Pediatric Le Fort, Zygomatic, and Naso-Orbito-Ethmoid Fractures.

Fractures of the pediatric midface are infrequent, particularly in children in the primary dentition, due to the prominence of the upper face relative to the midface and mandible. With downward and forward growth of the face, there is an increasing frequency of midface injuries seen in children in the mixed and adult dentitions. Midface fracture patterns seen in young children are quite variable; those in children at or near skeletal maturity mimic patterns seen in adults. Non-displaced injuries can typically be managed with observation. Displaced fractures require treatment with appropriate reduction and fixation and longitudinal follow-up to evaluate growth.

Orthognathic Surgery in Patients with Syndromic Craniosynostosis.

Patients with syndromic and nonsyndromic synostosis may have end-stage skeletal discrepancies involving the lower midface and mandible, with associated malocclusion. While orthognathic surgical procedures in this population can be reliably executed, the surgeon must be aware of the unique morphologic characteristics that accompany the primary diagnoses as well as the technical challenges associated with performing Le Fort I osteotomies in patients who have undergone prior subcranial midface distraction.

Accuracy and Reliability of 4D-CT and Flexible Laryngoscopy in Upper Airway Evaluation in Robin Sequence.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the performance of 4-dimensional computed tomography (4D-CT) in assessing upper airway obstruction (UAO) in patients with Robin sequence (RS) and compare the accuracy and reliability of 4D-CT and flexible fiber-optic laryngoscopy (FFL). STUDY DESIGN: Prospective survey of retrospective clinical data. SETTING: Single, tertiary care pediatric hospital. METHODS: At initial and 30-day time points, a multidisciplinary group of 11 clinicians who treat RS rated UAO severity in 32 sets of 4D-CT visualizations and FFL videos (dynamic modalities) and static CT images. Raters assessed UAO at the velopharynx and oropharynx (1 = none to 5 = complete) and noted confidence levels of each rating. Intraclass correlation and Krippendorff alpha were used to assess intra- and interrater reliability, respectively. Accuracy was assessed by comparing clinician ratings with quantitative percentage constriction (QPC) ratings, calculated based on 4D-CT airway cross-sectional area. Results were compared using Wilcoxon rank-sum and signed-rank tests. RESULTS: There was similar intrarater agreement (moderate to substantial) with 4D-CT and FFL, and both demonstrated fair interrater agreement. Both modalities underestimated UAO severity, although 4D-CT ratings were significantly more accurate, as determined by QPC similarity, than FFL (-1.06 and -1.46 vs QPC ratings, P = .004). Overall confidence levels were similar for 4D-CT and FFL, but other specialists were significantly less confident in FFL ratings than were otolaryngologists (2.25 and 3.92, P < .0001). CONCLUSION: Although 4D-CT may be more accurate in assessing the degree of UAO in patients with RS, 4D-CT and FFL assessments demonstrate similar reliability. Additionally, 4D-CT may be interpreted with greater confidence by nonotolaryngologists who care for these patients.

Global Interest in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery: Analysis of Google Trends Data.

PURPOSE: Oral and maxillofacial surgery (OMS) has an expansive scope, with myriad diagnoses treated by practicing surgeons. Patients and referring providers are increasingly turning to Web-based sources to find information about clinical conditions before consultations or in conjunction with ongoing care. The purpose of this study was to examine the current trends of public interest of OMS procedures as assessed by online search trends. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional study of Internet search data obtained via Google Trends (GT; Alphabet, Mountain View, CA) was conducted. Data were collected using GT for OMS-related search terms between January 2004 and May 2019. The search terms used in the analysis were "wisdom teeth," "TMJ," "dental implants," "jaw surgery," "jaw fracture," "facial trauma," and "facial cosmetic surgery," defined to be the core surgical aspects of OMS based on public awareness campaigns sponsored by the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Relative search volumes, trends over time, geographic trends, and seasonal trends were analyzed. For all analyses, P ≤ .05 was considered significant. RESULTS: Overall search volume trends for OMS procedures showed an increase over time, with seasonal and geographic trends. "Wisdom teeth" was the most searched term and had the greatest increase in search volume over time. "Facial trauma" was the least searched term, with no appreciable trend over time. Geographic search volume was greatest in the United States. Seasonal changes were most apparent with searches for "wisdom teeth" and "jaw surgery." CONCLUSIONS: Analysis of GT data shows substantial interest in core OMS procedures, with seasonal variations noted for certain areas of practice (third molars and jaw surgery) and consistent interest in other areas (facial cosmetic surgery, dental implant reconstruction, and temporomandibular disorders). The use of GT data may be a powerful tool for predicting demand for OMS services and for public education campaigns.

Transmucosal Pterygomaxillary Separation in the Le Fort I Osteotomy.

The Le Fort I osteotomy is a versatile operation for correction of developmental, congenital, and posttraumatic deformities of the lower midface. One of the challenges of the osteotomy is pterygomaxillary separation, with the potential for unfavorable fractures to the orbit/skull base or vascular injury. A modified technique for pterygomaxillary disjunction is the transmucosal tuberosity osteotomy. The authors have used this technique for pterygomaxillary separation in 200 consecutive Le Fort I osteotomies over a 3-year period (2014 to 2017). There were no episodes of unfavorable propagation to the skull base or orbit, oroantral or oronasal fistulae, excessive bleeding/vessel injuries, or vascular insufficiency to the maxilla. The transmucosal tuberosity approach is a reliable and safe method of performing the pterygomaxillary separation during the Le Fort I osteotomy.

Technical Modifications Specific to the Cleft Le Fort I Osteotomy.

PURPOSE: To discuss technical modifications specific to the cleft Le Fort I osteotomy that improve mobilization and demonstrate the stability of the maxilla at the Le Fort I level in a cohort of patients with cleft palate (with or without cleft lip) who underwent traditional maxillary advancement. METHODS: This was a retrospective evaluation of patients with cleft palate (+/- cleft lip) who underwent orthognathic surgery for management of skeletal malocclusions. All study subjects had a Le Fort I osteotomy +/- bilateral mandibular sagittal split osteotomies. The cleft Le Fort I osteotomy technique is modified to extensively release fibrous tissue and scar from the posterior maxilla, including around the tuberosity, along the posterior maxillary sinus wall, and circumferentially around the descending palatine canal. Maxillary position was assessed using angular and linear measurements pre-operatively (T0), immediately post-operatively (T1), and at 1-year post-operatively (T2). Descriptive and bivariate statistics were computed; a P < 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients with cleft palate (with or without cleft lip) were included. The sample's mean age was 18.9 ±â€Š1.4 years and included 11 females. The majority of subjects (64.3%) underwent bimaxillary surgery; eight subjects (28.6%) had segmental maxillary surgery and 14 subjects (50%) had simultaneous maxillary interpositional bone grafting. The mean maxillary sagittal advancement was 6.1 mm (range: 0-10 mm). At 1-year post-operatively, the absolute change in SNA was 0.7 ±â€Š0.9 degrees; the absolute change in maxillary sagittal position was 0.8 ±â€Š0.6 mm. There was no association between the magnitude of advancement and the magnitude of position change (P = 0.86). Stability was not influenced by segmental surgery, bone grafting, or bimaxillary surgery (P > 0.33). CONCLUSION: Using a modified technique with extensive release of posterior scar and graduated intra-operative traction, maxillary advancement of up to 10 mm can be performed in patients with cleft palate (± cleft lip) with sagittal relapse of < 1 mm at 1-year post-operatively.

Is Formal Research Training Associated With Academic Success in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery?

PURPOSE: Pursuing promotion in academic rank and seeking funded research opportunities are core elements of academic practice. Our purpose was to assess whether formal research training influences academic rank or National Institutes of Health (NIH) funding among full-time academic oral and maxillofacial surgeons (OMSs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional study of full-time academic OMSs in the United States. The primary predictor variable was completion of formal research training, defined as a research fellowship or advanced non-clinical doctoral research degree (PhD, DMSc, DPH, DPhil, ScD). The outcomes measures were current academic rank and successful acquisition of NIH funding (yes vs no). Other study variables included MD degree, clinical fellowship training, years since training completion, and Hirsch index (H-index), a measure of academic productivity. We computed the descriptive, bivariate, and multiple regression models and set P ≤ .05 as significant. RESULTS: A total of 299 full-time academic OMSs were included in the study sample. Of the 299 OMSs, 41 (13.7%) had had formal research training. Surgeons with formal research training had a greater mean interval since completion of training (P = 0.01) and had a greater mean H-index (P = 0.02). Formal research training was not associated with academic rank (P = .10) but was associated with an increased likelihood of receiving NIH funding (P < .001). In a multiple logistic regression model, after adjusting for years since completing training and H-index, formal research training was associated with an increased likelihood of obtaining NIH funding (odds ratio, 3.22; 95% confidence interval, 1.15 to 9.00; P = .03). CONCLUSIONS: Among academic OMSs, those with formal research training had greater success with obtaining NIH funding. However, formal research training did not appear to influence an OMS's current academic rank.

Distraction Osteogenesis Normalizes Mandibular Body-Symphysis Morphology in Infants With Robin Sequence.

PURPOSE: To evaluate changes in mandibular morphology in infants with Robin sequence (RS) after mandibular distraction osteogenesis (MDO) and compare the post-distraction morphology with that in infants without RS and infants with RS who had not undergone MDO. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Infants with RS treated with MDO were retrospectively evaluated over a 12-year period. All patients had pre-distraction and end-consolidation maxillofacial computed tomograms. Morphologic features of the mandible were divided into ramus and condyle, body and symphysis, and composite measurements. Post-distraction RS mandibular morphology was compared with pre-distraction morphology, as well as to age-matched infants without RS and age-matched infants with RS who had not undergone MDO. Comparisons were done using nonparametric paired-samples analyses. RESULTS: During the study period, 17 patients with RS treated with MDO met the inclusion criteria for the study. The mean ages at distraction and end-consolidation were 1.95 ± 3.24 and 8.46 ± 5.99 months, respectively. The post-MDO mandible was significantly different from the pre-MDO mandible with regard to the ramps-condyle unit and body-symphysis measurements, including development of a more parabolic mandibular arch form (P ≤ .001). Compared with age-matched non-RS infant mandibles, the post-distraction RS mandibles had similar morphologies. Compared with age-matched non-MDO RS mandibles, the post-distraction mandibles had significantly different morphologies anterior to the gonial angle, including a more parabolic arch form (P ≤ .006). CONCLUSIONS: MDO normalized mandibular morphology in infants with RS, with the greatest effect on measurements anterior to the gonial angle.

Which Factors Affect Citation Rates in the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Literature?

PURPOSE: Citation rate is one of several tools to measure academic productivity. The purposes of this study were to estimate and identify factors associated with citation rates in the oral and maxillofacial surgery (OMS) literature. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective longitudinal study of publications in the Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (JOMS), International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (IJOMS), and Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, and Oral Radiology (OOOO) from January through December 2012. The predictor variables were author- and article-specific factors. The outcome variable was the citation rate, defined as the total number of citations for each article over a 4-year period. Descriptive, bivariate, and multiple regression statistics were computed. RESULTS: The authors identified 993 articles published during 2012. The mean number of citations at 4 years after publication was 5.6 ± 5.3 (median, 4). In bivariate analyses, several author- and article-specific factors were associated with citation rates. In a multiple regression model adjusting for potential confounders and effect modifiers, first author H-index, number of authors, journal, OMS focus area, and Oxford level of evidence were significantly associated with citation rate (P ≤ .002). CONCLUSION: The authors identified 5 factors associated with citation rates in the OMS literature. These factors should be considered in context when evaluating citation-based metrics for OMS. Studies that focus on core OMS procedures (eg, dentoalveolar surgery, dental implant surgery), are published in specialty-specific journals (eg, JOMS or IJOMS), and have higher levels of evidence are more likely to be cited.

The Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Anesthesia Team Model.

Oral and maxillofacial surgeons have been providing safe anesthesia to their patients using the anesthesia team model; this has allowed access to care for patients that have significant anxiety. The AAOMS strives to maintain the excellent safety record of the anesthesia team model by creating simulation programs in anesthesia, regularly updating the office anesthesia evaluation program, convening anesthesia safety conferences and strengthening the standards in our training programs. Through these efforts, our delivery of anesthesia to our patients will remain safe and effective.

Lymphatic malformations: current cellular and clinical investigations.

OBJECTIVE: Summarize current knowledge of lymphatic malformation development, biology, and clinical outcome measures. METHODS: Panel presentation of lymphatic malformation biology and measurement of head and neck malformation treatment outcomes. RESULTS: Characterization of lymphatic malformation endothelial and stromal cells may lead to biologically based treatment. Traditionally, lymphatic malformation treatment outcomes have been measured according to reduction of malformation size. Currently, methods to measure functional outcomes following lymphatic malformation treatment are lacking. This is particularly apparent when the malformation directly involves the upper aerodigestive tract. CONCLUSIONS: The etiology and pathogenesis of head and neck lymphatic malformations are poorly understood, but understanding is improving through ongoing investigation. Reduction of lymphatic malformation size is generally possible, but further work is necessary to optimize methods for measuring therapeutic outcomes in problematic areas.

Lymphatic malformations: review of current treatment.

OBJECTIVE: Summarize current knowledge of lymphatic malformation medical, sclerotherapy, and surgical treatment; and highlight areas of treatment controversy and treatment difficulty that need improvement. METHODS: Panel presentation of various aspects of lymphatic malformation treatment. RESULTS: The mainstay of lymphatic malformation treatment has been surgical resection, which has been refined through lesion staging and radiographic characterization. Intralesional sclerotherapy in macrocystic lymphatic malformations is effective. Suprahyoid microcystic lymphatic malformations are more difficult to treat than macrocystic lymphatic malformations in the infrahyoid and posterior cervical regions. Bilateral suprahyoid lymphatic malformations require staged treatment to prevent complications. Lymphatic malformation treatment planning is primarily determined by the presence or possibility of functional compromise. Problematic areas include chronic lymphatic malformation inflammation, dental health maintenance, macroglossia, airway obstruction, and dental malocclusion. CONCLUSIONS: Lymphatic malformation treatment improvements have been made through radiographic characterization and staging of lymphatic malformations. Direct malformation involvement of the upper aerodigestive tract can cause significant functional compromise that is difficult to treat.