Aortic annulus angulation does not attenuate procedural success of transcatheter aortic valve replacement using a novel self-expanding bioprosthesis.

The objectives of the study were to evaluate the impact of aortic angulation (AA) on success of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with a new generation self-expandable prosthesis (Medtronic Evolut R®). Specific anatomical conditions, such as for example the presence of a horizontal aorta with elevated AA, have seemed to pose a significant challenge for the correct positioning and consequent functioning of self-expandable TAVR prostheses. We assessed 146 patients treated with Evolut R. AA was measured at computed tomography and two groups were identified using as cutoff the mean AA value. Acute outcomes were collected and compared. AA mean value was 49.6 ± 9.4° (AA ≥ 50°: 76 and AA < 50°: 70 patients). Risk profile (Logistic euroSCORE: AA ≥ 50°: 15.7; 75% IQR: 11.1-22.1 vs. AA < 50°: 14.7; 75% IQR: 10.7-24.0; p = 0.8) was equivalent. Perioperative results were similar: valve resheathing (AA ≥ 50°: 21.0% vs. AA < 50°: 24.2%; p = 0.6), recapturing (AA ≥ 50°: 19.7% vs. AA < 50°: 25.7%; p = 0.3), fluoroscopy time (AA ≥ 50°: 11.1 IQR: 8.6-17.0 min. vs. AA < 50°: 11.0 IQR: 8.0-15.7 min.; p = 0.9), and contrast agent use (AA ≥ 50°: 99.0 ± 41.8 ml. vs. AA < 50°: 104.2 ± 38.5 ml.; p = 0.4). At discharge, moderate paravalvular leak was present in 8/76 (10.5%) of the AA ≥ 50° and 6/70 (8.6%) of the AA < 50° (p = 0.7) patients. Severe paravalvular leak, implantation of a second valve, and/or conversion to surgery did not occur. Early safety (AA ≥ 50°: 7.8% vs. AA < 50°: 5.7%; p = 0.6) was similar in the two groups. AA did not affect procedural outcomes and valve performance of the Evolut R prosthesis.

Long-term durability and haemodynamic performance of a self-expanding transcatheter heart valve beyond five years after implantation: a prospective observational study applying the standardised definitions of structural deterioration and valve failure.

AIMS: Long-term results of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), in particular the incidence of bioprosthetic valve failure (BVF), are uncertain. This study presents data derived from a long-term, structured follow-up programme of the self-expanding CoreValve device utilising standardised definitions and core lab adjudication of valve performance. METHODS AND RESULTS: The study prospectively included all 152 patients who had undergone TAVI with the self-expanding CoreValve up to December 2011 at the Heart Center, Bad Segeberg, Germany. Late BVF (>30 days) was defined as either: 1) severe structural valve deterioration (transprosthetic mean pressure gradient ≥40 mmHg and/or ≥20 mmHg rise from baseline OR severe intraprosthetic aortic regurgitation), OR 2) bioprosthetic valve dysfunction leading to death or reintervention. Echocardiographic follow-up at 6.3±1.0 years (range: 5.0-8.9 years) was 88% complete (60 out of 68 survivors beyond five years) and all echocardiograms were analysed by an independent core laboratory. The all-cause mortality rate at 1, 2, 5, 6, 7 and 8 years was 14%, 20%, 50%, 60%, 65%, and 73%, respectively. Among survivors beyond five years, effective orifice area was 1.60±0.46 cm2, and transvalvular mean pressure gradient was 6.7±3.1 mmHg; no cases showed evidence of structural valve deterioration. Five patients (3.3%) had undergone redo TAVI (n=4) or surgery (n=1) 0.6 to 5.2 years after the index procedure, all due to paravalvular leakage. The estimated rate of BVF at eight years was 7.9% for the actuarial and 4.5% for the actual analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term follow-up up to 8.9 years after TAVI documents favourable performance of the self-expanding CoreValve with low rates of BVF.

Redo TAVI: initial experience at two German centres.

AIMS: The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility and early outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in dysfunctional TAVI prostheses (redo TAVI). METHODS AND RESULTS: Nineteen redo TAVI procedures were performed between October 2011 and November 2015 at two German centres. Mean age was 78 years, 13 (68%) were male, and the mean logistic EuroSCORE was 32%. Median time elapsed since index TAVI was 644 days (interquartile range 191-1,831). Failure mode of the index TAVI prosthesis was regurgitation (AR) in 16 patients (n=12 paravalvular AR, n=3 combined paravalvular/valvular AR, n=1 valvular AR) and stenosis in three patients. Device success was achieved in 89% (17/19). Median invasive post-interventional transprosthetic gradient was 3.0 mmHg. No severe prosthesis-patient mismatch (PPM) was observed. At one year, mean pressure gradient was 9±1.2 mmHg and no relevant PPM was documented in 90% of the cases. All-cause mortality at 30 days and one year was 11% and 33% (6/18, five non-cardiac deaths), respectively. Mean follow-up time was 404 days. CONCLUSIONS: Redo TAVI appears to be feasible. Paravalvular regurgitation was the most common indication for a redo procedure. Rates of device success were high with low post-interventional gradients and no severe PPM. Good functional status of the prosthesis was maintained after 12 months, but mortality rates were high in this small comorbid patient population.

Comparison of balloon-expandable vs self-expandable valves in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement: the CHOICE randomized clinical trial.

IMPORTANCE: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is an effective treatment option for high-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis. Different from surgery, transcatheter deployment of valves requires either a balloon-expandable or self-expandable system. A randomized comparison of these 2 systems has not been performed. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the balloon-expandable device is associated with a better success rate than the self-expandable device. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: The CHOICE study was an investigator-initiated trial in high-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis and an anatomy suitable for the transfemoral TAVR procedure. One hundred twenty-one patients were randomly assigned to receive a balloon-expandable valve (Edwards Sapien XT) and 120 were assigned to receive a self-expandable valve (Medtronic CoreValve). Patients were enrolled between March 2012 and December 2013 at 5 centers in Germany. INTERVENTIONS: Transfemoral TAVR with a balloon-expandable or self-expandable device. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary end point was device success, which is a composite end point including successful vascular access and deployment of the device and retrieval of the delivery system, correct position of the device, intended performance of the heart valve without moderate or severe regurgitation, and only 1 valve implanted in the proper anatomical location. Secondary end points included cardiovascular mortality, bleeding and vascular complications, postprocedural pacemaker placement, and a combined safety end point at 30 days, including all-cause mortality, major stroke, and other serious complications. RESULTS: Device success occurred in 116 of 121 patients (95.9%) in the balloon-expandable valve group and 93 of 120 patients (77.5%) in the self-expandable valve group (relative risk [RR], 1.24, 95% CI, 1.12-1.37, P < .001). This was attributed to a significantly lower frequency of residual more-than-mild aortic regurgitation (4.1% vs 18.3%; RR, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.09-0.58; P < .001) and the less frequent need for implanting more than 1 valve (0.8% vs 5.8%, P = .03) in the balloon-expandable valve group. Cardiovascular mortality at 30 days was 4.1% in the balloon-expandable valve group and 4.3% in the self-expandable valve group (RR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.29-3.25; P = .99). Bleeding and vascular complications were not significantly different, and the combined safety end point occurred in 18.2% of those in the balloon-expandable valve group and 23.1% of the self-expandable valve group (RR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.48-1.30; P = .42). Placement of a new permanent pacemaker was less frequent in the balloon-expandable valve group (17.3% vs 37.6%, P = .001). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Among patients with high-risk aortic stenosis undergoing TAVR, the use of a balloon-expandable valve resulted in a greater rate of device success than use of a self-expandable valve. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01645202.