CEA-CD3 bispecific antibody cibisatamab with or without atezolizumab in patients with CEA-positive solid tumours: results of two multi-institutional Phase 1 trials.

Cibisatamab is a bispecific antibody-based construct targeting carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) on tumour cells and CD3 epsilon chain as a T-cell engager. Here we evaluated cibisatamab for advanced CEA-positive solid tumours in two open-label Phase 1 dose-escalation and -expansion studies: as a single agent with or without obinutuzumab in S1 (NCT02324257) and with atezolizumab in S2 (NCT02650713). Primary endpoints were safety, dose finding, and pharmacokinetics in S1; safety and dose finding in S2. Secondary endpoints were anti-tumour activity (including overall response rate, ORR) and pharmacodynamics in S1; anti-tumour activity, pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics in S2. S1 and S2 enrolled a total of 149 and 228 patients, respectively. Grade ≥3 cibisatamab-related adverse events occurred in 36% of S1 and 49% of S2 patients. The ORR was 4% in S1 and 7% in S2. In S2, patients with microsatellite stable colorectal carcinoma (MSS-CRC) given flat doses of cibisatamab and atezolizumab demonstrated an ORR of 14%. In S1 and S2, 40% and 52% of patients, respectively, developed persistent anti-drug antibodies (ADAs). ADA appearance could be mitigated by obinutuzumab-pretreatment, with 8% of patients having persistent ADAs. Overall, cibisatamab warrants further exploration in immunotherapy combination strategies for MSS-CRC.

Extension of the Alternative Intravenous Dosing Regimens of Atezolizumab into Combination Settings through Modeling and Simulation.

Atezolizumab is approved as an intravenous (IV) infusion for use as a single agent and in combination with other therapies in a number of indications. The objectives of this publication are to characterize atezolizumab pharmacokinetics (PK) across indications with the available clinical data from one phase I and eight phase III studies, to determine the exposure-response (ER) relationships in combination settings across a variety of tumor types, and to provide the clinical safety to support the extension of the 840 mg q2w, 1200 mg q3w, and 1680 mg q4w IV dosing regimens across various indications in combination settings. Across all clinical studies, atezolizumab PK remained in the dose-linear range and were similar across tumor types when used in combination therapy or as a monotherapy. In the combination studies, efficacy was independent of the exposures tested and there was no significant increase in adverse events with increasing atezolizumab exposure (flat ER). The safety profile of atezolizumab in the individual combination studies was generally consistent with the established safety profile of atezolizumab, the combination partners, and the disease under study. The similar atezolizumab PK across monotherapy and combination therapy settings as well as the flat ER in new tumor types and combination therapies support the use of the 3 interchangeable atezolizumab dosing regimens in the combination setting. Atezolizumab is now approved with 3 interchangeable IV dosing regimens of 840 mg q2w, 1200 mg q3w, and 1680 mg q4w for single-agent and combination therapy use in the USA and EU.

The Impact of Radiation Therapy in Children and Adolescents With Metastatic Rhabdomyosarcoma.

PURPOSE: There is limited evidence to define the role of radiation therapy in children with metastatic rhabdomyosarcoma (mRMS). In the international BERNIE study, children with mRMS or non-RMS soft tissue sarcoma were randomized to receive standard chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab, with radiation therapy to all disease sites recommended after chemotherapy cycle 6. We retrospectively evaluated the impact of radiation therapy on survival in the mRMS cohort. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients were grouped according to the radiation therapy they received: radical, partial, or none. Radical irradiation was defined as radiation therapy delivered to all disease sites, unless a site was completely surgically resected. Partial irradiation was defined as radiation therapy to ≥1, but not all, disease sites. Landmark analysis excluded patients with an event before day 221. Overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) were modeled using Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: Of 102 patients with mRMS, 97 were included in the analysis for OS and 85 for EFS. Overall, 27 patients received radical irradiation, 46 partial irradiation, and 24 no irradiation. EFS was not significantly different among patient groups after adjustment for prognostic factors (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.520; P = .054 for any vs no irradiation). Radiation therapy was associated with improved OS compared with no radiation therapy (adjusted HR = 0.249; P = .00025), with OS being greater for radical versus partial irradiation (HR = 0.245; P = .039). The 3-year OS rate was 84%, 54%, and 23% for patients receiving radical, partial, and no irradiation, respectively. Radical treatment (surgery, irradiation, or both) of the primary site improved EFS and OS compared with no treatment. CONCLUSIONS: These findings demonstrate variability in the application of radiation therapy for mRMS and support the routine use of radical treatment to the primary site. Radical irradiation to metastatic sites may further improve OS. The burden of such treatment should be balanced against prognosis; further studies are needed.

Gross motor function outcomes following deep brain stimulation for childhood-onset dystonia: A descriptive report.

AIM: To examine the impact of deep brain stimulation (DBS) on gross motor function in children with dystonic movement disorders. METHOD: Prospective audit involving children implanted 2007-2015, followed for up to two years. Outcomes were evaluated across aetiological sub-groups (inherited, acquired, idiopathic) using the GMFM-88 and BFMDRS movement scale (BFM-M). The predictive value of proportion of life lived with dystonia (PLD) and baseline motor capacity were evaluated. RESULTS: Data was available for 60 children (median surgery age 10y11mo). Inherited monogenetic dystonias demonstrated a median increase in GMFM-88 scores of 6.9% (p = 0.021) and 14.5% (p = 0.116) at one and two years. Heredodegenerative and idiopathic dystonias showed disparate responses, with non-significant changes seen in GMFM-88 and BFM-M scores, with the exception of improved one-year BFM-M scores in the idiopathic group [median change 5.5, p = 0.021]. Median GMFM-88 and BFM-M change scores were near zero for acquired dystonias, though improvement was noted in 9/18 CP cases with one-year GMFM-88 data. No significant relationship was found between PLD, or baseline GMFM-88, and GMFM-88 change following DBS. CONCLUSION: Gross motor response to DBS is similar in profile to literature reporting results using impairment-based dystonia rating scales. Relatively consistent improvements were seen in inherited monogenetic ("primary") dystonias, while highly variable, often disappointing, gross motor responses were found in acquired, heredodegenerative, and idiopathic dystonias. In view of such response variability, alternatives to mean group studies, such as single case experimental designs with multiple replications, are needed to determine the efficacy of DBS in childhood-onset dystonias. Ongoing research is needed to identify factors that predict treatment response.

Integrated analysis of long-term growth and bone development in pediatric and adolescent patients receiving bevacizumab.

BACKGROUND: We conducted an integrated analysis of clinical data to describe long-term effects of bevacizumab on growth and bone development in pediatric and adolescent patients with solid tumors. PROCEDURE: Clinical data were pooled from five phase I/II trials of bevacizumab versus chemotherapy: BERNIE, HERBY, and AVF4117s enrolled newly diagnosed patients, AVF3842s and AVF2771s enrolled patients with relapsed/refractory disease. Height, weight, body mass index (BMI), and bone-age data were pooled by treatment group. Growth charts were used to track and monitor growth in relation to a reference population of healthy children. Bone age was measured based on X-ray of the left hand and wrist. Analyses were exploratory/descriptive. RESULTS: Overall, 268 patients received bevacizumab ± chemotherapy and 135 received chemotherapy alone. Baseline characteristics were generally balanced. Median duration of long-term follow-up was 41.8 months (range, 2.4-75.1) with bevacizumab and 22.9 months (range, 2.8-69.2) with chemotherapy alone. Patients had age-appropriate baseline height and weight. Mean height and weight percentiles decreased over time in both treatment groups, but remained within the normal range (height: mean standard deviation score [SDS] range -2 to +3; weight: mean SDS range -2 to +1). Similar trends were seen in BMI. A tendency for reduced growth velocity relative to the reference population was observed at 6 months and 1 year in both groups, but there was no additional decrease for patients receiving bevacizumab. CONCLUSION: Bevacizumab did not appear to have additional negative effects on growth or development of pediatric and adolescent patients with solid tumors.

Phase II, Open-Label, Randomized, Multicenter Trial (HERBY) of Bevacizumab in Pediatric Patients With Newly Diagnosed High-Grade Glioma.

Purpose Bevacizumab (BEV) is approved in more than 60 countries for use in adults with recurrent glioblastoma. We evaluated the addition of BEV to radiotherapy plus temozolomide (RT+TMZ) in pediatric patients with newly diagnosed high-grade glioma (HGG). Methods The randomized, parallel group, multicenter, open-label HERBY trial ( ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01390948) enrolled patients age ≥ 3 years to ≤ 18 years with localized, centrally neuropathology-confirmed, nonbrainstem HGG. Eligible patients were randomly assigned to receive RT + TMZ (RT: 1.8 Gy, 5 days per week, and TMZ: 75 mg/m2 per day for 6 weeks; 4-week treatment break; then up to 12 × 28-day cycles of TMZ [cycle 1: 150 mg/m2 per day, days 1 to 5; cycles 2 to 12: 200 mg/m2 per day, days 1 to 5]) with or without BEV (10 mg/kg every 2 weeks). The primary end point was event-free survival (EFS) as assessed by a central radiology review committee that was blinded to treatment. We report findings of EFS at 12 months after the enrollment of the last patient. Results One hundred twenty-one patients were enrolled (RT+TMZ [n = 59]; BEV plus RT+TMZ [n = 62]). Central radiology review committee-assessed median EFS did not differ significantly between treatment groups (RT+TMZ, 11.8 months; 95% CI, 7.9 to 16.4 months; BEV plus RT+TMZ, 8.2 months; 95% CI, 7.8 to 12.7 months; hazard ratio, 1.44; P = .13 [stratified log-rank test]). In the overall survival analysis, the addition of BEV did not reduce the risk of death (hazard ratio, 1.23; 95% CI, 0.72 to 2.09). More patients in the BEV plus RT+TMZ group versus the RT+TMZ group experienced one or more serious adverse events (n = 35 [58%] v n = 27 [48%]), and more patients who received BEV discontinued study treatment as a result of adverse events (n = 13 [22%] v n = 3 [5%]). Conclusion Adding BEV to RT+TMZ did not improve EFS in pediatric patients with newly diagnosed HGG. Our findings were not comparable to those of previous adult trials, which highlights the importance of performing pediatric-specific studies.

Retrospective review of the drop in observer detection performance over time in lesion-enriched experimental studies.

The vigilance decrement describes a decrease in sensitivity or increase in specificity with time on task. It has been observed in a variety of repetitive visual tasks, but little is known about these patterns in radiologists. We investigated whether there is systematic variation in performance over the course of a radiology reading session. We re-analyzed data from six previous lesion-enriched radiology studies. Studies featured 8-22 participants assessing 27-100 cases (including mammograms, chest CT, chest x-ray, and bone x-ray) in a reading session. Changes in performance and speed as the reading session progressed were analyzed using mixed effects models. Time taken per case decreased 9-23% as the reading session progressed (p < 0.005 for every study). There was a sensitivity decrease or specificity increase over the course of reading 100 chest x-rays (p = 0.005), 60 bone fracture x-rays (p = 0.03), and 100 chest CT scans (p < 0.0001). This effect was not found in the shorter mammography sessions with 27 or 50 cases. We found evidence supporting the hypothesis that behavior and performance may change over the course of reading an enriched test set. Further research is required to ascertain whether this effect is present in radiological practice.