A novel fragment specific classification of complex olecranon fractures: 3-dimensional model design, radiological validation, and proposed surgical algorithm.

BACKGROUND: Current classifications for proximal ulna fracture patterns rely on qualitative data and cannot inform surgical planning. We propose a new classification system based on a biological and anatomical stress analysis. Our hypothesis is that fragment types in complex fractures can be predicted by the tendon and ligament attachments on the proximal ulna. METHODS: First, we completed a literature review to identify quantitative data on proximal ulna soft tissue attachments. On this basis, we created a 3-dimensional model of ulnar anatomy with SliceOMatic and Catia V5R20 software and determined likely locations for fragments and fracture lines. The second part of the study was a retrospective radiological study. A level-1 trauma radiological database was used to identify computed tomography scans of multifragmentary olecranon fractures from 2009 to 2021. These were reviewed and classified according to the "fragment specific" classification and compared to the Mayo and the Schatzker classifications. RESULTS: Twelve articles (134 elbows) met the inclusion criteria and 7 potential fracture fragments were identified. The radiological study included 67 preoperative computed tomography scans (mean 55 years). The fragments identified were the following: posterior (40%), intermediate (42%), tricipital (100%), supinator crest (25%), coronoid (18%), sublime tubercle (12%), and anteromedial facet (18%). Eighteen cases (27%) were classified as Schatzker D (comminutive) and 21 (31%) Mayo 2B (stable comminutive). Inter-rater correlation coefficient was 0.71 among 3 observers. CONCLUSION: This proposed classification system is anatomically based and considers the deforming forces from ligaments and tendons. Having a more comprehensive understanding of complex proximal ulna fractures would lead to more accurate fracture evaluation and surgical planning.

Incongruity of the scapulohumeral arch: an indirect sign of posterior subluxation of the humeral head in primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis.

BACKGROUND: In symptomatic glenohumeral osteoarthritis, arthroplasty is the gold standard to restore a mobile and painless shoulder. The kind of arthroplasty chosen is mainly based on the evaluation of the rotator cuff and the type of glenoid. The aim of this study was to analyze the scapulohumeral arch in primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis (PGHOA) with an uninjured cuff and to determine whether posterior humeral subluxation influences the Moloney line, which corresponds to an intact scapulohumeral arch. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 2017 and 2020, 58 anatomic total shoulder arthroplasties were implanted in the same center. We included all patients with complete preoperative imaging (radiographs and magnetic resonance imaging or arthro-computed tomography scans) assessing an intact rotator cuff. A total of 55 shoulders that had undergone surgery with a total anatomic shoulder prosthesis were analyzed after determination of the type of glenoid in the frontal plane according to the Favard classification on an anteroposterior radiograph and in the axial plane according to the Walch classification on computed tomography scans. The grade of osteoarthritis was evaluated according to the Samilson classification. We analyzed whether there was a rupture of the Moloney line on the frontal radiograph and assessed the acromiohumeral distance. RESULTS: After preoperative analysis of 55 shoulders, 24 shoulders had type A glenoids and 31 had type B glenoids. Scapulohumeral arch rupture was observed in 22 shoulders, and posterior subluxation of the humeral head was found in 31 shoulders, of which 25 had type B1 glenoids and 6 had type B2 glenoids according to the Walch classification. Most glenoids were type E0 (n = 47.85%). Incongruity of the Moloney line was more frequent in shoulders with type B glenoids (20 of 31 [65%]) than those with type A glenoids (2 of 24 [8%], P < .001). No patient with a type A1 glenoid (0 of 15) had a rupture of the Moloney line, and only 2 patients with a type A2 glenoid (2 of 9) had incongruity of the scapulohumeral arch. CONCLUSION: In PGHOA, rupture of the scapulohumeral arch seen on anteroposterior radiographs, also known as the Moloney line, may be an indirect sign of posterior humeral subluxation, corresponding to a type B glenoid per the Walch classification. Incongruity of the Moloney line may indicate a rotator cuff injury or posterior glenohumeral subluxation with an intact cuff in PGHOA.