First-line atezolizumab plus nab-paclitaxel for unresectable, locally advanced, or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer: IMpassion130 final overall survival analysis.

BACKGROUND: Guidelines recommend atezolizumab plus nab-paclitaxel (A + nP) for first-line treatment of unresectable, locally advanced, or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer expressing programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) on tumor-infiltrating immune cells (IC), based on IMpassion130. We report the final overall survival (OS) and safety of that study as per the prespecified analysis plan. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were randomized to nP 100 mg/m2 (days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle) with atezolizumab 840 mg (A + nP) or placebo (P + nP; days 1 and 15), until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Coprimary endpoints were progression-free survival [intention-to-treat (ITT) and PD-L1 IC-positive populations] and OS (tested hierarchically in the ITT population and, if significant, in the PD-L1 IC-positive population). RESULTS: Each arm comprised 451 patients; 666 (73.8%) had died by the final OS analysis cut-off (median follow-up, 18.8 months; interquartile range, 8.9-34.7 months). Median OS in the ITT population was 21.0 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 19.0-23.4 months] with A + nP, and 18.7 months (95% CI, 16.9-20.8 months) with P + nP [stratified hazard ratio (HR), 0.87; 95% CI, 0.75-1.02; P = 0.077]. Exploratory analysis in the PD-L1 IC-positive population showed a median OS of 25.4 months (95% CI, 19.6-30.7 months) with A + nP (n = 185) and 17.9 months (95% CI, 13.6-20.3 months) with P + nP (n = 184; stratified HR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.53-0.86). Safety outcomes were consistent with previous analyses and the known toxicity profiles of each agent. Immune-mediated adverse events of special interest were reported in 58.7% and 41.6% of patients treated with A + nP and P + nP, respectively. CONCLUSION: Although the OS benefit in the ITT population was not statistically significant, precluding formal testing, clinically meaningful OS benefit was observed with A + nP in PD-L1 IC-positive patients, consistent with prior interim analyses. This combination remained safe and tolerable with longer follow-up.

Patient-reported outcomes from the phase III IMpassion130 trial of atezolizumab plus nab-paclitaxel in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC) is incurable. A key treatment goal is providing palliation while maintaining patients' health-related quality of life (HRQoL). IMpassion130 demonstrated progression-free survival benefit with atezolizumab + nab-paclitaxel (A + nP) versus placebo + nab-paclitaxel (Pl + nP) in first-line treatment of mTNBC patients with programmed death-ligand 1 positive (PD-L1+) tumors. We report data on patient-reported outcomes (PROs), which capture patient perspectives of treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with untreated advanced or mTNBC received atezolizumab (840 mg) or placebo every 2 weeks in combination with nab-paclitaxel (100 mg/m2) on days 1, 8, and 15 of each 28-day cycle until progression or intolerance. Patients completed the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30) and its Breast Cancer Module (QLQ-BR23) on day 1 of each cycle, at end of treatment, and every 4 weeks during 1 year of follow-up. Time-to-deterioration (TTD) in HRQoL (first ≥10-point decrease from baseline lasting two cycles) was a secondary end point. Exploratory end points included TTD in functioning and mean and mean change from baseline scores in HRQoL, functioning, and disease- and treatment-related symptoms. RESULTS: Baseline completion of PROs was 92% (QLQ-C30) and 89% (QLQ-BR23) and remained >80% through cycle 20 in intent-to-treat (ITT) and PD-L1+ patients. No differences between arms in median TTD in PD-L1+ patients were observed for HRQoL {hazard ratio (HR) 0.94 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.69-1.28]} or physical [HR 1.02 (95% CI 0.76-1.37)] or role [HR 0.77 (95% CI 0.57-1.04)] functioning. Mean baseline scores for A + nP versus Pl + nP for HRQoL (67.5 versus 65.0) and physical (82.8 versus 79.4) and role (73.7 versus 71.7) functioning were comparable between arms and throughout the course of treatment, with no clinically meaningful (≥10 point) changes from baseline until patients discontinued treatment. No differences in clinically meaningful worsening in treatment symptoms (fatigue, diarrhea, or nausea/vomiting) were observed between arms. Results in ITT patients were similar. CONCLUSIONS: A + nP as first-line treatment for mTNBC delayed progression without compromising patients' day-to-day functioning or HRQoL or worsening treatment symptoms. CLINICALTRIAL. GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT02425891.

The combined presence of CD20 + B cells and PD-L1 + tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in inflammatory breast cancer is prognostic of improved patient outcome.

PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to evaluate protein expression of PD-L1 and CD20 as prognostic biomarkers of patient outcome in inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) samples. METHODS: PD-L1 and CD20 protein expression was measured by immunohistochemistry in 221 pretreatment IBC biopsies. PD-L1 was assessed in tumor cells (PD-L1+ tumor cells) and tumor stromal infiltrating lymphocytes (PD-L1+ TILs); CD20 was scored in tumor-infiltrating B cells. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazard models were used for survival analysis. RESULTS: PD-L1+ tumor cells, PD-L1+ TILs, and CD20+ TILs were found in 8%, 66%, and 62% of IBC, respectively. PD-L1+ tumor cells strongly correlated with high TILs, pathological complete response (pCR), CD20+ TILs, but marginally with breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS, P = 0.057). PD-L1+ TILs strongly correlated with high TILs, CD20+ TILs, and longer disease-free survival (DFS) in all IBC and in triple-negative (TN) IBC (P < 0.035). IBC and TN IBC patients with tumors containing both CD20+ TILs and PD-L1+ TILs (CD20+TILs/PD-L1+TILs) showed longer DFS and improved BCSS (P < 0.002) than patients lacking both, or those with either CD20+ TILs or PD-L1+ TILs alone. In multivariate analyses, CD20+TILs/PD-L1+TILs status was an independent prognostic factor for DFS in IBC (hazard ratio (HR): 0.53, 95% CI 0.37-0.77) and TN IBC (HR: 0.39 95% CI 0.17-0.88), and for BCSS in IBC (HR: 0.60 95% CI 0.43-0.85) and TN IBC (HR: 0.38 95% CI 0.17-0.83). CONCLUSION: CD20+TILs/PD-L1+TILs status represents an independent favorable prognostic factor in IBC and TN IBC, suggesting a critical role for B cells in antitumor immune responses. Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 and B cell-activating immunotherapies should be explored in these settings.

Cost-effective manufacture of an allogeneic GM-CSF-secreting breast tumor vaccine in an academic cGMP facility.

BACKGROUND: GM-CSF-secreting, allogeneic cell-based cancer vaccines have shown promise for the treatment of a variety of solid tumors. We have now applied this approach to breast cancer. The aim of these studies was to optimize expansion parameters, qualify the manufacturing process, and establish expected outcomes for cGMP-compliant manufacturing of two GM-CSF-secreting breast tumor cell lines. METHODS: The variables affecting the efficiency of expanding and formulating two allogeneic GM-CSF-secreting cell lines, 2T47D-V and 3SKBR3-7, were systematically evaluated. Production criteria investigated included alternative cell culture vessels (flasks vs. cell factories), centrifugation time and speed variables for large volume cell concentration, cell seeding density, the minimal concentration of FBS required for maximal cell expansion, and the dose and timing of irradiation in relation to cryopreservation. RESULTS: These studies demonstrate that, in comparison with standard 150-cm2 tissue culture flasks, Nunc 10-Stack Cell Factories are a more efficient and practical cell culture vessel for vaccine cell line manufacture. Centrifugation optimization studies using the COBE 2991 Cell Processor established that a speed of 2000 r.p.m. (450 g) for 2 min reliably concentrated the cells while maintaining acceptable viability and bioactivity. Radiation studies established that lethal irradiation prior to cryopreservation does not compromise the quality of the product, as measured by post-thaw cell viability and GM-CSF cell line-specific secretion levels. Finally, studies aimed at optimizing the production of one vaccine cell line, 3SKBR3-7, demonstrated that seeding the cells at a higher density and maintaining them in half the initial concentration of FBS maximized the yield of bioactive cells, resulting in significant cost savings. DISCUSSION: A manufacturing process that simultaneously maximizes cell yield, minimizes cell manipulation and maintains vaccine cell potency is critical for producing cell-based cancer vaccines in an academic setting. These studies define a feasible, reproducible and cost-effective methodology for production of a GM-CSF-secreting breast cancer vaccine that is cGMP compliant.

Breast cancer vaccines: maximizing cancer treatment by tapping into host immunity.

Optimizing standard treatment modalities for breast cancer has improved the outlook for women afflicted with it, but the fact that 40% still ultimately die from the disease highlights the need for new therapies. Remarkable advances in molecular immunology and biotechnology have created a unique opportunity for developing active vaccination strategies that engage the patient's own immune system in the fight against breast cancer. Early clinical trials have established the safety and bioactivity of some breast cancer vaccine approaches, with a hint of clinical response. They have also highlighted the importance of elucidating the pharmacodynamic interactions between established therapies for breast cancer, such as tamoxifen, aromatase inhibitors, chemotherapy, the HER-2/neu-specific monoclonal antibody trastuzumab (Herceptin), and breast cancer vaccines. Preclinical studies have simultaneously defined the importance of developing targeted approaches for circumventing established immune tolerance to breast cancer during the vaccination process. The first strategies targeting the negative influence of CD4(+)CD25(+)T regulatory cells and the CTLA-4 signaling pathway are just entering clinical testing in combination with tumor vaccines. Developing the most potent approach for activating antitumor immunity while maintaining the efficacy of standard approaches to breast cancer management will ensure that active immunotherapy is successfully integrated into the standard of care.

Humoral and cellular immune responses: independent forces or collaborators in the fight against cancer?

Recent advances in our understanding of immune function with regard to the generation of a potent antitumor response have resulted in a renewed interest in cancer vaccines and point to a role for immunotherapy in the treatment of cancer. Currently, the majority of vaccine strategies for the treatment of solid malignancies focus on the generation of cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL) that destroy tumor cells that express a given target protein, or antigen. However, antibody therapies have already been successful against some cancers. Current humoral immunotherapy typically involves the passive infusion of monoclonal antibodies, which usually target a specific tumor-encoded antigen. However, vaccines can be engineered to induce humoral immunity. By focusing on the cellular arm of the immune response at the expense of humoral immunity (or the converse), we may have inadvertently limited the potential efficacy of our anticancer vaccines. This article seeks to explore the notion that a vaccine designed to optimally activate both arms of the immune system may well generate an antitumor immune response greater than the sum of the two individual effector mechanisms alone.

Cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and paclitaxel enhance the antitumor immune response of granulocyte/macrophage-colony stimulating factor-secreting whole-cell vaccines in HER-2/neu tolerized mice.

Tumor-specific immune tolerance limits the effectiveness of cancer vaccines. In addition, tumor vaccines alone have a limited potential for the treatment of measurable tumor burdens. This highlights the importance of identifying more potent cancer vaccine strategies for clinical testing. We tested immune-modulating doses of chemotherapy in combination with a granulocyte/macrophage-colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF)-secreting, HER-2/neu (neu)-expressing whole-cell vaccine as a means to treat existing mammary tumors in antigen-specific tolerized neu transgenic mice. Earlier studies have shown that neu transgenic mice exhibit immune tolerance to the neu-expressing tumors similar to what is observed in patients with cancer. We found that cyclophosphamide, paclitaxel, and doxorubicin, when given in a defined sequence with a GM-CSF-secreting, neu-expressing whole-cell vaccine, enhanced the vaccine's potential to delay tumor growth in neu transgenic mice. In addition, we showed that these drugs mediate their effects by enhancing the efficacy of the vaccine rather than via a direct cytolytic effect on cancer cells. Furthermore, paclitaxel and cyclophosphamide appear to amplify the T helper 1 neu-specific T-cell response. These findings suggest that the combined treatment with immune-modulating doses of chemotherapy and the GM-CSF-secreting neu vaccine can overcome immune tolerance and induce an antigen-specific antitumor immune response. These data provide the immunological rationale for testing immune-modulating doses of chemotherapy in combination with tumor vaccines in patients with cancer.

Chemotherapy: friend or foe to cancer vaccines?

Cancer vaccines are on the threshold of taking their place alongside the more traditional cancer treatment modalities of surgery, radiation therapy and chemotherapy. The toxicology and immunopharmacology of therapeutic cancer vaccines, particularly those that secrete granulocyte macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF), are currently under active clinical investigation. Interestingly, drugs traditionally used for tumor cytoreduction can have both positive and negative effects on host immunity. Exploration of the potential pharmacodynamic interactions of antineoplastic drugs with GM-CSF-secreting vaccines has revealed that low doses of some chemotherapeutics can augment the antitumor immunity induced by GM-CSF-secreting vaccines. These interactions will require thorough preclinical evaluation to maximize the clinical impact of this type of therapeutic cancer vaccine.

The collaboration of both humoral and cellular HER-2/neu-targeted immune responses is required for the complete eradication of HER-2/neu-expressing tumors.

HER-2/neu (neu) transgenic mice (neu-N mice), which express the nontransforming rat proto-oncogene, demonstrate immunological tolerance to neu that is similar to what is encountered in patients with neu-expressing breast cancer. We have shown previously that a significant increase in neu-specific T cells, but no induction of neu-specific antibody, is seen after neu-specific vaccination in neu-N mice. In contrast, a significant induction of both neu-specific T-cell and antibody responses is found in nontoleragenic FVB/N mice after vaccination. These mice are fully protected from a s.c. challenge with NT cells, a mammary tumor cell line derived from a spontaneous tumor that arose in a neu-N mouse, whereas neu-N mice are not. In this study, we demonstrate that CD4+ T cell-depleted FVB/N mice show no induction of neu-specific IgG after vaccination and are unable to reject an NT challenge (0 of 10 mice were tumor free). Conversely, the depletion of natural killer cells has no effect on vaccine-mediated tumor rejection (100% of mice were tumor free). In CD8+ T cell-depleted animals, where vaccine-induced neu-specific IgG titers were normal, NT growth was delayed, but only 10% of mice remained tumor free, demonstrating that neu-specific IgG alone is insufficient for protection from NT challenge. To directly assess the necessity for the combination of neu-specific cellular and humoral immune responses, severe combined immunodeficient mice were given an adoptive transfer of CTLs plus IgG derived from FVB/N mice. Animals that were given CTLs that recognized an irrelevant antigen plus neu-specific IgG developed tumors at a rate similar to CD8+ T cell-depleted FVB/N mice. Animals receiving an adoptive transfer of neu-specific CTLs plus control IgG derived from naive FVB/N mice were only partially protected from NT challenge (50% of animals were tumor free). However, only animals receiving the combination of neu-specific CTLs and neu-specific IgG were fully protected from NT challenge (100% of animals were tumor free). These studies specifically define the immunological requirements for the eradication of neu-expressing tumors in this model system, demonstrating that both cellular and humoral neu-specific responses are necessary for protection from an NT challenge. These data suggest that vaccines optimized to induce maximal T- and B-cell immunity to neu, and possibly to similar putative tumor-rejection antigens, may lead to more potent in vivo antitumor immunity.

Hepatocyte nuclear factor 1 alpha is expressed in a hamster insulinoma line and transactivates the rat insulin I gene.

Systematic mutational analysis previously identified two primary regulatory elements within a minienhancer (-247 to -198) of the rat insulin I promoter that are critical for transcriptional activity. The Far box (-241 to -232) and the FLAT element (-222 to -208) synergistically upregulate transcription and, together, are sufficient to confer tissue-specific and glucose-responsive transcriptional activity on a heterologous promoter. Detailed analysis of the FLAT element further revealed that, in addition to the positive regulatory activity it mediates in tandem with the Far box, it is a site for negative regulatory control. A portion of the FLAT element bears considerable sequence similarity to the consensus binding site for hepatocyte nuclear factor 1 alpha (HNF1 alpha; LF-B1) a liver-enriched homeodomain-containing transcription factor. Here we show that the HNF1-like site within the FLAT element exhibited positive transcriptional activity in both HepG2 and HIT cells and bound similar, but distinguishable, nuclear protein complexes in the respective nuclear extracts. Screening of a hamster insulinoma cDNA library with a PCR-derived probe encompassing the DNA-binding domain of rat HNF1 alpha resulted in isolation of a hamster HNF1 alpha (hHNF1 alpha) cDNA homolog. Specific antiserum identified the HNF1 alpha protein as one component of a specific FLAT-binding complex in HIT nuclear extracts. Expression of the hHNF1 alpha cDNA in COS cells resulted in transactivation of reporter constructs containing multimerized segments of the rat insulin I minienhancer. Thus, HNF1 alpha, one component of a DNA-binding complex involved in transcriptional regulation of the rat insulin I gene, may play a significant role in nonhepatic as well as hepatic gene transcription.