Broncho biliary fistula following interventional radiology for hepatic metastases.

Bronchobiliary fistulas are defined as an abnormal communication between the biliary system and the bronchial tree. They are extremely rare complications of radiofrequency or microwave ablation. A 39-year-old woman with a history of neuroendocrine pancreatic carcinoma suffering from liver metastasis was treated with microwave ablation (MWA). In this case report, we present a case of intractable biliptysis from a bronchobiliary fistula secondary to an MWA. The patient was diagnosed by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatograph and hepatobiliary scintigraphy. Treatment involved a right hemihepatectomy, a redo-hepaticojejunostomy, and the surgical placement of a transhepatic drain. After 6 weeks of drain placement, this could be removed. The fistula was thus successfully treated.

A critical appraisal of the ISGLS definition of biliary leakage after liver resection.

PURPOSE: The International Study Group of Liver Surgery (ISGLS) defined post-hepatectomy biliary leakage as drain/serum bilirubin ratio > 3 at day 3 or the interventional/surgical revision due to biliary peritonitis. We investigated the definition's applicability. METHODS: A retrospective evaluation of all liver resections over a 6-year period was performed. ROC analyses were performed for drain/serum bilirubin ratios on days 1, 2, and 3 including grade A to C (analysis I) and grade B and C biliary leakages (analysis II) to test specific cutoff values. RESULTS: A total of 576 patients were included. One hundred nine (18.9%) postoperative bile leakages occurred (19.6% of the whole population grade A, 16.5% grade B/C). Areas under the curve (AUC) for analysis I were 0.841 (day 1), 0.846 (day 2), and 0.734 (day 3). The highest sensitivity (78% on day 1/77% on day 2) and specificity (78% on day 1/79% on day 2) in analysis I were obtained for a drain/serum bilirubin ratio of 2.0. AUCs for analysis II were similar: 0.788 (day 1), 0.791 (day 2), and 0.650 (day 3). The highest sensitivity (73% on day 1/71% on day 2) and specificity (74% on day 1/76% on day 2) in analysis II were detected for a drain/serum bilirubin ratio of 2.0 on postoperative day 2. CONCLUSION: Biliary leakages should be defined if the drain/serum bilirubin ratio is > 2.0 on postoperative day 2.

Low Platelet Count Predicts Reduced Survival in Potentially Resectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

The prognostic role of platelet count in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains unclear, and in fact both thrombocytopenia and thrombocytosis are reported as predictors of unfavourable outcomes. This study aimed to clarify the prognostic value of preoperative platelet count in potentially resectable HCC. We retrospectively reviewed 128 patients who underwent hepatic resection for HCC at a tertiary academic centre (2007−2019). Patient data were modelled by regression analysis, and platelet count was treated as a continuous variable. 89 patients had BCLC 0/A tumours and 39 had BCLC B tumours. Platelet count was higher in patients with larger tumours and lower in patients with higher MELD scores, advanced fibrosis, and portal hypertension (p < 0.001 for all listed variables). After adjusting for BCLC stage and tumour diameter, low platelet count associated with reduced overall survival (hazard ratio 1.25 per 50/nL decrease in platelet count, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.02−1.53, p = 0.034) and increased perioperative mortality (odds ratio 1.96 per 50/nL decrease in platelet count, 95% CI 1.19−3.53, p = 0.014). Overall, low platelet count correlates with increased liver disease severity, inferior survival, and excess perioperative mortality in resectable HCC. These insights might be applied in clinical practice to better select patients for resection.

DIALAPP: a prospective validation of a new diagnostic algorithm for acute appendicitis.

PURPOSE: The management of patients with suspected appendicitis remains a challenge in daily clinical practice, and the optimal management algorithm is still being debated. Negative appendectomy rates (NAR) continue to range between 10 and 15%. This prospective study evaluated the accuracy of a diagnostic pathway in acute appendicitis using clinical risk stratification (Alvarado score), routine ultrasonography, gynecology consult for females, and selected CT after clinical reassessment. METHODS: Patients presenting with suspected appendicitis between November 2015 and September 2017 from age 18 years and above were included. Decision-making followed a clear management pathway. Patients were followed up for 6 months after discharge. The hypothesis was that the algorithm can reduce the NAR to a value of under 10%. RESULTS: A total of 183 patients were included. In 65 of 69 appendectomies, acute appendicitis was confirmed by histopathology, corresponding to a NAR of 5.8%. Notably, all 4 NAR appendectomies had other pathologies of the appendix. The perforation rate was 24.6%. Only 36 patients (19.7%) received a CT scan. The follow-up rate after 30 days achieved 69%, including no patients with missed appendicitis. The sensitivity and specificity of the diagnostic pathway was 100% and 96.6%, respectively. The potential saving in costs can be as much as 19.8 million €/100,000 cases presenting with the suspicion of appendicitis. CONCLUSION: The risk-stratified diagnostic algorithm yields a high diagnostic accuracy for patients with suspicion of appendicitis. Its implementation can safely reduce the NAR, simultaneously minimizing the use of CT scans and optimizing healthcare-related costs in the treatment of acute appendicitis. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02627781 (December 2015).

[Introduction of an interdisciplinary tumor board leads to improvement of treatment outcome of cholangiocarcinoma (bile duct cancer)]. / Einführung eines interdisziplinären Tumorboards führt zur Verbesserung der Behandlungsergebnisse von Cholangio- und Gallenblasenkarzinomen.

BACKGROUND: Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA, bile duct cancer) is a rare malignant disease with a poor prognosis. For several years interdisciplinary tumor boards (TuB) with the participation of experts from various disciplines have been organized to optimize medical treatment for patients suffering from oncological diseases. OBJECTIVE: This study addressed the question whether the introduction of TuB leads to a better life expectancy and quality of life for patients with CCA. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this retrospective study 161 patients treated for CCA were investigated. The patient collective was divided in two groups (TuB+ vs. TuB-) and a propensity score matching was carried out. RESULTS: The patient group TuB+ included 109 patients (67.7%) and the control group (TuB-) included 52 patients (32.3%). Using propensity score matching 84 patients in the TuB+ and 50 in the TuB group were identified and matched. The survival rates of the matched patients demonstrated an advantage for patients in the TuB+ group (1-year survival rate 61.9%, 5­year survival rate 23.6%, 10-year survival rate 18.0%) over patients in the TuB-group (1-year survival rate 32.0%, 5­year survival rate 8.0%, 10-year survival rate 0%) with p < 0.001. The results of the univariate (hazard ratio, HR 0.513, 95% confidence interval, CI 0.350-0.751, p = 0.001) and the multivariate Cox proportional hazard models (HR 0.459, 95% CI 0.303-0.694, p < 0.001) showed a significant benefit in survival for patients in the TuB+ group. CONCLUSION: This article shows that the introduction of a TuB meeting can provide a measurable benefit for patients with CCA. Hence it is recommended that all cases of patients with CCA should be discussed in a TuB.

Characteristics and management of penetrating abdominal injuries in a German level I trauma center.

PURPOSE: Penetrating abdominal injuries caused by stabbing or firearms are rare in Germany, thus there is lack of descriptive studies. The management of hemodynamically stable patients is still under dispute. The aim of this study is to review and improve our management of penetrating abdominal injuries. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed a 10-year period from the Trauma Registry of our level I trauma center. The data of all patients regarding demographics, clinical and outcome parameters were examined. Further, charts were reviewed for FAST and CT results and correlated with intraoperative findings. RESULTS: A total of 115 patients with penetrating abdominal trauma (87.8% men) were analyzed. In 69 patients, the injuries were caused by interpersonal violence and included 88 stab and 4 firearm wounds. 8 patients (6.9%) were in a state of shock at presentation. 52 patients (44.8%) suffered additional extraabdominal injuries. 38 patients were managed non-operatively, while almost two-thirds of all patients underwent surgical treatment. Hereof, 20 laparoscopies and 3 laparotomies were nontherapeutic. There were two missed injuries, but no patient experienced morbidity or mortality related to delay in treatment. 106 (92.2%) FAST and 91 (79.3%) CT scans were performed. Sensitivity and specificity of FAST were 59.4 and 94.2%, while those of CT were 93.2 and 85.1%, respectively. CONCLUSION: In hemodynamically stable patients presenting with penetrating abdominal trauma, CT is indicated and the majority of injuries can be managed conservatively. If surgical treatment is required, diagnostic laparoscopy for stable patients is feasible to avoid nontherapeutic laparotomy.

The Safety Level of Total Central Venous Access Port Implantation Performed by Residents.

OBJECTIVE: The implantation of totally implantable venous access ports (TIVAPs) is one of the first procedures surgical residents learn. Complications after implantation procedures have a major impact on patient outcomes, as it may lead to a delay of chemotherapy regimens or of parenteral nutrition. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes after totally implantable venous access ports implantations done by resident and attending surgeons. DESIGN: The study was performed as a retrospective analysis. SETTING: The study took place in primary care at the Department of General and Visceral Surgery at Frankfurt University Hospital. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 760 primary totally implantable venous access ports implantations performed between March 2008 and December 2016 were included in a database. Three groups of surgeons doing the implantations were defined: Group A (residents alone), Group B (resident with help), and Group C (attending surgeons). RESULTS: There was a significant difference between the surgeon groups in operation time (p < 0.001). The groups differed between Group A (mean, 49; SD, 22) and Group C (mean, 39; SD, 20); p < 0.001) and Group B (mean, 53; SD, 23) and Group C (mean, 39; SD, 20; p < 0.001). The incidence of surgical site infections between Groups A and C (3.6% vs. 0.3%; p = 0.003) and Groups B and C (2.5% vs. 0.3%; p = 0.027) differed also significantly. Based on multivariable logistic regression analysis operation time in minutes (OR, 1.04; 95%CI, 1.03-1.06; p < 0.001) was an independent risk factor for any intraoperative complications. For any postoperative complications younger age of the patient (OR, 0.98; 95%CI, 0.97-0.99; p = 0.004) and benign primary disease (OR, 3.25; 95%CI, 1.55-6.64; p = 0.002) were independent risk factors based on multivariable regression analysis. Based on multivariable regression analysis a lower body mass index of the patient (OR, 0.93; 95%CI, 0.86-0.99; p = 0.044), benign primary disease (OR, 2.89; 95%CI, 1.07-7.79; p = 0.036), and no chemotherapy (OR, 3.55; 95%CI, 1.50-8.39; p = 0.004) were independent risk factors for postoperative catheter infections. Surgeon group was no risk factor, neither for intraoperative and postoperative complications, nor for catheter explantation due to complications. CONCLUSION: Residents performing alone or residents performing with help can safely handle a central venous access port implantation. In patients with several risk factors, however, an attending should assist.

Identification of factors predictive of postoperative morbidity and short-term mortality in older patients after colorectal carcinoma resection: A single-center retrospective study.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of age on patient outcome after colorectal carcinoma (CRC) resection in patients over 65 years of age. METHODS: This study included patients aged 65 years and older who underwent CRC resection between 2003 and 2013 at a single-center institution. Patients were divided into two groups: Group A (65-74 years old) and Group B (≥75 years old). RESULTS: Multivariable logistic analysis of 415 patients revealed serum albumin levels on the third postoperative day (POD) (Odds Ratio (OR), 0.44; 95% CI, 0.21-0.94; P = 0.03) and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels (OR, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.00-1.01; P = 0.04) in patients with colon cancer as predictive factors for morbidity. In addition, the multivariable logistic analysis revealed serum albumin levels (OR, 0.27; 95% CI, 0.08-0.87; P = 0.03) in patients with rectal cancer as predictive factors for morbidity. The multivariate Cox Proportional Hazards Model identified re-intervention for colon cancer (Hazard Ratio (HR), 4.57; 95% CI, 1.36-15.4 P = 0.01) and for rectal cancer (HR, 11.8; 95% CI, 1.08-129 P = 0.04) as a predictive factor for 30-day mortality. Serum albumin level on the third POD was predictive of 30-day mortality (HR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.13-0.71; P = 0.01) and of 1-year mortality (HR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.17-0.66; P < 0.01) in patients with colon cancer. CONCLUSION: Age is not predictive of postoperative morbidity and mortality in patients with CRC. Serum albumin levels on the third POD can predict morbidity and mortality for colon and rectal carcinoma in older patients undergoing colorectal resections.