RESUMO
Individual therapeutic monitoring of busulfan (BU) minimizes its toxicity and improves the therapeutic outcomes during hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). For individual dose adjustment, several blood collections are performed that are uncomfortable for patients. The aim of this pilot study was to validate a laboratory method for quantification of BU in saliva and to present the results obtained using this protocol in HSCT patients. We performed analyses of selectivity, precision and accuracy of saliva with standard concentrations of BU using ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography with diode array detection. We also determined salivary and plasmatic concentrations of BU in six HSCT patients. Saliva exhibited excellent selectivity, precision and accuracy for quantification of BU. In the patient samples, significant correlations were noted between plasmatic and salivary concentrations of BU (r=0.97, P<0.001 in the test dose; r=0.93, P<0.001 in the adjusted dose). Passing &Bablok regression revealed good agreement between the two methods (R2=0.956 for test dose; R2=0.927 for adjusted dose). In conclusion, the saliva is safe for laboratory BU measurement. The good agreement with plasma encourages further clinical studies using saliva for BU therapeutic monitoring.
Assuntos
Bussulfano/administração & dosagem , Bussulfano/farmacocinética , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas , Saliva/metabolismo , Condicionamento Pré-Transplante , Adulto , Aloenxertos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Projetos PilotoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to identify and quantify polyomaviruses (BKPyV and JCPyV) in the saliva, mouthwash, blood and urine of liver pretransplant patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A case-control study was performed using a convenience sample of 21 end-stage liver disease patients (EG = experimental group) and 20 normoreactive controls (CG = control group). In total, 162 samples were collected. Detection and quantification of polyomaviruses were performed using real-time PCR method. RESULTS: In the EG, 21 samples (25%) were positive for BKPyV and 10 (11.90%) for JCPyV, while in the CG, 27 samples (34.61%) were positive for BKPyV and six (7.69%) for JCPyV. With regard to the number of samples positive for BKPyV and JCPyV, there was no statistically significant difference between EG and CG (p = .52 and p = .25). In the EG, we observed a panorama similar to that of the CG regarding the presence of polyomaviruses in mouthwash, blood and urine. The greatest difference between the samples was that regarding the identification of BKPyV in saliva. CONCLUSION: Cirrhotic patients on the liver transplant waiting list did not show higher prevalence of BKPyV and JCPyV compared to normoreactive controls.
Assuntos
Vírus BK/isolamento & purificação , Vírus JC/isolamento & purificação , Infecções por Polyomavirus/virologia , Saliva/virologia , Infecções Tumorais por Vírus/virologia , Adulto , Sangue/virologia , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Doença Hepática Terminal/cirurgia , Feminino , Humanos , Transplante de Fígado , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Período Pré-Operatório , Urina/virologia , Carga ViralRESUMO
Oral mucositis is a painful condition that occurs in 80% of patients who undergo haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Our objective was to determine the impact of mucositis on quality of life (QoL) of patients subjected to HSCT treated with low-level laser therapy (LLLT). Patients were evaluated: (1) on the first day of treatment; (2) 5 days after autologous or 8 days after allogeneic transplantation; (3) once bone marrow had integrated; and (4) 30 days after discharge. Clinical evaluation was performed using the World Health Organization criteria; oral health QoL was measured using the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14); and mucositis symptoms with the Patient-Reported Oral Mucositis Symptom (PROMS) scale. The higher the score, the lower the patient's QoL. The OHIP-14 responses showed that at D + 5/D + 8, all domains had the highest scores, while at times 1 and 4, the scores were lower. In the PROMS scale, all domains scored worst at time 2, and the differences between the scores at the four times were statistically significant. The study has shown that QoL improves over time in patients undergoing LLLT therapy for mucositis prevention.