RESUMO
PURPOSE: Acute vasodilator testing is recommended in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension to identify individuals who may benefit from long-term treatment with oral calcium channel blockers. The aim of this study was to investigate the use of vardenafil in acute vasoreactivity testing compared to adenosine. METHODS: A total of 20 patients eligible for right heart catheterisation were enrolled. Acute vasoreactivity testing was carried out with intravenous (iv) adenosine (n = 18) followed by oral vardenafil (n = 20). Haemodynamic responses were recorded at baseline and after 60 min (vardenafil). Responders were defined according to consensus guideline criteria. RESULTS: Both vardenafil and adenosine significantly decreased mean pulmonary arterial pressure (mPAP, p < 0.001 and p = 0.026, respectively) and pulmonary vascular resistance (p < 0.001 and p > 0.001, respectively), and significantly increased cardiac output (p = 0.001 and p = 0.005, respectively). Vardenafil reduced mPAP more than adenosine (p = 0.044), while adenosine resulted in higher responses of cardiac index (p = 0.009) and pulmonary arterial oxygen saturation (p = 0.042). Acute adverse reactions were common with adenosine, while no side effects were observed after a single oral dose vardenafil. Vardenafil identified five responders (out of 20), while adenosine identified three responders (out of 18). During a 7-year follow-up, vardenafil responders had significantly lower NT-proBNP levels compared to non-responders. CONCLUSIONS: Vardenafil may be safely used for acute vasoreactivity testing in patients with PH. A single oral dose of vardenafil is better tolerated than iv adenosine and may identify additional responders who could benefit from long-term vasodilator treatment.