Perioperative arterial catheterization: A prospective evaluation of ultrasound, infection, and patient-focused outcomes.

BACKGROUND: There is little information regarding complications of arterial catheterization in modern clinical care. We aimed to determine the incidence of abnormal duplex vascular ultrasound and catheter related infections following perioperative arterial catheterization. METHODS: Patients requiring arterial catheterization for elective surgery were included and insertion details collected prospectively. Duplex ultrasound evaluation was performed 24 h after catheter removal. Symptomatic patients were identified by self-reported questionnaire. On Day 7, patients answered questions by telephone, related to the insertion site, pain, and function. Results of catheter tip and blood culture analyses were sought. Univariate associations of patient and surgical characteristics with abnormal ultrasound were assessed with p < 0.05 considered significant. RESULTS: Of 339 catheterizations, 105 (40%) had ultrasound evaluation. Catheters were indwelling for median (IQR, range) duration of 6.0 h (4.4-8.2, 1.8-28) with no catheter-related infections. There were 16 (15.2%, 95% CI 9.0%-23.6%) abnormal results, including 14 radial artery thromboses, one radial artery dissection, and one radial vein thrombosis. Those with abnormal ultrasound results were more likely to have had Arrow catheters inserted (68.8% vs 27%, p = 0.023) and more than one skin puncture (37.5% vs 26.8%, p = 0.031). Two of the 16 (12.5%) patients with abnormal ultrasound results reported new symptoms related to the hand compared with nine of the 88 (10.2%) with normal results (p = 0.1). No patients required urgent referral for management. CONCLUSIONS: Thrombosis was the most common abnormality and was usually asymptomatic. There were no infections, few post-operative symptoms, and minimal functional impairment following arterial catheterization.

High-Flow Nasal Cannula for Apneic Oxygenation in Obese Patients for Elective Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Obese patients desaturate rapidly during the apneic period after induction of anesthesia for elective surgery. Administration of oxygen using high-flow nasal cannulae (HFNCs) may prevent desaturation in nonobese patients compared to facemask (FM) preoxygenation. The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare the effectiveness of HFNC to FM preoxygenation techniques in reducing preintubation desaturation in obese patients undergoing elective surgery. METHODS: This study protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42022309391). Adult studies that compared HFNC and FM preoxygenation in obese patients requiring general anesthesia for elective surgery were included. The primary outcome was desaturation resulting in oxygen saturation of <92% from induction of anesthesia until intubation. Secondary outcomes included the lowest arterial oxygen content before intubation expressed in mm Hg, safe apnea time expressed in seconds, the lowest oxygen saturation before intubation expressed as a percentage, patient-reported discomfort, the need for rescue ventilation, and the incidence of aspiration of gastric contents during intubation. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration tool. Certainty was assessed following the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. RESULTS: Six studies including 351 participants were eligible for analysis. There was no difference in odds of oxygen desaturation <92% between HFNC and FM (odds ratio [OR], 0.49; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.15-1.63; P = .24). The HFNC group had a significantly longer safe apnea time (mean difference [MD], -124.20 with 95% CI, -200.47 to -47.93; P = .001). There was no difference between HFNC and FM in the lowest arterial oxygen content (MD, -23.90; 95% CI, -88.64 to 40.85; P = .47) and the lowest peripheral oxygenation saturation (MD, -0.47 with 95% CI, -5.07 to 4.12; P = .84). HFNC had a lower odd of discomfort than FM (OR, 0.13; 95% CI, 0.03-0.52; P = .004). There was no difference in the odds of aspiration of gastric contents between HFNC and FM (OR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.01-8.21; P = .50). The risk of bias for our primary and secondary outcomes was low. The GRADE assessment for our primary outcome indicated a low level of certainty. For secondary outcomes, the GRADE assessment indicated a very low certainty for all outcomes except for patient discomfort, which was indicated as a moderate level of certainty. CONCLUSIONS: There may be no difference between HFNC and FM preoxygenation in preventing oxygen desaturation <92% or the lowest oxygen saturation before intubation. Preparation remains important to prevent and manage desaturation during induction of obese patients.

Obesity and the Risk of Venous Thromboembolism after Major Lower Limb Orthopaedic Surgery: A Literature Review.

The risk of venous thromboembolism following total joint arthroplasty is significantly greater than those of other types of elective orthopaedic procedures. This risk is increased in obesity due to the associated prothrombotic physiological and hematological changes that predispose to embolic events. The prevalence of obesity is increasing in the aging population, which contributes to a further increase in the risk of postoperative thrombosis in the older patients. There is a lack of clear evidence regarding dosing information for thromboprophylaxis medications in patients with obesity. As a result, the currently available thromboprophylaxis guidelines do not provide specific recommendations for this group. Suboptimal dosing regimens for these medications can place these patients at a risk of bleeding or clotting complications postsurgery. Hence any increase in dosage may require intensive surveillance for the residual anticoagulant effects and careful balancing of risks and benefits on an individual basis. Our review discusses the basis for increased thrombotic risk in obesity, the evidence supporting dosage recommendations, and the implications of the current guidelines for pharmacological thromboprophylaxis in patients with obesity undergoing lower limb arthroplasty.

Plasma and Interstitial Fluid Pharmacokinetics of Prophylactic Cefazolin in Elective Bariatric Surgery Patients.

Guidelines for surgical prophylactic dosing of cefazolin in bariatric surgery vary in terms of recommended dose. This study aimed to describe the plasma and interstitial fluid (ISF) cefazolin pharmacokinetics in patients undergoing bariatric surgery and to determine an optimum dosing regimen. Abdominal subcutaneous ISF concentrations (measured using microdialysis) and plasma samples were collected at regular time points after administration of cefazolin 2 g intravenously. Total and unbound cefazolin concentrations were assayed and then modeled using Pmetrics. Monte Carlo dosing simulations (n = 5,000) were used to define cefazolin dosing regimens able to achieve a fractional target attainment (FTA) of >95% in the ISF suitable for the MIC for Staphylococcus aureus in isolates of ≤2 mg · L-1 and for a surgical duration of 4 h. Fourteen patients were included, with a mean (standard deviation [SD]) bodyweight of 148 (35) kg and body mass index (BMI) of 48 kg · m-2. Cefazolin protein binding ranged from 14 to 36% with variable penetration into ISF of 58% ± 56%. Cefazolin was best described as a four-compartment model including nonlinear protein binding. The mean central volume of distribution in the final model was 18.2 (SD 3.31) L, and the mean clearance was 32.4 (SD 20.2) L · h-1. A standard 2-g dose achieved an FTA of >95% for all patients with BMIs ranging from 36 to 69 kg · m-2. A 2-g prophylactic cefazolin dose achieves appropriate unbound plasma and ISF concentrations in obese and morbidly obese bariatric surgery patients.

A retrospective observational study of patient analgesia outcomes when regional anaesthesia procedures are performed by consultants versus supervised trainees.

At teaching hospitals, consultants must provide effective supervision, including appropriate selection of teaching cases, such that the outcomes achieved by trainees are similar to that of consultants. Numerous studies in the surgical literature have compared patient outcomes when surgery is performed by consultant surgeons or surgical trainees but, to our knowledge, none exist in the field of anaesthesia. We aimed to compare analgesia outcomes of regional anaesthesia when performed by supervised trainees versus consultants. We designed a retrospective observational study using registry data. The primary outcome was inadequate analgesia, defined as a numerical rating scale (NRS) for pain >5 reported at any time in the post-anaesthesia care unit (PACU). Secondary outcomes included the maximum pain NRS, pain experienced in the PACU, and the requirement for systemic opioid analgesia in the PACU. Of the 1814 patients analysed, the primary proceduralist was a consultant for 514 (28.3%) patients and a trainee for 1300 (71.7%) patients. All trainees were supervised by an on-site consultant. There were no statistically significant differences between consultants and supervised trainees in terms of the primary outcome (NRS >5 in 24.9% and 24.5% of patients, respectively; P = 0.84) and secondary outcomes. Compared to trainees, consultants had a slightly higher rate of patients with a body mass index >30 kg/m2, an American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification of 3 or 4, nerve blocks performed under general anaesthesia, paravertebral/neuraxial blocks and blocks with perineural catheter placement. Regional anaesthesia performed by supervised trainees can achieve similar analgesia outcomes to consultant-performed procedures.

The effect of transnasal humidified rapid-insufflation ventilator exchange (THRIVE) versus nasal prongs on safe apnoea time in paralysed obese patients: a randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Evidence is lacking regarding the efficacy of Optiflow transnasal humidified rapid-insufflation ventilator exchange (THRIVE™) in obese patients. We compared the impact of this technique at 70 L min-1 with 4 L min-1 oxygen via nasal prongs on safe apnoea times of paralysed obese patients. METHODS: We randomised adults with a BMI >35 kg m-2 undergoing elective bariatric surgery. While apnoeic and paralysed, Group T received 70 L min-1 oxygen via Optiflow THRIVE™. Group N received nasal prong oxygen at 4 L min-1. The primary outcome was time to SpO2 ≤95% while apnoeic, with a 360 s cut-off. This was analysed by applying a time-to-event analysis. RESULTS: Forty-two patients were included. The median (inter-quartile range) BMI was 44.8 kg m-2 (40.0-50.0) in Group T and 42.0 kg m-2 (39.3-45.1) in Group N. Median (inter-quartile range) time to SpO2 ≤95% in Group T was 356 (165 to ≥360) s and in Group N, 210 (160-270) s. Using a survival analysis framework, median time-to-event in Group T was 356 s (95% confidence interval 165 s-upper limit not defined) and 210 s (95% confidence interval 160-242 s) (P=0.049) in Group N. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with oxygen delivered via nasal prongs at 4 L min-1, oxygen delivery via Optiflow THRIVE™ at a flow rate of 70 L min-1 can prolong safe apnoea time, however, the results are statistically inconclusive. Optiflow THRIVE™ did decrease the rate of reduction in Pao2 during apnoea. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ANZCTR 12618000445279.

Obesity, metabolic syndrome, and inflammation: An update for anaesthetists caring for patients with obesity.

Our understanding of chronic inflammation in obesity is evolving. Suggested mechanisms include hypoxia of adipose tissue and a subsequent increase in circulating cytokines. It is now known that adipose tissue, far from being an inert tissue, produces and secretes multiple peptides that influence inflammation and metabolism, including substrates of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS). RAAS blocking antihypertensive medication and cholesterol-lowering agents are now being evaluated for their metabolic and inflammation-modulating effects. Surgery also has pro-inflammatory effects, which may be exacerbated in patients with obesity. This narrative review will summarise the recent literature surrounding obesity, metabolic syndrome, inflammation, and interplay with the RAAS, with evidence-based recommendations for the optimisation of patients with obesity, prior to surgery and anaesthesia.

ClearSight™ finger cuff versus invasive arterial pressure measurement in patients with body mass index above 45 kg/m2.

BACKGROUND: Measuring blood pressure in patients with obesity is challenging. The ClearSight™ finger cuff (FC) uses the vascular unloading technique to provide continuous non-invasive blood pressure measurements. We aimed to test the agreement of the FC with invasive radial arterial monitoring (INV) in patients with obesity. METHODS: Participants had a body mass index (BMI) ≥45 kg/m2 and underwent laparoscopic bariatric surgery. FC and INV measurements were obtained simultaneously every 5 min on each patient, following induction of anesthesia. Agreement over time was assessed using modified Bland-Altman plots and error grid analysis permitted clinical interpretation of the results. Four-quadrant plots allowed assessment of concordance in blood pressure changes. RESULTS: The 30 participants had a median (IQR) BMI of 50.2 kg/m2 (IQR 48.3-55.3). The observed bias (SD, 95% limits of agreement) for systolic blood pressure (SBP) was 14.3 mmHg (14.1, -13.4 - 42.0), 5.2 mmHg (10.9, -16.0 - 26.5) for mean arterial pressure (MAP) and 2.6 mmHg (10.8, -18.6 - 23.8) for diastolic blood pressure (DBP). Error grid analysis showed that the proportion of readings in risk zones A-E were 90.8, 6.5, 2.7, 0 and 0% for SBP and 91.4, 4.3, 4.3, 0 and 0% for MAP, respectively. Discordance occurred in ≤8% of pairs for consecutive change in SBP, MAP and DBP. CONCLUSIONS: The vascular unloading technique was not adequately in agreement with radial arterial monitoring. Evaluation in a larger sample is required before recommending this technique for intraoperative monitoring of patients with BMI ≥45 kg/m2.

Upper limb dimensions in adults presenting for elective surgery - implications for blood pressure measurement.

BACKGROUND: Arm conicity is associated with non-invasive blood pressure (NIBP) measurement error and may be avoided by using finger cuffs. Predicting arm conicity may help decisions regarding NIBP measurement techniques. METHODS: We obtained upper limb measurements of adults presenting to the Pre-Anesthetic Clinic to determine: the suitability of arm and finger cuff sizes; the best anthropometric predictor of arm conicity based on the right arm slant angle; the incidence of a right arm slant angle < 83 degrees. Right mid-arm circumference (MAC) was compared to recommended cuff sizes and finger circumference compared to available cuffs. Slant angle was calculated from the measurements obtained. Linear regression was used to determine the better predictor of right arm slant angle. Correlation coefficients were calculated and R2 values compared. RESULTS: Four hundred fifty-four patients participated and 453 had cone-shaped arms. One participant (0.2, 95% CI 0.0-1.2) had a MAC outside the recommended cuff range. Twenty-five participants (5.5, 95% CI 3.6-8.0) had a middle finger circumference greater than the largest ClearSight™ cuff. Body mass index (BMI), weight and right MAC all had low to moderate correlation with right arm slant angle (r = - 0.49, - 0.39, - 0.48, all p < 0.001) and regression revealed R2 values of 0.24, 0.15 and 0.23. Six participants (1.3, 95% CI 0.5-2.9) had a slant angle < 83 degrees. CONCLUSION: Current NIBP equipment caters for most patients, based on the traditional measure of MAC. The utility of finger cuffs is limited by cuff size. BMI and right MAC showed the most promise in predicting arm conicity.

Prophylactic Cefazolin Dosing in Women With Body Mass Index >35 kg·m-2 Undergoing Cesarean Delivery: A Pharmacokinetic Study of Plasma and Interstitial Fluid.

BACKGROUND: Obesity is a risk factor for surgical site infection after cesarean delivery. There is inadequate pharmacokinetic data available regarding prophylactic cefazolin dosing in obese pregnant women. We aimed to describe the plasma and interstitial fluid (ISF) pharmacokinetics of cefazolin in obese women undergoing elective cesarean delivery and use dosing simulations to predict optimal dosing regimens. METHODS: Eligible women were scheduled for elective cesarean delivery at term, with a body mass index (BMI) of >35 kg·m. Plasma and ISF samples were collected following 2 g of intravenous cefazolin. Concentrations were determined using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. Population pharmacokinetic modeling and Monte Carlo dosing simulations were performed using Pmetrics. Total and unbound cefazolin concentrations in plasma and ISF were compared with the minimum inhibitory concentration at which 90% of isolates are inhibited (MIC90) of cefazolin for Staphylococcus aureus, 2 mg·L. The fractional target attainment (FTA) of dosing regimens to achieve a pre-established target of 95% unbound ISF concentrations >2 mg·L throughout a 3-hour duration of the surgery was calculated. RESULTS: The 12 women recruited had a median (interquartile range [IQR]) BMI of 41.5 (39.7-46.6) kg·m and a median (IQR) gestation of 38.7 weeks (37.9-39.0). For each timepoint up to 180 minutes, the median across subjects of total and unbound plasma concentration of cefazolin remained above 2 mg·L. The minimum observed total plasma concentration was 31.7 mg·L and plasma unbound concentration was 7.7 mg·L (observed in the same participant). For each timepoint up to 150 minutes, the median across subjects of unbound ISF concentrations remained above 2 mg·L. The minimum observed unbound ISF concentration was 0.7 mg·L (observed in 1 participant). In 2 participants, the ISF concentration of cefazolin was not maintained above 2 mg·L. The mean (± standard error [SE]) penetration of cefazolin (calculated as area under the concentration-time curve for the unbound fraction of drug [fAUC]tissue/fAUCplasma) into the ISF was 0.884 ± 1.11. Simulations demonstrated that FTA >95% was achieved in patients weighing 90-150 kg by an initial 2 g dose with redosing of 2 g at 2 hours. FTA was improved to >99% when an initial 3 g dose was repeated at 2 hours. CONCLUSIONS: To maintain adequate ISF antibiotic concentrations in obese pregnant women, our results suggest that redosing of cefazolin may be required. When wound closure has not occurred within 2 hours, redosing is suggested, following either a 2 or 3 g initial bolus. These preliminary results require validation in a larger population.

Perioperative Blood Pressure Monitoring in Patients With Obesity.

Blood pressure monitoring plays a key part in the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative care of all patients. In patients with obesity, hypertension indicates increased metabolic and surgical risk and may signal the presence of significant medical comorbidities, including obstructive sleep apnea. Avoidance of hypertension postoperatively is necessary to minimize bleeding risk after surgery. Hypotension in the postoperative period may be the first sign of significant complications that require urgent management. With the problem of being overweight or obese now affecting two-thirds of adults in Western countries, the proportion of patients with obesity in perioperative environments is similarly increasing. Detection of aberrations in blood pressure is contingent on the accuracy of blood pressure measurement methods. Patients with obesity tend to have a large arm circumference and "cone-shaped arms." Standard blood pressure cuffs fit such patients poorly, and this compromises the accuracy of measurements. Alternatives to arm blood pressure cuffs, some made specifically for individuals with obesity, have been evaluated but are not widely available to clinicians. This focused narrative review will discuss the relevance of hypertension management in the care of patients with obesity, highlight the currently available methods for perioperative monitoring of blood pressure, and explore the opportunities that exist to improve the perioperative blood pressure care in patients with obesity undergoing surgical procedures.