Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Forensic Sci ; 61(2): 551-554, 2016 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26375871

RESUMO

Tear gases are used by police or armed forces for control of riots or social events or by the general population for private self-defense. These agents are used widely throughout the world, but some harmful effects have reported. In addition, despite well-defined chemical side effects documented in the literature, data are insufficient regarding mechanical injury due to tear gas capsules. We report three cases of severe maxillofacial injury in patients who had these capsules fired from tear gas guns directly to their faces. The capsules penetrated the patients' faces, causing potentially fatal injuries. To our knowledge, reports of this kind of injury related to tear gas capsules are very rare in the literature. In conclusion, tear gas guns may be very dangerous in terms of human health and they may cause severe injuries, especially when they are not used according to strict guidelines.


Assuntos
Traumatismos Faciais/etiologia , Corpos Estranhos/patologia , Corpos Estranhos/cirurgia , Maxila/lesões , Gases Lacrimogênios/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Traumatismos Faciais/diagnóstico por imagem , Corpos Estranhos/diagnóstico por imagem , Humanos , Masculino , Maxila/diagnóstico por imagem , Guerra
2.
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg ; 19(1): 25-8, 2013 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23588975

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The purpose of the study was to analyze the accuracy of interpretation of extremity traumas by emergency physicians (EP) to determine the most difficult areas for interpretation in comparison to official radiology reports of direct X-ray. METHODS: Radiologist reports and EP reports of direct X-rays from isolated extremity trauma patients were retrospectively compared from 01.05.2011 to 31.05.2011. A total of 181 fractures in 608 cases were confirmed. RESULTS: The locations of the misinterpreted fractures were ankle and foot (51.4%), wrist and hand (32.4%), elbow and forearm (5.4%), shoulder and upper arm (5.4%), hip and thigh (2.7%), and knee and leg (2.7%). The diagnostic accuracy of the EPs and radiologists were not significantly different (kappa=0.856, p=0.001). CONCLUSION: Knowledge about the types of fractures that are most commonly missed facilitates a specifically directed educational effort.


Assuntos
Fraturas Ósseas/diagnóstico , Adulto , Diagnóstico Tardio , Erros de Diagnóstico , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Feminino , Fraturas Ósseas/diagnóstico por imagem , Hospitais Universitários , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Radiografia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Turquia , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA