower test (26.46 W vs 27.48 W; P = .60) but did significantly differ on the faster test (32.13 W vs 37.63 W; P = .041). At an average of 19.9 months postoperation, all physical function and pain-related patient-reported outcome scores showed clinically and statistically significant improvement. CONCLUSION: Achilles reconstruction with a hamstring autograft ± FHL transfer allowed patients with severe Achilles pathology to return to good subjective function, with modest deficits in calf strength compared with the uninjured side. Overall knee flexion strength did not appear impaired. These results suggest that hamstring autograft reconstruction is a viable method to treat these complex cases involving a lack of healthy tissue, allowing patients to return to symptom-free physical function and athletic activity. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, case series.

Risk Factors Associated With Worse Clinical Outcomes of Ankle Fractures Involving the Posterior Malleolus.

Background: Ankle fractures involving the posterior malleolus (PM) tend to result in inferior clinical outcomes compared to other ankle fractures. However, it is unclear which specific risk factors and fracture characteristics are associated with negative outcomes in these fractures. The aim of this study was to identify risk factors for poor postoperative patient-reported outcomes in patients with fractures involving the PM. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included patients who sustained ankle fractures involving the PM between March 2016 and July 2020 and had preoperative computed tomography (CT) scans. In total, 122 patients were included for analysis. One patient (0.8%) had an isolated PM fracture, 19 (15.6%) had bimalleolar ankle fractures involving the PM, and 102 (83.6%) had trimalleolar fractures. Fracture characteristics including the Lauge-Hansen (LH) and Haraguchi classifications and posterior malleolar fragment size were collected from preoperative CT scans. Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) scores were collected preoperatively and at a minimum of 1 year postoperatively. The association between various demographic and fracture characteristics with postoperative PROMIS scores was assessed. Results: Involvement of more malleoli was associated with worse PROMIS Physical Function (P = .04), Global Physical Health (P = .04), and Global Mental Health (P < .001), and Depression scores (P = .001). Elevated BMI was also associated with worse PROMIS Physical Function (P = .0025), Pain Interference (P = .0013), and Global Physical Health (P = .012) scores. Time to surgery, fragment size, Haraguchi classification, and LH classification were not associated with PROMIS scores. Conclusion: In this cohort, we found that trimalleolar ankle fractures were associated with inferior PROMIS outcomes compared with bimalleolar ankle fractures involving the PM in multiple domains. Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Anterior and posterior glenoid bone loss in patients receiving surgery for glenohumeral instability is not the same: a comparative 3-dimensional imaging analysis.

Background: Anterior and posterior glenoid bone loss morphology have both been individually and morphologically described in previous studies. While there exists substantial literature on anterior bone loss, and emerging evidence describing posterior bone loss, a direct comparison between the two is lacking in the current literature. The purpose of this study is to quantitatively compare the anatomic and morphological differences in glenoid bone loss (GBL) in operative patients with anterior versus posterior glenohumeral instability. Methods: All patients over a 3-year period indicated for operative stabilization with posterior glenohumeral instability and suspected glenoid bone loss who underwent a computed tomography (CT) scan were reviewed. Included patients were then singularly matched by gender, laterality, and age (±3 years) to a collection of patients who presented for operative stabilization of anterior glenohumeral instability. GBL parameters were assessed based on the following characterizing measurements: (1) percentage of GBL, (2) glenoid vault version, (3) slope of the glenoid defect relative to the glenoid surface, (4) superior-inferior defect height, and (5) anterior-posterior defect width. Results: Sixty patients (30 anterior GBL, 30 posterior GBL) were included in the final analysis (60 males), with a mean age of 28.8 ± 8.15 years (range 16.0 to 51.0 years). Patients with anterior instability presented with higher GBL (24.94% ± 7.69 vs. 9.22% ± 5.58, P < .001), greater superior-inferior defect height (23.89 ± 4.21 mm vs. 21.88 ± 3.42 mm, P = .047), and steeper slope of glenoid defect (58.80° ± 11.86 vs. 38.59° ± 14.30, P < .001), while patients with posterior instability had greater retroversion (1.53° ± 4.04 vs. 7.59° ± 7.71, P < .001). Additionally, the anterior instability cohort had significantly more patients with moderate- to high-grade glenoid bone loss (n = 30) than patients with posterior instability (n = 11) (P < .001). Conclusion: Anterior instability presents with a steeper slope of glenoid defect, higher percentage GBL, and greater superior-inferior defect height, whereas posterior instability presents with greater retroversion. This underscores the finding that anterior and posterior instability bone loss are not the same morphologically, and this should be considered in the operative treatment of glenohumeral instability.

Augmenting Osteochondral Autograft Transplantation and Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate with Particulate Cartilage Extracellular Matrix Is Associated With Improved Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Osteochondral autograft transplant (OAT) is often used to treat large osteochondral lesions of the talus and is generally associated with good outcomes. The addition of adjuncts such as cartilage extracellular matrix with bone marrow aspirate concentrate (ECM-BMAC) may further improve the OAT procedure but have not been thoroughly studied. We hypothesized that the placement of ECM-BMAC around the OAT graft would improve radiographic and patient-reported outcomes following OAT. METHODS: Patients who received OAT, with ECM-BMAC or BMAC alone, were screened and their charts were reviewed. For patients who did receive ECM-BMAC, the mixture was spread around the edges of the OAT plug and into any surrounding areas of cartilage damage. Survey and radiographic data were collected. Average follow-up in both groups was over 2 years. Magnetic resonance imaging scans were scored using the Magnetic Resonance Observation of Cartilage Tissue (MOCART) system. Outcomes were compared statistically between groups. RESULTS: Patients treated with ECM-BMAC (n = 34) demonstrated significantly greater improvement of scores in the FAOS categories Symptoms (17 vs -3; P = .02) and Sports Activities (40 vs 7; P = .02), and the MOCART category Subchondral Lamina (P = .008) compared to those treated with BMAC alone (n = 30). They also experienced significantly lower rates of postoperative cysts (53% vs 18%, P = .04) and edema (94% vs 59%, P = .02). CONCLUSION: The addition of ECM-BMAC to OAT was associated with improved imaging and clinical outcomes compared to OAT with BMAC alone.

Subscapularis repair techniques for reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: A systematic review.

IMPORTANCE: Repair of the subscapularis can be effective in the setting of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA). However, there has yet to be a consensus on an optimal repair technique. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this systematic review is to consolidate current high-quality studies comparing outcomes after rTSA with different subscapularis repair techniques. EVIDENCE REVIEW: A comprehensive literature review was conducted according to the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-Analyses using the PubMed, Embase, Scopus and Cochrane databases for original, English-language studies observing outcomes of rTSA after subscapularis repair published between January 1, 2000 and December 31, 2020. Subscapularis management techniques were repair to (1) tendon (tendon-tendon), (2) prosthetic stem, (3) lesser tuberosity (bone tunnels) or (4) a subscapularis-preserving approach (intact). The repair technique was recorded for included studies, and clinical and functional subjective scores were extracted from text, tables and figures. Forest plots were created to allow for qualitative comparison of the outcomes of interest between subscapularis repair techniques. FINDINGS: Seven comprehensive studies were identified, which included 367 patients. The mean age of patient at the time of surgery was 71.1 ± 2.8 years (range = 47-87 years). Overall, 259 patients underwent tendon-tendon repair, 48 patients underwent repair to prosthetic stem, 40 patients underwent repair with bone tunnels and 20 patients' subscapularis remained intact. Significant improvement was seen in most studies for Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (range, Δ 42.6-Δ 46.0 out of 3), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (range, Δ44.2-Δ43.6 out of 3) and Visual Analogue Scale pain scores (range Δ 4.2-Δ 6 out of 5). Active forward elevation (range Δ 40.4°-Δ 57.3° out of 4) and active external rotation (range Δ 2.9°-Δ 16.0° out of 4) significantly improved, but forward elevation varied by nearly 17° (Δ16.94°), while external rotation varied by 13° (Δ13.16°) among repair techniques. Complications were reported in only one study, which used a tendon-tendon technique. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This study summarizes the current evidence regarding subscapularis repair techniques after rTSA including functional and subjective clinical outcome scores. Several different subscapularis repair techniques during rTSA appear to lend to sufficient improvement in clinical and subjective outcomes. This information can help guide future studies in this area and highlights the need for high quality studies comparing different subscapularis repair techniques. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Return to Physical Activity Following Flatfoot Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Progressive collapsing foot deformity (PCFD) is a debilitating condition encompassing several interrelated, progressive deformities requiring a combination of reconstructive procedures. Few studies investigate returns to activity following flatfoot reconstruction, and existing studies only examine 1 or 2 of the numerous procedures employed. This study aims to provide the first generalizable assessment of returns to sports and physical activity following reconstruction surgery in patients with flexible flatfoot deformity. METHODS: Patients aged 18-60 years who underwent reconstructive surgery between February 16 and May 19 for symptomatic flexible-stage flatfoot deformity were identified by registry review. Eighty-two of 113 eligible patients (73%) were reached at a mean 2.9 years (range, 2.0-5.4) of follow-up with mean age at surgery of 48.9 years (range, 18-59). Returns to physical activity were evaluated with a sports-specific survey. Clinical outcomes were evaluated with Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) scores. RESULTS: Patients reported participation in 21 specific sports and activities. One-fourth (25.6%) of patients (21/82) reported increased difficulty with physical activities postoperatively, 15.9% reported equal difficulty, and 58.5% (48/82) reported decreased difficulty. Median return times were 9-12 months for participation and 12-18 months to reach maximum preoperative participation levels. Improvements in Physical Function (P= .001), Pain Interference (P < .001), Pain Intensity (P <.001), and Global Physical Health (P = .004) were associated with increased satisfaction with respect to sports and physical activities. DISCUSSION: This study investigated participation in specific sports and physical activities following flatfoot reconstruction. Our findings suggest mixed outcomes, where many patients reported life-changing improvements but many also experienced prolonged pain and difficulty after surgery. Some patients reported increased difficulty or inability to return to their preoperative maximum level of participation, indicating that flatfoot reconstructions can lead to athletic limitations. CONCLUSION: Although flatfoot reconstruction can be a powerful tool to increase patients' capacity to engage in physical activity, in our cohort many patients had reduced physical activity outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, retrospective case series.

Comparison of Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes Following Arthroscopic Debridement With Extracellular Matrix Augmentation and Osteochondral Autograft Transplantation for Medium-Size Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus.

BACKGROUND: Historically, microfracture has been used to treat small talar osteochondral lesions with good results, whereas osteochondral autologous transplantation (OAT) has proven effective for the treatment of larger lesions. It is not clear which method is more effective for medium-sized lesions around the critical size of 150 mm2, above which microfracture outcomes tend to be poor. The purpose of this study was to determine the potential advantages of OAT augmented with a combination of extracellular matrix and bone marrow aspirate concentrate (ECM-BMAC) compared to debridement with ECM-BMAC (DEB) in the treatment of medium-sized osteochondral lesions of the talus (OLTs). METHODS: Clinical and radiographic data were collected retrospectively for patients treated by a single fellowship-trained foot and ankle surgeon. Magnetic resonance images (MRIs) were scored using the Magnetic Resonance Observation of Cartilage Tissue (MOCART) system and were evaluated for the presence of cysts and edema. Fifty-two patients met inclusion criteria, with 25 who received an OAT procedure. Age, body mass index, lesion size, lesion location, and follow-up time were similar between groups. Average MRI follow-up times were 16.7 months for the OAT group and 20.3 months for the DEB group (P = .38). RESULTS: Patients treated with OAT had significantly higher average total MOCART scores (69 vs 55, P = .04) and significantly lower rates of cyst (14% vs 55%, P < .01), edema (59% vs 90%, P = .04), revision surgery (0% vs 19%, P = .05), and therapeutic injection for pain (4% vs 30%, P = .02) compared to patients treated with DEB. No significant differences were detected in patient-reported outcome scores between groups. CONCLUSION: The native hyaline cartilage introduced by OAT appears to result in higher-quality repair tissue when compared to DEB, as evidenced by OAT patients' higher MOCART scores and lower rates of cyst and edema. There was no difference in clinical outcome scores, though OAT patients did not require revision surgery or therapeutic injection for pain as frequently as DEB patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Comparison of Functional and Radiographic Outcomes of Talar Osteochondral Lesions Repaired With Micronized Allogenic Cartilage Extracellular Matrix and Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate vs Microfracture.

BACKGROUND: Microfracture (MF) has been used historically to treat osteochondral lesions of the talus (OLTs), with favorable outcomes reported in approximately 80% to 85% of cases. However, MF repairs have been shown to degrade over time at long-term follow-up, suggesting that further study into optimal OLT treatment is warranted. The use of adjuvant extracellular matrix with bone marrow aspirate concentrate (ECM-BMAC) has not been extensively evaluated in the literature. We present a comparison of patient-reported and radiographic outcomes following ECM-BMAC repair vs traditional MF. METHODS: Patients who underwent MF (n = 67) or ECM-BMAC (n = 62) treatment for an OLT were identified and their charts were retrospectively reviewed. Postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was evaluated and patient-reported outcome scores, either Foot and Ankle Outcome Scores (FAOS) or Patient-Reported Measurement Information System (PROMIS) scores, were collected. MRIs were scored by a radiologist, fellowship trained in musculoskeletal radiology, using the Magnetic Resonance Observation of Cartilage Repair Tissue (MOCART) system. Radiographic and clinical outcomes were compared between groups. RESULTS: On average, patients treated with ECM-BMAC demonstrated a higher total MOCART score compared to the MF group (73 ± SD 11.5 vs 54.0 ± 24.1; P = .0015). ECM-BMAC patients also had significantly better scores for the Infill, Integration, and Signal MOCART subcategories. Last, patients treated with ECM-BMAC had a lower rate of revision compared to those treated with MF (4.8% vs 20.9%; P = .007). FAOS scores were compared between groups, with no significant differences observed. CONCLUSION: When comparing outcomes between patients treated for an OLT with ECM-BMAC vs traditional MF, we observed superior MRI results for ECM-BMAC patients. The rate of revision surgery was higher for MF patients, although patient-reported outcomes were similar between groups. The use of ECM-BMAC as an adjuvant therapy in the treatment of OLTs may result in improved reparative tissue when compared to MF. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, comparative series.

Clinical Outcomes and Complications With Open vs Minimally Invasive Achilles Tendon Repair.

BACKGROUND: There is no current consensus on whether to use an open or minimally invasive (MIS) approach for Achilles tendon repair after acute rupture. We hypothesized that patients in both open and MIS groups would have improved patient-reported outcome scores using the PROMIS system postoperatively, but that there would be minimal differences in these scores and complication rates between operative techniques. METHODS: A total of 185 patients who underwent surgery for an acute, unilateral Achilles tendon rupture between January 2016 and June 2019, with minimum 1-year follow-up were included in the cohort studied. The minimally invasive group was defined by use of a commercially available minimally invasive device through a smaller surgical incision (n=118). The open repair group did not use the device, and suture repair was performed through larger surgical incisions (n=67). Postoperative protocols were similar between groups. Preoperative and postoperative PROMIS scores were collected prospectively through our institution's registry. Demographics and complications were recorded. RESULTS: PROMIS scores overall improved in both study groups after operative repair. No significant differences in postoperative PROMIS scores were observed between the open and MIS repair groups. There were also no significant differences in complication rates between groups. Overall, 19.5% of patients in the MIS group had at least 1 postoperative complication (8.5% deep vein thrombosis [DVT], 3.3% rerupture, 1.7% sural nerve injury, 2.5% infection), compared to 16.4% in the open group (9.0% DVT, 1.5% rerupture, 1.5% sural nerve injury, 0% infection). CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing either minimally invasive or open Achilles tendon repair after acute rupture have similar PROMIS outcomes and complication types and incidences. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective cohort study.

The Virtual Foot and Ankle Physical Examination.

The COVID-19 pandemic has necessitated a rapid and drastic shift for clinicians and patients away from traditional in-person visits and toward internet-based virtual visits. The adoption of telehealth services is likely to persist in some capacity even as in-person visits resume, given the convenience and efficiency of telehealth consultations for patients and perhaps surgeons. A primary challenge of virtual visits, particularly in the field of orthopedic surgery, is the physical examination. However, for the foot and ankle, routine physical examination maneuvers can be completed virtually with little modification given proper patient instruction. We present a comprehensive virtual foot and ankle examination for telehealth visits, including instructions that can be provided to patients verbatim and a corresponding checklist for provider documentation.Level of Evidence: Level V, expert opinion.