RESUMO
Postoperative junctional ectopic tachycardia (JET) is a frequent complication after pediatric cardiac surgery. Current recommendations on how and when to treat JET are inconsistent. We evaluated the management strategies of postoperative JET in German-speaking countries. We sent an online survey to 30 centers of pediatric cardiology that perform surgery for congenital heart defects in Germany (24), Austria (4), and Switzerland (2). The survey asked 18 questions about how and in what treatment sequence postoperative JET was managed. All 30 centers completed the survey (100% return rate). There was general agreement that the management of JET is based on administration of antiarrhythmic drugs, body surface cooling, and temporary pacing. Many centers presented treatment algorithms based on published literature, all centers named amiodarone as the first drug of choice. Significant disagreement was found concerning the timing and sequential order of additional therapeutic measures and particularly about the dosing of amiodarone and the role of R-wave synchronized atrial pacing. CONCLUSION: This survey reveals that from center to center, the treatment of postoperative JET may vary substantially. Future work should focus on those treatment modalities where a high rate of variation is found. Such studies may be of value to achieve commonly adopted treatment recommendations. What is known: ⢠Treatment of postoperative junctional ectopic tachycardia is predominantly based on administration of antiarrhythmic drugs, therapeutic cooling, and temporary pacing. ⢠Amiodarone is the antiarrhythmic drug of choice in this context. What is new: ⢠Dosing and duration of administration of amiodarone differ relevantly from center to center. ⢠The sequential order of drug administration, therapeutic cooling, and pacing is not consistent.
Assuntos
Amiodarona/administração & dosagem , Antiarrítmicos/administração & dosagem , Estimulação Cardíaca Artificial/métodos , Crioterapia/métodos , Taquicardia Ectópica de Junção/terapia , Áustria , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos/efeitos adversos , Criança , Alemanha , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Humanos , Lactente , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/terapia , Suíça , Taquicardia Ectópica de Junção/prevenção & controleRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Junctional ectopic tachycardia is a frequent complication after pediatric cardiac surgery. A uniform definition of postoperative junctional ectopic tachycardia has yet to be established in the literature. The objective of this study is to analyze differences in the general and age-related prevalence of postoperative junctional ectopic tachycardia according to different diagnostic definitions. DESIGN: Data files and electrocardiograms of 743 patients (age, 1 d to 17.6 yr) who underwent surgery for congenital heart disease during a 3-year period were reviewed. The prevalence of postoperative junctional ectopic tachycardia in this cohort was determined according to six different definitions identified in the literature and one definition introduced for analytical purposes. Agreement between the definitions was analyzed according to Cohen κ coefficients. A receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed to determine the ability of different definitions to discriminate between patients with increased postoperative morbidity and without. SETTING: A university-affiliated tertiary pediatric cardiac PICU. PATIENTS: Infants and children who underwent heart surgery. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The prevalence of postoperative junctional ectopic tachycardia ranged from 2.0% to 8.3% according to the seven different definitions. Even among definitions for which the general prevalence was almost equal, the distribution according to age varied. Most definitions used a frequency criterion to define postoperative junctional ectopic tachycardia. Definitions based on a fixed frequency criterion did not identify cases of postoperative junctional ectopic tachycardia in patients older than 12 months. The grade of agreement was moderate or poor between definitions using a fixed or dynamic frequency criterion and those not based on a critical heart rate (κ = 0.37-0.66). In the receiver operating characteristic analysis, the definition with a fixed frequency criterion of 180 beats/min or an age-related frequency criterion according to the 95th percentile showed the optimal cut-off value to determine increased postoperative morbidity. CONCLUSIONS: Different definitions of junctional ectopic tachycardia after pediatric cardiac surgery lead to relevant differences in the reported prevalence and age distribution pattern. A uniform definition of postoperative junctional ectopic tachycardia is needed to provide comparable study results and to improve the diagnosis of junctional ectopic tachycardia in pediatric patients.
Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/diagnóstico , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Taquicardia Ectópica de Junção/diagnóstico , Taquicardia Ectópica de Junção/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Eletrocardiografia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Prevalência , Curva ROC , Estudos Retrospectivos , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Taquicardia Ectópica de Junção/etiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Postoperative junctional ectopic tachycardia (JET) occurs frequently after pediatric cardiac surgery. R-wave synchronized atrial (AVT) pacing is used to re-establish atrioventricular synchrony. AVT pacing is complex, with technical pitfalls. We sought to establish and to test a low-cost simulation model suitable for training and analysis in AVT pacing. METHODS: A simulation model was developed based on a JET simulator, a simulation doll, a cardiac monitor, and a pacemaker. A computer program simulated electrocardiograms. Ten experienced pediatric cardiologists tested the model. Their performance was analyzed using a testing protocol with 10 working steps. RESULTS: Four testers found the simulation model realistic; 6 found it very realistic. Nine claimed that the trial had improved their skills. All testers considered the model useful in teaching AVT pacing. The simulation test identified 5 working steps in which major mistakes in performance test may impede safe and effective AVT pacing and thus permitted specific training. The components of the model (exclusive monitor and pacemaker) cost less than $50. Assembly and training-session expenses were trivial. CONCLUSIONS: A realistic, low-cost simulation model of AVT pacing is described. The model is suitable for teaching and analyzing AVT pacing technique.