Familial hydatidiform molar pregnancy: the germline imprinting defect hypothesis?

Imprinting is the uniparental expression of a set of genes. Somatic cells carry two haploid sets of chromosomes, one maternal and one paternal, while germ cells contain only one of the two forms of chromosomes, male or female. This implies that during early embryogenesis the cells committed for developing the future germ cell lineage, the primordial germ cells, which are diploid, have to undergo a total chromosome reprogramming process. This process is delicately controlled during gametogenesis to ensure that males and females have only their respective form of gametes. The machinery involved in this process is yet poorly defined. Familial hydatidiform molar (HM) pregnancy is an abnormal form of pregnancy characterized by hydropic degeneration of placental villi and abnormal, or absence of, embryonic development. To date, the molecular defect causing this condition is unknown. However, in a few studied cases, the presence of paternal methylation patterns on the maternal chromosomes was observed. In this chapter, we summarize what is known about methylation aberrations in HMs and examine more closely the proposed hypothesis of a maternal germline imprinting defect.

Bisulfite-based methylation analysis of imprinted genes.

Genomic imprinting is an epigenetically controlled form of gene regulation leading to the preferential expression of one parental gene copy. To date, approximately 40 imprinted genes have been described that are exclusively or predominantly expressed from either the paternal or the maternal allele (www.mgu.har.mrc.ac.uk/imprinting/implink.html). Changes in the imprinted expression of such genes result in developmental abnormalities; in the human they are associated with several diseases and various types of cancer (1-3).

Sequence conservation and variability of imprinting in the Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome gene cluster in human and mouse.

In human and mouse most imprinted genes are arranged in chromosomal clusters. This linked organization suggests coordinated mechanisms controlling imprinted expression. We have sequenced 250 kb in the centre of the mouse imprinting cluster on distal chromosome 7 and compared it with the orthologous Beckwith-Wiedemann gene cluster on human chromosome 11p15.5. This first comparative imprinting cluster analysis revealed a high structural and functional conservation of the six orthologous genes identified. However, several striking differences were also discovered. First, compared with the mouse the human sequence is approximately 40% longer, mostly due to insertions of two large repetitive clusters. One of these clusters encompasses an additional gene coding for a homologue of the ribosomal protein L26. Second, pronounced blocks of unique direct repeats characteristic of imprinted genes were only found in the human sequence. Third, two of the orthologous gene pairs Tssc4/TSSC4 and Ltrpc5/LTRPC5 showed apparent differences in imprinting between human and mouse, whereas others like Tssc6/TSSC6 were not imprinted in either organism. Together these results suggest a significant functional and structural variability in the centre of the imprinting cluster. Some genes escape imprinting in both organisms whereas others exhibit tissue- and species-specific imprinting. Hence the control of imprinting in the cluster appears to be a highly dynamic process under fast evolutionary adaptation. Intriguingly, whereas imprinted genes within the cluster contain CpG islands the non-imprinted Ltrpc5 and Tssc6/TSSC6 do not. This and additional comparisons with other imprinted and non-imprinted regions suggest that CpG islands are key features of imprinted domains.

Methylation levels at selected CpG sites in the factor VIII and FGFR3 genes, in mature female and male germ cells: implications for male-driven evolution.

Transitional mutations at CpG dinucleotides account for approximately a third of all point mutations. These mutations probably arise through spontaneous deamination of 5-methylcytosine. Studies of CpG mutation rates in disease-linked genes, such as factor VIII and FGFR3, have indicated that they more frequently originate in male than in female germ cells. It has been speculated that these sex-biased mutation rates might be a consequence of sex-specific methylation differences between the female and the male germ lines. Using the bisulfite-based genomic-sequencing method, we investigated the methylation status of the human factor VIII and FGFR3 genes in mature male and female germ cells. With the exception of a single CpG, both genes were found to be equally and highly methylated in oocytes and spermatocytes. Whereas these observations strongly support the notion that DNA methylation is the major determining factor for recurrent CpG germ-line mutations in patients with hemophilia and achondroplasia, the higher mutation rate in the male germ line is apparently not a simple reflection of sex-specific methylation differences.