A clinical and magnetoencephalography study of MRI-negative startle epilepsy.

OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to investigate clinical findings, ictal semiology, and results of video/electroencephalography (video/EEG), and magnetoencephalography (MEG) in patients with startle epilepsy and normal brain MRI. METHODS: Four patients (mean age 12.5 years) with startle epilepsy were investigated with MRI, video/EEG, and MEG. RESULTS: Epilepsy diagnosis was established in childhood, and all had spontaneous and reflex seizures. Reflex seizures were triggered by sudden, unexpected sounds and tactile stimuli. The neurological examinations and MRIs were normal. MEG recordings showed focal epileptiform activity. An ictal MEG was obtained in one patient. Source modeling yielded dipole sources in right central frontal region. CONCLUSION: The present study demonstrates that the origin of epileptiform activity in startle epilepsy can be localized in brain areas associated with supplementary motor seizures, even in patients with normal brain MRI. MEG adds complementary information to the localization of epileptiform activity and can be useful in planning invasive studies in cases evaluated for epilepsy surgery.

Management of epilepsy in oncological patients.

INTRODUCTION: Comorbidity between epilepsy and cancer is elevated. As a life-time condition, it is not impossible for a patient with epilepsy to have a cancer at some point. Besides, at least 30% of patients with primary brain tumors have epileptic seizures, but also in patients with metastatic infiltrating lesions of the central nervous system and with extracerebral tumors, epilepsy can be related. Seizures may also appear associated with paraneoplastic syndromes, such as limbic encephalitis and metabolic and infectious complications of chemotherapy and radiotherapy. RESULTS: The precise mechanisms by which brain tumors and the other conditions mentioned above produce seizures are not fully understood, but are reviewed in this article, as well as the many different therapeutic options that may be used in the treatment of epileptic seizures. Pharmacological treatment poses various controversies, such as the utility of prophylactic treatment, interactions between antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) and chemotherapeutic drugs and the complications derived from the adverse effects of AEDs in this population. Finally, other treatments are proposed such as chemotherapy, radiotherapy and surgery, the rational application of which allows for an improvement in the patients' quality of life. CONCLUSION: In order to arrive at a diagnosis, the different causes that could condition the appearance of epileptic seizures in cancer patients must be known. After this, the most adequate treatment should be chosen, thus ensuring the comprehensive treatment of cancer and epilepsy.