RESUMO
Introduction: Drain placement is commonplace after many plastic surgery procedures to evacuate excess blood and fluid. Tranexamic acid (TXA) is an antifibrinolytic that has been shown to decrease bleeding and fluid production at surgical sites and can be administered orally, intravenously, and topically. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of topical TXA on drain removal in abdominally based autologous breast reconstruction (ABABR). Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed on patients who underwent ABABR from August 2018 to November 2019. In 1 cohort, a 2.5% TXA solution was topically applied to the abdominal wall prior to closure. Drains were removed when output was less than 30 mL/day for 2 consecutive days. The primary outcome was days to drain removal. Secondary outcomes include daily inpatient drain output, postoperative hemoglobin levels, blood transfusions, and complications within 30 days postoperatively. Results: Eighty-three patients were included, with 47 in the control group and 36 in the TXA group. Drains were removed significantly earlier in patients who received TXA (16 days vs 23 days, P = .02). Additionally, significantly fewer patients required postoperative blood transfusions in the TXA group (2 vs 14, P = .005). Abdominal complications were fewer in the TXA group with significantly less wound healing complications (22% vs 49%, P = .01). There was no difference in flap loss or systemic thromboembolic events. Conclusion: Topical TXA use in ABABR results in earlier abdominal drain removal, less blood transfusions, and lower abdominal wound complications without an increased risk of flap loss or adverse patient outcomes.
Introduction : La mise en place d'un drain est habituelle après de nombreuses procédures de chirurgie plastique pour l'évacuation des excès de sang et de liquide. L'acide tranexamique (TXA) est un agent antifibrinolytique qui a une efficacité démontrée sur la réduction des saignements et de la production de fluides au niveau des sites chirurgicaux; il peut être administré par voie orale, par voie intraveineuse ou en application locale. L'objectif de cette étude était d'évaluer l'effet du TXA topique sur le retrait du drain après reconstruction mammaire autologue à base abdominale (ABABR). Méthodes : Un examen rétrospectif des dossiers des patients ayant subi une ABABR entre août 2018 et novembre 2019 a été effectué. Dans une cohorte, une solution de TXA à 2,5 % a été appliquée localement sur la paroi abdominale avant sa fermeture. Les drains ont été retirés quand la production est devenue inférieure à 30 mL/jour pendant 2 jours consécutifs. Le critère d'évaluation principal était le nombre de jours jusqu'au retrait du drain. Les critères de jugement secondaires étaient notamment : la production quotidienne du drain chez les patients hospitalisés, les taux d'hémoglobine postopératoires, les transfusions sanguines et les complications survenues dans les 30 jours postopératoires. Résultats : Quatre-vingt-trois patients ont été inclus, dont 47 dans le groupe contrôle et 36 dans le groupe TXA. Les drains ont été retirés significativement plus tôt chez les patients qui avaient reçu du TXA (16 jours contre 23 jours, P = 0,02). De plus, un nombre significativement inférieur de patients a nécessité des transfusions sanguines postopératoires dans le groupe TXA (2 contre 14, P = 0,005). Les complications abdominales ont été moins nombreuses dans le groupe TXA avec significativement moins de complications de cicatrisation (22 % contre 49 %, P = 0,01). Il n'y a pas eu de différence concernant la perte du lambeau cutané ou les événements thromboemboliques systémiques. Conclusion : L'utilisation topique de TXA dans l'ABABR permet un retrait plus précoce du drain abdominal, moins de transfusions sanguines et moins de complications de la plaie abdominale inférieure sans augmentation du risque de perte du lambeau cutané ou d'événements indésirables pour le patient.
RESUMO
Regret after gender-affirming surgery (GAS) is a complex issue. Comparing regret after GAS to regret after plastic surgery operations and other major life decisions is a novel approach that can provide insight into the magnitude of this issue. A systematic review of three databases was conducted to investigate regret after common plastic surgery operations. Three separate literature reviews on regret after GAS, regret after elective operations, and regret after major life decisions were performed. A total of 55 articles examining regret after plastic surgery were included. The percentage of patients reporting regret ranged from 0 to 47.1 â% in breast reconstruction, 5.1-9.1 â% in breast augmentation, and 10.82-33.3 â% in body contouring. In other surgical subspecialties, 30 â% of patients experience regret following prostatectomy and up to 19.5 â% following bariatric surgery. Rate of regret after GAS is approximately 1 â%. Other life decisions, such as having children and getting a tattoo have regret rates of 7 â% and 16.2 â%, respectively. When comparing regret after GAS to regret after other surgeries and major life decisions, the percentage of patients experiencing regret is extremely low.
Assuntos
Emoções , Humanos , Cirurgia de Readequação Sexual/psicologia , Masculino , Feminino , Mamoplastia/psicologiaRESUMO
PURPOSE: Currently, there are several methods of achieving maxillomandibular fixation (MMF), each with its unique operative considerations and subsequent patient outcomes and complications. In this study, we reviewed the literature to evaluate and compare all MMF methods. METHODS: A systematic review of all MMF types was conducted and post-operative outcome data were analyzed and compared among the different types. Conventional Erich arch bars were compared to hybrid arch bars, MMF screws, and eyelet interdental wiring. A random-effects meta-analysis was used to determine the mean differences, and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) with a statistical significance of P < 0.05. RESULTS: Among the 4234 articles identified, 24 were included, and 17 were meta-analyzed. Time to achieve MMF (-43.38 min; 95% CI, -58.20 to -28.56; P < 0.001), total operative time (-30.33 min; 95% CI, -61.05 to 0.39; P = 0.05), incidence of wire puncture injuries and glove perforations (0.11; 95% CI, 0.04 to 0.30; P < 0.001), and incidence of poor oral hygiene (0.08; 95% CI, 0.02 to 0.28; P < 0.001) were lower for alternative MMF interventions compared to those of the conventional Erich arch bars. CONCLUSIONS: Alternative MMF methods required shorter operative time to achieve MMF and demonstrated other increased efficiencies of practice such as shorter total operative time and decreased glove perforations, when compared to conventional Erich arch bars. If a patient is a candidate for MMF, the presented alternative MMF techniques should be considered depending on the clinical context and availability of institutional resources.
Assuntos
Técnicas de Fixação da Arcada Osseodentária , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Humanos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Técnicas de Fixação da Arcada Osseodentária/instrumentação , Fraturas Mandibulares/cirurgia , Resultado do Tratamento , Duração da CirurgiaRESUMO
PURPOSE: Adult acquired buried penis (AABP) is a morbid condition often necessitating surgical intervention. Accurate assessment of pre- and postoperative symptoms is crucial to understand how AABP impacts a patients' quality of life, verify surgical effectiveness, and practice patient-centered care. There is no validated patient-reported outcome instrument specific for AABP evaluation. We undertook a comprehensive review of existing literature on patient-reported outcome instruments post-AABP surgery to highlight the importance of developing a specific tool. METHODS: Following the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis 2020 guidelines, we queried three databases using relevant keywords (e.g., "buried penis repair"). Inclusion criteria were studies that discussed surgical management of AABP with patient-reported outcomes. Pediatric and congenital cases were excluded. Information collected included study design, level of evidence, number of participants included in the study, etiology of buried penis, surgical technique, preoperative or postoperative patient-reported outcomes, and patient-reported outcome instrument used. RESULTS: Initial query identified 998 records. After abstract screening and applying the inclusion or exclusion criteria, a total of 19 articles with 440 patients were included. Eight studies implemented patient-reported outcome instruments. The international index of erectile dysfunction-5 and Likert satisfaction scales were used most frequently. Although all instruments were validated, none were validated in the specific context of AABP surgical intervention. CONCLUSIONS: There is considerable heterogeneity within the AABP literature regarding patient symptomatology, postoperative complications, patient-reported outcomes, and instruments used. The results of this study emphasize the need for a patient-reported outcome measure to examine the influence of AABP repair on patient satisfaction and health-related quality of life.
Assuntos
Medidas de Resultados Relatados pelo Paciente , Doenças do Pênis , Humanos , Masculino , Adulto , Doenças do Pênis/cirurgia , Qualidade de Vida , Pênis/cirurgia , Pênis/anormalidades , Síndrome , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/cirurgiaRESUMO
Breast reconstruction is highly complex, requiring navigation of not only clinical and operative realities, but of patient expectations as well. The authors sought to identify historical art pieces that exhibit breast asymmetries and deformities for comparison with photographs of breast reconstruction patients seen at the clinic of the senior author (S.O.P.) to demonstrate that achievement of perfect breast cosmesis is challenging in both breast reconstruction and in the classical arts. Open access libraries and Creative Commons images were reviewed to identify appropriate works of art from various time periods and geographic locations. Following artwork selection, photographs of breast reconstruction patients were reviewed and paired with selected artworks exhibiting cosmetically similar breasts. A total of 8 pieces of selected historic art were found to have at least 1 matching patient photograph, with 9 correlative patient photographs ultimately chosen. Common breast asymmetries and deformities identified included ptosis, asymmetric chest wall placement, asymmetric nipple placement, and absence of the nipple. This review identified diverse artworks of varying styles spanning vast expanses of both geography and time that exhibited breast deformities and asymmetries commonly encountered in patients seeking revision of breast reconstruction. This underscores that creating the cosmetically ideal breast is difficult both in the operating room and the art studio. Importantly, the authors emphasized that the arts frequently celebrate that which is considered beautiful, although to the trained eye of a plastic surgeon that which is considered beautiful is often classified as dysmorphic or asymmetric.
Assuntos
Mamoplastia , Mastectomia , Humanos , Feminino , Mamoplastia/métodos , Mamoplastia/efeitos adversos , Mastectomia/efeitos adversos , Estética , História do Século XX , Neoplasias da Mama/cirurgia , Fotografação , Mama/cirurgia , Mama/anormalidades , História do Século XIX , Arte , Mamilos/cirurgiaRESUMO
Background: Carpal tunnel syndrome affects up to 6% of the general population, and surgical intervention is often required to ameliorate symptoms. Osteoarthritis (OA) is a common condition that often coexists with carpal tunnel syndrome. We hypothesized that patients with preexisting OA use more healthcare resources after carpal tunnel release (CTR) than patients without arthritis. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study at a single academic center between January 1, 2018 and November 1, 2021. Patients who underwent CTR were included. Preoperative carpal tunnel symptoms, diagnostic tests, medications, and concomitant OA were abstracted. Hand, wrist, and basal joint arthritis were specified. The primary outcome was healthcare utilization represented by duration and frequency of hand clinic and occupational therapy (OT) follow-up. In total, 312 hands were included. Multivariable analysis was performed. Results: The average duration of hand clinic follow-up among patients without arthritis was 25.3 days compared with 87.1 days for patients with any arthritis (P = 0.0375) and 172 days for patients with wrist arthritis (P = 0.012). The average number of postoperative surgeon visits was increased in patients with hand arthritis, with an average of 2.3 visits versus 1.34 visits for patients without arthritis (P = 0.003). Both the number of OT visits and the duration of OT follow-up did not differ between cohorts. Conclusion: After CTR, patients with preexisting OA use more healthcare resources than patients without OA.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: The effects of enhanced recovery protocols and use of tranexamic acid (TXA) to reduce postoperative complications after periareolar and double-incision (DIM) gender-affirming mastectomies have not been previously described. We sought to evaluate the efficacy of our ERP including use of liposomal bupivacaine [Exparel] in these cases, assess the efficacy of TXA in reducing postoperative complications, and compare need for revisionary surgery between periareolar and DI mastectomy techniques. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review from November 2017 to June 2022 was performed. Data were collected on patient demographics, operative data, and postoperative outcomes including complications and revisions. Morphine milligram equivalent was used to assess opioid use after surgery. RESULTS: Overall, 260 patients were included: 240 (92.3%) patients in the DI and 20 (7.7%) patients in the periareolar group. Thirty-five (7.3%) breasts in the DIM group and five (12.5%) breasts in the periareolar cohort developed complications (p = 0.220). Significantly more breasts in the periareolar cohort developed hematomas (12.5% vs. 2.9%, p = 0.011). Sixteen (3.3%) breasts in the DIM group developed seromas. Significantly more breasts in the periareolar group required revisionary surgery (15.0% vs. 5.2%, p = 0.025). Patients who received intraoperative liposomal bupivacaine [Exparel] had fewer opioids intraoperatively (p = 0.019) and at discharge (p < 0.001). Use of TXA did not affect rates of complications including hematoma or seroma. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, complication rates for periareolar and DIM are similar. However, the periareolar technique results in a significantly higher rate of hematomas and revisionary surgery. Use of intraoperative liposomal bupivacaine [Exparel] resulted in significantly lower opioid use. Lastly, use of topical TXA did not lower the risk of postoperative hematoma or seroma.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama , Mamoplastia , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides , Ferida Cirúrgica , Ácido Tranexâmico , Humanos , Feminino , Mastectomia/métodos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Ácido Tranexâmico/uso terapêutico , Mamoplastia/métodos , Analgésicos Opioides , Seroma/etiologia , Neoplasias da Mama/complicações , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/prevenção & controle , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Bupivacaína , Ferida Cirúrgica/etiologia , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides/etiologia , Hematoma/etiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Given that patients with morbid obesity are predisposed to frailty, we sought to determine whether the 5-Factor Modified Frailty Index (mFI-5) predicts postoperative complications following surgery for adult-acquired buried penis, and secondarily, to compare the mFI-5 to body mass index (BMI) and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) status as preoperative risk stratification measures. METHODS: We included all patients who underwent surgical management for adult-acquired buried penis at an academic Level I trauma center between 2015 and 2023. A manual chart review was performed to collect data on patient demographics, modified frailty index variables, intraoperative data, postoperative outcomes, and complications. RESULTS: A total of 55 patients underwent surgical repair of adult-acquired buried penis, with 26 experiencing postoperative complications (47.3%). Univariable regression analyses revealed that the mFI-5 was a significant predictor of postoperative complications (odds ratio [OR] 3.40, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.56-7.42, p = .002), ongoing postoperative urinary problems (OR 2.03, 95% CI: 1.02-4.05, p = .045), patient dissatisfaction with outcomes (OR 3.29, 95% CI: 1.35-8.02, p = .009), and persistent postoperative symptoms (OR 2.42, 95% CI: 1.10-5.35, p = .029). There was no significant association between ASA classification and postoperative complications (OR 1.59, 95% CI:.544-4.63, p = .398). Multivariable analysis demonstrated that the mFI-5 was an independent predictor of postoperative complications (OR 5.34, 95% CI: 1.80-15.9, p = .003) when controlling for BMI and age. CONCLUSION: The mFI-5 is an independent predictor of postoperative complications in patients undergoing surgical repair of adult-acquired buried penis. The simplicity of the index permits efficient preoperative risk stratification of adult-acquired buried penis patients and provides important counseling information that may not be reflected by age or BMI alone.
Assuntos
Fragilidade , Masculino , Adulto , Humanos , Fragilidade/complicações , Fragilidade/diagnóstico , Fatores de Risco , Estudos Retrospectivos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/diagnóstico , Pênis/cirurgia , Medição de RiscoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Social media is a powerful tool that has empowered plastic surgeons to easily collaborate with one another and rapidly publicize research progression. The present study investigates the relationship between academic productivity and social media presence among both integrated and independent plastic surgery programs and their faculty. METHODS: Plastic surgery programs on the American Council of Academic Plastic Surgeons website were included. Faculty were identified via review of each program's website. Following metrics of academic productivity were collected for each faculty member: h-index, i10-index, number of publications, and number of citations. Online review was then conducted to identify faculty and program Instagram and Twitter accounts, and the number of associated followers and posts. RESULTS: Integrated plastic surgery programs were more likely to have an Instagram account (p < 0.001), have higher average faculty h-index (p = 0.027), i10-index (p = 0.027), and number of publications (p = 0.042). A number of Instagram followers were significantly associated with average faculty h-index (p < 0.001), i10-index (p < 0.001), and number of publications (p < 0.001). The number of posts on a program's Instagram significantly predicted average faculty h-index (p < 0.001), i10-index (p < 0.001), and number of publications (p < 0.001). Twitter followers were significantly associated with average faculty h-index (p = 0.0397), i10-index (p = 0.0432), and number of citations (p = 0.00737). CONCLUSIONS: The present study reveals a correlation between metrics of social media popularity and academic productivity of plastic surgeons. We propose that Instagram and Twitter are effective tools with which plastic surgeons may not only publicize their clinical practice, but also rapidly disseminate important innovations among the medical community. Integrated plastic surgery programs and their faculty have significantly higher utilization of social media platforms. The number of followers and posts on a program's Instagram have a significantly positive correlation with average faculty's academic productivity. Social media platforms may empower academic plastic surgeons to disseminate their innovations on a larger scale. NO LEVEL ASSIGNED: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each submission to which Evidence-Based Medicine rankings are applicable. This excludes Review Articles, Book Reviews, and manuscripts that concern Basic Science, Animal Studies, Cadaver Studies, and Experimental Studies. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
Assuntos
Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica , Mídias Sociais , Cirurgiões , Cirurgia Plástica , Humanos , Estados UnidosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The aims of this retrospective cohort study were to assess if the Area Deprivation Index (ADI), a novel neighborhood-level socioeconomic disparities metric, is associated with follow-up non-adherence, and secondarily, determine the individual-level socioeconomic factors associated with follow-up non-adherence after treatment of distal radius fractures (DRF). METHODS: We included all patients who underwent non-operative and operative management of DRF at an academic level I trauma center between 2019 and 2021. A manual chart review was performed to collect data on ADI, sociodemographic factors, injury characteristics, conservative and surgical interventions, and healthcare utilization. RESULTS: There was a significant, weak negative Spearman-ranked correlation between ADI state deciles and clinic attendance rates (rs(220) = -.144; [95% CI: -.274, -.009] p = .032). Socioeconomic factors associated with significant differences in clinic attendance rates were having a spouse or partner (protective) (p = .007), Medicaid insurance (p = .013), male sex (p = .023), and current smokers (p = .026). Factors associated with differences in no show rates were having spouse or partner (OR .326; [95% CI: .123 - .867] p = .025), Medicaid insurance (OR 7.78; [95% CI: 2.15 - 28.2] p = .002), male sex (OR 4.09; [95% CI: 1.72 - 9.74] p = .001), and cigarette use (OR 5.07; [95% CI: 1.65 - 15.6] p = .005). CONCLUSIONS: ADI has a weak, negative correlation with clinic attendance rates following DRF treatment. Significant disparities in clinic follow-up adherence exist between patients with different marital status, insurances, sexes, and cigarette use.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The integrated plastic surgery residency match continues to be highly competitive. Every year, some candidates are former NCAA athletes. While it is challenging to balance academic and athletic responsibilities, participation in NCAA sports may be predictive of continued success. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of participation in collegiate athletics on applicant anticipated rank and academic success. METHODS: All applications received from 2017 to 2020 at a single institution were reviewed for participation in NCAA athletics (Division I-III). Our primary outcome of interest was applicant anticipated rank by letter of reference writers. Applications were also examined for demographic information, membership in AOA, number of research publications, and USMLE board certification examination scores. RESULTS: After reviewing 885 applications, 61 applicants (6.89%) were former NCAA athletes. Former NCAA involvement was associated with the highest effect on anticipated ranking (- 0.22, p=0.001). Former NCAA involvement demonstrated the highest odds of receiving an anticipated ranking in the top 5 (OR 1.83, p=0.025). We found no significant difference in research productivity between the two groups, including first authorships or USMLE Step 1 board certification exam scores. A significant difference was seen in race distribution, with forty-five (80.4%) of athlete applicants identifying as Caucasian, while 430 (56.5%) of non-athletes identified as Caucasian (p=0.012). CONCLUSION: Former athletes applying to become integrated plastic surgery residents overcome the challenges of balancing athletic and academic pursuits with a higher anticipated rank in the integrated plastic surgery match while having comparable academic achievement. Former collegiate athletes have demonstrated greater success in and after residency. Former NCAA participation demonstrated the highest odds of receiving a top-5 rank. Former NCAA applicants showed no difference in academic productivity LEVEL OF EVIDENCE V: Case series study. This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Adult acquired buried penis (AABP) is a complex condition often necessitating surgical intervention. This study seeks to examine the validity of the Wisconsin Classification System (WCS) in guiding the surgical management of AABP. Additionally, we aimed to identify which factors contribute to postoperative complications and persistent symptoms following AABP repair. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all patients who underwent surgical repair of AABP from 2015-2021 by the senior author at our institution. Patients were categorized according to anatomic characteristics using the WCS. Preoperative symptoms, postoperative symptoms, and postoperative complications were evaluated. RESULTS: Fifty-two patients underwent AABP repair. The mean age was 56.5±14.8 years, and the mean duration of follow-up was 350.0±517.4 days. The assigned preoperative WCS score was congruent with operative management in most patients (86.0%). Morbid obesity (BMI>40.0kg/m2) and postoperative complications were associated with persistent symptoms following AABP repair (p=0.026 and p=0.021, respectively). Increased WCS score was not associated with persistent postoperative symptoms (p=0.314). Morbid obesity (p=0.003), diabetes (p=0.029) and having a panniculectomy during AABP repair (p=0.046) increased the odds for developing postoperative complications. Patients with Type I AABP had significantly fewer complications than those with Type II, III, or IV (p=0.032). CONCLUSIONS: The Wisconsin Classification System serves as a preoperative guide, an educational tool for patients, and provides a framework for the discussion of intraoperative maneuvers and the likelihood of complications. It is imperative to counsel patients on the surgical management of AABP and the postoperative course, as this may permit realistic patient expectations and optimize outcomes.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Conversion of subpectoral reconstruction to the prepectoral plane has been increasing in popularity. However, there is a paucity of research assessing patient-reported outcomes following this operation. The primary aim of this study is to examine patient-reported outcomes following conversion of implants from the subpectoral to prepectoral plane through utilization of the BREAST-Q. METHODS: We retrospectively examined patients who underwent subpectoral to prepectoral implant conversion by three surgeons at two separate centers from 2017-2021. Patient demographics, primary indication for the conversion, surgical characteristics, postoperative outcomes, and BREAST-Qs were obtained. RESULTS: Sixty-eight breasts in 39 patients underwent implant conversion. The most common primary indications for implant conversion were chronic pain (41%), animation deformity (30%), and cosmetic concerns (27%). Average BREAST-Q scores improved significantly preoperatively to postoperatively in all the domains measured ("satisfaction with breasts", "satisfaction with implants", "physical well-being," "psychosocial well-being," and "sexual well-being") (p<0.01). When examined by primary indication, all cohorts had significant preoperative to postoperative score improvement in "satisfaction with breasts" (p<0.001) and "physical well-being" (p<0.01) domains. Fifteen breasts (22%) developed postoperative complications, with implant loss in 9% of breasts. CONCLUSIONS: :Conversion of subpectoral implants to the prepectoral plane significantly improves BREAST-Q outcomes in all aspects, including patient satisfaction with breasts and implants, as well as psychosocial, physical, and sexual well-being. Implant conversion to the prepectoral plane in now becoming our primary solution to most patients with chronic pain, animation deformity or cosmetic concerns after subpectoral reconstruction.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Prior studies have identified the lack of diversity within the field of plastic surgery (PS) and associated residency matches. In this study, the authors aimed to examine the effect of PS program chairs (PCs), program directors (PD), and faculty members' race and sex on PS applicants and matriculants within the same program. METHODS: Deidentified applicant data from 2017 to 2021 submitted to the University of Wisconsin-Madison's integrated PS program were analyzed. Applicants' self-reported sex and race were collected. Integrated PS program websites were assessed to determine whether applicants matched the program. Race and sex of PCs, PDs, and faculty members were collected from each program's website. RESULTS: Overall, 79 integrated PS programs' websites and 1470 applicants were reviewed. The majority of PCs, PDs, and faculty members were male (87.3%, 81.0%, and 69.6%, respectively) and white (74.7%, 70.9%, and 68.8%, respectively). Most applicants were male (54.0%) and white (60.8%). For a given program, white PCs and PDs have 5 and 6 times the odds of matching an applicant of the same race ( P <0.001 for both). Having male PCs and PDs did not significantly increase the odds of matching an applicant of the same sex ( P =0.198 and 0.905, respectively). CONCLUSION: Although the field of PS has made great strides to close the sex gap within the residency match process, this study highlights ongoing racial disparities among nonwhite applicants.
Assuntos
Internato e Residência , Cirurgia Plástica , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Cirurgia Plástica/educaçãoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Many patients are not adherent to hand therapy rehabilitation following surgical repair of traumatic flexor tendon injuries, which can negatively affect surgical outcomes and long-term hand function. We aimed to identify the factors that predict patient non-adherence to hand therapy following flexor tendon repair surgery. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included 154 patients who underwent surgical repair of flexor tendon injuries at a level I trauma center between January 2015 and January 2020. A manual chart review was performed to collect demographic data, insurance status, injury characteristics, and details of the postoperative course including health care utilization. RESULTS: Factors significantly associated with occupational therapy no-shows included Medicaid insurance (OR, 8.35; 95% CI, 2.91 to 24.0; p < 0.001), self-identified Black race (OR, 7.28; 95% CI, 1.78 to 29.7; p = 0.006), and current cigarette smoker status (OR, 2.69; 95% CI, 1.18 to 6.15; p = 0.019). Patients without insurance attended 73.8% of their OT visits and patients with Medicaid attended 72.0% of their visits, which were significantly lower rates than those with private insurance 90.7% (p=0.026 and p=0.001, respectively). Patients with Medicaid were 8 times more likely to seek emergency department care postoperatively than patients with private insurance (p=0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Significant disparities in hand therapy adherence following flexor tendon repair surgery exist between patients with different insurance statuses, races, and tobacco use. Understanding these disparities can help providers identify at-risk patients to improve hand therapy utilization and postoperative outcomes.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Abdominal donor site morbidity after autologous breast reconstruction is common and often underreported. This work aims to compare prospectively collected technical details of the procedure and patient factors and their impact on the development of symptomatic and asymptomatic abdominal bulges (ASB and SB). METHODS: A review of patients undergoing abdominal-based autologous breast reconstruction from May 2012 to October 2017 by two surgeons at a single institution was performed. Demographics, prior medical and surgical history, intraoperative data, and postoperative course were collected. Primary outcomes of interest were ASB or SB and wound healing complications. RESULTS: Overall, 196 free flaps from 117 patients were included. The average follow-up was 1.9 ± 1.7 years. Thirteen (11.1%) patients developed ASB, and 13 (11.1%) patients developed SB. Patients with BMI ≥ 30, bilateral ms-TRAM reconstruction, and an onlay type of abdominal closure were 2×, 2.3×, and 8.1× more likely to develop a bulge, respectively (p = 0.017, p = 0.010, p = 0.049). Every one-point increase in BMI above 30 increased the odds of developing a bulge by 10.8%. Prior abdominal surgery increased the risk of SB by 7-fold (p = 0.017). The size of the harvested muscle, use of mesh, or nerve preservation did not affect the rate of bulge development. CONCLUSION: High BMI, bilateral ms-TRAM, onlay type of abdominal closure, and prior abdominal surgery increase the risk of ASB and SB development to varying degrees, while several other operative variables did not seem to make a difference. Breast reconstruction patients can use this information for preoperative counseling and intraoperative decision-making.
Assuntos
Retalhos de Tecido Biológico , Mamoplastia , Humanos , Retalhos de Tecido Biológico/cirurgia , Abdome/cirurgia , Morbidade , Mamoplastia/efeitos adversos , Mamoplastia/métodos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/cirurgia , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Residency applicant assessment is imperfect, with little objectivity built into the process, which, unfortunately, impacts recruitment diversity. Linear rank modeling (LRM) is an algorithm that standardizes applicant assessment to model expert judgment. Over the last 5 years, we have used LRM to assist with screening and ranking integrated plastic surgery (PRS) residency applicants. This study's primary objective was to determine if LRM scores are predictive of match success and, secondarily, to compare LRM scores between gender and self-identified race categories. DESIGN: Data was collected on applicant demographics, traditional application metrics, global intuition rank, and match success. LRM scores were calculated for screened and interviewed applicants, and scores were compared by demographic groups. Univariate logistic regression was used to evaluate the association of LRM scores and traditional application metrics with match success. SETTING: University of Wisconsin, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. Academic institution. PARTICIPANTS: Six hundred seventeen candidates who applied to a single institution over 4 application cycles (2019-2022). RESULTS: Using area under the curve modeling, LRM score was the most predictive indicator for match success. With every one-point increase in LRM score, there was an 11% and 8.3% increase in the likelihood of screened and interviewed applicant match success (p < 0.001). An algorithm was developed to estimate the probability of match success based on LRM score. No significant differences in LRM scores were appreciated for interviewed applicant gender or self-identified race groups. CONCLUSIONS: LRM score is the most predictive indicator of match success for PRS applicants and can be used to estimate an applicant's probability of successfully matching into an integrated PRS residency. Furthermore, it provides a holistic evaluation of the applicant that can streamline the application process and improve recruitment diversity. In the future, this model could be applied to assist in the match process for other specialties.
Assuntos
Internato e Residência , Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica , Cirurgia Plástica , Humanos , Seleção de Pessoal , Cirurgia Plástica/educaçãoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: A neuropsychiatric diagnosis (ND) has the potential to affect patient satisfaction after breast reconstruction. However, literature regarding the interplay between neuropsychiatric diagnoses and revision operations after reconstruction remains sparse. In this study, we aim to determine whether neuropsychiatric diagnoses result in increased revision operations and healthcare utilization of plastic surgery resources after alloplastic and autologous breast reconstruction. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 200 patients from 2010 to 2019 who underwent postmastectomy alloplastic or autologous breast reconstruction by a single surgeon at our institution. We evaluated for the presence of neuropsychiatric diagnoses, type of neuropsychiatric diagnoses, number of revisions, and number of postreconstruction plastic surgery appointments. Continuous variables were compared using independent samples t tests, and categorical variables were compared using χ 2 tests. RESULTS: Of the 196 patients who met inclusion criteria, the majority underwent at least one revision (65.3%). The presence of an ND did not predict a higher number of revision operations ( P = 0.512) nor was the timing of the diagnosis (preoperative vs postoperative) significantly associated with the number of revision procedures ( P = 0.156). The patients who had a ND at any point during the reconstructive process had a significantly higher number of plastic surgery appointments and a longer duration of follow-up compared with the patients without any neuropsychiatric diagnoses ( P = 0.009 and P = 0.040, respectively). Complications did not impact the number of revision operations ( P = 0.780). CONCLUSIONS: Neuropsychiatric diagnoses do not significantly influence the number of revision operations after breast reconstruction. However, neuropsychiatric diagnoses result in increased healthcare utilization of plastic surgery resources that may lead to increased healthcare costs.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama , Mamoplastia , Humanos , Feminino , Reoperação , Mastectomia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Neoplasias da Mama/cirurgia , Mamoplastia/métodosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Publication in peer-reviewed journals is a duty and privilege. It is essential to the advancement of evidence-based medicine and often used as a proxy for academic achievement, contributing to decisions around promotion in academia. Within plastic surgery, authors have historically been male surgeons affiliated with academic institutions, lacking representation of women, private practice, medical students, and international collaboration. This study analyzes differences in authors' gender, practice affiliation, degree of education, and international collaboration in articles published in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, which was chosen as the representative journal given its high impact factor (3.946) and consistent ranking as the number one journal in plastic surgery worldwide. METHODS: A list of Breast, Cosmetic, and Hand/Peripheral Nerve articles published between 2006 and 2019 was compiled from the online archive of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. Demographic author characteristics were recorded, and statistical analyses were performed to identify trends over time. RESULTS: A total of 2688 articles were analyzed. The proportion of articles written by female authors in the Breast category, authors in private practice with academic affiliation in the Cosmetic section, and U.S. collaboration with other countries increased over time (p = 0.038, p = 0.029, p < 0.001, respectively). First authors with bachelor's, master's, and doctorate degrees have also been contributing increasingly. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis revealed increasing demographic heterogeneity of authors in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery over time, with increasing contributions from women, surgeons in private practice with academic affiliation, medical students, and international collaborations. The Journal is capturing contributions from an increasingly diverse authorship, consistent with the changing demographics of plastic surgeons.